E-MEXP-2229
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: E-MEXP-2229 | ExpressionAtlas | 2014-07-10
REPOSITORIES: ExpressionAtlas
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-MEXP-2229-analysis-methods.tsv | Tabular | |||
| E-MEXP-2229-atlasExperimentSummary.Rdata | Rdata | |||
| E-MEXP-2229-configuration.xml | Xml | |||
| E-MEXP-2229-percentile-ranks.tsv | Tabular | |||
| E-MEXP-2229.condensed-sdrf.tsv | Tabular |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 96 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Transcription profiling of seven-day-old seedlings of p35S:OBP4-GR treated with DEX or EtOH for 12 and 24 h. Purpose: find transcriptionally regulated genes downstream of the dof transcription factors OBP4 in the root tip of Arabidopsis thaliana Method: compare transcript levels after ectopic induction of OBP4 for 12 h and 24 h. Ectopic expressing was induced by introducing the coding sequence of OBP4 fused to the glucocorticoid receptor under the control of the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus p35S promoter (p35S:OBP4-GR) in wild type Arabidopsis Col-0 plants. Seven day old plants expressing the construct were treated with Dexamethason (DEX) or ethanol (EtOH) as a mock for 12 and 24 h. After root tips of 300 seedlings per rep were collected.
2017-02-23 | E-MTAB-4838 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of 6-day-old seedlings of Arabidopsis wild type control and mutants is performed using Affymetrix IVT Arabidopsis ATH1 Genome Array.
2019-01-21 | GSE109424 | GEO
Project description:Transcript profiling analysis of AtFBP7 mutant seedlings compared to wild type using Arabidopsis ATH1 GeneChip array. Keywords: 5 day old light grown seedlings, wild type and mutant
2005-12-31 | GSE3864 | GEO
Project description:Transcript profiling analysis of vfb (Vier F-Box) mutant seedlings compared to wild type using Arabidopsis ATH1 GeneChip array. Keywords: 10 day old light grown seedlings, wild type and mutant
2005-12-31 | GSE3863 | GEO
Project description:Transcript profiling analysis of csn4-1 light grown mutant seedlings compared to wild type using Arabidopsis ATH1 GeneChip array Keywords: 7 day old light grown seedlings, wild type and mutant
2008-03-25 | GSE3865 | GEO
Project description:We report the gene expression profiles of Arabidopsis seedlings treated with or without ethanol under drought conditions.
2022-10-04 | GSE201379 | GEO
Project description:Transcription profiling by array of Arabidopsis MKK9DD (constitutively active MKK9 kinase mutant) overexpressing seedlings and Pi-starved wild type seedlings to identify the same regulated genes
2014-06-02 | E-MTAB-2553 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The first described feedback loop of the Arabidopsis circadian clock is based on reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and CCA1/LHY. CCA1 and LHY are MYB transcription factors that bind directly to the TOC1 promoter to negatively regulate its expression. Conversely, the activity of TOC1 has remained less well characterized. Genetic data supports that TOC1 is necessary for the reactivation of CCA1/LHY, but there is little description of its biochemical function. Here we show that TOC1 occupies specific genomic regions in the CCA1 and LHY promoters. Purified TOC1 binds directly to DNA through its CCT domain, which is similar to known DNA binding domains. Chemical induction and transient overexpression of TOC1 in Arabidopsis seedlings cause repression of CCA1/LHY expression demonstrating that TOC1 can repress direct targets, and mutation or deletion of the CCT domain prevents this repression showing that DNA binding is necessary for TOC1 action. Furthermore, we use the Gal4/UAS system in Arabidopsis to show that TOC1 acts as a general transcriptional repressor, and that repression activity is in the Pseudoreceiver (PR) domain of the protein. To identify the genes regulated by TOC1 on a genomic scale, we couple TOC1 chemical induction with microarray analysis and identify new potential TOC1 targets and output pathways. Together these results define the biochemical action of the core clock protein TOC1 and refine our perspective on how plant clocks function. Keywords: Expression profiling by array wild type (Col-0) and ALC::TOC1 were sown on Murashige-Skoog with 0.8% agar, stratified for 48 hours and grown in12:12 light:dark (LD) for 12 days and either left in LD or transferred to constant light (LL) and then grown for one more day before the start of the experiment. Tissue was submerged in Murashige-Skoog media supplemented with 2.5% ethanol or no ethanol (mock) and with 20mM MG132 for 3 hours and harvested at ZT1. Three replicates each of the seedlings were collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen.
2012-01-15 | E-GEOD-34897 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Transcript profiling analysis of csn3-1, csn4-1 and csn5 (csn5a-2 csn5b) light grown and dark grown mutant seedlings compared to light grown and dark grown wild type using Arabidopsis ATH1 GeneChip array Keywords: mutant analysis, growth condition analysis
2008-04-24 | GSE9728 | GEO
Project description:The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of autotetraploidy on gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana by comparing diploid versus tetraploid transcriptomes. In particular, this included the comparison of the transcriptome of different tetraploid A. thaliana ecotypes (Col-0 vs. Ler-0). The study was extended to address further aspects. One was the comparison of the transcriptomes in subsequent generations. This intended to obtain information on the genome wide stability of autotetraploid gene expression. Another line of work compared the transcriptomes of different diploid vs. tetraploid tissues. This aimed to investigate whether particular gene groups are specifically affected during the development of A. thaliana autotetraploids. Samples 1-8: Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of diploid vs. tetraploid Col-0 seedlings. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Col-0 lines. Samples 9-12: Arabidopsis thaliana Ler-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of diploid vs. tetraploid Ler-0 seedlings. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Ler-0 lines. Samples 13-24: Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of diploid vs. tetraploid Col-0 leaves (6th - 8th). The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Col-0 lines. Samples 25-32: Arabidopsis thaliana Ler-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of diploid vs. tetraploid Ler-0 leaves (6th - 8th). The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Ler-0 lines. Samples 33-36: Arabidopsis thaliana Ler-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of tetraploid vs. tetraploid Ler-0 seedlings from the second (F2) and third (F3) generation after induction, respectively. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Ler-0 lines. Samples 37-40: Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of tetraploid vs. tetraploid Col-0 seedlings from the second (F2) and third (F3) generation after induction, respectively. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Col-0 lines. Samples 41-44: Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0/Ler-0 diploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of diploid Col-0 vs. diploid Ler-0 seedlings. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of esrablished lines. Samples 45-48: Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0/Ler-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of tetraploid Col-0 vs tetraploid Ler-0 seedlings. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Col-0 and Ler-0 lines.
2010-05-01 | GSE18482 | GEO