Dataset Information

Hu2020 - E. coli translation model

ABSTRACT: This translation model consists of 274 biochemical reactions, including 119 reactions with non-linear kinetics. This mechanistic model accounts for the concentrations of mRNA, the ribosome, the different charged tRNAs, and the elongation factors Ts (EF-Ts) and Tu (EF-Tu). We fully parameterized the model with molecular masses and kinetic constants measured experimentally; the only exceptions are the initiation parameters, which were previously estimated from gene expression data, and the ribosomal Michaelis constant for the ternary complexes, which was estimated based on the diffusion limit and hence represents a lower bound. The model is based purely on biochemical and biophysical considerations; it contains no free parameters for fitting, nor does it include any explicit growth-rate dependencies. This model is used to test our hypothesis that, to maximize the E. coli growth rate in a given environment, natural selection minimizes the total cost of translation components utilized to achieve the required protein production rate.

OTHER RELATED OMICS DATASETS IN: PRJNA312619

SUBMITTER: Xiao-Pan Hu

PROVIDER: MODEL2006210001 | BioModels | 2020-07-01

REPOSITORIES: BioModels

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	MODEL2006210001?filename=Data-S1.xml	Xml

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Publications

Co-variation of tRNA abundance and codon usage in Escherichia coli at different growth rates.

Dong H H Nilsson L L Kurland C G CG

Journal of molecular biology 19960801 5

We have used two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to fractionate tRNAs from Escherichia coli. A sufficiently high degree of resolution was obtained for 44 out of 46 tRNA species in E. coli to be resolved into individual electrophoretic components. These isolated components were identified by hybridization to tRNA-specific oligonucleotide probes. Systematic measurements of the abundance of each individual tRNA isoacceptor in E. coli, grown at rates varying from 0.4 to 2.5 doublings ...[more]

PMID: 8709146

Publication: 1/6

Similar Datasets

Project description:Firczuk2013 - Eukaryotic mRNA translation machinery This is a model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA translation which includes the initiation, elongation and termination phases. The model is for 20 condon mRNAs. The building of a multi-factor complex in initiation and also the different processes in elongation and termination are modelled in detail. The model takes into account that ribosomes cover more than one codon of mRNA so that the movement of ribosomes are effectively blocked by other ribosomes several codons downstream. It is assumed that 15 codons are occupied by each ribosome. This blocking effect is considered in reaction R18 in initiation and also reaction R26, the reaction where translocation of ribosomes takes place in elongation. The kinetic functions of these two reactions are based on MacDonald et al. 1968 and Heinrich & Rapaport 1980. All other kinetic functions follow mass-action kinetics. The concentrations of transfer RNA species (Met-tRNA, aa-tRNA and tRNA in the model) are kept constant, while the other species' concentrations can change in the course of the simulation. The model describes the translation of a short mRNA with 20 codons. Therefore, all reactions in the elongation cycle (R22, R23, R25, R26, R28 and R29) and the corresponding species are replicated accordingly to model the species with ribosomes bound at different positions. In summary, the model contains 165 different species and 141 reactions. The value of the 56 rate constant parameters were estimated by fitting the model against a series of experimental data consisting of modulation of the various translation factors (Figures 2, 3 and S3). Overall the parameter estimation was carried out over 212 different data points (steady states). This model is described in the article: An in vivo control map for the eukaryotic mRNA translation machinery Helena Firczuk, Shichina Kannambath, Jürgen Pahle, Amy Claydon, Robert Beynon, John Duncan, Hans Westerhoff, Pedro Mendes and John EG McCarthy Molecular Systems Biology. 9:635 Abstract: Rate control analysis defines the in vivo control map governing yeast protein synthesis and generates an extensively parameterized digital model of the translation pathway. Among other non-intuitive outcomes, translation demonstrates a high degree of functional modularity and comprises a non-stoichiometric combination of proteins manifesting functional convergence on a shared maximal translation rate. In exponentially growing cells, polypeptide elongation (eEF1A, eEF2, and eEF3) exerts the strongest control. The two other strong control points are recruitment of mRNA and tRNAi to the 40S ribosomal subunit (eIF4F and eIF2) and termination (eRF1; Dbp5). In contrast, factors that are found to promote mRNA scanning efficiency on a longer than-average 5′untranslated region (eIF1, eIF1A, Ded1, eIF2B, eIF3, and eIF5) exceed the levels required for maximal control. This is expected to allow the cell to minimize scanning transition times, particularly for longer 5′UTRs. The analysis reveals these and other collective adaptations of control shared across the factors, as well as features that reflect functional modularity and system robustness. Remarkably, gene duplication is implicated in the fine control of cellular protein synthesis. This model is hosted on BioModels Database and identified by: BIOMD0000000457 . To cite BioModels Database, please use: BioModels Database: An enhanced, curated and annotated resource for published quantitative kinetic models . To the extent possible under law, all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this encoded model have been dedicated to the public domain worldwide. Please refer to CC0 Public Domain Dedication for more information.

Project description:Confluent human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were exposed to LPS (1 micg/mL) for 2 hours. Ribosomal profiling via gradient centrifugation and fractionation was used to separate monosome, or under-translated, and polysome, or actively-translated, mRNA species that were then used to probe cDNA arrays, a process known as Translation State Array Analysis (TSAA). Four samples were obtained from these experiments: control monosome, control polysome, LPS monosome and LPS polysome. using the normalized signal intensities from the GeneFilters, we calculated a translation index, or measure of movement of an mRNA molecule from the monosome to the polysome fraction upon stimulation. This calculation was made as follows: (LPS polysome/LPS monosome)/(control polysome/control monosome). Translational indices greater than 2.5 (upregulated) or lower than 0.4 (downregulated) were chosen for further study. HUVECs were stimulated with LPS (1 micg/mL) for 2 hours. Cycloheximide (CHX) was added to a final concentration of 100 ng/mL for 5 minutes and cells were then rinsed with cold HBSS containing CHX (100 ng/mL) and scraped from the dish and pelleted by centrifugation (2000 x g, 5 minutes). The supernatant was removed and cells were carefully resuspended in 375 ïL Low Salt Buffer (LSB; 20 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4) + RNasin (40 U/mL) + DTT (10 nM) for 3 minutes on ice. 125 ïL LSB Lysis buffer (LSB containing 200 mM sucrose and 1.2% Triton-X100) was then added and cells disrupted by pipetting. The mixture was then transferred to 1.7 mL microfuge tubes and centrifuged (20,000 x g, 1 minute, 4ï° C) to remove nuclei and cellular debris. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube containing 50 ïL LSB + RNasin (40 U/mL) + DTT (10 nM) and 15 ïL 5M NaCl. This mixture was then layered onto prepoured gradients (15-50% sucrose in LSB). Gradients were spun at 43,700 rpm for 90 minutes (4ï° C) and then run on a density gradient flow cell fractionator (Isco) to obtain ribosomal profiles. Ribosomal fractions corresponding to monosomes (M) and polysomes (P) (Figure 1) were collected into Trizol LS (Invitrogen) and total RNA isolated according to the directions of the manufacturer. Total RNA was reverse transcribed using oligo dT primers in the presence of 33P dCTP to generate labeled cDNA probes from the M and P associated mRNA fractions of control and stimulated cells and these probes used to detect specific array elements on four identical Research Genetics (ResGen) Named Human Gene cDNA GeneFilters (GF 211, Invitrogen). These filters were washed using high stringency conditions and exposed to phosphorimaging screens for analysis using Pathways 3, proprietary software included with the ResGen filters. Hybridization signals were normalized to the average intensity of the hybridization signals from the particular array filter to correct for differing global hybridization efficiencies between filters. To determine if a particular hybridization signal was significantly above background levels, an initial screen of the array elements was conducted by dividing the hybridization signal of an individual cDNA spot by the background signal on particular filter. Background signal levels were determined using the Pathways 3 analysis software that measures the signal intensity of the area between cDNA spots and averages that signal over the area of the entire array. Array elements were considered to be distinguishable from background if the hybridization signal/background ratio was greater than 1.1. Signal intensities from each filter were normalized by dividing the raw signal intensity of the cDNA spot by the average signal intensity for the entire filter. The translation state (TS) of each qualifying array element was determined by dividing the normalized signal intensity of the element in the polysome fraction by the normalized signal intensity of the element in the monosome fraction: TS=P/M. The Translation Index (TLI), a measure of the change of translation states of individual genes, was determined by calculating the ratio of the treated cell TS to the control cell TS; TLI = TSe/TSc where e represents experimental or treated conditions and c represents controls. In this scenario, a gene that is not regulated by translation would have a TLI value of 1, actively translated genes would have a TLI value greater than 1, whereas a poorly translated or under-translated gene would have a TLI value less than 1. Arbitrary TLI values of 2.5 and 0.4 were used to categorize individual array elements as being translationally regulated.

Project description:Confluent human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were exposed to TNF-alpha (100 units/mL) for 2 hours. Ribosomal profiling via gradient centrifugation and fractionation was used to separate monosome, or under-translated, and polysome, or actively-translated, mRNA species that were then used to probe cDNA arrays, a process known as Translation State Array Analysis (TSAA). Four samples were obtained from these experiments: control monosome, control polysome, TNF monosome and TNF polysome. using the normalized signal intensities from the GeneFilters, we calculated a translation index, or measure of movement of an mRNA molecule from the monosome to the polysome fraction upon stimulation. This calculation was made as follows: (TNF polysome/TNF monosome)/(control polysome/control monosome). Translational indices greater than 2.5 (upregulated) or lower than 0.4 (downregulated) were chosen for further study. HUVECs were stimulated with TNF-alpha (100 U/mL) for 2 hours. Cycloheximide (CHX) was added to a final concentration of 100 ng/mL for 5 minutes and cells were then rinsed with cold HBSS containing CHX (100 ng/mL) and scraped from the dish and pelleted by centrifugation (2000 x g, 5 minutes). The supernatant was removed and cells were carefully resuspended in 375 micL Low Salt Buffer (LSB; 20 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4) + RNasin (40 U/mL) + DTT (10 nM) for 3 minutes on ice. 125 micL LSB Lysis buffer (LSB containing 200 mM sucrose and 1.2% Triton-X100) was then added and cells disrupted by pipetting. The mixture was then transferred to 1.7 mL microfuge tubes and centrifuged (20,000 x g, 1 minute, 4 deg C) to remove nuclei and cellular debris. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube containing 50 micL LSB + RNasin (40 U/mL) + DTT (10 nM) and 15 micL 5M NaCl. This mixture was then layered onto prepoured gradients (15-50% sucrose in LSB). Gradients were spun at 43,700 rpm for 90 minutes (4 deg C) and then run on a density gradient flow cell fractionator (Isco) to obtain ribosomal profiles. Ribosomal fractions corresponding to monosomes (M) and polysomes (P) (Figure 1) were collected into Trizol LS (Invitrogen) and total RNA isolated according to the directions of the manufacturer. Total RNA was reverse transcribed using oligo dT primers in the presence of 33P dCTP to generate labeled cDNA probes from the M and P associated mRNA fractions of control and stimulated cells and these probes used to detect specific array elements on four identical Research Genetics (ResGen) Named Human Gene cDNA GeneFilters (GF 211, Invitrogen). These filters were washed using high stringency conditions and exposed to phosphorimaging screens for analysis using Pathways 3, proprietary software included with the ResGen filters. Hybridization signals were normalized to the average intensity of the hybridization signals from the particular array filter to correct for differing global hybridization efficiencies between filters. To determine if a particular hybridization signal was significantly above background levels, an initial screen of the array elements was conducted by dividing the hybridization signal of an individual cDNA spot by the background signal on particular filter. Background signal levels were determined using the Pathways 3 analysis software that measures the signal intensity of the area between cDNA spots and averages that signal over the area of the entire array. Array elements were considered to be distinguishable from background if the hybridization signal/background ratio was greater than 1.1. Signal intensities from each filter were normalized by dividing the raw signal intensity of the cDNA spot by the average signal intensity for the entire filter. The translation state (TS) of each qualifying array element was determined by dividing the normalized signal intensity of the element in the polysome fraction by the normalized signal intensity of the element in the monosome fraction: TS=P/M. The Translation Index (TLI), a measure of the change of translation states of individual genes, was determined by calculating the ratio of the treated cell TS to the control cell TS; TLI = TSe/TSc where e represents experimental or treated conditions and c represents controls. In this scenario, a gene that is not regulated by translation would have a TLI value of 1, actively translated genes would have a TLI value greater than 1, whereas a poorly translated or under-translated gene would have a TLI value less than 1. Arbitrary TLI values of 2.5 and 0.4 were used to categorize individual array elements as being translationally regulated.

Project description:Confluent human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were exposed to histamine (100 mM) for 2 hours. Ribosomal profiling via gradient centrifugation and fractionation was used to separate monosome, or under-translated, and polysome, or actively translated, mRNA species that were then used to probe cDNA arrays, a process known as Translation State Array Analysis (TSAA). Four samples were obtained from these experiments, control monosome, control polysome, histamine monosome and histamine polysome. Using the normalized signal intensities from the GeneFilters, we calculated a translation index, or measure of movement of an mRNA molecule from the monosome to the polysome fraction upon stimulation. This calculation was made as follows: (histamine polysome/histamine monosome)/(control polysome/control monosome). Translational indices greater than 2.5 (upregulated) or lower than 0.4 (downregulated) were chosen for further study. HUVECs were stimulated with histamine (100 mM) for 2 hours. Cycloheximide (CHX) was added to a final concentration of 100 ng/mL for 5 minutes and cells were then rinsed with cold HBSS containing CHX (100 ng/mL) and scraped from the dish and pelleted by centrifugation (2000 x g, 5 minutes). The supernatant was removed and cells were carefully resuspended in 375 ïL Low Salt Buffer (LSB; 20 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4) + RNasin (40 U/mL) + DTT (10 nM) for 3 minutes on ice. 125 ïL LSB Lysis buffer (LSB containing 200 mM sucrose and 1.2% Triton-X100) was then added and cells disrupted by pipetting. The mixture was then transferred to 1.7 mL microfuge tubes and centrifuged (20,000 x g, 1 minute, 4ï° C) to remove nuclei and cellular debris. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube containing 50 ïL LSB + RNasin (40 U/mL) + DTT (10 nM) and 15 ïL 5M NaCl. This mixture was then layered onto prepoured gradients (15-50% sucrose in LSB). Gradients were spun at 43,700 rpm for 90 minutes (4ï° C) and then run on a density gradient flow cell fractionator (Isco) to obtain ribosomal profiles. Ribosomal fractions corresponding to monosomes (M) and polysomes (P) (Figure 1) were collected into Trizol LS (Invitrogen) and total RNA isolated according to the directions of the manufacturer. Total RNA was reverse transcribed using oligo dT primers in the presence of 33P dCTP to generate labeled cDNA probes from the M and P associated mRNA fractions of control and stimulated cells and these probes used to detect specific array elements on four identical Research Genetics (ResGen) Named Human Gene cDNA GeneFilters (GF 211, Invitrogen). These filters were washed using high stringency conditions and exposed to phosphorimaging screens for analysis using Pathways 3, proprietary software included with the ResGen filters. Hybridization signals were normalized to the average intensity of the hybridization signals from the particular array filter to correct for differing global hybridization efficiencies between filters. To determine if a particular hybridization signal was significantly above background levels, an initial screen of the array elements was conducted by dividing the hybridization signal of an individual cDNA spot by the background signal on particular filter. Background signal levels were determined using the Pathways 3 analysis software that measures the signal intensity of the area between cDNA spots and averages that signal over the area of the entire array. Array elements were considered to be distinguishable from background if the hybridization signal/background ratio was greater than 1.1. Signal intensities from each filter were normalized by dividing the raw signal intensity of the cDNA spot by the average signal intensity for the entire filter. The translation state (TS) of each qualifying array element was determined by dividing the normalized signal intensity of the element in the polysome fraction by the normalized signal intensity of the element in the monosome fraction: TS=P/M. The Translation Index (TLI), a measure of the change of translation states of individual genes, was determined by calculating the ratio of the treated cell TS to the control cell TS; TLI = TSe/TSc where e represents experimental or treated conditions and c represents controls. In this scenario, a gene that is not regulated by translation would have a TLI value of 1, actively translated genes would have a TLI value greater than 1, whereas a poorly translated or under-translated gene would have a TLI value less than 1. Arbitrary TLI values of 2.5 and 0.4 were used to categorize individual array elements as being translationally regulated.

Project description:Confluent human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were exposed to histamine (100 mM) for 2 hours. Ribosomal profiling via gradient centrifugation and fractionation was used to separate monosome, or under-translated, and polysome, or actively translated, mRNA species that were then used to probe cDNA arrays, a process known as Translation State Array Analysis (TSAA). Four samples were obtained from these experiments, control monosome, control polysome, histamine monosome and histamine polysome. Using the normalized signal intensities from the GeneFilters, we calculated a translation index, or measure of movement of an mRNA molecule from the monosome to the polysome fraction upon stimulation. This calculation was made as follows: (histamine polysome/histamine monosome)/(control polysome/control monosome). Translational indices greater than 2.5 (upregulated) or lower than 0.4 (downregulated) were chosen for further study. HUVECs were stimulated with Serum (20% pooled human serum) for 6 hours. Cycloheximide (CHX) was added to a final concentration of 100 ng/mL for 5 minutes and cells were then rinsed with cold HBSS containing CHX (100 ng/mL) and scraped from the dish and pelleted by centrifugation (2000 x g, 5 minutes). The supernatant was removed and cells were carefully resuspended in 375 ïL Low Salt Buffer (LSB; 20 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4) + RNasin (40 U/mL) + DTT (10 nM) for 3 minutes on ice. 125 micL LSB Lysis buffer (LSB containing 200 mM sucrose and 1.2% Triton-X100) was then added and cells disrupted by pipetting. The mixture was then transferred to 1.7 mL microfuge tubes and centrifuged (20,000 x g, 1 minute, 4 deg C) to remove nuclei and cellular debris. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube containing 50 ïL LSB + RNasin (40 U/mL) + DTT (10 nM) and 15 micL 5M NaCl. This mixture was then layered onto prepoured gradients (15-50% sucrose in LSB). Gradients were spun at 43,700 rpm for 90 minutes (4 deg C) and then run on a density gradient flow cell fractionator (Isco) to obtain ribosomal profiles. Ribosomal fractions corresponding to monosomes (M) and polysomes (P) (Figure 1) were collected into Trizol LS (Invitrogen) and total RNA isolated according to the directions of the manufacturer. Total RNA was reverse transcribed using oligo dT primers in the presence of 33P dCTP to generate labeled cDNA probes from the M and P associated mRNA fractions of control and stimulated cells and these probes used to detect specific array elements on four identical Research Genetics (ResGen) Named Human Gene cDNA GeneFilters (GF 211, Invitrogen). These filters were washed using high stringency conditions and exposed to phosphorimaging screens for analysis using Pathways 3, proprietary software included with the ResGen filters. Hybridization signals were normalized to the average intensity of the hybridization signals from the particular array filter to correct for differing global hybridization efficiencies between filters. To determine if a particular hybridization signal was significantly above background levels, an initial screen of the array elements was conducted by dividing the hybridization signal of an individual cDNA spot by the background signal on particular filter. Background signal levels were determined using the Pathways 3 analysis software that measures the signal intensity of the area between cDNA spots and averages that signal over the area of the entire array. Array elements were considered to be distinguishable from background if the hybridization signal/background ratio was greater than 1.1. Signal intensities from each filter were normalized by dividing the raw signal intensity of the cDNA spot by the average signal intensity for the entire filter. The translation state (TS) of each qualifying array element was determined by dividing the normalized signal intensity of the element in the polysome fraction by the normalized signal intensity of the element in the monosome fraction: TS=P/M. The Translation Index (TLI), a measure of the change of translation states of individual genes, was determined by calculating the ratio of the treated cell TS to the control cell TS; TLI = TSe/TSc where e represents experimental or treated conditions and c represents controls. In this scenario, a gene that is not regulated by translation would have a TLI value of 1, actively translated genes would have a TLI value greater than 1, whereas a poorly translated or under-translated gene would have a TLI value less than 1. Arbitrary TLI values of 2.5 and 0.4 were used to categorize individual array elements as being translationally regulated.

Project description:Confluent human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were exposed to Insulin (100 micM) for 2 hours. Ribosomal profiling via gradient centrifugation and fractionation was used to separate monosome, or under-translated, and polysome, or actively-translated, mRNA species that were then used to probe cDNA arrays, a process known as Translation State Array Analysis (TSAA). Four samples were obtained from these experiments: control monosome, control polysome, Insulin monosome and Insulin polysome. using the normalized signal intensities from the GeneFilters, we calculated a translation index, or measure of movement of an mRNA molecule from the monosome to the polysome fraction upon stimulation. This calculation was made as follows: (Insulin polysome/Insulin monosome)/(control polysome/control monosome). Translational indices greater than 2.5 (upregulated) or lower than 0.4 (downregulated) were chosen for further study. HUVECs were stimulated with Insulin (100 micM) for 2 hours. Cycloheximide (CHX) was added to a final concentration of 100 ng/mL for 5 minutes and cells were then rinsed with cold HBSS containing CHX (100 ng/mL) and scraped from the dish and pelleted by centrifugation (2000 x g, 5 minutes). The supernatant was removed and cells were carefully resuspended in 375 ïL Low Salt Buffer (LSB; 20 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4) + RNasin (40 U/mL) + DTT (10 nM) for 3 minutes on ice. 125 ïL LSB Lysis buffer (LSB containing 200 mM sucrose and 1.2% Triton-X100) was then added and cells disrupted by pipetting. The mixture was then transferred to 1.7 mL microfuge tubes and centrifuged (20,000 x g, 1 minute, 4ï° C) to remove nuclei and cellular debris. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube containing 50 ïL LSB + RNasin (40 U/mL) + DTT (10 nM) and 15 ïL 5M NaCl. This mixture was then layered onto prepoured gradients (15-50% sucrose in LSB). Gradients were spun at 43,700 rpm for 90 minutes (4ï° C) and then run on a density gradient flow cell fractionator (Isco) to obtain ribosomal profiles. Ribosomal fractions corresponding to monosomes (M) and polysomes (P) (Figure 1) were collected into Trizol LS (Invitrogen) and total RNA isolated according to the directions of the manufacturer. Total RNA was reverse transcribed using oligo dT primers in the presence of 33P dCTP to generate labeled cDNA probes from the M and P associated mRNA fractions of control and stimulated cells and these probes used to detect specific array elements on four identical Research Genetics (ResGen) Named Human Gene cDNA GeneFilters (GF 211, Invitrogen). These filters were washed using high stringency conditions and exposed to phosphorimaging screens for analysis using Pathways 3, proprietary software included with the ResGen filters. Hybridization signals were normalized to the average intensity of the hybridization signals from the particular array filter to correct for differing global hybridization efficiencies between filters. To determine if a particular hybridization signal was significantly above background levels, an initial screen of the array elements was conducted by dividing the hybridization signal of an individual cDNA spot by the background signal on particular filter. Background signal levels were determined using the Pathways 3 analysis software that measures the signal intensity of the area between cDNA spots and averages that signal over the area of the entire array. Array elements were considered to be distinguishable from background if the hybridization signal/background ratio was greater than 1.1. Signal intensities from each filter were normalized by dividing the raw signal intensity of the cDNA spot by the average signal intensity for the entire filter. The translation state (TS) of each qualifying array element was determined by dividing the normalized signal intensity of the element in the polysome fraction by the normalized signal intensity of the element in the monosome fraction: TS=P/M. The Translation Index (TLI), a measure of the change of translation states of individual genes, was determined by calculating the ratio of the treated cell TS to the control cell TS; TLI = TSe/TSc where e represents experimental or treated conditions and c represents controls. In this scenario, a gene that is not regulated by translation would have a TLI value of 1, actively translated genes would have a TLI value greater than 1, whereas a poorly translated or under-translated gene would have a TLI value less than 1. Arbitrary TLI values of 2.5 and 0.4 were used to categorize individual array elements as being translationally regulated.