Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

IL-2 and IL-21 confer opposing differentiation programs to CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy

ABSTRACT: IL-2 and IL-21 are closely related cytokines that might have arisen by gene duplication. Both cytokines promote the function of effector CD8+ T cells, but their distinct effects on antigen-driven differentiation of naÃ¯ve CD8+ T cells into effector CD8+ T cells are not clearly understood. We found that antigen-induced expression of eomesodermin and maturation of naÃ¯ve CD8+ T cells into granzyme B and CD44 expressing effector CD8+ T cells was enhanced by IL-2, but, unexpectedly, suppressed by IL-21. Furthermore, IL-21 repressed expression of IL-2Ra and inhibited IL-2-mediated acquisition of a cytolytic CD8+ T cell phenotype. Despite its inhibitory effects, IL-21 did not induce anergy, but instead potently enhanced the capacity of cells to mediate tumor regression upon adoptive transfer. In contrast, IL-2, surprisingly, impaired the subsequent anti-tumor function of transferred cells. Gene expression studies revealed a distinct IL-21-program that was characterized phenotypically by increased expression of L-selectin and functionally by enhanced anti-tumor immunity that was not reversed by secondary in vitro stimulation with antigen and IL-2. Thus, the efficacy of CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy can be influenced by opposing differentiation programs conferred by IL-2 and IL-21, a finding with important implications for the development of cellular cancer therapies. Two-condition experiment: Cytokine-exposed t-cells subsequentially restimulated without cytokine vs. control t-cells without cytokine subsquentially restimulated without cytokine. 3 independent experiments - 1 with experimental RNA labeled with Cy5, control with Cy3, and 2 with dyes-swapped Keywords: Cytokine exposure comparison Comparitive analysis of cytokine effects on lymphocyte gene expression. GSM265712.gpr (S89_1_IL2_0.gpr): Cy3 - control, Cy5 - experimental GSM265713.gpr (S90_1_IL15_0.gpr): Cy3 - control, Cy5 - experimental GSM265714.gpr (S91_1_IL21_0.gpr): Cy3 - control, Cy5 - experimental GSM265715.gpr (S27_2_0_IL2.gpr): Cy3 - experimental, Cy5 - control GSM265716.gpr (S29_2_0_IL15.gpr): Cy3 - experimental, Cy5 - control GSM265717.gpr (S30_2_0_IL21.gpr): Cy3 - experimental, Cy5 - control GSM265718.gpr (S31_3_0_IL2.gpr): Cy3 - experimental, Cy5 - control GSM265719.gpr (S33_3_0_IL15.gpr): Cy3 - experimental, Cy5 - control

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

SUBMITTER: Keith Kerstann

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-10403 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Publications

IL-2 and IL-21 confer opposing differentiation programs to CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy.

Hinrichs Christian S CS Spolski Rosanne R Paulos Chrystal M CM Gattinoni Luca L Kerstann Keith W KW Palmer Douglas C DC Klebanoff Christopher A CA Rosenberg Steven A SA Leonard Warren J WJ Restifo Nicholas P NP

Blood 20080214 11

IL-2 and IL-21 are closely related cytokines that might have arisen by gene duplication. Both cytokines promote the function of effector CD8(+) T cells, but their distinct effects on antigen-driven differentiation of naive CD8(+) T cells into effector CD8(+) T cells are not clearly understood. We found that antigen-induced expression of Eomesodermin (Eomes) and maturation of naive CD8(+) T cells into granzyme B- and CD44-expressing effector CD8(+) T cells was enhanced by IL-2, but, unexpectedly, ...[more]

PMID: 18276844

Similar Datasets

Project description:Clostridium difficile is a gram-positive, spore-forming enteric anaerobe which can infect humans and a wide variety of animal species. Recently, the incidence and severity of human C. difficile infection has markedly increased. In this study, we evaluated the genomic content of 73 C. difficile strains isolated from humans, horses, cattle, and pigs by comparative genomic hybridization with microarrays containing coding sequences from C. difficile strains 630 and QCD-32g58. The sequenced genome of C. difficile strain 630 was used as a reference to define a candidate core genome of C. difficile and to explore correlations between host origins and genetic diversity. Approximately 16% of the genes in strain 630 were highly conserved among all strains, representing the core complement of functional genes defining C. difficile. Absent or divergent genes in the tested strains were distributed across the entire C. difficile 630 genome and across all the predicted functional categories. Interestingly, certain genes were conserved among strains from a specific host species, but divergent in isolates with other host origins. This information provides insight into the genomic changes which might contribute to host adaptation. Due to a high degree of divergence among C. difficile strains, a core gene list from this study offers the first step toward the construction of diagnostic arrays for C. difficile.investigated by determining changes in transcript profiles when aerobic steady-state cultures were depleted of air. Dye-swap experiments with genomic DNA of tested and reference strains 8383cy3.gpr- Cy3 – test, Cy5 – reference 8384cy3.gpr- Cy3 – test, Cy5 – reference 8384cy5.gpr- Cy3 – reference, Cy5 – test 8385cy3.gpr- Cy3 – test, Cy5 – reference 8385cy5.gpr- Cy3 – reference, Cy5 – test 8386cy3.gpr- Cy3 – test, Cy5 – reference 8525cy3.gpr- Cy3 – test, Cy5 – reference 8525cy5.gpr- Cy3 – reference, Cy5 – test 8527cy5.gpr- Cy3 – reference, Cy5 – test 8529cy5.gpr- Cy3 – reference, Cy5 – test 8531cy3.gpr- Cy3 – test, Cy5 – reference 8531cy5.gpr- Cy3 – reference, Cy5 – test 8533cy3.gpr- Cy3 – test, Cy5 – reference 8533cy5.gpr- Cy3 – reference, Cy5 – test 8596cy3.gpr- Cy3 – test, Cy5 – reference 8596cy5.gpr- Cy3 – reference, Cy5 – test 8694cy3.gpr- Cy3 – test, Cy5 – reference 8694cy5.gpr- Cy3 – reference, Cy5 – test 2 GPR files per Sample record except for 4 Sample records (GSM480414, GSM480417, GSM480419, and GSM480420) which have 1 GPR file each 4 GPR file for those Sample records are lost

Project description:A set of 5,908 69-70 mers oligonucleotides that correspond to all C. glabrata putative open reading frames and some non-coding sequences was designed and synthesized at Pasteur Institute, France. Each oilgonucleotide was dissolved into 50% DMSO and spotted on UltraGAPsTM glass slides (Corning Incorporated, Acton, MA) in duplicate to generate whole genome microarray for C. glabrata. The microarray was printed at Biotechnology Research Institute/National Research Council of Canada in Montreal. The sequence information of the oligonucleotides and the micorarray setup can be found at platform GPL3922. Using the microarray, the transcriptional profiles of C. glabrata cells that were coincubated with J774A.1 murine Macrophage-like cells for 2 and 6 hrs were examined. At each time point, three biological repeats were done. 20 ug of total RNA from either macrophage-ingested C. glabrata cells (experimental sample) or the medium-alone controls (control sample) was used to synthesize Cy5- or Cy3-labeled cDNA probes with an anchor primer [(dT)18(dA/dG/dC)] in the presence of Cy5- or Cy3-dCTP (PerkinElmer). For each pair of experimental and control samples, dye-swap was performed, that is, two probe mixtures, the Cy5-experimental plus the Cy3-control probes, and conversely, the Cy3-experimental plus the Cy5-control probes were individually hybridized with a single C. glabrata microarray slide. The hybridization and subsequent washing conditions follows the instruction on the manual for UltraGAPsTM glass slides. The hybridized microarrays were scanned with Axon 4000B scanner, and Data were extracted using Axon GenePix program. Log2 (experimental/control) for each spot on the microarray was calculated. From each dye-swap experiment, the Log2 (experimental / control) for each spot were averaged. Finally, 6 Log2 (experimental/control) values (3 repeats × duplicate spots on each slide) were imported into SAM (significance analysis of microarrays) software for statistical analysis. For genes that are considered significantly induced or repressed, the median of false discovery rate (FDR) equals to 0, while the 90% FDR is less than 0.001. Keywords: transcriptional profiling by microarray

Project description:Sample groupings for this project are as follows: Cauline leaf vs Cultured Cell : - Cauline leaf, p1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cotyledon dark : - Cotyledon, CP1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cotyledon, CP2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon, cn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon, cn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Cotyledon dark vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon dark, n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Germinating seed vs Cultured cell : - Germinating seed, gn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl light vs Hypocotyl dark : - Hypocotyl, hldn1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Hypocotyl, hldn2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Hypocotyl light vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl light, hln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl light, hln2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Petal vs Cultured cell : - Petal, pn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) 1DBP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DBP, pin1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Pistil 1DPP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DPP, psn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn4; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root dark vs Cultured cell : - Root dark, rdn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root dark, rdn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root light vs Cultured cell : - Root light, rln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root light, rlp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Root light vs Root dark : - Root light vs dark, rldp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Root light vs dark, rldp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Rosette leaf vs Cultured cell : - Rosette leaf, rfp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Sepal vs Cultured cell : - Sepal, sn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Sepal, sn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 3DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 3DPP, s3n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 8DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 8DPP, s8n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stamen vs Cultured cell : - Stamen, smn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl dark vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl dark, hn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl dark, hn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stem vs Cultured cell : - Stem, stp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Keywords: other

Dataset Information

IL-2 and IL-21 confer opposing differentiation programs to CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy

Publications

IL-2 and IL-21 confer opposing differentiation programs to CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets