Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Transcriptional Signatures in Response to Wheat Germ Agglutinin and Starvation in Drosophila melanogaster Larval Midgut

ABSTRACT: One function of plant lectins is to serve as defenses against herbivorous insects. The midgut is the critical site affected by dietary lectins such as wheat germ agglutinin (WGA). We observed marked cellular structural and gene expression changes in Drosophila melanogaster third-instar larval midguts from insects WGA-fed or starved. Dietary WGA caused shortening, branching, swelling, distortion and in some cases disintegration of the midgut microvilli (Mv). Starvation was accompanied by shortening of the Mv. Microarray analyses revealed that dietary WGA evolved differential expression of 62 transcripts; seven of which were also differentially expressed in starved insects. The differentially regulated gene cluster in WGA-fed larvae were associated with (i) cytoskeletal organization, (ii) immune responses, (iii) detoxification reactions, and (iv) energy metabolism. Four putative transcription factor binding motifs (TFBMs) were associated with the differentially-expressed genes. At least one of these putative TFBMs exhibited substantial similarity to MyoD, a TFBM associated with cellular structures in mammals. These results are in keeping with the hypothesis that WGA causes a starvation-like effect as well as structural changes of midgut cells of Drosophila third-instar larvae. Experiment Overall Design: Three treatments (control, WGA, and Starvation), and three replicates for each treatment. So there are total nine samples. no dye-swap.

ORGANISM(S): Drosophila melanogaster

SUBMITTER: Hongmei LI

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-11047 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:In addressing R. microplus - A. marginale interactions, we propose and test three linked hypotheses. The first is that the tick gene response is organ specific: the midgut gene regulation is unique during feeding and during acquisition of A. marginale as compared to the salivary gland. This distinction is relevant as the two organs serve very different roles in the transmission biology of A. marginale with early survival and replication within the midgut epithelium, composed of highly phagocytic cells, required for initial colonization while a second round of replication in the salivary gland acini, composed of highly secretory cells, is required for transmission of an infectious dose in the saliva. Importantly, both the midgut epithelium and salivary glands have been identified as separate and distinct barriers for transmission of A. marginale and thus represent two potential sites where transmission could be blocked. The second hypothesis to be tested is that the salivary gland transcriptome is temporally dynamic. Initiation of tick attachment and feeding involves secretion of a virtual pharmacopeia including lytic enzymes, anticoagulants, and inhibitors of the mammalian innate immune and nocioceptive systems. Concomitantly, the acini provide an environment where A. marginale replicates >100 fold and are secreted into the saliva. Prior studies show that duration of feeding is a critical component of transmission efficiency, with increased efficiency positively correlated with time of tick feeding. The third hypothesis to be tested is that A. marginale colonization does not significantly modulate the tick midgut and salivary gland transcriptome. This hypothesis is based on observations by ourselves and others that tick infection does not impart a significant fitness cost on the vector. This is in contrast to other bacterial and protozoal pathogens that have dramatic effects on success of tick attachment, engorgement, and survival. A. marginale, similar to other tick-borne pathogens in the Family Anaplasmataceeae, is believed to have evolved from an arthropod-specific bacterium with relatively late adaptation to specific niches in mammalian hosts. Consequently, we predict that A. marginale is well adapted to its tick vector and utilizes the normal signaling pathways of the feeding tick with few, if any, effects on the midgut and salivary gland transcriptome. In this manuscript, we report the testing of these three hypotheses and present the results in context of the vector-pathogen-mammalian host interaction at the time of transmission. A Roche NimbleGen high-density gene expression microarray was custom designed based on the expressed sequence tag (EST) database, B. microplus Gene Index Version 2 (BmiGI V2) for R. microplus. The expression level of 14,447 R. microplus genes was analyzed from total RNA extracted from 10 different tick tissue samples; 30 arrays were included since triplicates of each different sample were analyzed as follow: unfed (midgut and salivary glands), blood feeding (2 days midgut and 2, 6 and 9 days salivary glands), A. marginale-infected blood feeding (2 days midgut and 2, 6 and 9 days salivary glands).

Project description:Purpose: We isolated Drosophila midgut cells : Delta+ intestinal stem cells (ISCs), Su(H)+enteroblasts (EBs), Esg+ cells (ISC+EB), Myo1A+Enterocytes (ECs), Pros+Enteroendocrine cells (EEs) and How+Visceral muscle cells (VM) from whole midguts to identify stem cell specific genes and study cell type specificities of midgut cells. We also isolated all the cell types from the 5 major regions (R1-R5) of the Drosophila midgut to study differences in cells in different regions. Methods: 3-7 day old female flies were dissected. Flies with GFP/YFP marking different cell types (using the GAL4-UAS system) were used to separate cells of the midgut.The midguts were dissociated with Elastase and FACS sorted using FACS AriaIII. RNA was extracted, amplified and sequenced. Whole midgut samples were sequenced on Illumina GAIIX and regional cell populations were sequenced on HiSeq2000. Methods:Raw fastqc reads were mapped to the Drosophila genome (Drosophila_melanogaster.BDGP5.70.dna.toplevel.fa) using Tophat 2.0.9 at default (using boost_1_54_0, bowtie2-2.1.0, samtools-0.1.19). Methods: For differential expression analysis, DESeq (p-value adjustment 0.05 by method Benjamini-Hochberg) was used. The reads were normalized also to Reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM). Results: More than 50% of the genome is expressed in the adult midgut (FlyAtlas- Chintapalli et al., 2007), of these genes about 50% (2457) were differentially expressed (DE) between all 4 cell types (ISCs, EBs, ECs and EEs) atleast 2 folds with 95% confidence Results: 159 genes that were specifically enriched in ISCs, 509 genes were specifically repressed in ISCs Conclusions: Our study represents the first detailed analysis of Drosophila intestinal cell transcriptomes, with biologic replicates, generated by RNA-seq technology.Our data facilitates comparative investigations of expression profiles of cells and reveals novel stem cell genes. Further region specific profiling adds precision to the analysis of variances in the midgut regions. We identify transcriptional regulators and regional transcription factors which modulate the midgut physiology. The dataset will be a great resource for hypothesis generation, tool building and fine tuned studies on the Drosophila midgut. mRNA profiles of Drosophila intestinal cells from whole midguts and midgut regions were generated by Deep Sequencing. Whole midgut profiles were generated in triplicates (Illumina GAIIx, 72 bp read length) and regional cell type profiles were genrated in duplicates (HiSeq 2000, 50bp read length).

Dataset Information

Transcriptional Signatures in Response to Wheat Germ Agglutinin and Starvation in Drosophila melanogaster Larval Midgut

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets