Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Transcriptional response of ethanol-stressed vs. non-stressed culture

ABSTRACT: The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is well known for its high ethanol production performances. An original fermentation process that allows the yeast S. cerevisiae to produce in less than 45 h more than 150 g/l ethanol (i.e. 18.9°GL) was set up in our laboratory [1]. Under this condition, the yeast cells induce a dynamic process to adapt to increased ethanol concentration by a mechanism that is likely different to the stress response triggered by sudden ethanol addition to exponentially growing cells [2]. Kinetic analysis of the growth curve identified two main phases: a growth phase that ended up at 90 g/l ethanol and then an uncoupling phase during which non-growing cells kept producing ethanol. This latter phase is also characterized with an increased loss of viability. In order to investigate on a genome scale the expression changes occurring during this process, gene expression was quantified using DNA chips technology at six different time-points during fed-batch fermentation. [1] Alfenore et al, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 60 : 67-72, 2002. [2] Alexandre H. et al., FEBS Lett. 498(1) : 98-103, 2001. We measure the changes in the gene expression of ethanol stressed culture at five different time-points during fed-batch fermentation compared to a common reference consisting of exponentially growing yeast cells ( sample number 1 : growing cells ; low ethanol concentration of 17 g/l ; specific growth rate of 0.3 h-1) . The sets corresponded to sample number 2 : growing cells/ethanol concentration of 60 g/l ; sample number 3 : before growth arrest/ethanol concentration of 90 g/l ; sample number 4 : growth arrest/ethanol concentration of 95 g/l ; sample number 5 : 1 hour after growth arrest/ethanol concentration of 100 g/l and sample number 6 : uncoupling phase/ethanol concentration of 125 g/l. For each sample, total RNAs from one yeast culture (no biological replicate) were extracted three times (technical replicates -extract). For labelling, we labelled the common reference with dCTP-Cy5 and labelled the sample with dCTP-Cy3 and hybridized cDNA on three independent microarrays, given rise to six data value per gene (each gene is duplicate in the slide).

ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae

SUBMITTER: Laurent Benbadis

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-15493 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Isolation of two cell populations from yeast during high-level alcoholic fermentation that resemble quiescent and nonquiescent cells from the stationary phase on glucose.

Benbadis Laurent L Cot Marlène M Rigoulet Michel M Francois Jean J

FEMS yeast research 20090721 8

High-level production of bioethanol (140 g L(-1) in 45 h) in aerated fed-batch cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was shown to be linked to the length of a production phase uncoupled to the growth. The induction of this phase was characterized by metabolic and morphologic changes reminiscent of those occurring in the stationary phase of growth on glucose. Global transcriptomic analysis of ethanol-stressed yeast cells in the uncoupling phase harboured features similar to those from stationary-p ...[more]

PMID: 19686340

Similar Datasets

Project description:Second fermentation in a bottle supposes such specific conditions that undergo yeasts to a set of stress situations like high ethanol, low nitrogen, low pH or sub-optimal temperature. Also, yeast have to grow until 1 or 2 generations and ferment all sugar available while they resist increasing CO2 pressure produced along with fermentation. Because of this, yeast for second fermentation must be selected depending on different technological criteria such as resistance to ethanol, pressure, high flocculation capacity, and good autolytic and foaming properties. All of these stress factors appear sequentially or simultaneously, and their superposition could amplify their inhibitory effects over yeast growth. Considering all of the above, it has supposed interesting to characterize the adaptive response of commercial yeast strain EC1118 during second-fermentation experiments under oenological/industrial conditions by transcriptomic profiling. We have pointed ethanol as the most relevant environmental condition in the induction of genes involved in respiratory metabolism, oxidative stress, autophagy, vacuolar and peroxisomal function, after comparison between time-course transcriptomic analysis in alcoholic fermentation and transcriptomic profiling in second fermentation. Other examples of parallelism include overexpression of cellular homeostasis and sugar metabolism genes. Finally, this study brings out the role of low-temperature on yeast physiology during second-fermentation. S. cerevisiae EC1118 pre-adapted to ethanol cells and sucrose (20 g/L) were added to 20 L of base wine (Cavas Freixenet, Sant Sadurní D’Anoia, Spain). Complete volume was bottled with 350 mL each one. All were sealed and incubated in static conditions at 16ºC for approximately 40 days after tirage. Three samples were taken during the process for transcriptional study of the physiological adaptation of yeast cells to industrial second fermentation conditions. A sample corresponding to exponential-growth phase under unstressed conditions (in YPD at 28ºC) was used as an external reference. Three timepoints from second-fermentation were monitored and three biological replicates from each timepoint were analyzed.

Dataset Information

Transcriptional response of ethanol-stressed vs. non-stressed culture

Publications

Isolation of two cell populations from yeast during high-level alcoholic fermentation that resemble quiescent and nonquiescent cells from the stationary phase on glucose.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets