Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Stage-specific expression of TNFM-NM-1 regulates bad/bid-mediated apoptosis and RIP1/ROS-mediated secondary necrosis in Birnavirus-infected fish cells

ABSTRACT: Infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) is a fish-derived pathogen and possess a bi-segmented, double-stranded RNA genome. By using zebrafish 14K oligo-microarray and quantitative RT-PCR, we identified differential expression of a defined subset of genes involved in apoptosis and immunity at 6-, 12- and 24- hour after IPNV infection. Transcripts divided into 11 functional categories were significantly modulated by IPNV, including immune response, apoptosis, transcription, signal transduction, lipid and cholesterol metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, cell cycle, protein degradation, protein folding and stress response, protein synthesis, nucleoside metabolism and synthesis. Most of pro-apoptotic bcl-2 family members were up-regulated after IPNV infection. Activation of pro-apoptotic members might disrupt potential of mitochondria and leaded to the mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in the late stage of IPNV infection. After treating the IPNV-infected cells with TNFM-NM-1 inhibitor AP126, expression of two bcl-2 family genes Bad and Bid and activation of caspase-8 and -3 had been inhibited significantly in early stage of IPNV infection. Expression of RIP-1 and Bmf-1 these two necroptosis-related genes and production of ROS were diminished in virus-infected cells which pre-treated with AP126. Our study shows the interactions between host cells and IPNV, the molecular mechanisms involved in IPNV-induced pathogenesis, and the variation of transcriptome through TNFM-NM-1 during infection which shows the important component of host defense. TNFM-NM-1 might lead to apoptosis in early stage and necrosis in late stage in ZF4 cells infected by IPNV. TNFM-NM-1 is crucial to apoptosis and ROS-mediated necrosis caused by IPNV in zebrafish cells. Zebrafish ZF4 cell line was derived from 24h post-fertilization zebrafish embryos. Previous studies have been shown that adult zebrafish and zebrafish cell line could be infected with IPNV. In the present study, ZF4 cells were infected with IPNV, and total RNA was isolated from infected and uninfected control cells at 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h post-infection. Microarray analysis gene expression between IPNV-infected and uninfected cells relative to internal control on slides. The zebrafish 14K oligo microarray we used comprise 1800 zebrafish gene sequences from the NCBI and a database of 12768 putative open reading frames using NCBI zebrafish EST sequence information. Data files were imported into GeneSpring GX 7.3 for further analysis. Expression data sets must pass all the following quality control categories before used for cluster analysis. Clustering analysis allowed us to observe differences in cellular gene expression. A similar expression pattern was seen when comparing differentially expressed host cell genes between 12 and 24 h post-infection. The expression profiles were significantly different between 6 and 12 h post-infection. Therefore, we conclude that the regulation of host gene expression was changed after 12 h post-infection, and progressed into the late stage. To understand the interactions between host cells and IPNV and the molecular mechanisms involved in IPNV-induced pathogenesis, we used zebrafish oligo microarrays to investigate the gene expression profiles of IPNV-infected zebrafish embryonic cells. We also studied expression of specific genes related to immune response and apoptosis which were not present on the microarray we used by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. We used Pathway StudioM-bM-^@M-^Ys software to analyze the altered genes in cellular pathway for IPNV, TNFM-NM-1 was shown to be crucial to these genes of host response. Our study proved the variation of transcriptome during infection, which shows the activation of important component of host defense, apoptosis and necrosis through TNFM-NM-1 mediate pathway.

ORGANISM(S): Danio rerio

SUBMITTER: Wei-Lun Wang

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-21077 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Stage-specific expression of TNFα regulates bad/bid-mediated apoptosis and RIP1/ROS-mediated secondary necrosis in Birnavirus-infected fish cells.

Wang Wei-Lun WL Hong Jiann-Ruey JR Lin Gen-Hwa GH Liu Wangta W Gong Hong-Yi HY Lu Ming-Wei MW Lin Ching-Chun CC Wu Jen-Leih JL

PloS one 20110203 2

Infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) can induce Bad-mediated apoptosis followed by secondary necrosis in fish cells, but it is not known how these two types of cell death are regulated by IPNV. We found that IPNV infection can regulate Bad/Bid-mediated apoptotic and Rip1/ROS-mediated necrotic death pathways via the up-regulation of TNFα in zebrafish ZF4 cells. Using a DNA microarray and quantitative RT-PCR analyses, two major subsets of differentially expressed genes were characterized, i ...[more]

PMID: 21304825

Similar Datasets

Project description:In susceptible plant hosts, co-evolution has favoured viral strategies to evade host defenses and utilize resources to their own benefit. The degree of manipulation of host gene expression is dependent on host-virus specificity and certain abiotic factors. In order to gain insight into global transcriptomic changes for a geminivirus pathosystem, South African cassava mosaic virus [ZA:99] (SACMV-ZA:99]) and Arabidopsis thaliana, 4 x 44K Agilent microarrays were adopted. After normalization, a 2-fold change filtering of data (p<0.05) identified 1,820 differentially expressed genes in apical leaf tissue. A significant increase in differential gene expression over time (451 genes at 14 dpi, 742 genes at 24 dpi, and 1011 genes at 36 dpi) was observed. This increase in expression, correlated with an increase in SACMV accumulation as virus copies were 5-fold higher at 24 dpi and 6-fold higher at 36 dpi than at 14 dpi (1.1x104 virus copies present at 14 dpi, 5.7x104 copies at 24 dpi, and 6.3x104 copies at 36 dpi). Many 2-fold genes were primarily involved in stress and defense responses, phytohormone signalling pathways, cellular transport, cell-cycle regulation, transcription, oxidation-reduction, and other metabolic processes. Forty-one genes (2.3%) were shown to be continuously expressed across the infection period, indicating that the majority of genes were transient and unique to a particular time point. Plant signalling networks were disrupted and manipulated by SACMV-[ZA:99] in order to affect homeostasis and antagonize hostM-bM-^@M-^Ys defense responses. At the same time, an adaptive response was initiated to reprogramme metabolism and divert energy from growth-related processes to defense, all leading to disruption of normal biological host processes. Comparisons between SACMV-[ZA:99] with plant-infecting RNA and DNA viruses revealed similarities and differences in expression patterns among viruses, showing either general defense or virus-specific responses. Within the Geminiviridae family in particular, similarities in cell-cycle regulation and gene expression patterns correlated between SACMV-[ZA:99] and Cabbage leaf curl virus (CaLCuV) but differences were also evident. For instance, CaLCuV showed antagonistic interactions between Salicyclic Acid (SA) and Jasmonic Acid (JA) pathways, whereas SACMV displayed synergism. Differences in gene induction, repression and outcome between the two geminiviruses clearly demonstrated host-specific interactions with SACMV-[ZA:99] leading to infection. To our knowledge this is the first geminivirus study identifying differentially expressed transcripts across 3 time points A three time-point (14, 24, and 36 dpi) study was carried out to identify differentially expressed genes in SACMV-[ZA:99] infected Arabidopsis leaf cells using a direct comparison design against mock-inoculated controls. Three biological replicates and 1 technical replicate for both SACMV-[ZA:99]-infected and mock-inoculated controls were conducted at each time point.

Project description:Ectothermic vertebrates are different from mammals that are sensitive to hypothermia and they have to maintain core temperature for survival. Why and how ectothermic animals can survive, grow and reproduce in low temperature have been for a long time a scientifically challenging and important inquiry to biologists. We used a microarray to profile the gill transcriptome in zebrafish (Danio rerio) after exposure to low temperature. Adult zebrafish were acclimated to a low temperature of 12 ï°C for 1 (1-d) and 30 d (30-d), and the gill transcriptome was compared to wild types by oligonucleotide microarray hybridization. Results showed 11 and 22 transcripts were found to be upregulated by low-temperature treatment for 1-d and 30-d respectively, while 56 and 70 transcrips were downregulated. The gill transcriptome profiles revealed that ionoregulation-related gene was highly upregulated in cold-acclimated zebrafish. This observation encouraged us to investigate the role of ionoregulatory genes in zebrafish gills during cold acclimation. Cold acclimation caused upregulation of genes that are essential for ionocyte specification, differentiation, ionoregulation, and acid/base balance, and also increased the numbers of cells expressing these genes. mRNA expression of epithelial Ca2+ channel (ECaC), one of these genes, was increased in parallel with the level of Ca2+ influx, revealing a functional compensation after long-term acclimation to cold. Phospho-histone H3 and TUNEL staining showed that the cell turnover rate was retarded in cold-acclimated gills. These results suggest that gills may sustain their functions by yielding mature ionocytes from preexisting undifferentiated progenitors in low-temperature environments. The AB strain of zebrafish (D. rerio) was originally obtained from the University of Oregon, and were kept in the zebrafish stock center at Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. Fish were reared in local tap water at 28 ï°C and a photoperiod regime of 14-h L/10-h D. Adult zebrafish were acclimated to 12 ï°C with a gradually reduced temperature at a gradient of 4 ï°C/h in order to prevent temperature shock and reduce mortality. After 30 d of acclimation, surviving (over an 80% survival rate) fish appeared to be feeding and behaving normally compared with control fish. The experimental protocols were approved by the Academia Sinica Institutional Animal Care and Utilization Committee (approval no. RFiZOOHP2006083). After the low-temperature treatment, gill tissues dissected from 6 individuals were pooled as a sample and then homogenized in 5 ml Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Thirty six individuals (18 for low-temperature treatment and 18 for control) were sacrificed for each microarray hybridization experiment, and another 60 individuals were used for quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. After chloroform extraction, RNA precipitation and ethanol washing, the RNA samples were purified and treated with DNase1 to remove the genomic DNA by using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Huntsville, Alabama). The quantity and quality of total RNA were assessed by spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. The commercial zebrafish 14K oligonucleotides set (MWG Biotech AG, Ebersbach, Germany) were obtained and were printed on UltraGAPS Coated slide (Corning, New York, NY ) with use of the OmniGrid 100 microarrayer (Genomic Solutions, Ann Arbor, MI) according to the manufactureâs instructions. The 14,067 oligonucleotides represent 9666 genes (7009 singlet genes and 2657 redundant genes), and the redundancy of this chip is 31 %. The detailed description of the oligonucleotides information can be obtained on the Ocimun Biosolution website (http://www.ocimumbio.com/web/default.asp). cDNA probes were synthesized by reverse transcription of 20 Î¼g total RNA using a SuperScript indirect cDNA labeling system (Invitrogen) and were labeled with Cy5 (cold treatment groups) and Cy3 (control groups)(Amersham Bioscience, Buckinghamshire, UK) , respectively. The zebrafish 14K OciChip array chip was pretreated with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (fraction V), 4x saline-sodium citrate (SSC), and 1% sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) at 42 Â°C for 45 min, and then hybridized overnight in a cocktail containing 5x Denhardt's solution, 6x SSC, 0.5% SDS, 50% formamide, 50 mM sodium phosphate, and 2 Âµg/Âµl yeast tRNA. Slides were washed with 2x SSC and 0.1% SDS (5 min), 1x SSC and 0.1% SDS (5 min), 0.5x SSC (5 min), and twice with 0.1x SSC (2 min each). Scanning was performed with a Genepix scanner (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). The acquired images were analyzed using ScanArray Express 3.0 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) and Genespring (Aglient Technologies, Foster City, CA) software. The measurements of spots were filtered by flags, and the lowest normalization was performed after subtraction of the median background. To assess the differential expressions of genes, we identified the ratio of Cy5/Cy3 intensity > 2 or < 0.5. Each experiment contained 3 biological replicates (including 1 dye swap) with different samples, and the differentially expressed genes were selected from those with at least 2 of 3 significant signals (ratio > 2 or < 0.5).

Project description:The fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infects a broad range of dicotyledonous plant species and is the causative agent of stem rot in Brassica napus. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the defense response, we studied the patterns of gene expression in a partially resistant variety of ZhongYou 821 (ZY821) and a susceptible line from Westar over five time points, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-inoculation (hpi) using a B. napus oligonucleotide microarray. Maximum differential gene expression was observed at 48 hpi in both genotypes with ZY821 responding more quickly than Westar. Specific sets of genes exhibited higher levels of expression at the earlier stages of the infection (6-12 hpi), including genes encoding defense-associated proteins such as chitinases, glucanases, osmotins and lectins and genes encoding transcription factors belonging to the zinc finger, WRKY, AP2, and MYB classes. Genes encoding enzymes involved in JA, ethylene, and auxin synthesis were induced in both genotypes, as were those for gibberellin degradation. Changes in metabolic pathways affecting carbohydrate and energy metabolism appeared to be directed toward shuttling carbon reserves to the TCA cycle. Genes involved in glucosinolate and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis were highly up-regulated suggesting that secondary metabolites are also important components of the response to S. sclerotiorum in B. napus. Keywords: Time course, infected vs mock infected Time course experiment (6hr, 12 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hrs), sclerotinia infected vs mock-infected. Biological replicates: 3, independently harvested. Technical replicates: 2, dye swapped within each time for each biological replicate (total 6 slides per time point) time after innoculation: 6 hours: zy 6h inf vs control rep1, zy 6h control vs inf rep1, zy 6h inf vs control rep2, zy 6h control vs inf rep2, zy 6h inf vs control rep3, zy 6h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 12 hours: zy 12h inf vs control rep1, zy 12h control vs inf rep1, zy 12h inf vs control rep2, zy 12h control vs inf rep2, zy 12h inf vs control rep3, zy 12h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 24 hours: zy 24h inf vs control rep1, zy 24h control vs inf rep1, zy 24h inf vs control rep2, zy 24h control vs inf rep2, zy 24h inf vs control rep3, zy 24h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 48 hours: zy 48h inf vs control rep1, zy 48h control vs inf rep1, zy 48h inf vs control rep2, zy 48h control vs inf rep2, zy 48h inf vs control rep3, zy 48h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 72 hours: zy 72h inf vs control rep1, zy 72h control vs inf rep1, zy 72h inf vs control rep2, zy 72h control vs inf rep2, zy 72h inf vs control rep3, zy 72h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: zy 6h inf vs control rep1, zy 6h inf vs control rep2, zy 6h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: zy 6h control vs inf rep1, zy 6h control vs inf rep2, zy 6h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 6h inf vs control rep1, zy 6h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 6h inf vs control rep2, zy 6h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 6h inf vs control rep3, zy 6h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: zy 12h inf vs control rep1, zy 12h inf vs control rep2, zy 12h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: zy 12h control vs inf rep1, zy 12h control vs inf rep2, zy 12h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 12h inf vs control rep1, zy 12h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 12h inf vs control rep2, zy 12h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 12h inf vs control rep3, zy 12h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: zy 24h inf vs control rep1, zy 24h inf vs control rep2, zy 24h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: zy 24h control vs inf rep1, zy 24h control vs inf rep2, zy 24h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 24h inf vs control rep1, zy 24h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 24h inf vs control rep2, zy 24h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 24h inf vs control rep3, zy 24h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: zy 48h inf vs control rep1, zy 48h inf vs control rep2, zy 48h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: zy 48h control vs inf rep1, zy 48h control vs inf rep2, zy 48h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 48h inf vs control rep1, zy 48h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 48h inf vs control rep2, zy 48h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 48h inf vs control rep3, zy 48h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: zy 72h inf vs control rep1, zy 72h inf vs control rep2, zy 72h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: zy 72h control vs inf rep1, zy 72h control vs inf rep2, zy 72h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 72h inf vs control rep1, zy 72h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 72h inf vs control rep2, zy 72h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 72h inf vs control rep3, zy 72h control vs inf rep3

Project description:The fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infects a broad range of dicotyledonous plant species and is the causative agent of stem rot in Brassica napus. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the defense response, we studied the patterns of gene expression in a partially resistant variety of ZhongYou 821 (ZY821) and a susceptible line from Westar over five time points, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-inoculation (hpi) using a B. napus oligonucleotide microarray. Maximum differential gene expression was observed at 48 hpi in both genotypes with ZY821 responding more quickly than Westar. Specific sets of genes exhibited higher levels of expression at the earlier stages of the infection (6-12 hpi), including genes encoding defense-associated proteins such as chitinases, glucanases, osmotins and lectins and genes encoding transcription factors belonging to the zinc finger, WRKY, AP2, and MYB classes. Genes encoding enzymes involved in JA, ethylene, and auxin synthesis were induced in both genotypes, as were those for gibberellin degradation. Changes in metabolic pathways affecting carbohydrate and energy metabolism appeared to be directed toward shuttling carbon reserves to the TCA cycle. Genes involved in glucosinolate and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis were highly up-regulated suggesting that secondary metabolites are also important components of the response to S. sclerotiorum in B. napus. Keywords: Time course, and infected vs mock infected Time course experiment (6hr, 12 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hrs), sclerotinia infected vs mock-infected. Biological replicates: 3, independently harvested. Technical replicates: 2, dye swapped within each time for each biological replicate (total 6 slides per time point) time after innoculation: 6 hours: westar 6h inf vs control rep1, westar 6h control vs inf rep1, westar 6h inf vs control rep2, westar 6h control vs inf rep2, westar 6h inf vs control rep3, westar 6h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 12 hours: westar 12h inf vs control rep1, westar 12h control vs inf rep1, westar 12h inf vs control rep2, westar 12h control vs inf rep2, westar 12h inf vs control rep3, westar 12h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 24 hours: westar 24h inf vs control rep1, westar 24h control vs inf rep1, westar 24h inf vs control rep2, westar 24h control vs inf rep2, westar 24h inf vs control rep3, westar 24h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 48 hours: westar 48h inf vs control rep1, westar 48h control vs inf rep1, westar 48h inf vs control rep2, westar 48h control vs inf rep2, westar 48h inf vs control rep3, westar 48h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 72 hours: westar 72h inf vs control rep1, westar 72h control vs inf rep1, westar 72h inf vs control rep2, westar 72h control vs inf rep2, westar 72h inf vs control rep3, westar 72h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: westar 6h inf vs control rep1, westar 6h inf vs control rep2, westar 6h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: westar 6h control vs inf rep1, westar 6h control vs inf rep2, westar 6h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 6h inf vs control rep1, westar 6h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 6h inf vs control rep2, westar 6h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 6h inf vs control rep3, westar 6h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: westar 12h inf vs control rep1, westar 12h inf vs control rep2, westar 12h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: westar 12h control vs inf rep1, westar 12h control vs inf rep2, westar 12h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 12h inf vs control rep1, westar 12h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 12h inf vs control rep2, westar 12h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 12h inf vs control rep3, westar 12h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: westar 24h inf vs control rep1, westar 24h inf vs control rep2, westar 24h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: westar 24h control vs inf rep1, westar 24h control vs inf rep2, westar 24h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 24h inf vs control rep1, westar 24h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 24h inf vs control rep2, westar 24h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 24h inf vs control rep3, westar 24h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: westar 48h inf vs control rep1, westar 48h inf vs control rep2, westar 48h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: westar 48h control vs inf rep1, westar 48h control vs inf rep2, westar 48h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 48h inf vs control rep1, westar 48h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 48h inf vs control rep2, westar 48h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 48h inf vs control rep3, westar 48h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: westar 72h inf vs control rep1, westar 72h inf vs control rep2, westar 72h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: westar 72h control vs inf rep1, westar 72h control vs inf rep2, westar 72h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 72h inf vs control rep1, westar 72h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 72h inf vs control rep2, westar 72h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 72h inf vs control rep3, westar 72h control vs inf rep3

Dataset Information

Stage-specific expression of TNFM-NM-1 regulates bad/bid-mediated apoptosis and RIP1/ROS-mediated secondary necrosis in Birnavirus-infected fish cells

Publications

Stage-specific expression of TNFα regulates bad/bid-mediated apoptosis and RIP1/ROS-mediated secondary necrosis in Birnavirus-infected fish cells.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets