Identification of DNA Methylation Markers for Lineage Commitment of in vitro Hepatogenesis
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
SUBMITTER: Mirang Kim
PROVIDER: E-GEOD-25048 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Publications
Identification of DNA methylation markers for lineage commitment of in vitro hepatogenesis.
Kim Mirang M Kang Tae-Wook TW Lee Han-Chul HC Han Yong-Mahn YM Kim Hyemin H Shin Hyoung Doo HD Cheong Hyun Sub HS Lee Daeyoup D Kim Seon-Young SY Kim Yong Sung YS
Human molecular genetics 20110419 14
Hepatocytes that have differentiated from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) have great potential for the treatment of liver disease as well as for drug testing. Moreover, in vitro hepatogenesis is a powerful model system for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying liver development. DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism that influences differential gene expression during embryonic development. We profiled gene expression and DNA methylation of three cell states of in vitro h ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Hepatocytes that have differentiated from human embryonic stem cells have great potential for the treatment of liver disease as well as for drug testing. Moreover, in vitro hepatogenesis is a powerful model system for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying liver development. DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism that influences differential gene expression during embryonic development. We profiled gene expression and DNA methylation of three cell states of in vitro hepatogenesis—human embryonic stem cells, endoderm progenitors, and mature hepatocytes—using microarray analysis. Among 525 state-specific expressed genes, 67 showed significant negative correlation between gene expression and DNA methylation. State-specific expression and methylation of target genes were validated by quantitative reverse transcription–PCR and pyrosequencing, respectively. To elucidate genome-scale methylation changes beyond the promoter, we also performed high-throughput sequencing of methylated DNA captured by MBD2 protein [see SRA link below]. We found dynamic methylation changes in intergenic regions of the human genome during differentiation. Conclusion: This study provides valuable methylation markers for the lineage commitment of in vitro hepatogenesis and should help elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying stem cell differentiation and liver development. ES, EP, and MH expression assays were run in quadruplicate. RNA isolated from the cell line at the indicated time points was used for gene expression analysis using the Human-6 Whole-Genome Expression BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA), which generates expression profiles for more than 46,000 human transcripts. Biotin-labeled cRNA was produced using a linear amplification kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) using 300 ng of quality-checked total RNA as input. Chip hybridizations, washing, Cy3-streptavidin staining, and scanning were performed on a BeadArray Reader (Illumina) platform using reagents and following protocols supplied by the manufacturer. The detection score was used to determine expression
2011-06-10 | E-GEOD-25046 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Hepatocytes that have differentiated from human embryonic stem cells have great potential for the treatment of liver disease as well as for drug testing. Moreover, in vitro hepatogenesis is a powerful model system for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying liver development. DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism that influences differential gene expression during embryonic development. We profiled gene expression and DNA methylation of three cell states of in vitro hepatogenesis—human embryonic stem cells, endoderm progenitors, and mature hepatocytes—using microarray analysis. Among 525 state-specific expressed genes, 67 showed significant negative correlation between gene expression and DNA methylation. State-specific expression and methylation of target genes were validated by quantitative reverse transcription–PCR and pyrosequencing, respectively. To elucidate genome-scale methylation changes beyond the promoter, we also performed high-throughput sequencing of methylated DNA captured by MBD2 protein [see SRA link below]. We found dynamic methylation changes in intergenic regions of the human genome during differentiation. Conclusion: This study provides valuable methylation markers for the lineage commitment of in vitro hepatogenesis and should help elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying stem cell differentiation and liver development. ES, EP, and MH methylation assays were run in triplicate. Genomic DNA (1 µg) from each sample was bisulfite converted using the EZ DNA methylation kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA), and 200 ng of the converted DNA was used for amplification. Amplified DNA was hybridized to the Infinium HumanMethylation27 BeadChip (Illumina), which analyzes the methylation status of 27,578 CpG sites selected from more than 14,495 well-annotated genes. The arrays were imaged using the BeadArray Reader, and image processing and extraction of intensity data were performed according to Illumina’s instructions. Each methylation signal was used to compute the β value, which is a quantitative measure of DNA methylation ranging from 0 (for completely unmethylated cytosines) to 1 (for completely methylated cytosines).
2011-06-10 | E-GEOD-25047 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Previous studies demonstrated that hepatocyte-specific transcription factors could directly convert fibroblasts into functional hepatocytes-like cells, namely induced hepatocytes (iHeps) using viral systems. However, viral integration into host genome causes insertional mutation and risk of tumorigenecity. we showed iHeps could be generated from MEFs using the integration-free system. They were expandable in vitro and showed hepatic features, similar to primary hepatocytes. iHeps_G4H1F3 transfected (Episomal vectors) and iHeps_G4H1F3 transduced (pMXs) were duplicate, respectively. MEFs and primary hepatocytes were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.
2015-03-27 | E-GEOD-67362 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Studies in mice have shown that PPARalpha is an important regulator of hepatic lipid metabolism and the acute phase response. However, little information is available on the role of PPARalpha in human liver. Here we set out to compare the function of PPARalpha in mouse and human hepatocytes via analysis of target gene regulation. Primary hepatocytes from 6 human and 6 mouse donors were treated with PPARalpha agonist Wy14643 and gene expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix GeneChips followed by a systems biology analysis. Baseline PPARalpha expression was similar in human and mouse hepatocytes. Depending on species and time of exposure, Wy14643 significantly induced the expression of 362-672 genes. Surprisingly minor overlap was observed between the Wy14643-regulated genes from mouse and human, although more substantial overlap was observed at the pathway level. Xenobiotics metabolism and apolipoprotein synthesis were specifically regulated by PPARalpha in human hepatocytes, whereas glycolysis-gluconeogenesis was regulated specifically in mouse hepatocytes. Most of the genes commonly regulated in mouse and human were involved in lipid metabolism and many represented known PPARalpha targets, including CPT1A, HMGCS2, FABP, ACSL, and ADFP. Several genes were identified that were specifically induced by PPARalpha in human (MBL2, ALAS1, CYP1A1, TSKU) or mouse (Fbp2, lgals4, Cd36, Ucp2, Pxmp4). Furthermore, several putative novel PPARalpha targets were identified that were commonly regulated in both species, including CREB3L3, KLF10, KLF11 and MAP3K8. Our results suggest that PPARalpha activation has a major impact on gene regulation in human hepatocytes. Importantly, the role of PPARalpha as master regulator of hepatic lipid metabolism is generally well-conserved between mouse and human. Overall, however, PPARalpha regulates a mostly divergent set of genes in mouse and human hepatocytes. Experiment Overall Design: Primary hepatocytes from 6 human subjects were treated with the PPARalpha agonist Wy14643 for 6 and 24 hours, and gene expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix GeneChips. Human hepatocytes and Hepatocyte Culture Medium Bulletkit were purchased from Lonza Bioscience (Verviers, Belgium). Primary hepatocytes were isolated from surgical liver biopsies obtained from six individual donors who underwent surgery after informed consent was obtained for surgery with subsequent use of samples in experiments. Hepatocytes were isolated with two-step collagenase perfusion method and the viability of the cells was over 80%. Cells were plated on collagen-coated six-well plates and filled with maintenance medium. Upon arrival of the cells, the medium was discarded and was replaced by Hepatocyte Culture Medium (HCM) with additives. The additives included Gentamicin sulphate/Amphotercin-B, Bovine serum albumin (Fatty acid free), Transferrin, Ascorbic acid, Insulin, Epidermal growth factor, Hydrocortisone hemisuccinate. The next day, cells were incubated in fresh medium in the presence or absence of Wy14643 (50 microM) dissolved in DMSO for 6 and 24 hours, followed by RNA isolation.
2009-09-25 | E-GEOD-17251 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:To understand in detail the molecular phases that occur during the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to hepatocyte-like cells we performed an RNA-seq time course of the stages of differentiation across the 21 day differentiation time course. We used a chemically defined (serum-free) protocol, modified from Si-Tayeb et al., 2010 and Song et al., 2009. We describe acquisition of definitive endoderm characteristics at day 3, followed by hepatoblast charcter at day 7-13 and then maturation to hepatocyte-like cells at day 21. Time course of differentiation of human embryoic stem cells to hepatocyte-like cells over 21 days, using an adapted chemically defined protocol of Song et al., 2009; Cell Research
2017-04-28 | E-GEOD-70741 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In this study, primary health liver cells obtained from patients with colon cancer and liver metastasis were stimulated with hyper-IL-6 for 6, 24, 48 and 72 h or kept untreated. Both mRNA and miRNA levels were characterized (this is miRNA dataset).
2019-02-28 | E-MTAB-6572 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In this study, primary healthy liver cells obtained from patients with colon cancer and liver metastasis were stimulated with hyper-IL-6 for 6, 24, 48 and 72 h or kept untreated. Both mRNA and miRNA levels were characterized (this is mRNA dataset).
2019-02-28 | E-MTAB-6571 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Studies in mice have shown that PPARα is an important regulator of hepatic lipid metabolism and the acute phase response. However, little information is available on the role of PPARα in human liver. Here we set out to compare the function of PPARα in mouse and human hepatocytes via analysis of target gene regulation. Primary hepatocytes from 6 human and 6 mouse donors were treated with PPARα agonist Wy14643 and gene expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix GeneChips followed by a systems biology analysis. Baseline PPARα expression was similar in human and mouse hepatocytes. Depending on species and time of exposure, Wy14643 significantly induced the expression of 362-672 genes. Surprisingly minor overlap was observed between the Wy14643-regulated genes from mouse and human, although more substantial overlap was observed at the pathway level. Xenobiotics metabolism and apolipoprotein synthesis were specifically regulated by PPARα in human hepatocytes, whereas glycolysis-gluconeogenesis was regulated specifically in mouse hepatocytes. Most of the genes commonly regulated in mouse and human were involved in lipid metabolism and many represented known PPARα targets, including CPT1A, HMGCS2, FABP, ACSL, and ADFP. Several genes were identified that were specifically induced by PPARα in human (MBL2, ALAS1, CYP1A1, TSKU) or mouse (Fbp2, lgals4, Cd36, Ucp2, Pxmp4). Furthermore, several putative novel PPARα targets were identified that were commonly regulated in both species, including CREB3L3, KLF10, KLF11 and MAP3K8. Our results suggest that PPARα activation has a major impact on gene regulation in human hepatocytes. Importantly, the role of PPARα as master regulator of hepatic lipid metabolism is generally well-conserved between mouse and human. Overall, however, PPARα regulates a mostly divergent set of genes in mouse and human hepatocytes. GSE17250: Comparative analysis of gene regulation by the transcription factor PPARα_mouse; GSE17251: Comparative analysis of gene regulation by the transcription factor PPARα_human Experiment Overall Design: Refer to individual Series
2009-09-11 | E-GEOD-17254 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Recent studies have shown that defined sets of transcription factors could directly convert fibroblasts into induced hepatocytes (iHeps). However, the underlying mechanism of direct conversion process toward a hepatic lineage is largely unknown. Here, we report that the direct conversion kinetics from fibroblasts into iHeps throughout screening multiple additional factors that potentially rescue the delayed kinetics of MET and hepatic program. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were efficiently converted into iHeps in the presence of c-Myc and Klf4 (CK), the activators for MET process, with the previously defined sets of hepatic transcription factors, resulting in remarkably improved generation of iHeps. Furthermore, in the presence of CK, Hnf4? alone could convert fibroblasts into iHeps within 5 days with a relatively higher efficiency. Cells transduced with different combinations of factors were cultured in standard Hep medium. Epithelial colonies were observed within 5 days with much higher numbers in the presence of additional factor, c-Myc and Klf4, compared to control group, indicating the number of epithelial colony was dramatically increased in the presence of additional stem cell factors
2013-12-03 | E-GEOD-52566 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:There are many toxic chemicals to contaminate the world and cause harm to human and other organisms. How to quickly discriminate these compounds and characterize their potential molecular mechanism and toxicity is essential. High through put transcriptomics profiles such as microarray have been proven useful to identify biomarkers for different classification and toxicity prediction purposes. Here we aim to investigate how to use microarray to predict chemical contaminants and their possible mechanisms. In this study, we divided 105 compounds plus vehicle control into 14 compound classes. On the basis of gene expression profiles of in vitro primary cultured hepatocytes, we comprehensively compared various normalization, feature selection and classification algorithms for the classification of these 14 class compounds. We found that normalization had little effect on the averaged classification accuracy. Two support vector machine methods LibSVM and SMO had better classification performance. When feature sizes were smaller, LibSVM outperformed other classification methods. Simple logistic algorithm also performed well. At the training stage, usually the feature selection method SVM-RFE performed the best, and PCA was the poorest feature selection algorithm. But overall, SVM-RFE had the highest overfitting rate when an independent dataset used for a prediction in this case. Therefore, we developed a new feature selection algorithm called gradient method which had a pretty high training classification as well as prediction accuracy with the lowest over-fitting rate. Through the analysis of biomarkers that distinguished 14 class compounds, we found a goup of genes that mainly invovled in cell cylce were significanly downregulated by the metal and inflammatory compounds, but were induced by anti-microbial, cancer related drugs, pesticides, and PXR mediators. For in vitro experiment, primary cultured rat hepatocytes were treated one of 105 compounds with relative controls. At least three biological replicates were used for each unique condition. In total 531 arrays were used.
2010-01-05 | E-GEOD-19662 | biostudies-arrayexpress