Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Exon-array profiling of Heat-shock stress response in HeLa cell line

ABSTRACT: The heat-shock stress response was studied at the level of exons using Affymetrix Exon-array profiling for both sense and anti-sense transcripts. Sense transcript profiling was done as per the protocol of Affymetrix Exon 1.0 ST array and anti-sense transcript array profiling was done using a modified protocol (Xijin Ge et al., BMC Genomics. 2008 Jan 22;9:27). In short, for profiling antisense transcripts, first cycle cDNA synthesis and IVT step is skipped. This modified protocol starts directly from the second cycle cDNA synthesis step. The labelled target DNA fragments are in reverse orientation of original mRNAs. Thus the hybridization signals will represent transcripts from the same exonic regions but from the opposite DNA strand. Study was undertaken with 2 biological replicates each for - a) Heat-shock treated Sense b) Heat-shock treated Anti-sense c) Untreated control Sense d) Untreated control Anti-Sense

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

SUBMITTER: mitali mukerji

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-27127 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that antisense transcription is pervasive in budding yeasts and is conserved between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. While studies have examined antisense transcripts of S. cerevisiae for inverse transcription in stationary phase and stress conditions, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis of the conditional specific evolutionary characteristics of antisense transcription between yeasts. Here we attempt to decipher the evolutionary relationship of antisense transcription of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus cultured in mid log, early stationary phase, and heat shock conditions. Results: Massively parallel sequencing of sequence strand-specific cDNA library was performed from RNA isolated from S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus cells at mid log, stationary phase and heat shock conditions. We performed this analysis using a stringent set of sense ORF transcripts and non-coding antisense transcripts that were expressed in all the three conditions, as well as in both species. We found the divergence of the condition specific anti-sense transcription levels is higher than that in condition specific sense transcription levels, suggesting that antisense transcription played a potential role in adapting to different conditions. Furthermore, 43% of sense-antisense pairs demonstrated inverse transcription in either stationary phase or heat shock conditions relative to the mid log conditions. In addition, a large part of sense-antisense pairs (67%), which demonstrated inverse transcription, were highly conserved between the two species. Our results were also concordant with known functional analyses from previous studies and with the evidence from mechanistic experiments of role of individual genes. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive picture of the role of antisense transcription mediating sense transcription in different conditions across yeast species. We can conclude from our findings that antisense regulation could act like an on-off switch on sense regulation in different conditions. Transcriptomes of two yeast species under mid-log phase, early stationary phase, and after heat shock treatment were generated by Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired-end sequencing

Project description:High-temperature stress is a critical environmental parameter for all organisms and induces a cellular heat shock response, characterized by an upregulation of heat shock proteins. For Crenarchaeota, it is unknown how this response is regulated, given the lack of conservation of known prokaryotic or eukaryotic heat shock-regulating transcription factors and how cellular processes are affected. To this end, we studied the heat shock response of the thermoacidophilic Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, thriving in volcanic hot springs at 75°C, upon shift to 86°C, at the transcriptome and proteome level. By pulse-labeling of neosynthesized RNA and proteins upon heat shock, we show a drastic reduction of the cell’s major transcriptional activity immediately after shift and neosynthesis of certain abundant (heat shock) proteins, including the thermosome. By combining RNA-sequencing and mass spectrometry, we show that RNA levels of half of the genes are affected immediately after temperature shift and that reprogramming of the protein landscape takes at least one hour and changes are more subtle. Correlation analysis provides evidence that considerable post-transcriptional and post-translational regulation is occurring upon heat shock. Functional enrichment analysis indicates that nearly all biological processes are affected by heat shock. An overall downregulation is observed for transcription, translation, DNA replication and cell division. However, quality control of translation and of the protein landscape is increased. Many DNA repair pathways are differentially expressed, accompanied with an increase in a DNA import system. Furthermore, expression of DNA topoisomerases is investigated, coinciding with a significant differential expression of nucleoid-associated proteins. Based on these findings and considering the absence of a conserved DNA-binding motif, we propose that regulation of the heat shock response in Sulfolobales is most likely not established by a classical transcription factor, but is rather caused by changes in chromosome organization or established at the post-transcriptional level.

Project description:Direct comparison of the genome-level expression patterns of THP-1 cells exposed to either LPS or heat shock; Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) serve a sentinel role allowing the host to efficiently sense and adapt to the presence of danger signals. Herein we have directly compared the genome-level expression patterns (microarray) of human PBMC (THP-1 cells) subjected to one of two canonical danger signals, heat shock and lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Based on sequential expression and statistical filters, and in comparison to control cells, we found that 3,988 genes were differentially regulated in THP-1 cells subjected to LPS stress, and 2,921 genes were differentially regulated in THP-1 cells subjected to heat shock stress. Venn analyses demonstrated that the majority of differentially regulated genes (greather than or equal to 70%) were uniquely expressed in response to one of the two danger signals. Functional analyses demonstrated that the two danger signals induced expression or repression of genes corresponding to unique pathways, molecular functions, biological processes, and gene networks. In contrast, there were 184 genes that were commonly upregulated by both stress signals, and 430 genes that were commonly downregulated by both stress signals. Interestingly, the 184 commonly upregulated genes corresponded to a gene network broadly related to inflammation, and more specifically to chemokine signaling. These data demonstrate that the mononuclear cell responses to the canonical stress signals, heat shock and LPS, are highly divergent. However, there is a heretofore unrecognized common pattern of gene network expression corresponding to chemokine-related biology. The data also serve as a reference database for investigators in the field of stress signaling. Experiment Overall Design: In vitro exposure of THP-1 cells to control conditions, LPS (1 micogram/ml for 4 hrs), or heat shock (43 deg C for 1 hour, followed by a 4 hour recovery at 37 deg C)

Dataset Information

Exon-array profiling of Heat-shock stress response in HeLa cell line

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets