MicroRNA expression during Hematopoiesis
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
SUBMITTER: Habib Hamidi
PROVIDER: E-GEOD-28338 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Similar Datasets
Project description:The goal of this study was to identify genes that are differentially expressed during a 24 hour Notch blockade and whether a Wnt antagonist (anti-Lrp6) could block this effect. 3 condition experiment, Control untreated compared to N1N2 treated, and N1N2 treated compared to N1N2_Lrp6 treated. 5 biological replicates per condition.
2015-03-11 | E-GEOD-66751 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Cellular responses to signalling pathways are often highly dynamic, however most analyses of developmental signalling pathways focus on a single endpoint. Here we have analyzed the temporal changes in transcription following a short Notch activation treatment and have related these to the recruitment of the Notch pathway transcription factor, CSL [Suppressor of Hairless, Su(H), in Drosophila], and to the state of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) binding. A total of 154 genes showed significant differential expression over time and their expression profiles stratified into 14 clusters based on temporal and quantitative differences in their responses. These differences were partially reflected in the profiles of Pol II and Su(H) binding. However neither could fully account for the different response profiles. Furthermore, the timing of the different responses was unaffected by more prolonged Notch activation. Instead our data suggest that regulatory relationships between genes that segregate into different response clusters can partially account for the stratification. Thus feed-forward repression, where products of early responding Enhancer of split bHLH genes (E(spl)bHLH) inhibit expression of endogenous repressors, is one mechanism that explains the profile of genes that exhibit delayed up-regulation. E(spl)bHLH genes may therefore be responsible for co-ordinating the Notch response of a wide spectrum of other targets, explaining their critical functions in many developmental and disease contexts. DmD8 cells were cultured in Schneiders medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma), 5ug/ml insulin (Sigma) and 5% penicillin / streptomycin (Sigma) according to standard protocols. Notch signalling was initiated by replacing cell media with 2mM EDTA in PBS. The cells were stimulated for 5 minutes before washing out EDTA using normal culture media. The cells were then collected at 18 time points at 0M-bM-^@M-^Y, 5M-bM-^@M-^Y, 10M-bM-^@M-^Y, 15M-bM-^@M-^Y, 20M-bM-^@M-^Y, 25M-bM-^@M-^Y, 30M-bM-^@M-^Y, 35M-bM-^@M-^Y, 40M-bM-^@M-^Y, 50M-bM-^@M-^Y, 60M-bM-^@M-^Y, 70M-bM-^@M-^Y, 80M-bM-^@M-^Y, 90M-bM-^@M-^Y, 100M-bM-^@M-^Y, 110M-bM-^@M-^Y, 120M-bM-^@M-^Y and 150M-bM-^@M-^Y after stimulation in 4 independent time trials. For control samples, for each time trial, media was replaced with fresh media to mimic the addition and removal of EDTA in corresponding experimental samples and then collected at equivalent times. For each trial 50 M-BM-5g of the untreated control RNA sample of each time point was pooled to create a trial specific reference sample. Samples from trials #1 and #3 were labelled with Cy5 and trails #2 and #4 as dye-swap with Cy3.
2012-12-31 | E-GEOD-35557 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Using a hitherto uncharacterized knockout mouse model of Notch 3, a Notch signaling receptor paralogue highly expressed in vascular SMCs, we uncover a striking susceptibility to ischemic stroke upon challenge. Cellular and molecular analyses of vascular SMCs derived from these animals associate Notch 3 activity to the expression of specific gene targets, whereas genetic rescue experiments unambiguously link Notch 3 function in vessels to the ischemic phenotype. Microarray Studies. Biotinylated cRNA samples from freshly sorted brain SMCs (four Notch 3 +/- mice and five Notch 3 -/- mice) were fragmented before hybridization (15 ug each) onto mouse 430 2.0 Affymetrix chips. The chips were washed, stained by using strepavidin-phycoerytrin, and scanned the next day as described in ref. 24. For data normalization, all probe sets were scaled to a target intensity of 150. Microarray data analysis was performed by using Rosetta Resolver. All cells were from 10- to 12-week-old male mice. Gene Ontology Analyses. PANTHER software was used to define over- and underrepresented functions in the list of signature genes found by microarray analysis (25). P values were calculated by using binomial statistics.
2014-06-11 | E-GEOD-58368 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This study examined transcripts that are enriched in neonatal mouse cochlear supporting cells at postnatal day 1 and postnatal day 6 after inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway. Cochleas from postnatal day 0 and postnatal day 5 were cultured for 24 hours in the gamma secretase inhibitor DAPT or DMSO as a vehicle control. Supporting cells were purified by FACS sorting for GFP fluorescence from the cochleas of transgenic mice in which a BAC including the LFng locus drives the expression of GFP. Two replicates of GFP+ supporting cells were compared with all other cochlear cell types that were GFP-. We performed this experiment at two different ages, postnatal day 0+24 hours culture and postnatal day 5 + 24 hours culture. (corresponding to P1 and P6). mRNA profiles of P0 and P5 supporting cells (GFP+) and all other cochlear cell types (GFP-) treated with DAPT or DMSO, two replicates each, were generated by deep sequencing using Illumna TruSeq.
2016-07-01 | E-GEOD-83340 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The Notch signaling pathway functions in a number of processes during embryologic development, especially the maintenance or aquisition of cell fate. We purturb the Notch signalling pathway in embryonic Xenopus laevis in order to 1) better characterize the downstream targets of Notch signalling, and 2) determine the extent to which early embryos can recover from transient purturbations to critical signalling pathways, if at all. Xenopus laevis embryos were unilaterally injected at the two cell stage with either GFP, GFP and ICD (Notch intracellular domain, an up-regulator of the Notch pathway), or GFP and DBM (domain-binding mutant, a downregulator of the Notch pathway). At stages 18, 28, and 38, for each injection, pooled total RNA from 10 embryos was extracted. Extraction was performed for three biological replicates for each time/injection condition. cDNA from total RNA was hybridized on Affymetrix Xenopus laevis Genome 2.0 arrays.
2014-08-06 | E-GEOD-60127 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Vasculature permeate our entire body and involved in homeostasis and progression of various disease. Endothelium is a backbone of cardiovascular system and endothelial disfunction is associated with most forms of cardiovascular disease from atherosclerosis to chronic heart failure. Decrease in shear stress, particularly due to disturbance of the blood flow by bends or vascular obstruction, lead to atherosclerosis and endothelial disfunction. Notch signaling may act as mechanosensor and assumed to be one of the central signal pathways associated with endothelial disfunction. Association of shear stress, Notch and endothelial dysfunction is well known, molecular mechanisms connected these factors still poorly understood. One might assume that long-term shear stress and dysregulation of Notch in endothelium cause changes in epigenomic profile. While epigenomic changes in shear stressed environment are known to be involved in endothelial disfunction, possible connection of Notch and epigenetic changes in endothelium has not yet been tested. Therefore, here we analyzed how activation of Notch signaling influence on histone code and secretome of endothelial cells in vitro. We found that activation of Notch increase level of N-acetylated forms of Histone 1: H1-0, H1-3, H1-4, H1-5, H1-10. These changes were also associated with changes in secretome profile of endothelium and might have broad biomedical significance in case of endothelial dysfunction.
2023-02-15 | PXD032978 | Pride
Project description:To identify genes upregulated in response to Notch signalling in KC cells. Keywords: Expression analysis at a single timepoint (30' after Notch activation) KC cells were obtained from Dr Martin Zeidler. Control versus Notch activated KC cells: mRNA was extracted from KC cells incubated in the absence or presence of EDTA to activate Notch (cells were harvested 30 minutes after addition of EDTA). RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Sigma) and reverse transcription was performed with Superscript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) and oligo-dT primers (Sigma). Control and experimental samples were labeled with Cy3 or Cy5, mixed together and hybridized on Drosophila transcriptome long-oligonucleotide microarrays (FlyChip, FL002; http://www.flychip.org.uk/services/core/FL002/). Three biological replicates and dye swaps were performed (5 arrays in total/experiment). Slides were scanned by Genepix 400B dual laser scanner (Axon) and spots were found and quantified by Dapple software.
2010-06-23 | E-GEOD-9965 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Cellular responses to signalling pathways are often highly dynamic, however most analyses of developmental signalling pathways focus on a single endpoint. We have analyzed the temporal changes in transcription following a short Notch activation treatment and related these to the recruitment of the Notch pathway transcription factor, CSL [Suppressor of Hairless, Su(H), in Drosophila], and to the state of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) binding. A total of 154 genes showed significant differential expression over time and their expression profiles stratified into 14 clusters based on temporal and quantitative differences in their responses. These differences were partially reflected in the profiles of Pol II and Su(H) binding. However, neither could fully account for the different response profiles. Furthermore, the timing of the different responses was unaffected by more prolonged Notch activation. Instead our data suggest that regulatory relationships between genes that segregate into different response clusters can partially account for the stratification. Thus, feed-forward repression, where products of early responding Enhancer of split bHLH genes (E(spl)bHLH) inhibit expression of endogenous repressors, is one mechanism that explains the profile of genes that exhibit delayed up-regulation. E(spl)bHLH genes may therefore be responsible for co-ordinating the Notch response of a wide spectrum of other targets, explaining their critical functions in many developmental and disease contexts. DmD8 cells were collected at 7 time points (0M-bM-^@M-^Y, 10M-bM-^@M-^Y, 20M-bM-^@M-^Y, 30M-bM-^@M-^Y, 40M-bM-^@M-^Y, 60M-bM-^@M-^Y and 100M-bM-^@M-^Y) after a 5 minute Notch stimulation as 3 independent replicates. Immunoprecipitation was performed with Pol II (Ser 2 and Ser 5 phosphorylated) antibody and compared to the total input DNA. Samples from replicates #1 and #3 were labelled with Cy5, and replicate #2 was labelled with Cy3 as a dye-swap.
2012-12-31 | E-GEOD-35715 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Gene expression profiling on IL-10-secreting and non-secreting murine Th1 cells, stimulated in the presence or absence of the Notch ligand Delta-like 4 (Dll4), was performed to identify transcription factors co-expressed with IL-10. Primary naM-CM-/ve T helper cells were isolated from lymph nodes and spleens of C57BL/6 wildtype mice. Cells were enriched using the Multisort Kit from Miltenyi Biotec for CD25-CD4+CD62L+, and afterwards cultured under Th1 polarizing conditions. For activation, 0.25E06 naM-CM-/ve T cells were co-cultured with 0.75E06 MACSi Beads in 96-well flat bottom plates. MACSi Beads were coated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 (30 M-BM-5g of total primary IgG antibody per 1.0E08 beads) prior to seeding. Notch activation via Dll4 was induced by additional co-culture with MACSi Beads covalently coated with recombinant mouse Dll4. After 5 days in culture, the cells were restimulated with PMA/Ionomycin and subjected to an IL-10-secretion assay (Miltenyi Biotec) to separate IL-10-secreting and non-secreting cells. Using a BD Aria or DIVA cell sorter (Becton Dickinson), living CD4+ IL-10-secreting and non-secreting cells, with (co-culture with Dll4; 'TH1Notch') or without ('TH1Control') activation of the Notch signaling pathway, were isolated. Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). The integrity and amount of isolated RNA was assessed for each sample using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) and a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). The preparation for the hybridization to the chip was done using the GeneChip 3' IVT Express Kit. Fifteen micrograms of fragmented cRNA of each sample were hybridized to a total of 4 mouse genome 430 2.0 GeneChips (Affymetrix). Hybridization was performed in a Hybridization Oven 640, and chips were washed and stained in the Fluidics Station 400 (both Affymetrix). Finally, the arrays were scanned with a GeneChip Scanner 3000 using the GCOS software, version 1.1.1., both Affymetrix. The data was analyzed using the original GCOS CHP-file Signals, Excel and AmiGO website.
2014-05-08 | E-GEOD-57417 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Cellular responses to signalling pathways are often highly dynamic, however most analyses of developmental signalling pathways focus on a single endpoint. We have analyzed the temporal changes in transcription following a short Notch activation treatment and related these to the recruitment of the Notch pathway transcription factor, CSL [Suppressor of Hairless, Su(H), in Drosophila], and to the state of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) binding. A total of 154 genes showed significant differential expression over time and their expression profiles stratified into 14 clusters based on temporal and quantitative differences in their responses. These differences were partially reflected in the profiles of Pol II and Su(H) binding. However, neither could fully account for the different response profiles. Furthermore, the timing of the different responses was unaffected by more prolonged Notch activation. Instead our data suggest that regulatory relationships between genes that segregate into different response clusters can partially account for the stratification. Thus, feed-forward repression, where products of early responding Enhancer of split bHLH genes (E(spl)bHLH) inhibit expression of endogenous repressors, is one mechanism that explains the profile of genes that exhibit delayed up-regulation. E(spl)bHLH genes may therefore be responsible for co-ordinating the Notch response of a wide spectrum of other targets, explaining their critical functions in many developmental and disease contexts. DmD8 cells were collected at 7 time points (0M-bM-^@M-^Y, 10M-bM-^@M-^Y, 20M-bM-^@M-^Y, 30M-bM-^@M-^Y, 40M-bM-^@M-^Y, 60M-bM-^@M-^Y and 100M-bM-^@M-^Y) after a 5 minute Notch stimulation as 3 independent replicates. Immunoprecipitation was performed with Su(H) antibody and compared to the total input DNA. Samples from replicates #1 and #2 were labelled with Cy5, and replicate #3 was labelled with Cy3 as a dye-swap. For time point 10M-bM-^@M-^Y, only 2 biological replicates were obtained.
2012-12-31 | E-GEOD-35719 | biostudies-arrayexpress