Gene expression profiling of FFPE breast cancer samples
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
SUBMITTER: Maurizio Callari
PROVIDER: E-GEOD-38554 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Similar Datasets
Project description:The use of Affymetrix U133 2.0 Plus chips on FFPE samples when coupled with a qPCR-based sample pre-assessment step, yielded satisfactory results from the point of view of biological reliability. When compared with the Illumina DASL WG platform, specifically designed for degraded RNA, the data generated with the Affymetrix platform showed a wider interquartile range (IQR 1.32 vs 0.57, p<2.2x10-16) suggesting a superior discriminatory power within samples as indicated by the good agreement with the immunohistiochemically derived ER status. FFPE primary breast cancer samples profiled using Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarray platform after RNA amplification with the Nugen WT-Ovation FFPE System The following criteria were considered for a direct comparison of 12 GEPs obtained from Affymetrix and DASL platforms: gene variability as defined by IQR, ESR1 expression in ER status subgroups defined by IHC, distribution of fold changes for predefined ER related genes when comparing ER positive and negative samples.
2015-02-25 | E-GEOD-51450 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This study was performed to evaluated RNA extraction and gene expression analysis of FFPE specimen stored for more than 20 years. Using long time stored FFPE material; large retrospective studies correlating molecular features with therapeutic response and clinical outcome, can be performed. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to evaluate RNA extraction methods and to compare gene expression profiles of FFPE and fresh frozen (FF) tissue. Extracted RNA was subsequently subjected to microarray analysis and compared to qPCR data. The Ambion RecoverAll kit appears to be particularly suited for RNA extraction of long time stored FFPE tissues. Gene expression analysis using Affymetrix platform displayed a high degree of correlation for endogenous control genes comparing FF and FFPE tissues. We conclude that high quality gene expression signatures can be recognized using Affymetrix gene expression platform on FFPE tissue stored for more than 20 years. However, a general interpretation must be done with caution as different FFPE procedures have varying effects on RNA quality. Three RNA extraction methods from Roche (Basel, Switzerland), Ambion (Austin, TX, USA) and Qiagen (Hilden, Germany), designed for FFPE material was used. The methods were compared using qPCR. For the qPCR analysis, two different concentrations of input cDNA were used (20ng and 100ng) and 32 human endogenous control genes were examined. RNA from the Ambion FFPE kit was further analyzed by using microarray. Amplification of RNA prior to microarray analysis was performed using Nugen technologies (San Carlos, CA, USA). Nugen has developed amplification kits both for FFPE and FF materials: WT- ovation FFPE RNA amplification System V2 (Nugen FFPE), Ovation FF RNA Amplification System V2 (Nugen V2 FF) and Ovation FF Pico RNA Amplification System (Nugen PICO FF). The Nugen FFPE kit, designed for FFPE material was only used for FFPE tissue. The Nugen Pico FF kit, designed to target small amounts of FF RNA (>500 pg) and the Nugen V2 FF kit designed to target total FF RNA, were only used for FF tissue. Affymetrix standard amplification protocol (Affy FF) designed for FF RNA was also included as the standard method for amplification.
2011-09-14 | E-GEOD-31735 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The use of Affymetrix U133 2.0 Plus chips on FFPE samples when coupled with a qPCR-based sample pre-assessment step, yielded satisfactory results from the point of view of biological reliability. When compared with the Illumina DASL WG platform, specifically designed for degraded RNA, the data generated with the Affymetrix platform showed a wider interquartile range (1.32 vs 0.57, p<2.2x10-16) suggesting a superior discriminatory power within samples as indicated by the good agreement with the immunohistiochemically derived ER status. FFPE primary breast cancer samples profiled using Illumina DASL WG platform after RNA amplification with the Nugen WT-Ovation FFPE System
2015-02-25 | GSE51451 | GEO
Project description:Gene expression profiling of 273 pre-treatment endoscopic FFPE oesophageal and oesophago-gastric junctional adenocarcinomas for validation of a DNA Damage Response Deficiency Assay. All patients were treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and were collected at four UK centres in the Oesophageal Cancer Clinical and Molecular Stratification (OCCAMS) consortium between 2004 and 2013. Biopsies were reviewed for pathological subtype prior to marking for macrodissection and samples containing at least 50% adenocarcinoma tissue by area were taken forward. Total RNA was extracted using the RecoverallTM Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit for FFPE (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and amplified using the NuGen Ovation FFPE Amplification System v3 (NuGen San Carlos, CA). The amplified product was hybridized to the Almac Diagnostics Xcel™ array (Almac, Craigavon, United Kingdom), a cDNA microarray-based technology optimized for archival FFPE tissue, and analysed using the Affymetrix 7G scanner (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA)
2019-01-31 | E-MTAB-6969 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Purpose: The goals of this study is to determine the best method of gene expression quantification (RNA-seq, Microarray, NanoString) and amplification kits adapted to low-input and/or low-quality RNA samples (FFPE samples) Methods: Mouse bladder cancer cell line (mouse bladder cancer cell line, BC57) and mouse normal mouse normal urothelium were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin (FFPE), andfesh frozen (FF) in liquid nitrogen. The total RNA of these 4 samples were tested by 3 technologies (NanoString, RNA-seq and Microarray) and the results were compared to its reference (high-quality and high-input RNA of mouse bladder cancer cell line and mouse normal mouse normal urothelium). For NanoString with low-input RNA samples, each sample was tested by NanoString quantification after amplification by SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit - Pico Input mammelian and Ovation SoLo NuGEN RNA-seq System, and NanoString based on PCR approach with three input quantities: 50pg, 250pg and 2ng of total RNA, except for NanoString quantification after amplification by SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit - Pico Input mammelian kit for which the minimum recommended quantity was 250pg of total RNA. NanoString direct quantification was also done for FF and FFPE samples at high amount (50ng of total RNA) and results obtained from FF samples were considered as the reference. To determine which is the method for NanoString technology, low-input and low-quality RNA samples, we performed NanoString control quality metrics, principal component analysis, and a differential analysis between the mouse bladder cancer cell lines and the mouse normal mouse normal urothelium for each input quantity, amplification method and method of sample preservation (FF or FFPE). Results: The NanoString based PCR based approach is recommended for quantification of gene expression of FFPE and FF samples from 250pg of total RNA. However, NanoString quantification after amplification by SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit - Pico Input mammelian and Ovation SoLo NuGEN RNA-seq System is not recommended for FF and FFPE from low-input samples.
2024-07-19 | GSE117670 | GEO
Project description:The use of Affymetrix U133 2.0 Plus chips on FFPE samples when coupled with a qPCR-based sample pre-assessment step, yielded satisfactory results from the point of view of biological reliability. When compared with the Illumina DASL WG platform, specifically designed for degraded RNA, the data generated with the Affymetrix platform showed a wider interquartile range (1.32 vs 0.57, p<2.2x10-16) suggesting a superior discriminatory power within samples as indicated by the good agreement with the immunohistiochemically derived ER status. FFPE primary breast cancer samples profiled using Illumina DASL WG platform after RNA amplification with the Nugen WT-Ovation FFPE System The following criteria were considered for a direct comparison of 12 GEPs obtained from Affymetrix and DASL platforms: gene variability as defined by IQR, ESR1 expression in ER status subgroups defined by IHC, distribution of fold changes for predefined ER related genes when comparing ER positive and negative samples.
2015-02-25 | E-GEOD-51451 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Purpose: The goals of this study is to determine the best method of gene expression quantification (RNA-seq, Microarray, NanoString) and amplification kits adapted to low-input and/or low-quality RNA samples (FFPE samples) Methods: Mouse bladder cancer cell line (mouse bladder cancer cell line, BC57) and mouse normal mouse normal urothelium were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin (FFPE), andfesh frozen (FF) in liquid nitrogen. The total RNA of these 4 samples were tested in triplicate by 3 technologies (NanoString, RNA-seq and Microarray) and the results were compared to its reference (high-quality and high-input RNA of mouse bladder cancer cell line and mouse normal mouse normal urothelium). For RNA-sequencing, each sample was tested by two library contruction kits: SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit - Pico Input mammelian and Ovation SoLo NuGEN RNA-seq System with three input quantities: 50pg, 250pg and 2ng of total RNA, except for the SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit - Pico Input mammelian kit for which the minimum recommended quantity was 250pg of total RNA. RNA-seq based on poly(A) tail enrichment was considered as the reference and was done for the two FF samples at high amount (1µg of total RNA) . Results obtained with the two tested kits were compared to those based on poly(A) tail enrichment. To determine which is the best kit suitable for RNA-seq, low-input and low-quality RNA samples, we performed RNA-seq control quality metrics, principal component analysis, and a differential analysis between the mouse bladder cancer cell lines and the mouse normal mouse normal urothelium for each input quantity, library kit and method of sample preservation (FF or FFPE). Results: The Ovation SoLo NuGEN RNA-seq System library kit are recommended for quantification of gene expression of FFPE and FF samples at low-input (down to 50pg) whereas the SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit - Pico Input mammelian is only suitable for FF samples from 250pg of total RNA.
2024-07-19 | GSE117677 | GEO
Project description:To study feasibility of gene expression profiling from FFPE tissues using NuGen amplified mRNA hybridized on Affymetrix GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST arrays, we designed a pilot study utilizing samples from prostate cancer cohort. We selected samples from large-scale epidemiologic studies and clinical trials representative of a wide variety of fixation times, block ages and block storage conditions.
2014-07-01 | GSE54808 | GEO
Project description:To study feasibility of gene expression profiling from FFPE tissues using NuGen amplified mRNA hybridized on Affymetrix GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST arrays, we designed a pilot study utilizing samples from prostate cancer cohort. We selected samples from large-scale epidemiologic studies and clinical trials representative of a wide variety of fixation times, block ages and block storage conditions.
2014-07-01 | GSE54807 | GEO
Project description:2C embryos were generated from Kdm1a FL/Fl Zp3Cre females mated to wild type males for RNA-seq analysis using the Nugen Ovation RNA-seq system V2. Ovulated eggs from Kdm1a FL/Fl Zp3Cre females were isolated for RNA-seq analysis using the Nugen Ovation RNA-seq system V2.
2015-03-10 | GSE66547 | GEO