Project description:In this study we utilized a genome-wide approach to analyze circadian patterns of gene expression in mouse lung lungs, both in the basal state and in the setting of systemic inflammation caused by endotoxemia. We chose the lung because it represents a primary portal for systemic infection and organ failure in critically ill patients, and because the lung exhibits strong physiological circadian rhythms in health and in diseases such as asthma. The gene expression the data presented here was correlated to histological observations and metabolite measurements derived from the same biological samples, in order to obtain a broad picture of how inflammation impacts circadian rhythms in mouse lung. To examine circadian regulation in mouse lung we performed 2 independent time-series experiments (Microarray Experiments #1 and #2), in which groups of mice were euthanized at 4 hour intervals for 48 hours. The purpose of Microarray Experiment #1 was to control for environmental influences (light and nutrition) on the detection of circadian rhythms in gene expression. In Microarray Experiment #1, 72 mice were segregated equally into 2 equal groups the day prior to the experiment at the beginning of the dark phase (Circadian Time 12 (CT12) or 7:00 PM local time). In one group (samples labeled with the suffix “MR”) the mice were kept under standard lighting and nutritional conditions (LD 12:12). In the second group (samples labeled with the suffix “DD”), mice were kept in constant darkness and food pellets were removed from their cages at the start of sample acquisition (DD 12:12+STV). Sample acquisition commenced at CT4 (or 11:00 AM local time). For each group 3 animals were sacrificed per time point (12 time points total). For mRNA isolation lung tissue was immersed in RNAlater (Qiagen) and total RNA was then extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). RNA quality (RIN>=7) was confirmed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. RNA from all biological samples was labeled at once using the Ambion TotalPrep-96 RNA Amplification Kit. The samples were then blinded, randomized to chip position and hybridized to the Illumina MouseRef-8 v2.0 Expression BeadChips. For Microarray Experiment #1 RNA labeling and microarray hybridization were conducted at the Partners Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine. All biological samples were represented by a single technical replicate on the microarray.

Project description:In this study we utilized a genome-wide approach to analyze circadian patterns of gene expression in mouse lung lungs, both in the basal state and in the setting of systemic inflammation caused by endotoxemia. We chose the lung because it represents a primary portal for systemic infection and organ failure in critically ill patients, and because the lung exhibits strong physiological circadian rhythms in health and in diseases such as asthma. The gene expression the data presented here was correlated to histological observations and metabolite measurements derived from the same biological samples, in order to obtain a broad picture of how inflammation impacts circadian rhythms in mouse lung. To examine circadian regulation in mouse lung we performed 2 independent time-series experiments (Microarray Experiments #1 and #2), in which groups of mice were euthanized at 4 hour intervals for 48 hours. The purpose of Microarray Experiment #2 was to compare circadian gene expression in healthy lungs (samples labeled with the prefix “NT”) to lungs derived from endotoxemic animals (samples labeled with the prefix “LT”). For Microarray Experiment #2, 94 mice were placed under constant light conditions (LL 12:12, food ad libitum) at CT12 the prior day (7:00 PM local time). At CT10 (5:00 PM) on the day of the experiment a sub-group of 40 mice received a single intraperitoneal injection of 12 mg/kg E. coli O127:B8 endotoxin (LPS, Sigma L3129, Lot 029K4055), and sample collection began directly after. 3-4 mice per group were sacrificed at consecutive 4 hour intervals for 2-3 days. The left lung and the right upper lobe were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen for microarray analysis. For mRNA isolation lung tissue was immersed in RNAlater (Qiagen) and total RNA was then extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). RNA quality (RIN>=7) was confirmed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. RNA from all biological samples was labeled at once using the Ambion TotalPrep-96 RNA Amplification Kit. The samples were then blinded, randomized to chip position and hybridized to the Illumina MouseRef-8 v2.0 Expression BeadChips. For Microarray Experiment #2 at the Channing Division of Network Medicine (Brigham and Women’s Hospital). Two biological samples (NT00L1 and LT00L1) were represented by 2 technical replicates on the microarray. The remaining biological samples were represented by a single technical replicate.

Project description:Fifty percent of cutaneous melanomas are driven by activated BRAFV600E, but tumors treated with RAF inhibitors, even when they respond dramatically, rapidly adapt and develop resistance. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify the major mechanisms of intrinsic and adaptive resistance and develop drug combinations that target these resistance mechanisms. In a combinatorial drug screen on a panel of 12 treatment-naïve BRAFV600E mutant melanoma cell lines of varying levels of resistance to MAPK pathway inhibition we identified the combination PLX4720, a targeted inhibitor of mutated BRaf, and lapatinib, an inhibitor of the ERBB family of receptor tyrosine kinases, as synergistically cytotoxic in the subset of cell lines that displayed the most resistance to PLX4720. To identify potential mechanisms of resistance to PLX4720 treatment and synergy with lapatinib treatment we performed a multi-platform functional genomics analysis to profile the genome as well as the transcriptional and proteomic responses of these cell lines to treatment with PLX4720. We found modest levels of resistance correlated with the zygosity of the BRAF V600E allele and RTK mutational status. Layered over base-line resistance was substantial upregulation of many ERBB pathway genes in response to BRaf inhibition, thus generating the vulnerability to combination with lapatinib. The transcriptional responses of ERBB pathway genes are associated with a number of transcription factors, including ETS2 and its associated cofactors that represent a convergent regulatory mechanism conferring synergistic drug susceptibility in the context of diverse mutational landscapes. 12 BRAF mutant melanomas and 4 melanomas with WT BRAF were exposed plx4720 treatment to evaluate their responses after 8 hours of treatment. 5 of the 12 BRAF mutant melanomas responses were also evaluated in response to the treatment of lapatinib alone, masitinib alone, the combination of lapatinib with plx4720, or the combination of masitinib with plx4720. All samples were run in at least triplicate.

Project description:The objective of the study was to figure out the impact of LXR signaling on human macrophages. Primary human macrophages in an early differentiating and a mature differentiation state were treated with the LXR agonist T091317 for 4 and 24 h and transcriptome-wide expression analysis were performed. As LXRa is highly induced during macrophage differentiation and 68% of all LXRs targets change their expression during this process, we suggest that LXRs have essential functions in macrophage development. More than 238 genes are regulated in early as well as mature macrophages by activation of LXRs; most of them are up-regulated. LXRs administrate differentiation state specific as well as common macrophages functions related primarily to lipid homeostasis, immune response and cell fate. Interestingly, almost only genes related to lipid and cholesterol metabolism are overrepresented among early induced genes, whereas genes related to immune functions respond later, implying the existence of indirect mechanisms of control. Furthermore, in early differentiating macrophages cell proliferation and cell death associated genes are induced after 24 h of LXR activation, whereas in mature macrophages, showing high LXRa expression, the same functional cluster respond far earlier (4 h) after LXR ligand treatment. In conclusion, our data suggest that LXRs are modulators of macrophage differentiation, operating principally as positive transcriptional regulators of genes involved in lipid and cholesterol metabolism and by this indirectly influencing the immunophenotype of macrophages. CD14 positive cells of healthy donors were isolated by magnetic separation and differentiated in the presence of human serum to macrophages. At an early differentiating state (16 h after isolation) and at in mature differentiating state (day 11 after isolation) the cells were treated with the synthetical LXR agonist T091317 respective its solvent DMSO for 4 and 24 h. RNA was isolated and a whole genome microarray was performed.

Dataset Information

CIRCADIAN RHYTHM REPROGRAMMING DURING LUNG INFLAMMATION

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets