Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Molecular characterization of Notch1 positive progenitor cells in the developing retina

ABSTRACT: The oscillatory expression of Notch signaling in neural progenitors suggests that both repressors and activators of neural fate specification are expressed in the same progenitors. Since Notch1 regulates photoreceptor differentiation and contributes (together with Notch3) to ganglion cell fate specification, we hypothesized that genes encoding photoreceptor and ganglion cell fate activators would be highly expressed in Notch1 receptor-bearing (Notch1+) progenitors, directing these cells to differentiate into photoreceptors or into ganglion cells when Notch1 activity is diminished. To identify these genes, we used microarray analysis to study expression profiles of whole retinas and isolated from them Notch1+ cells at embryonic day 14 (E14) and postnatal day 0 (P0). To isolate Notch1+ cells, we utilized immunomagnetic cell separation. RNA from Notch1+ cells and whole retinas at E14 and P0 was extracted and used for microarray analysis. We processed individual samples that each contained 200,000-500,000 Notch1+ cells. A total of three independent biological replicates in the early stage (E14) of retinal development and four independent biological replicates in the late stage (P0) of retinal development were obtained for comparative profiling of Notch1+ cells and whole retinas.

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

SUBMITTER: Dmitry Ivanov

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-65977 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Cyclin C was cloned as a growth-promoting G1 cyclin1,2, and several studies postulated a role for cyclin C in driving cell proliferation3-8 . Moreover, cyclin C, together with its kinase partner, the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK8, is believed to represent an essential component of basal transcriptional machinery where it globally represses gene expression9-13. However, the function of cyclin C in vivo has never been addressed. Here we show that in the living organism cyclin C acts as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor, through its function of controlling Notch1 oncogene levels. Cyclin C activates an “orphan” CDK19 kinase14, as well as CDK8 and CDK3. These cyclin C-CDK complexes phosphorylate Notch1 intracellular domain (ICN1), which allows binding of ICN1 to Fbw7 and triggers ICN1 polyubiquitination. Genetic ablation of cyclin C blocks ICN1 phosphorylation, disrupts Fbw7 binding, and decreases ICN1 ubiquitination in vivo, thereby strongly elevating ICN1 levels in several compartments of cyclin C knockout mice. Cyclin C was cloned as a growth-promoting G1 cyclin1,2, and several studies postulated a role for cyclin C in driving cell proliferation3-8 . Moreover, cyclin C, together with its kinase partner, the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK8, is believed to represent an essential component of basal transcriptional machinery where it globally represses gene expression9-13. However, the function of cyclin C in vivo has never been addressed. Here we show that in the living organism cyclin C acts as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor, through its function of controlling Notch1 oncogene levels. Cyclin C activates an “orphan” CDK19 kinase14, as well as CDK8 and CDK3. These cyclin C-CDK complexes phosphorylate Notch1 intracellular domain (ICN1), which allows binding of ICN1 to Fbw7 and triggers ICN1 polyubiquitination. Genetic ablation of cyclin C blocks ICN1 phosphorylation, disrupts Fbw7 binding, and decreases ICN1 ubiquitination in vivo, thereby strongly elevating ICN1 levels in several compartments of cyclin C knockout mice.

Project description:Purpose: Neuropeptide signaling has been reported to impact neurogenesis in the central nervous system. However, these studies have typically been conducted using pharmacological agents in ex vivo preparations, and in vivo evidence for their developmental function is generally lacking. The goal of this study is to identify the impact of somatostatin signaling on retinal neurogenesis and development both ex vivo and in vivo. Methods: Mouse retinal explants grown ex vivo from E14-P0 and treated with a range of doses of agonist for the somatostatin receptor Sstr2 were multiplexed according to the MULTI-seq protocol and used to generate a single scRNA-seq expression library. Retinas from P0 littermates representing an allelic series (+/+, +/-, -/-) of Sstr2 KO mice were mutliplexed according to the MULTI-seq protocol and used to generate a single scRNA-seq expression library. Retinas from P14 littermates representing an allelic series (+/+, +/-, -/-) of Sstr2 KO mice were mutliplexed according to the MULTI-seq protocol and used to generate a single scRNA-seq expression library. Sequencing was performed on an illumina sequencer. Bcl files were analyzed by Cellranger. Samples were deconvoluted with the deMULTIplex r package and clustering and gene expression analysis were performed with the Seurat and Monocle2 r packages. Results: Cell type proportions were found to be impacted by Sstr2 signaling ex vivo with increasing levels of Sstr2 agonist found to decrease photoreceptor proportion and increase primary progenitor proportion. Sstr2 KO was not found to have an impact on cell type proportion in vivo at either P0 or P14. Sstr2 pharmacologic manipulation and Sstr2 KO did produce complementary gene expression changes in neurogenic progenitors indicating that somatostatin signaling downregulates neurogenesis. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a role for somatostatin in retinal development by downregulating neurogenesis in neurogenic progenitors. However, it also demonstrates that somatostatin signaling is dispensable for in vivo retinal development and likely redundant with other cell extrinsic signals released during the same period.

Project description:Photoreceptor disorders are collectively known as retinal degeneration (RD), and include retinitis pigmentosa (RP), cone-rod dystrophy and age related macular degeneration (AMD). These disorders are largely genetic in origin; individual mutations in any one of >200 genes cause RD, making mutation specific therapies prohibitively expensive. A better treatment plan, particularly for late stage disease, may involve stem cell transplants into the photoreceptor or ganglion cell layers of the retina. Stem cells from young mouse retinas can be transplanted, and can form photoreceptors in adult retinas. These cells can be grown in tissue culture, but can no longer form photoreceptors. We have used microarrays to investigate differences in gene expression between cultured retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) that have lost photoreceptor potential, postnatal day 1 (pn1) retinas and the postnatal day 5 (pn5) retinas that contain transplantable photoreceptors. We have also compared FACS sorted Rho-eGFP expressing rod photoreceptors from pn5 retinas with Rho-eGFP negative cells from the same retinas. We have identified over 300 genes upregulated in rod photoreceptor development in multiple comparisons, 37 of which have been previously identified as causative of retinal disease when mutated. It is anticipated that this research should bring us closer to growing photoreceptors in culture and therefore better treatments for RD. This dataset is also a resource for those seeking to identify novel retinopathy genes in RD patients. We extracted whole retinas from postnatal day 1 (Pn1) and postnatal day 5 (Pn5) mice, and compared them with cultured RPCs derived from pn5 retinas, using Affymetrix mouse 430A_2 arrays. We also extracted cells from Rho-eGFP Pn5 retinas and FACS sorted them. GFP+ve cells represent immature rod photoreceptors, as they express the Rho-eGFP fusion protein, which is only expressed in rods. GFP-ve cells represent all other retinal neurons. These samples were amplified and compared using Affymetrix mouse 430A_2arrays, by Source Biosciences GMBH, Berlin, Germany. Results from immature rods were then compared with those from other retinal neurons, while results from whole Pn5 retinas were compared with Pn1 retinas (which don't yet express rod specific genes), and RPCs, which are glial precursors. RPCs were also compared with Pn1 retinas. Genes which showed changed expression profiles in at least 3/4 of comparisons were prioritised for further investigation.

Dataset Information

Molecular characterization of Notch1 positive progenitor cells in the developing retina

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets