Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Multi-angled transcriptome analyses reveal chameleon-like behavior of macrophages in the porcine respiratory tract

ABSTRACT: Macrophages have a pivotal role during viral infections in pigs. By expressing cell surface receptors, macrophages become viral targets and reservoirs. In the case of upper respiratory tract infections, many viruses target the peripheral nasal mucosa. Recent in vivo and in vitro (primary nasal cell cultures) porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) studies demonstrated that several macrophage subsets exist in the porcine nasal mucosa, and that virus strains with different virulence showed altered tropism for these different macrophage populations. To further investigate these macrophage subsets, total RNA sequencing was performed in parallel on two subsets from the nasal mucosa and lung macrophages. Macrophages were isolated by either fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS; cf. bulk RNAseq) or laser capture microdissection (LCM; cf. LCM RNAseq) in combination with immunofluorescence staining against two macrophage markers, CD163 and Sialoadhesin (Sn). With both RNAseq methods, nasal macrophages showed a different transcriptomic profile compared to lung macrophages. Differentially expressed genes were identified in the two subsets of nasal macrophages. Gene set enrichment analysis on the three macrophage populations showed that GO terms and KEGG pathways on LCM RNAseq data were more specific to the spatial location of macrophage subsets than bulk RNAseq data. Cell type signature analysis revealed that nasal CD163+Sn- cells resemble squamous epithelial cells (LCM RNAseq) or antigen presenting cells (bulk RNAseq) while nasal CD163+Sn+ cells are more like fibroblasts/stromal cells (LCM RNAseq) or vascular endothelial cell (bulk RNAseq). Our results confirmed that not only macrophages in different tissues but also macrophages in different areas within the same tissue have different transcriptional programs, suggesting their differential roles in their interaction with pathogens and corresponding immune responses.

INSTRUMENT(S): Illumina MiSeq

ORGANISM(S): Sus scrofa

SUBMITTER: Nick Vereecke

PROVIDER: E-MTAB-12120 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Recent studies suggest the presence of both âclassically activatedâ M1 and âalternatively activatedâ M2 macrophages in human atherosclerotic tissue, yet due to the lack of validated markers the reported localization patterns of these macrophage phenotypes within plaques are ambiguous. In the present study, we searched for markers that indisputably can identify differentiated M1 and M2 macrophages independently of stimuli that affect the activation status of the two subpopulations. We used these validated markers to assess the presence of M1 and M2 macrophages in different zones of human carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques obtained from 12 patients. Using microarray and qPCR technology we show that the frequently used macrophage subpopulation markers MCP-1 and CD206 do not discriminate between M1 and M2 macrophages. However, we confirm the subtype specificity of the classical M2 marker CD163 and we report that the genes INHBA and DSP (both M1) and SEPP1 and MARCKS (both M2) are highly suitable for macrophage phenotyping. mRNA expression of the pan-macrophage marker CD68 in the shoulder zones of the plaques and in adjacent tissue segments correlated positively with mRNA expression levels of SEPP1, MARCKS and CD163 (r=0.86, 0.94 and 0.96, and r= 0.86, 0.98 and 0.69, respectively) but not with the expression of the M1 markers DSP and INHBA. In contrast, mRNA expression of CD68 in the core of the plaques correlated positively with expression of DSP and INHBA (r=0.73 and 0.49) but not with SEPP1, MARCKS and CD163. These findings suggest that M1 macrophages predominate in the core of human carotid atherosclerotic plaques while M2 macrophages prevail at the periphery of the plaque. Keywords: Expression profiling by array Monocytes from healthy volunteers were differentiated into M1 and M2 macrophages by incubation with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), respectively. After 5 days cells were exposed to oxidized LDL. Total RNA was isolated and subjected to gene expression profiling.

Dataset Information

Multi-angled transcriptome analyses reveal chameleon-like behavior of macrophages in the porcine respiratory tract

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets