Effect of Humanin treatment on brain tumor vascular cells
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): NextSeq 500
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
SUBMITTER: Roland Kälin
PROVIDER: E-MTAB-14064 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Similar Datasets
Project description:Gamma delta T cells were sorted from the lungs of 4 female FVB/n mice (labeled wild-type [WT] 1-4) and 4 female mammary tumour-bearing K14-Cre;Brca1F/F;Trp53F/F (KB1P) mice (labeled Tumour 1-4).The sorted cells were loaded onto the Chromium Single Cell 30 Chip Kit v2 (10xGenomics) to generate libraries for scRNAseq, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequencing-ready library was cleaned up with SPRIselect beads (Beckman Coulter, High Wycombe, UK). Quality control of the library was performed prior to sequencing (Qubit, Bioanalyzer, qPCR). Illumina sequencing was performed using NovaSeq S1 by Edinburgh Genomics (University of Edinburgh).
2021-07-12 | E-MTAB-10677 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Sequencing of mRNA from ID8 tumor cells and ID8 tumor cells harvested from ascites of mice 11 weeks after intra peritoneal inoculation show acquisition of cancer stem cell-like features in ascitic tumor cells.
2020-01-06 | E-MTAB-8140 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:RNA sequencing analysis was performed on mouse cell samples. Quality control of total RNA samples after RNA isolation with the Agilent Bioanalyzer revealed acceptable RNA quality for provided samples. Libraries were successfully prepared from these RNA samples using the Illumina TruSeq® Stranded mRNA technology. This approach uses fragmentation and sequencing adapter ligation in combination with a poly-T oligo pulldown. RNA sequencing was performed on the Illumina NextSeq500 next generation sequencing system (Illumina) and its high output mode with two runs of 1x75 bp single-end read chemistry and a high amount of high quality reads was generated.
2024-07-15 | E-MTAB-13225 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Total RNA was extracted using RNAble (Eurobio), then cleaned-up with RNeasy columns (Qiagen), then sequenced. The libraries were prepared following the TruSeq Stranded mRNA protocol (Illumina), starting from 1 μg of high quality total RNA. Paired end (2 × 75 bp) sequencing was performed on an Illumina Nextseq 500 platform(Illumina).
2020-01-13 | E-MTAB-7768 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Small RNA (<100 bases in length) were purified from total RNA using miRNeasy kit (Qiagen), then sequenced. Libraries were prepared at the Genomics Platform of the Cochin Institute, following the TruSeq small RNA protocol (Illumina), starting from 1 µg of high quality total RNA. Single read (1 × 75 bp) sequencing was performed on a Nextseq 500 platform (Illumina). FASTQ sequences were aligned on miRBase v.2052, then counted with STAR (v.2.5.2a). Counts were normalized with DESeq v1.30.0
2020-05-01 | E-MTAB-7969 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Gene expression in histologically normal epithelium from breast cancer patients and cancer-free prophylactic mastectomy patients share a similar profile Introduction: We hypothesized that gene expression in histologically normal epithelium (NlEpi) would differ in breast cancer patients (HN) compared to usual-risk controls undergoing reduction mammoplasty (RM), and that gene expression in NlEpi from cancer-free prophylactic mastectomies from high-risk women (PM), would resemble HN gene expression. Methods: We analyzed gene expression in 73 NlEpi samples microdissected from frozen tissue. In 42 cases, we used Affymetrix HU133A microarrays to compare gene expression in 18 RM vs 18 age-matched HN (9 ER+, 9 ER-) and 6 PM. Data were validated with qPCR in 31 independent NlEpi samples (8 RM, 17 HN, 6 PM). Results: 98 probesets (86 genes) were differentially expressed between RM and HN samples. Perfoming supervised hierarchical analysis with these 98 probesets, PM and HN samples clustered together, away from RM samples. qPCR validation of independent samples was high (84%) and uniform in RM vs HN, and lower (58%), but more heterogeneous, in RM vs PM. The 86 genes were implicated in many processes including transcription and the MAPK pathway. Conclusion: Gene expression differs between NlEpi of cancer cases and controls. The cancer cases' profile can be discerned in high-risk NlEpi. This suggests that the profile is not an effect of the tumor, but may mark increased risk and reveal breast cancer's earliest genomic changes. We determined that 98 probesets significantly differed between reduction mammoplasty and histologically normal epithelium from breast cancer patients. We also found that the histologically normal epithelium from prophylactic mastectomy patients' gene expression was more similar to histologically normal epithelium from breast cancer patients' than to reduction mammoplasty patients' gene expression. These results demonstrate that gene expression differs between NlEpi of cancer cases and controls. The cancer casesâ?? profile can be discerned in high-risk NlEpi. This suggests that the profile is not an effect of the tumor, but may mark increased risk and reveal breast cancer's earliest genomic changes. 42 total laser capture microdissected histologically normal breast tissue samples were analyzed with Affymetrix HU133A microarrays. 36 samples were age-matched between reduction mammoplasty (n=18) and histologically normal epithelial samples from breast cancer patients (n=18; 9ER+, 9ER-). 6 histologically normal epithelial samples from prophylactic mastectomy patients were then compared to data generated from the original 36 sample comparison. Sample numbers correspond to individual patient samples.
2010-06-08 | E-GEOD-20437 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Background: We hypothesize that important genomic differences between breast cancer subtypes occur early in carcinogenesis. Therefore, gene expression might distinguish histologically normal breast epithelium (NlEpi) from breasts containing estrogen receptor positive (ER+) compared with estrogen receptor negative (ER-) cancers. Methods: We examined gene expression in 46 cases of microdissected NlEpi from previously untreated women undergoing breast cancer surgery. From 30 age-matched cases (15 ER+, 15 ER-) we used Affymetryix U133A arrays. From 16 independent cases (9ER+, 7 ER-), we validated seven selected genes using qPCR. We then compared gene expression between NlEpi and invasive breast cancer using 4 publicly available datasets. Results: 216 probes (corresponding to 198 unique genes) distinguished the NlEpi from breasts with ER+ (NlEpiER+) compared to ER- cancers (NlEpiER-). These include genes characteristic of ER+ and ER- cancers themselves, (e.g., ESR1, GATA3, and CX3CL1, FABP7, respectively). QPCR validated the microarray results in both a sampling of the 30 original cases (84%) and all of the 16 independent cases (77%). Gene expression in NlEpiER+ and NlEPIERNlEpiER- resembled gene expression in ER+ and ER- cancers, respectively: 36%-53% of the genes or probes examined in each the 4 external datasets overlapped between NlEpi and the corresponding cancer subtype. Conclusions: Gene expression differs in NlEpi of breasts containing ER+ compared to ER- breast cancers. These differences echo differences in ER+ and ER- invasive cancers. Thus, breast cancer subtypes may be detectable before histologic abnormalities. NlEpi gene expression may help define subtype-specific risk signatures, identify initial subtype specific genomic differences, and suggest new targets for subtype-specific prevention and therapy. We determined that 216 probesets significantly differed between histologically normal epithelium from ER+ breast cancer patients and from ER- breast cancer patients, and that gene expression in each type of histologically normal epithelium resembles expression of the corresponding subtype of invasive breast cancer (i.e., ER+ or ER-). These findings suggest that characteristic features of breast cancer subtypes are detectable prior to any histologic abnormality. This suggestion has implications for understanding breast cancer biology and devising new tools for assessing breast cancer risk. 30 total laser capture microdissected histologically normal breast tissue samples were analyzed with Affymetrix HU133A microarrays. All samples were age-matched between histologically normal epithelial samples from ER+ breast cancer patients (n=15) and histologically normal epithelial samples from ER- breast cancer patients (n=15). Sample numbers correspond to individual patient samples. Of the 4 publicly available datasets mentioned above, the only dataset with a GEO number was GSE3494, corresponding to the Miller dataset. The supplementary file below lists the 251 Samples used from the GSE3494 study. We did not reanalyze the data - there was no change made to the Miller dataset; we only used these data for confirmation of our own dataset.
2010-12-07 | E-GEOD-21947 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:RNA-sequencing samples from DMSO or Reversine treated hTERT RPE-1 cells. Reversine treated cells were further divided in those still able to continue to proliferate and those that got arrested. Cells were analyzed to generate panel in Figure 6d and e, and Extended Data Figure 8g and h.
2023-01-31 | E-MTAB-12537 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Intervention type:DRUG. Intervention1:Huaier, Dose form:GRANULES, Route of administration:ORAL, intended dose regimen:20 to 60/day by either bulk or split for 3 months to extended term if necessary. Control intervention1:None.
Primary outcome(s): For mRNA libraries, focus on mRNA studies. Data analysis includes sequencing data processing and basic sequencing data quality control, prediction of new transcripts, differential expression analysis of genes. Gene Ontology (GO) and the KEGG pathway database are used for annotation and enrichment analysis of up-regulated genes and down-regulated genes.
For small RNA libraries, data analysis includes sequencing data process and sequencing data process QC, small RNA distribution across the genome, rRNA, tRNA, alignment with snRNA and snoRNA, construction of known miRNA expression pattern, prediction New miRNA and Study of their secondary structure Based on the expression pattern of miRNA, we perform not only GO / KEGG annotation and enrichment, but also different expression analysis.. Timepoint:RNA sequencing of 240 blood samples of 80 cases and its analysis, scheduled from June 30, 2022..
| 2612481 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:We performed single-cell RNA-seq of full, microdissected and dissociated mouse amygdala, 2h, 8h or 24h after tone-cued fear conditioning (CFC), and 2h after recall (exposure to CS only, 24h post-CFC), and naive homecage controls.
2023-01-01 | E-MTAB-12096 | biostudies-arrayexpress