Allostatic load and cardiovascular outcomes in males with prostate cancer.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in men with prostate cancer (PC). Accumulated stress plays an important role in CVD development. The cumulative burden of chronic stress and life events can be measured using allostatic load (AL).Methods
The initial cohort included males aged 18 years and older diagnosed with PC (2005-2019). AL was modeled as an ordinal variable (0-11). Fine-Gray competing risk regressions measured the impact of precancer diagnosis AL and postdiagnosis AL in 2-year major cardiac events (MACE). The effect of AL changes over time on MACE development was calculated via piecewise Cox regression (before, and 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year after PC diagnosis).Results
We included 5261 PC patients of which 6.6% had a 2-year MACE. For every 1-point increase in AL before and within 60 days after PC diagnosis, the risk of MACE increased 25% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] =1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18 to 1.33) and 27% (aHR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.35), respectively. Using AL as a time-varying exposure, the risk of MACE increased 19% (aHR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.27), 22% (aHR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.33), 28% (aHR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.23 to 1.33), and 31% (aHR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.35) for every 1-point increase in AL before, 2 months after, 6 months after, and 1 year after PC diagnosis, respectively.Conclusion
AL and its changes over time are associated with MACE in PC patients, suggesting a role of a biological measure of stress as a marker of CVD risk among men with PC.
SUBMITTER: Stabellini N
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10005613 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Allostatic load and cardiovascular outcomes in males with prostate cancer.
Stabellini Nickolas N Cullen Jennifer J Bittencourt Marcio S MS Moore Justin X JX Cao Lifen L Weintraub Neal L NL Harris Ryan A RA Wang Xiaoling X Datta Biplab B Coughlin Steven S SS Garcia Jorge J Shanahan John J Hamerschlak Nelson N Waite Kristin K Fillmore Nathanael R NR Terris Martha M Montero Alberto J AJ Barnholtz-Sloan Jill S JS Guha Avirup A
JNCI cancer spectrum 20230301 2
<h4>Background</h4>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in men with prostate cancer (PC). Accumulated stress plays an important role in CVD development. The cumulative burden of chronic stress and life events can be measured using allostatic load (AL).<h4>Methods</h4>The initial cohort included males aged 18 years and older diagnosed with PC (2005-2019). AL was modeled as an ordinal variable (0-11). Fine-Gray competing risk regressions measured the impact of precancer diagn ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Objective:To examine the relationships between resiliency, sociodemographic factors, and allostatic load among male Veterans. Design/Study Participants:Cross-sectional study with minority (African American or Hispanic) and non-minority (White) male Veterans undergoing prostate biopsy. Setting:Veterans Affairs Medical Center located in Charleston, SC. Main Outcome Measures:Self-reported resilience measured using the two item sub-scale from the Connor-Davidson Resiliency Scale and allostatic load determined from biomarkers measured in blood. Results:In this small sample, bounce-back resilience and allostatic load level had a significant negative correlation, while adaptation resilience and allostatic load were slightly correlated, but the association was not statistically significant. Sixty-six percent of participants reported that they were able to adapt and 40% reported they were able to bounce back. Higher income and lower PSA level were significantly correlated with greater adaptation resilience. Minority men were significantly more likely than non-minority men to report that they are able to bounce back. Married men were also significantly more likely than unmarried men to report that they were able to bounce back. Conclusion:It may be important to target resiliency training programs to Veterans based on their social determinants and to examine the effects of these programs on allostatic load.
| S-EPMC7138440 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo assess the association between allostatic load, as an estimate of chronic stress, and adverse pregnancy outcomes.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of nuMoM2b (Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be), a prospective observational cohort study. Our primary exposure was dichotomous high allostatic load in the first trimester, defined as 4 or more of 12 biomarkers in the "worst" quartile. The primary outcome was a composite adverse pregnancy outcome: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), and stillbirth. Secondary outcomes included components of the composite. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test the association between high allostatic load and adverse pregnancy outcomes, adjusted for potential confounders. Mediation and moderation analyses were conducted to assess the role of allostatic load along the causal pathway between racial disparities and adverse pregnancy outcomes.ResultsAmong 4,266 individuals, 34.7% had a high allostatic load. Composite adverse pregnancy outcome occurred in 1,171 (27.5%): 14.0% HDP, 8.6% preterm birth (48.0% spontaneous and 52.2% indicated), 11.0% SGA, and 0.3% stillbirth. After adjustment for maternal age, gravidity, smoking, bleeding in the first trimester, and health insurance, high allostatic load was significantly associated with a composite adverse pregnancy outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.5, 95% CI 1.3, 1.7) and HDP (aOR 2.5, 95% CI 2.0-2.9), but not preterm birth or SGA. High allostatic load partially mediated the association between self-reported race and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The association between allostatic load and HDP differed by self-reported race, but not for a composite adverse pregnancy outcome, preterm birth, or SGA.ConclusionHigh allostatic load in the first trimester is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly HDP. Allostatic load was a partial mediator between race and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The association between allostatic load and HDP differed by self-reported race.
| S-EPMC9712159 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Allostatic load (AL) is a biomarker of chronic stress associated with various chronic diseases. No study has evaluated the relationship between AL and lung cancer risk. Methods: To address this gap, we analyzed the association between AL and the development of lung cancer in 344,380 participants from the UK Biobank. Results: During the follow-up period from 2006 to 2020, 2517 participants were diagnosed with incident lung cancer. Participants who developed lung cancer had significantly higher AL compared to cancer-free controls (mean: 3.49 vs. 2.87, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, a marginally significant association was observed between higher AL and increased lung cancer risk (per one AL unit: Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.02, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.99, 1.04). In the categorical analysis, individuals with high AL (AL > 2) had a 15% higher risk of lung cancer compared to those with low AL (AL ≤ 2) (HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.25). Stratified analyses revealed that this increased risk was only observed in former (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.43) and current smokers (HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.42) but not in never-smokers (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.74, 1.17). Moreover, we found that demographics, socioeconomics, and other health behaviors could modify the risk association. Finally, among cigarette smoking-related variables, a significant trend of increasing AL was observed with higher pack-years, longer smoking duration, earlier age of smoking initiation, and later age of smoking cessation. Conclusions: These findings suggest that higher AL is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. The results need to be further confirmed in additional studies.
| S-EPMC11429585 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIndividuals with cancer experience stress throughout the cancer trajectory. Allostatic load (AL), a cumulative multi-system measure, may have a greater value in stress assessment and the associated biological burden than individual biomarkers. A better understanding of the use of AL and its operationalization in cancer could aid in early detection and prevention or alleviation of AL in this population.PurposeTo consolidate findings on the operationalization, antecedents, and outcomes of AL in cancer.MethodsSeven databases (CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched for articles published through April 2020. The NIH tools were used to assess study quality.ResultsTwelve studies met inclusion criteria for this review. Although variability existed in the estimation of AL, biomarkers of cardiovascular, metabolic, and immune systems were mostly used. Associations of AL with cancer-specific variables were examined mostly utilizing population-databases. Significant associations of AL with variables such as cancer-related stress, positive cancer history, post traumatic growth, resilience, tumor pathology, and cancer-specific mortality were found. Mini meta-analysis found that a one-unit increase in AL was associated with a 9% increased risk of cancer-specific mortality.ConclusionThis review reveals heterogeneity in operationalization of AL in cancer research and lack of clarity regarding causal direction between AL and cancer. Nevertheless, AL holds a significant promise in cancer research and practice. AL could be included as a screening tool for high-risk individuals or a health outcome in cancer. Optimal standardized approaches to measure AL would improve its clinical utility.
| S-EPMC8755951 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAllostatic load (AL) reflects the collective load of chronic stress during lifetime. Previous studies have shown that higher AL is associated with poor clinical outcomes among breast cancer patients. However, the relationship between AL and breast cancer risk is still unclear.MethodsTo fill the gap, we analyzed the association between AL and the development of breast cancer in 181,455 women identified from the UK Biobank.ResultsDuring the follow-up from 2006 to 2020, 5,701 women were diagnosed with incident breast cancer. Significantly higher AL was observed among incident breast cancer cases than all study participants (mean: 2.77 vs. 2.63, P < 0.01). Univariate Cox regression analysis indicated the risk of breast cancer was increased by 5% per one AL unit increase (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04, 1.07). In multivariate analyses, after adjusting demographics, family history of breast cancer, reproductive factors, socioeconomic status, lifestyle factors, and breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS), the significant association remained (HR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.03, 1.07). The significant relationship was further confirmed in the categorical analysis. Compared with women in the low AL group (AL: 0 ~ 2), those in the high AL group (AL: 3 ~ 11) had a 1.17-fold increased risk of breast cancer (HR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.11, 1.24). Finally, in the stratified analysis, joint effects on the risk of breast cancer were observed between the AL and selected known breast cancer risk factors, including age, family history of breast cancer, PRS, income, physical activity, and alcohol consumption.ConclusionIn summary, those findings have demonstrated that higher AL was associated with an increased breast cancer risk in women. This association is likely independent of known breast cancer risk factors. Thus, the AL could be a valuable biomarker to help breast cancer risk prediction and stratification.
| S-EPMC10729373 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Military personnel experience decrements in physical fitness and psychological well-being during training that may be attributed to allostatic load. This investigation examined the association between allostatic load measured by the allostatic load index (ALI) and physical performance and psychological responses in personnel undergoing a 10-week training course. Thirty-one participants (14 women) provided biochemical, questionnaire (perceived stress appraisal (PSS), sleep difficulty (SD), resilience (CD-RISC-25), and Physical Fitness Test (PFT; three-mile run [3MR], pullups, Run-Row PFT score, Push-Pull PFT score, Crunches-Plank PFT score, and total PFT score)) data before and after training. ALI (0-8) was calculated using biomarker components from neuroendocrine, autonomic, and immune systems. Simple linear regression analysis assessed the association between change (Δ) in ALI and responses. Backward stepwise regression identified components associated with responses (α = 0.05). In men, ΔALI was associated with Δpullups (β = -0.88, p = 0.015), Δpush-pull PFT score (β = -2.87, p = 0.013), Δtotal PFT score (β = -3.48, p = 0.007), and ΔSD (β = -0.56, p = 0.046) with immune components explaining relationships. In women, ΔALI was associated with ΔSD (β = -1.25, p < 0.001) and ΔCD-RISC-25 (β = 2.65, p = 0.025) with no component explaining relationships. Increased ALI is associated with worsened physical performance in men and improved psychological outcomes in women, highlighting potential sex-specific responses to increased allostatic load during training.
| S-EPMC11923871 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Elevated chronic stress is thought to increase cancer risk, though the results so far have been inconsistent. In this study, we assessed the relationship between allostatic load (AL), a biological indicator of chronic stress, and overall cancer risk in 3015 women who participated in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Based on the distribution of AL, the study population was categorized into four groups, from the lowest (1st category) to the highest AL group (4th category). At baseline, African American and Hispanic women were more likely to be in the higher AL categories than White women (p < 0.001). In addition, women who smoked regularly, drank alcohol regularly, had no leisure physical activity, and had restless sleep were also more likely to be in the higher AL categories than their relative counterparts (p < 0.001). We also observed that women in the lower-income category with no health insurance were more likely to be in the higher AL category (p < 0.001). The study then found that women in the 4th category of AL (the highest AL group) had a 1.64-fold increased risk of overall cancer (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04, 2.59). The risk association was further strengthened after adjusting demographics, healthy behaviors, and socioeconomic factors with an HR of 2.08. In further analysis of individual biomarkers of AL score, we found that higher levels of triglyceride and CRP were associated with increased risk of cancer, highlighting the role of metabolic dysfunction and inflammation in the etiology of cancer development. In summary, we report that higher AL is associated with increased cancer risk.
| S-EPMC9264860 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionObesity and proinflammatory conditions are associated with increased risks of cancer. The associations of baseline allostatic load with cancer mortality and whether this association is modified by body mass index (BMI) were examined.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed in March-September 2022 using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey years 1988 through 2010 linked with the National Death Index through December 31, 2019. Fine and Gray Cox proportional hazard models were stratified by BMI status to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios of cancer death between high and low allostatic load status (adjusted for age, sociodemographics, and health factors).ResultsIn fully adjusted models, high allostatic load was associated with a 23% increased risk of cancer death (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio=1.23; 95% CI=1.06, 1.43) among all participants, a 3% increased risk of cancer death (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio=1.03; 95% CI=0.78, 1.34) among underweight/healthy weight adults, a 31% increased risk of cancer death (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio=1.31; 95% CI=1.02, 1.67) among overweight adults, and a 39% increased risk of death (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio=1.39; 95% CI=1.04, 1.88) among obese adults, when compared to those with low allostatic load.ConclusionsThe risk of cancer death is highest among those with high allostatic load and obese BMI, but this effect was attenuated among those with high allostatic load and underweight/healthy or overweight BMI.
| S-EPMC10440242 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceHealth disparities among racial and ethnic minoritized populations, particularly for cancer mortality rates, remain a major public health concern. Men from underrepresented backgrounds (Black and Hispanic men, specifically) face the pervasive effects of discrimination in their daily lives, which also contribute to the complex associations among allostatic load (a marker of chronic stress), educational opportunities, and elevated risks of cancer mortality.ObjectiveTo elucidate the associations among educational attainment, allostatic load, and cancer mortality risk among men.Design, setting, and participantsThis is a retrospective cohort analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative sample of approximately 5000 people across the US, from 1988 to 2010 linked with data from the National Death Index, which served as follow-up data for the cohort and was available through December 31, 2019. Participants included men aged 18 years and older. Data were analyzed from June to October 2024.ExposureAllostatic load data were stratified by educational attainment levels, categorized as (1) less than high school education and (2) high school graduate and above. Allostatic load score was calculated as the sum of total abnormal biomarkers and health measures (9 total). Participants were considered to have high allostatic load if their score was 3 or more.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was cancer death. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of cancer death between educational attainment and allostatic load (adjusted for age, income, and smoking status).ResultsAmong all 20 529 men (mean [SE] age, 41.00 [0.22] years), those with high AL and less than high school educational attainment had a greater than 4-fold increased risk of cancer mortality (unadjusted HR, 4.71; 95% CI, 3.36-6.60) compared with those with low allostatic load and a college degree or higher. Similarly, both Black men (HR, 4.19; 95% CI, 2.09-8.40) and White men (HR, 5.77; 95% CI, 4.06-8.20) with high allostatic load and less than high school educational attainment had higher risks for cancer death compared with race-specific counterparts with college education and low allostatic load. After adjustments for age, poverty-to-income ratio, smoking status, history of cancer, and ever congestive heart failure and heart attack, the associations were attenuated, but all men (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.15-2.47) and White men (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.16-2.85) still had greater than 50% increased risk of cancer death compared with men with college education and low allostatic load.Conclusions and relevanceThis study highlights the detrimental association of not attaining a high school degree, combined with high allostatic load as a marker of chronic stress, with cancer mortality. Efforts to promote educational attainment and address the underlying social determinants of health are imperative in reducing cancer disparities in this population.
| S-EPMC11632542 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPrevention of hearing loss via addressing potentially modifiable risk factors may offer means of reducing the global burden of hearing loss. Prior studies reported associations between individual markers of inflammation and risk of hearing impairment. Allostatic load is an index of cumulative physiological stressors, including inflammation, to multiple biological systems. Our aims were to investigate associations between allostatic load and both audiometric and self-reported hearing impairment and examine whether associations are stronger over time due to prolonged high allostatic load.MethodsData were taken from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), a nationally representative study of people aged 50+ living in England over 3 time points between 2008 and 2014. Allostatic load score was comprised of thirteen different measures available at baseline and 4 years post-baseline (high-density lipoprotein/total cholesterol, triglyceride, fibrinogen, haemoglobin A1c, C-reactive protein, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, resting pulse rate, peak expiratory flow, BMI and waist circumference), measured using clinical cut-off points for normal biomarker parameters. Hearing acuity was measured with a simple handheld tone-producing device at follow-up 7 years post-baseline, while self-reported hearing impairment was measured at time point.ResultsWe included samples of 4373 and 4430 for the cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis, respectively. In the cross-sectional model high allostatic load was associated both self-reported (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.0,1.1; p < 0.01) and objective hearing loss (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.1,1.2; p < 0.001) adjusting for age and sex. Cross-sectional associations between allostatic load and hearing were not significant after further adjustment for covariates (qualification, physical activity and smoking).In longitudinal modelling, high allostatic load was associated with both audiometric (Z score OR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.1,1.2; p < 0.001) and self-reported hearing impairment (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.0,1.1; p < 0.001) adjusting for age and sex. Allostatic load was no longer associated with self-reported hearing loss but the association with audiometric hearing impairment (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.03,1.13; p < 0.001) remained following additional adjustment for baseline self-reported hearing, education, physical activity, and smoking.ConclusionsProlonged high allostatic load was associated with risk of hearing impairment. Reducing allostatic load via healthy lifestyle changes including non-smoking, healthy diet and exercise may offer an opportunity to reduce the risk of hearing impairment in later life.
| S-EPMC9429496 | biostudies-literature