Pyrotinib plus capecitabine could significantly improve overall survival in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Guan X
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10025258 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundPyrotinib, a novel irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated promising antitumor activity to improve the overall response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the survival data of pyrotinib or pyrotinib plus capecitabine in HER2-positive MBC remains scarce. Thus, we summarized the updated individual patient data from the phase I trials of pyrotinib or pyrotinib plus capecitabine, to provide a cumulative assessment on long-term outcomes and associated biomarker analysis of irreversible TKIs in HER2-positive MBC patients.MethodsWe performed a pooled analysis of the phase I trials for pyrotinib or pyrotinib plus capecitabine based on the updated survival data from individual patients. Next-generation sequencing was performed on circulating tumor DNA for predictive biomarkers.ResultsA total of 66 patients were enrolled, including 38 patients from the phase Ib trial for pyrotinib and 28 patients from the phase Ic trial for pyrotinib plus capecitabine. The median follow-up duration was 84.2 months (95% CI: 74.7-93.7 months). The estimated median PFS in the entire cohort was 9.2 months (95% CI: 5.4-12.9 months) and median OS was 31.0 months (95% CI: 16.5-45.5 months). The median PFS was 8.2 months in the pyrotinib monotherapy cohort and 22.1 months in the pyrotinib plus capecitabine group, while the median OS was 27.1 months in the pyrotinib monotherapy group and 37.4 months in the pyrotinib plus capecitabine group. Biomarker analysis suggested that the patients harbored concomitant mutations from multiple pathways in HER2-related signaling network (HER2 bypass signaling pathways, PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and TP53) were observed with significantly poorer PFS and OS when compared to those with none or one genetic alteration (median PFS, 7.3 vs. 26.1 months, P = 0.003; median OS, 25.1 vs. 48.0 months, P = 0.013).ConclusionsThe updated survival results based on individual patient data from the phase I trials of pyrotinib-based regimen revealed promising PFS and OS in HER2-positive MBC. Concomitant mutations from multiple pathways in HER2-related signaling network may be a potential efficacy and prognosis biomarker for pyrotinib in HER2-positive MBC.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT01937689, NCT02361112).
| S-EPMC9940415 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe phase 2 PERMEATE study has shown the antitumor activity and safety of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases. In this report, survival results were updated with extended follow-up.MethodsBetween January 29, 2019 and July 10, 2020, adult patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who had radiotherapy-naïve brain metastases (cohort A, n = 59) or progressive disease after radiotherapy (cohort B, n = 19) were enrolled and received pyrotinib (400 mg once daily) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Secondary endpoints progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were updated, and post-hoc central nervous system (CNS)-PFS was analyzed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03691051).FindingsAs of February 2, 2023, the median follow-up duration was 30.9 months (interquartile range, 16.1-39.8). Median PFS was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6-14.6) in cohort A and 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.4-11.5) in cohort B. Median OS was 35.9 months (95% CI, 24.4-not reached) in cohort A and 30.6 months (95% CI, 12.6-33.3) in cohort B. Median CNS-PFS was 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.0-15.8) in cohort A and 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.4-11.5) in cohort B. Median OS was 34.1 months (95% CI, 21.7-not reached) for 14 patients with intracranial progression only in cohort A who restarted pyrotinib plus capecitabine after local radiotherapy.InterpretationThese data support further validation in a randomized controlled trial for the assessment of pyrotinib in combination with capecitabine as systemic therapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases.FundingNational Cancer Center Climbing Foundation Key Project of China, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals.
| S-EPMC11458988 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) gene is present in 20~25% of breast cancer (BC) patients, contributing to an inferior prognosis. Recent clinical trials showed that pyrotinib has promising antitumor activities and acceptable tolerability for those patients (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03080805 and NCT02422199). Therefore, this study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of pyrotinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine for patients with HER2-positive metastatic BC after prior trastuzumab.MethodsA lifetime-partitioned survival model was established to evaluate health and economic outcomes with different treatment strategies. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Data were derived from the published literature, clinical trials, expert opinions, and other local charges. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Scenario analyses were developed to make further evaluations.ResultsThe pyrotinib regimen had significant advantages over the lapatinib regimen after enrolling in the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL), with cost savings of USD 15,599.27 and a gain of 0.53 QALYs. Meanwhile, before enrolling in NRDL, the pyrotinib regimen afforded the same QALYs at a higher incremental cost of USD 45,400.64 versus the lapatinib regimen, producing an ICER of USD 85,944.79 per QALY. Scenario analyses yielded similar results. Sensitivity analyses suggested stability in the cost-effectiveness findings.ConclusionsCompared to lapatinib plus capecitabine, the pyrotinib plus capecitabine enrolled in NRDL is a cost-effective alternative second-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive metastatic BC in China.
| S-EPMC9497482 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeNALA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01808573) is a randomized, active-controlled, phase III trial comparing neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), plus capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib, a reversible dual TKI, plus capecitabine (L+C) in patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with ≥ 2 previous HER2-directed MBC regimens.MethodsPatients, including those with stable, asymptomatic CNS disease, were randomly assigned 1:1 to neratinib (240 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (750 mg/m2 twice a day 14 d/21 d) with loperamide prophylaxis, or to lapatinib (1,250 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice a day 14 d/21 d). Coprimary end points were centrally confirmed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). NALA was considered positive if either primary end point was met (α split between end points). Secondary end points were time to CNS disease intervention, investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).ResultsA total of 621 patients from 28 countries were randomly assigned (N+C, n = 307; L+C, n = 314). Centrally reviewed PFS was improved with N+C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.93; stratified log-rank P = .0059). The OS HR was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.07; P = .2098). Fewer interventions for CNS disease occurred with N+C versus L+C (cumulative incidence, 22.8% v 29.2%; P = .043). ORRs were N+C 32.8% (95% CI, 27.1 to 38.9) and L+C 26.7% (95% CI, 21.5 to 32.4; P = .1201); median DoR was 8.5 versus 5.6 months, respectively (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74; P = .0004). The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (N+C 83% v L+C 66%) and nausea (53% v 42%). Discontinuation rates and HRQoL were similar between groups.ConclusionN+C significantly improved PFS and time to intervention for CNS disease versus L+C. No new N+C safety signals were observed.
| S-EPMC7499616 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPatients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer and primary resistance to trastuzumab have a poor clinical outcome and lack good evidence to inform clinical decision. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in this population.MethodsThis phase 2 trial was conducted at 16 sites in China. Patients received oral pyrotinib 400 mg once daily and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsBetween June 2019 and September 2021, 100 patients were enrolled with a median age of 51 years (range, 24-69). All patients had been treated with trastuzumab and 21 (21.0%) patients had prior use of pertuzumab. As of August 31, 2022, the median follow-up duration was 20.1 months (range, 1.3-38.2). The median PFS was 11.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-15.1), which crossed the pre-specified efficacy boundary of 8.0 months. The objective response rate was 70.0% (70/100), with a median duration of response of 13.8 months (95% CI, 10.2-19.3). The disease control rate was 87.0% (87/100). The median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea (24 [24.0%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred.ConclusionsPyrotinib plus capecitabine can be considered to be a treatment option in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients who have shown primary resistance to trastuzumab. Even in the era of modern anti-HER2 treatments, this clinical setting warrants more investigations to meet unmet needs.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04001621. Retrospectively registered on June 28, 2019.
| S-EPMC10410905 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This pooled analysis explored the possibility and potential of pyrotinib plus capecitabine as a first-line regimen in relapsed or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients who received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab and discussed the potential treatment options for these patients, especially for the patients relapsed during or within 6 months after adjuvant trastuzumab.
| S-EPMC10686177 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveNeratinib plus capecitabine (Ner+Cap) were proved to be clinically beneficial as a third-line treatment for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Ner+Cap from the Chinese healthcare perspective.DesignA three-state Markov simulation model was performed based on the results of NALA trial. The utilities of health state and disutilities of adverse events were derived from the published literature. Direct costs of anticancer agents, drug administration, routine follow-up and serious adverse events management were calculated in the model. Uncertainty was evaluated through univariate and probability sensitivity analysis.ParticipantsPatients with confirmed HER2-positive MBC who previously received at least two HER2-targeted treatments and were aged ≥18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1. A total of 621 patients were enrolled in the NALA trial.InterventionsThird-line treatment with Ner+Cap or lapatinib plus capecitabine (Lap+Cap).Main outcome measuresThe primary health outcomes of the model were costs, expected life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).ResultsWhen compared with Lap+Cap, Ner+Cap provided an additional 0.431 LYs and 0.339 QALYs, and increased the cost by $4299.2. The corresponding ICERs were 9970.1/LY and $12 670.2/QALY. Univariate sensitivity analyses suggested that the results were generally robust. Besides, Ner+Cap had a 100% probability of being cost-effective according to probabilistic sensitivity analysis.ConclusionsNer+Cap was likely to be a cost-effective regimen as the third-line therapy for women with HER2-positive MBC at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $37 653.0/QALY in China.
| S-EPMC9667994 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo analyze the safety and efficacy of orally administered metronomic capecitabine plus pyrotinib in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, we conducted a prospective phase II study with a single-arm design.MethodsHER2 positive patients received oral metronomic capecitabine 500 mg three times a day and pyrotinib 400 mg per day. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Other endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and safety.ResultsThe study included 50 patients with MBC that was HER2-positive, while 1 patient was excluded due to nonstandard medication. The median PFS and OS was 11.9 months (95%CI 8.8-14.6) and 29.3 months (95%CI 24.4-34.8) respectively. ORR was 34.7%, and CBR was 81.6% with 2 CR (4.1%), 15 PR (30.6%) and 23 SD (46.9%). The mPFS in first- or second-line treatment was 12.2 months. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events included hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, vomiting and nausea. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 15(30.6%) patients, including hand-foot syndrome (12.2%), diarrhea (12.2%), vomiting (4.1%), and nausea (2.0%). 1 grade 4 adverse event of diarrhea (2.0%) was observed.ConclusionThe combination of metronomic capecitabine and pyrotinib is a promising regimen with competitive efficacy and improved tolerability in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients.
| S-EPMC10520922 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10721794 | biostudies-literature
Project description:(1) Background: recent evidence suggests that long low-dose capecitabine regimens have a synergistic effect with endocrine therapy as aromatase inhibitors (AIs), and might increase overall survival for hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer compared to both treatments. We performed a retrospective study to confirm the efficacy and expand the safety data for capecitabine plus AI (a combination henceforth named XELIA) for this indication. (2) We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 163 hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who received either the XELIA regimen, capecitabine, or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as single agents in first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival, best objective response, and toxicity incidence. (3) Results: the median progression-free survival for patients receiving XELIA, AI, and capecitabine was 29.37 months (20.91 to 37.84; 95% CI), 20.04 months (7.29 to 32.80; 95% CI) and 10.48 (8.69 to 12.28; 95% CI), respectively. The overall response rate was higher in the XELIA group (29.5%) than in the AI (14.3%) and capecitabine (9.1%) groups. However, the differences in overall survival were not statistically significant. Apart from hand-foot syndrome, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse events between the groups. (4) Conclusions: this retrospective study suggests that progression-free survival and overall response rates improved with the XELIA regimen compared to use of aromatase inhibitors and capecitabine alone. Combined use demonstrated an adequate safety profile and might represent an advantageous treatment in places where CDK 4/6 is not available. Larger studies and randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the effects shown in our study.
| S-EPMC10377785 | biostudies-literature