The dilemma of selecting a first line CDK4/6 inhibitor for hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Grinshpun A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10033931 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
The dilemma of selecting a first line CDK4/6 inhibitor for hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Grinshpun Albert A Tolaney Sara M SM Burstein Harold J HJ Jeselsohn Rinath R Mayer Erica L EL
NPJ breast cancer 20230322 1
Similar Datasets
Project description:(1) Background: recent evidence suggests that long low-dose capecitabine regimens have a synergistic effect with endocrine therapy as aromatase inhibitors (AIs), and might increase overall survival for hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer compared to both treatments. We performed a retrospective study to confirm the efficacy and expand the safety data for capecitabine plus AI (a combination henceforth named XELIA) for this indication. (2) We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 163 hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who received either the XELIA regimen, capecitabine, or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as single agents in first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival, best objective response, and toxicity incidence. (3) Results: the median progression-free survival for patients receiving XELIA, AI, and capecitabine was 29.37 months (20.91 to 37.84; 95% CI), 20.04 months (7.29 to 32.80; 95% CI) and 10.48 (8.69 to 12.28; 95% CI), respectively. The overall response rate was higher in the XELIA group (29.5%) than in the AI (14.3%) and capecitabine (9.1%) groups. However, the differences in overall survival were not statistically significant. Apart from hand-foot syndrome, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse events between the groups. (4) Conclusions: this retrospective study suggests that progression-free survival and overall response rates improved with the XELIA regimen compared to use of aromatase inhibitors and capecitabine alone. Combined use demonstrated an adequate safety profile and might represent an advantageous treatment in places where CDK 4/6 is not available. Larger studies and randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the effects shown in our study.
| S-EPMC10377785 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThis phase II study evaluated the impact of adding ribociclib to maintenance endocrine therapy (ET) treatment of physicians' choice following the first palliative chemotherapy in pre- and post-menopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC).Patients and methodsThe initial randomized study design was later amended into a single-arm study, and all subsequent patients received ribociclib and ET. The primary end point was locally assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), safety, compliance, and quality of life (QoL).ResultsA total of 43 patients received ribociclib + ET and 10 patients received ET only. Median PFS was 12.4 months [95% CI 8.7-24.4] for patients who received ribociclib + ET and 4.75 months [95% CI 1.0-10.3] for those who received ET only. Median OS was not reached for patients who received ribociclib + ET, and 28 (65.1%) patients experienced clinical benefit [95% CI 49.1-79.0]. For patients who received ribociclib + ET, grade 3-4 hematological adverse events (AEs) occurred in 25 (58.1%) patients, and grade 3-4 non-hematological AEs occurred in 17 (39.5%) patients. During the study, 15 patients died - 14 of whom due to tumor-related reasons, and one patient due to pneumonia, which was not treatment-related.ConclusionThe results of the AMICA study show a promising efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with ribociclib added to ET after at least stable disease following the first metastatic chemotherapy in patients with HR+/HER2-mBC.Trial registrationAnti-hormonal Therapy With Ribociclib in HR-positive/HER2- Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (AMICA), NCT03555877, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03555877.
| S-EPMC10507224 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceEndocrine therapy (ET) combined with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) agents is the standard first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-negative metastatic breast cancer. However, optimal therapy after tumor progression to ET plus CDK4/6i remains unclear.ObjectiveTo evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the clinical practice setting in patients with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer following progression with ET plus CDK4/6i.Design, setting, and participantsThe multicenter retrospective cohort study included 506 patients diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer between April 22, 2015, and January 31, 2023, and who received ET-based or chemotherapy (CT)-based treatment following progression during ET plus CDK4/6i. Outcomes were analyzed based on treatment type, clinicopathologic features, and the duration of prior CDK4/6i therapy.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was PFS in the clinical practice setting, defined as the time between the initiation of the first systemic treatment on tumor progression to ET plus CDK4/6i treatment and the detection of disease progression or patient death from any cause. The secondary end point was OS in the clinical practice setting, defined as the time interval between tumor progression during ET plus CDK4/6i treatment and patient death from any cause.ResultsIn 506 women (median age at diagnosis, 52.4 [IQR, 44.6-62.8] years) diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer progressing during ET plus CDK4/6i, independent factors associated with poorer PFS outcomes were visceral metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.17-1.80; P = .008) and de novo metastatic disease (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.54; P = .04). A longer duration of CDK4/6i therapy (OS HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41-0.73; P < .001) and an older age (PFS HR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.98-1.00; P = .03) were associated with better outcomes. Compared with oral CT, both intravenous CT- and ET-based treatments were associated with shorter PFS (intravenous CT: hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11-1.89; P = .006; everolimus plus exemestane: HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.78; P = .02; ET only: HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.05-1.89; P = .02). A duration of CDK4/6i treatment exceeding 12 months was associated with longer OS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41-0.73; P < .001). Among patients with visceral metastases, intravenous CT was associated with shorter OS compared with oral CT (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.03-2.24; P = .04).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, the duration of tumor control achieved with CDK4/6i-based therapy and the presence of visceral metastases emerged as key factors that may affect treatment decision. Oral CT may offer potential benefits for specific patient subgroups.
| S-EPMC11846014 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are the standard of care for hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy. However, the real-world efficacy and safety of standard versus reduced doses in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of standard versus reduced doses of CDK4/6 inhibitors in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 158 patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed with HR+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who received either standard or reduced doses of CDK4/6 inhibitors (Ademaciclib, Ribociclib, Palbociclib) as first-line therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons between groups were performed using a log-rank test. Results: Of the total population, 108 patients (68.4%) received the standard dose, and 50 patients (31.6%) received a reduced dose. The standard-dose group had significantly longer median PFS compared to the reduced-dose group (21.3 vs. 15.2 months, p = 0.014), while the median OS did not differ significantly (37.2 vs. 37.2 months, p = 0.103). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in PFS or OS between standard and reduced doses for Ademaciclib and Ribociclib, while Palbociclib at standard dose showed superior PFS (21.9 vs. 12.7 months, p = 0.029) and OS (50.5 vs. 28.6 months, p = 0.026). The incidence of Grade 2-4 AEs was higher in the standard-dose group (74.2% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.044). Conclusions: Dose reduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors, particularly Ademaciclib and Ribociclib, is a viable option in elderly patients, maintaining comparable OS outcomes to standard dosing while reducing the risk of adverse events. Palbociclib at standard dose may offer superior outcomes. These findings support personalized dosing strategies to optimize efficacy and tolerability in frail or elderly patients.
| S-EPMC11641986 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The development of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors has been more prominent in hormone receptor (HR)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers, with a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in first and later lines of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) therapy. Preclinical evidence suggests that there is activity of CDK4/6 inhibitors in nonluminal cell lines. Here, we present a review of the current preclinical and clinical data on the use of CDK inhibitors in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
| S-EPMC6299331 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5017548 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Estrogen receptor modulators and estrogen deprivation have become standards of care for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. However, after traditional first-line endocrine monotherapy treatment, the disease typically progresses despite the initial high rate of clinical benefit. Multiple studies have aimed at optimizing treatment strategies to improve upon clinical benefit beyond the traditional single-agent endocrine treatment. With the availability of new data and novel therapies, the clinical practice challenge becomes how best to define the optimal treatment sequence to maximize clinical benefit. In this review, we present treatment options clinically relevant to the management of hormone-positive, her2-negative metastatic breast cancer, and we propose a treatment algorithm based on the current literature.
| S-EPMC6001771 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeClinical biomarkers to identify patients unlikely to benefit from CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) are lacking. We implemented a comprehensive circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis to identify genomic features for predicting and monitoring treatment resistance.Experimental designctDNA was isolated from 216 plasma samples collected from 51 patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) on a phase II trial of palbociclib combined with letrozole or fulvestrant (NCT03007979). Boosted whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed at baseline and clinical progression to evaluate genomic alterations, mutational signatures, and blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB). Low-pass whole-genome sequencing was performed at baseline and serial timepoints to assess blood copy-number burden (bCNB).ResultsHigh bTMB and bCNB were associated with lack of clinical benefit and significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) compared with patients with low bTMB or low bCNB (all P < 0.05). Dominant APOBEC signatures were detected at baseline exclusively in cases with high bTMB (5/13, 38.5%) versus low bTMB (0/37, 0%; P = 0.0006). Alterations in ESR1 were enriched in samples with high bTMB (P = 0.0005). There was a high correlation between bTMB determined by WES and bTMB determined using a 600-gene panel (R = 0.98). During serial monitoring, an increase in bCNB score preceded radiographic progression in 12 of 18 (66.7%) patients.ConclusionsGenomic complexity detected by noninvasive profiling of bTMB and bCNB predicted poor outcomes in patients treated with ET and CDK4/6i and identified early disease progression before imaging. Novel treatment strategies including immunotherapy-based combinations should be investigated in this population.
| S-EPMC10150240 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEfficacy of endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer could differ depending on the presence of BRCA1/2 germline mutation.MethodsThe ESME metastatic breast cancer platform (NCT03275311) is a French real world database. Multivariable models including a time-varying approach and landmark analyses assessed the association between time-dependent gBRCA status (categorised as gBRCAm, gBRCAwt (wild type), and untested), overall survival (OS), and first-line progression-free survival (PFS1).ResultsA total of 170 patients were gBRCAm carriers, 676 gBRCAwt, and 12,930 were untested at baseline. In the multivariable analysis, gBRCAm carriers overall had a lower OS compared to gBRCAwt (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.26 [1.03-1.55]). gBRCAm patients treated with front-line endocrine therapy had lower adjusted OS (adjusted HR [95% CI] = 1.54 [1.03-2.32]) and PFS1 (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.58 [1.17-2.12]) compared to gBRCAwt patients. However, for patients who received frontline chemotherapy, neither OS nor PFS1 differed between gBRCAm carriers and the other groups (HR versus gBRCAwt for OS: 1.12 [0.88-1.41], p = 0.350; PFS1: 1.09 [0.90-1.31], p = 0.379).ConclusionIn this large cohort of HR+/HER2- MBC patients treated in a pre-CDK4/6 inhibitors era, gBRCAm status was associated with a lower OS and lower PFS following first-line endocrine therapy, but not following first-line chemotherapy.
| S-EPMC10205708 | biostudies-literature
Project description:CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy are the standard treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. Patients might show intrinsic and acquired resistance, which leads to treatment failure and progression. Circulating biomarkers have the potential advantages of recognizing patients who might not respond to treatment, monitoring treatment effects and identifying markers of acquired resistance during tumor progression with a simple withdrawal of peripheral blood. Genomic alterations on circulating tumor DNA and serum thymidine kinase activity, but also circulating tumor cells, epigenetic or exosome markers are currently being tested as markers of CDK4/6i treatment response, even though none of these have been integrated into clinical practice. In this review, we discuss the recent advancements in the development of circulating biomarkers of CDK4/6i response in patients with HR+/HER2-breast cancer.
| S-EPMC8199335 | biostudies-literature