Dataset Information

Impact of Microscopically Positive (≤1 mm) Distal Margins on Disease Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The adequate distal resection margin is still controversial in rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a distal margin of ≤1 mm on locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS).

Methods

Among 255 patients treated with nCRT and surgery at the National Cancer Institute of Milan, 83 (32.5%) had a distal margin of ≤1 mm and 172 (67.5%) had a distal margin of >1 mm. Survival analyses were performed to assess the impact of distal margin on 5-year LRRFS, as well as Cox survival analysis. The role of distal margin on survival was analyzed according to different tumor regression grades (TRGs).

Results

The overall 5-year LRRFS rate was 77.6% with a distal margin of ≤1 mm vs. 88.3% with a distal margin of >1 mm (Log-rank p = 0.09). Only stage ypT4 was an independent predictor of worse LRRFS (HR 15.14, p = 0.026). The 5-year LRRFS was significantly lower in TRG3-5 patients with a distal margin of ≤1 mm compared to those with a distal margin of >1 mm (68.5% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.027), while no difference was observed in case of TRG1-2 (p = 0.77).

Conclusions

Low-responder rectal cancers after nCRT still require a distal margin of >1 mm to reduce the high likelihood of local relapse.

SUBMITTER: Sorrentino L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10047023 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impact of Microscopically Positive (≤1 mm) Distal Margins on Disease Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Sorrentino Luca L Sileo Annaclara A Daveri Elena E Battaglia Luigi L Guaglio Marcello M Centonze Giovanni G Sabella Giovanna G Patti Filippo F Villa Sergio S Milione Massimo M Belli Filiberto F Cosimelli Maurizio M

Cancers 20230317 6

<h4>Background</h4>The adequate distal resection margin is still controversial in rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a distal margin of ≤1 mm on locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS).<h4>Methods</h4>Among 255 patients treated with nCRT and surgery at the National Cancer Institute of Milan, 83 (32.5%) had a distal margin of ≤1 mm and 172 (67.5%) had a distal margin of >1 mm. Survival analyses were performed to a ...[more]

PMID: 36980714

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer.MethodsA total of 265 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, whole Diffusion-Weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) images, clinically stage II to III (cT3-4 and/or cN+) and treated with NCRT followed by TME were screened. Fifty patients with pCR and another 50 patients without pCR with similar clinical charcacters and treatment regimens were selected for statistical analysis. All the patients' pre-CRT and post-CRT average ADC values were calculated from the coefficient maps created by DWI-MRI and recorded independently. The difference in the ADC values between the pCR and non-pCR was analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. The cut-off ADC value of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with pCR was then established.ResultsThe mean pre- and post-ADC values in all patients, and in pCR patients and non-pCR patients were 0.879±0.06 and 1.383±0.11, 0.859±0.04 and 1.440±0.10, 0.899±0.07 and 1.325±0.09 (×10(-3) mm(2)/s), respectively. The difference between the pre- and post-ADC values in all patients, pCR patients, and non-pCR patients were considered to be statistically significant. The pre-ADC value was significantly lower in the pCR patients than in the non-pCR patients (p = 0.003), whereas the post-ADC values were significantly higher in the pCR patients than in the non-pCR patients. The percentage increase of the ADC value (ΔADC%) in the pCR and non-pCR patients were 68% and 48% respectively (p<0.001). The ROC curves of the cut-off value of the pre-CRT patient ADC value was 0.866×10(-3) mm(2)/s. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of diagnosing pCR were 0.670 (95% CI 0.563-0.777), 0.600, 0.640, 60%, 60%, and 60%, respectively. The cut-off value of ΔADC% was 58%. The corresponding AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of diagnosing pCR were 0.856 (95% CI 0.783-0.930), 0.800, 0.760, 76.9%, 79.2%, and 78%, respectively.ConclusionsDWI-MRI technology can be efficient for predicting pCR for LARC after NCRT. Although the mean pre-CRT ADC value and the ΔADC% are moderate predictors for pCR, the latter would be more accurate.

Project description:BackgroundRadiation-induced colorectal fibrosis (RICF) is a common pathological alteration among patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Anastomotic stenosis (AS) causes symptoms and negatively impacts patients' quality of life and long-term survival. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the fibrosis signature of RICF and develop a nomogram to predict the risk of AS in patients with rectal cancer undergoing nCRT.MethodsOverall, 335 pairs of proximal and distal margins were collected and randomly assigned at a 7:3 ratio to the training and testing cohorts. The RICF score was established to evaluate the fibrosis signature in the anastomotic margins. A nomogram based on the RICF score for AS was developed and evaluated by using the area under the curve, decision curve analysis, and the DeLong test.ResultsThe training cohort included 235 patients (161 males [68.51%]; mean age, 59.61 years) with an occurrence rate of AS of 17.4%, whereas the testing cohort included 100 patients (72 males [72.00%]; mean age, 57.17 years) with an occurrence rate of AS of 11%. The RICF total score of proximal and distal margins was significantly associated with AS (odds ratio, 3.064; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.200-4.268; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that the RICF total score, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and surgical approach were independent predictors for AS. The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination in the training cohort (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.876; 95% CI, 0.816-0.937), with a sensitivity of 68.3% (95% CI, 51.9%-81.9%) and a specificity of 85.5% (95% CI, 78.7%-89.3%). Similar results were observed in the testing cohort.ConclusionsThis study results suggest that the RICF total score of anastomotic margins is an independent predictor for AS. The prediction model developed based on the RICF total score may be useful for individualized AS risk prediction in patients with rectal cancer undergoing nCRT and sphincter-preserving surgery.

Dataset Information

Impact of Microscopically Positive (≤1 mm) Distal Margins on Disease Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Impact of Microscopically Positive (≤1 mm) Distal Margins on Disease Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets