Adjuvant therapy of biliary tract cancers.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Kefas J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10052632 | biostudies-literature | 2023
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Adjuvant therapy of biliary tract cancers.
Kefas Joanna J Bridgewater John J Vogel Arndt A Stein Alexander A Primrose John J
Therapeutic advances in medical oncology 20230328
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare and heterogeneous malignant tumours including cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer. They are very aggressive, often refractory to chemotherapy and associated with an overall poor prognosis. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment option but less than 35% present with resectable disease. Adjuvant treatments have been widely used but until recently, supportive data were limited to non-randomised, non-controlled retrospective stu ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Opinion statementA paradigm shift towards molecular-based, personalized cancer therapeutics has occurred in recent years and a number of targeted drugs have emerged. Various targeted therapies like erlotinib, trastuzumab, and cetuximab have been approved in lung, breast, and colon cancers, respectively. Numerous clinical trials involving targeted drugs in biliary tract cancers are currently in progress, though none have been approved for this disease. Biliary tract cancers are divided into separate entities both anatomically and in terms of pathogenesis but are grouped together in most trials given their rarity. Combination chemotherapy involving cisplatin and gemcitabine is the current standard of care in the metastatic setting. In this review, we will discuss the various molecular pathways implicated in biliary tract cancers and potential therapeutic targets.
| S-EPMC4534500 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRecent randomized controlled trials (rcts) have contributed high-quality data about adjuvant therapy in curatively resected biliary tract cancer (btc); however, a standard approach to treating those patients still has not been developed.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of published studies and abstracts up to and including June 2018, choosing rcts involving patients with btc receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after complete surgical resection. Network meta-analysis methods were used for indirect comparisons of overall survival (os) and relapse-free survival (rfs) for various adjuvant therapies.ResultsFive rcts were included in qualitative synthesis, and three rcts (bilcap, prodige 12-accord 18, and bcat) had data sufficient for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Results from the indirect comparison demonstrated no significant improvement in os for capecitabine compared with gemcitabine or with gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (gemox), the hazard ratios (hrs) being 0.82 [95% confidence interval (ci): 0.53 to 1.27] and 0.86 (95% ci: 0.56 to 1.34) respectively. Similarly, no significant improvement in rfs was observed for capecitabine compared with gemcitabine or gemox.ConclusionsAlthough in the present analysis, we found no statistically significant improvements in os or rfs for capecitabine compared with gemox or gemcitabine, capecitabine can-until further prospective trials are completed-be considered the standard of care in the adjuvant setting based on a single randomized phase iii study.
| S-EPMC7096209 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and aimsGallbladder cancer (GBC) has a female predominance, whereas the other biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have a male predominance, suggesting that sex hormones may be involved in carcinogenesis. We sought to evaluate the association between menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and the risk of BTC in women.Approach and resultsThis nested case-control study was conducted in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Cases diagnosed between 1990 and 2017 with incident primary cancers of the gallbladder (GBC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), ampulla of Vater (AVC), and mixed type were matched to 5 controls on birth year, diagnosis year, and years in the general practice using incidence density sampling. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate ORs and 95% CIs for associations between MHT use and BTC type. The sample consisted of 1,682 BTC cases (483 GBC, 870 CCA, 105 AVC, and 224 mixed) and 8,419 matched controls with a mean age of 73 (SD, 11) years. Combined formulations (estrogen-progesterone) were associated with an increased GBC risk (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.08, 3.59). Orally administered MHT was associated with an increased GBC risk (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.24, 4.17). Estrogen-only formulations (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.34, 0.93) and cream or suppository administrations (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34, 0.95) were associated with decreased CCA risk. The number of prescriptions, dose, duration of use, and time since last use were not associated with GBC or CCA risk. MHT use was not associated with risk of AVC or mixed cancer.ConclusionsCombination MHT formulations and oral administrations were associated with increased GBC risk, whereas estrogen-only formulations were associated with a lower CCA risk. MHT formulation and administration should be carefully considered when prescribing.
| S-EPMC8766909 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with a dismal prognosis. Despite radical surgery, the five-year overall survival (OS) does not exceed 40% in the best series. Adjuvant treatments are widely used even though they have mainly been investigated in small retrospective series until recently. Available data suggest that chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (and relative prodrugs) or gemcitabine can reduce the risk of relapse and potentially improve patients' long-term outcome. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy seems to be confined to patients with positive surgical margins. In addition, patients with high-risk factors for relapse (nodal involvement and non-radical resection) benefit most from chemotherapy. Recent results from large randomized trials have clarified the benefit of adjuvant treatments and probably defined a new standard of care.
| S-EPMC8798763 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Biliary tract cancers are rare but highly fatal with poorly understood etiology. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors for these cancers is essential for prevention. Here we estimated the relationship between adiposity and cancer across the biliary tract, including cancers of the gallbladder (GBC), intrahepatic bile ducts (IHBDC), extrahepatic bile ducts (EHBDC), and the ampulla of Vater (AVC). We pooled data from 27 prospective cohorts with over 2.7 million adults. Adiposity was measured using baseline body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip, and waist-to-height ratios. HRs and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for sex, education, race, smoking, and alcohol consumption with age as the time metric and the baseline hazard stratified by study. During 37,883,648 person-years of follow-up, 1,343 GBC cases, 1,194 EHBDC cases, 784 IHBDC cases, and 623 AVC cases occurred. For each 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI, there were risk increases for GBC (HR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.19-1.36), IHBDC (HR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.21-1.45), and EHBDC (HR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.23), but not AVC (HR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.88-1.11). Increasing waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio were associated with GBC and IHBDC but not EHBDC or AVC. These results indicate that adult adiposity is associated with an increased risk of biliary tract cancer, particularly GBC and IHBDC. Moreover, they provide evidence for recommending weight maintenance programs to reduce the risk of developing these cancers. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings identify a correlation between adiposity and biliary tract cancers, indicating that weight management programs may help minimize the risk of these diseases.
| S-EPMC6759233 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background & aimsGallbladder cancer (GBC) is known to have a female predominance while other biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have a male predominance. However, the role of female reproductive factors in BTC etiology remains unclear.MethodsWe pooled data from 19 studies of >1.5 million women participating in the Biliary Tract Cancers Pooling Project to examine the associations of parity, age at menarche, reproductive years, and age at menopause with BTC. Associations for age at menarche and reproductive years with BTC were analyzed separately for Asian and non-Asian women. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by study.ResultsDuring 21,681,798 person-years of follow-up, 875 cases of GBC, 379 of intrahepatic bile duct cancer (IHBDC), 450 of extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EHBDC), and 261 of ampulla of Vater cancer (AVC) occurred. High parity was associated with risk of GBC (HR ≥5 vs. 0 births 1.72; 95% CI 1.25-2.38). Age at menarche (HR per year increase 1.15; 95% CI 1.06-1.24) was associated with GBC risk in Asian women while reproductive years were associated with GBC risk (HR per 5 years 1.13; 95% CI 1.04-1.22) in non-Asian women. Later age at menarche was associated with IHBDC (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.31) and EHBDC (HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.01-1.22) in Asian women only.ConclusionWe observed an increased risk of GBC with increasing parity. Among Asian women, older age at menarche was associated with increased risk for GBC, IHBDC, and EHBDC, while increasing reproductive years was associated with GBC in non-Asian women. These results suggest that sex hormones have distinct effects on cancers across the biliary tract that vary by geography.Lay summaryOur findings show that the risk of gallbladder cancer is increased among women who have given birth (especially women with 5 or more children). In women from Asian countries, later age at menarche increases the risk of gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic bile duct cancer and extrahepatic bile duct cancer. We did not see this same association in women from Western countries. Age at menopause was not associated with the risk of any biliary tract cancers.
| S-EPMC7901003 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Biliary tract cancers are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. Two-thirds of these primary liver malignancies are diagnosed at advanced stages where therapeutic options are limited. Whereas several molecular targeted therapies emerge in biliary tract cancers, immunotherapy is still investigational, the only approved immunotherapy to date being the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab for the small fraction of patients with microsatellite-instable tumors. In microsatellite-stable, pre-treated biliary tract cancers, single-agent immune checkpoint blockade has a limited albeit often long-lasting clinical activity in a still ill-defined subgroup of patients. The identification of predictive biomarkers will allow a better selection of patients that may benefit from immunotherapy. Combinations of immunotherapies with each other, with chemotherapy or targeted molecular therapies are being investigated in early lines of therapy, including first-line.
| S-EPMC8036747 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMalignant tumors of the biliary system are characterized by a high degree of malignancy and strong invasiveness, and they are usually diagnosed at late stages with poor prognosis. For patients with advanced biliary tract cancer, chemotherapy and targeted therapy are two of the options available to improve prognosis and delay tumor progression. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of various chemotherapy schemes for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer in published systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRoMAs).MethodsAn umbrella review method was adopted, which aims to summarize the existing evidence from multiple studies around a research topic. SRoMAs up to April 9, 2022, were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane database, and manual screening. Eligible studies were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study had been registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022324548). For each eligible study, we extracted the data of general characteristics and the main findings. The methodological quality of the included studies were assessed by the AMSTAR2 scale, and the quality of evidence was evaluated by the GRADE tools.ResultsA total of 1833 articles were searched; 14 unique articles with 94 outcomes were identified by eligibility criteria. The incidence of skin rash (RR = 18.11, 95% CI 5.13-63.91, GRADE: Moderate) and diarrhea (RR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.2-5.10, GRADE: Moderate) was higher in patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy plus targeted therapy than in patients receiving gemcitabine monotherapy. The number of patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy who developed leukopenia (OR = 7.17, 95% CI 1.43-36.08, GRADE: Moderate), anemia (OR = 7.04, 95% CI 2.59-19.12, GRADE: High), thrombocytopenia (RR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.39-4.32, GRADE: Moderate), and neutropenia (RR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.04-10.50, GRADE: Moderate) was significantly higher than that of patients who received gemcitabine-free regimens. In addition, patients receiving S-1 monotherapy had significantly better ORR (RR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.27-4.57, GRADE: Moderate) than patients receiving S-1 + gemcitabine. Patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy had longer OS (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.7-0.99, GRADE: Moderate), higher DCR (0R = 5.18, 95% CI 3.3-10.23, GRADE: Moderate), and higher ORR (0R = 3.24, 95% CI 1.18-8.92, GRADE: Moderate) compared with patients who received 5-FU/LV monotherapy or supportive therapy. Surprisingly, we found evidence that gemcitabine-based chemotherapy did not improve postoperative patients' OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.74-1.12, GRADE: Moderate) when compared with best supportive care.ConclusionsThis study comprehensively evaluated the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy or targeted therapy regimens for advanced biliary tract cancer and found 11 outcomes with "Moderate" or "High" levels; however, most of the outcomes were still at "low" or "very low" levels. More randomized controlled studies are needed in the future to further summarize high levels of evidence.
| S-EPMC10131316 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundComplete resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the gold standard for patients with localized cholangiocarcinoma (CC) or gallbladder cancer (GBC). However, this is not always feasible, and recurrence rates remain high.ObjectivesTo understand the real-world proportions and reason for treatment failure in resected biliary tract cancers.Design and methodsWe performed a retrospective population-based review of patients with GBC or CC [intrahepatic (IHCC) or extrahepatic (EHCC)] resected between 2005 and 2019 using the BC Cancer provincial database. A chart review was conducted to characterize demographics, treatments received and outcomes.ResultsIn total, 594 patients were identified of whom 416 (70%) had disease recurrence. Most GBCs (96%) were diagnosed incidentally, and repeat oncologic resection was performed in 45%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received in 51% of patients diagnosed after 2017 (mostly capecitabine). Patient co-morbidities, disease progression and patient preference were the commonest reasons for not proceeding with adjuvant chemotherapy. One-third of patients did not complete all planned cycles. Median overall survival was significantly higher in those with complete (R0) versus incomplete (R1) resection [31.6 versus 18 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35-0.53] and in those with versus without re-resection for GBC [29.4 versus 19 months, HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41-0.73]. There was a trend towards improved survival with versus without adjuvant therapy (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.61-1.02). Only 25% in the more contemporary cohort (2017-2019) had an R0 resection and completed adjuvant chemotherapy.ConclusionComplete resection, including reresection for incidentally diagnosed GBCs, and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with improved outcomes in this retrospective cohort, yet many patients were not able to complete these treatments. Neoadjuvant strategies may improve treatment delivery and ultimately, outcomes.
| S-EPMC11020734 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have distinct tumor biology but share a poor prognosis, with a 5-year-survival-rate of 5-19%. Surgical resection is the only potential cure, but recurrences are common. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (XRT) remains unclear. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (2006-2018), we analyzed resected non-metastatic BTCs. Patients who survived beyond 90 days post-surgery were included, while those with R2 resections or neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Propensity matching was performed based on predictors of adjuvant radiation, age, and sex. Survival outcomes were compared between no adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy alone, and XRT ± chemotherapy. Results: Among 21,275 patients, including 5308 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC), 2689 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), 3092 distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC), and 10,186 gallbladder cancer (GBC) cases, adjuvant XRT did not improve survival for IHC. For PHC and DCC, XRT improved survival over no adjuvant therapy (PHC: 31.2 vs. 26.3 months, p = 0.004; DCC: 33.7 vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.015) but not over chemotherapy alone. For GBC, XRT significantly improved survival compared to both no adjuvant therapy and chemotherapy (30.2 vs. 26.6 and 24.6 months; p = 0.05 and p = 0.001). Conclusions: XRT provides a survival benefit for GBC, especially in node-positive and R1-resected patients. For PHC and DCC, XRT improves outcomes compared to no therapy, but its benefit over chemotherapy is uncertain. No benefit was observed for IHC.
| S-EPMC11815919 | biostudies-literature