Editorial: Autoimmune blistering diseases, volume II.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Li X
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10061345 | biostudies-literature | 2023
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Editorial: Autoimmune blistering diseases, volume II.
Li Xiaoguang X Di Zenzo Giovanni G Schmidt Enno E Joly Pascal P Hashimoto Takashi T
Frontiers in immunology 20230316
Similar Datasets
Project description:The presence of anti-desmocollin (Dsc) antibodies is rarely described in autoimmune blistering diseases patients. Moreover, several clinical phenotypes of pemphigus may be associated with these antibodies. In this review we analyze clinicopathological, immunologic and outcome features of anti-Dsc autoimmune blistering diseases patients, to improve their diagnosis and management. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and Embase (1990-present) for studies reporting cases of autoimmune blistering diseases with anti-Dsc antibodies. We classified the selected patients as patients with exclusively anti-Dsc autoantibodies, and patients with anti-Dsc and other autoantibodies. Of 93 cases with anti-Dsc autoantibodies included, 38 (41%) had exclusively these antibodies. Only 18% of patients presented with the typical clinicopathological phenotype of pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigus foliaceous. Mucosal involvement was seen in approximately half of the patients. Up to 18% of cases were associated with neoplasms. Acantholysis was described in 54% of cases with histopathological information. Treatments and outcomes vary in the different clinical phenotypes. The presence of anti-Dsc antibodies must be suspected mainly in those patients with either atypical pemphigus, in special with clinical pustules, or in cases showing intraepithelial or dermal neutrophilic/eosinophilic infiltrate on histological examination and dual pattern by direct immunofluorescence examination.
| S-EPMC8462461 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak, attention has gradually moved from the respiratory manifestations of the disease toward its dermatologic aspects. The need for wearing personal protective measures and their cutaneous side effects, detection of related or specific COVID-19 skin eruptions, and the evaluation of certain risk groups of immunosuppressed dermatologic patients have initiated significant discussions about various therapeutic interventions and, in particular, about biologic therapy for psoriasis and for autoinflammatory, orphan, or malignant cutaneous disorders. Autoimmune bullous dermatoses have been of concern due to their chronic course, at times life-threatening prognosis, and the need for prolonged and often aggressive immunomodulatory therapy. We have summarized the current knowledge regarding the impact of COVID-19 infection on autoimmune bullous dermatoses, including recommendations for the main treatment strategies, available patient information, and the registries organized for documentation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
| S-EPMC7955939 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10227560 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) of the skin are characterized by autoantibodies against different intra-/extracellular structures within the epidermis and at the basement membrane zone (BMZ). Binding of the antibodies to their target antigen leads to inflammation at the respective binding site and degradation of these structures, resulting in the separation of the affected skin layers. Clinically, blistering, erythema and lesions of the skin and/or mucous membranes can be observed. Based on the localization of the autoantigen, AIBDs can be divided into pemphigus (intra-epidermal blistering diseases) and pemphigoid diseases (sub-epidermal blistering diseases), respectively. Although autoantigens have been extensively characterized, the underlying causes that trigger the diseases are still poorly understood. Besides the environment, genetic factors seem to play an important role in a predisposition to AIBDs. Here, we review currently known genetic and immunological mechanisms that contribute to the pathogenesis of AIBDs. Among the most commonly encountered genetic predispositions for AIBDs are the HLA gene region, and deleterious mutations of key genes for the immune system. Particularly, HLA class II genes such as the HLA-DR and HLA-DQ alleles have been shown to be prevalent in patients. This has prompted further epidemiological studies as well as unbiased Omics approaches on the transcriptome, microbiome, and proteome level to elucidate common and individual genetic risk factors as well as the molecular pathways that lead to the pathogenesis of AIBDs.
| S-EPMC6843061 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Pemphigoid diseases refer to a group of severe autoimmune skin blistering diseases characterized by subepidermal blistering and loss of dermal-epidermal adhesion induced by autoantibody and immune cell infiltrate at the dermal-epidermal junction and upper dermis. Here, we explore the role of the immune cell-secreted serine protease, granzyme B, in pemphigoid disease pathogenesis using three independent murine models. In all models, granzyme B knockout or topical pharmacological inhibition significantly reduces total blistering area compared to controls. In vivo and in vitro studies show that granzyme B contributes to blistering by degrading key anchoring proteins in the dermal-epidermal junction that are necessary for dermal-epidermal adhesion. Further, granzyme B mediates IL-8/macrophage inflammatory protein-2 secretion, lesional neutrophil infiltration, and lesional neutrophil elastase activity. Clinically, granzyme B is elevated and abundant in human pemphigoid disease blister fluids and lesional skin. Collectively, granzyme B is a potential therapeutic target in pemphigoid diseases.
| S-EPMC7804321 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases (AISBDs) are rare skin disorders of animals that were first identified in dogs but several AISBDs are now recognised in other companion animal species. Most AISBDs in animals are homologues of the human diseases and are thought to share similar pathomechanisms of epidermal and/or mucosal blister formation caused by autoantibodies targeting structural proteins of the basement membrane zone (BMZ). Disruption of their structural function by the autoantibodies and/or recruited inflammation leads to BMZ fragility, which presents clinically as vesicles, bullae and, later, deep erosions and ulcers. Canine AISBDs are the best characterised, particularly the more common variants such as mucous membrane pemphigoid (48%), epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) (26%), and bullous pemphigoid (10%). Exceedingly rare AISBDs in the dog are junctional EBA, mixed AISBD, type-1 bullous systemic lupus erythematosus, linear IgA dermatosis, and pemphigus gestationis. The diagnosis of a specific AISBD is made by combining the clinical features (breed, age, lesion distribution) with histological evidence of subepithelial clefting, but not all AISBDs can be differentiated in this manner and specialised immunological testing is required. This latter, unfortunately, is not readily available and, therefore, the specific AISBD diagnosis often remains unconfirmed. While this limits further understanding of these diseases, it does not prevent clinicians from treating their patients, as the treatment approaches are similar for the different AISBDs in dogs. This review primarily focuses on canine AISBDs, the species for which these diseases have been best characterised, and shorter descriptions of variants in other species are also provided.
| S-EPMC9969658 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8606529 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9885184 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10011613 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlopecia is a complication of autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) that affects patients' quality of life; however, it has generally been overlooked in patients with severe disease because it is regarded as a cosmetic issue.ObjectiveTo study the epidemiologic data and clinical presentations of alopecia in our cohort of patients with AIBDs.MethodsForty-one patients with AIBDs were assessed in this cross-sectional study. An assessment tool to collate patient information, including AIBD scalp involvement, trichoscopic findings, and Severity of Alopecia Tool II scores, was used.ResultsMore than 70% of patients in our cohort had at least 1 type of alopecia, with 10% presenting with a nonspecific (end-stage) scarring alopecia. Elevated Dsg1 ratios were predictive of hair loss in pemphigus vulgaris (P < .001) and increased alopecia was associated with worse disease severity in bullous pemphigoid (P = .001).LimitationsThe small sample size and lack of severe cases.ConclusionThere is a likelihood that 1 in 10 patients with AIBDs have a scarring alopecia related to their disease. To our knowledge, this is the first study including alopecia prevalence in patients with bullous pemphigoid, which was not significantly increased despite providing clues to disease severity.
| S-EPMC9661710 | biostudies-literature