Dataset Information

Evaluating corrected carotid flow time as a non-invasive parameter for trending cardiac output and stroke volume in cardiac surgery patients.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The corrected carotid flow time (ccFT) is derived from a pulsed-wave Doppler signal at the common carotid artery. Several equations are currently used to calculate ccFT. Its ability to assess the intravascular volume status non-invasively has recently been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation and trending ability of ccFT with invasive cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) measurements.

Methods

Eighteen cardiac surgery patients were included in this prospective observational study. ccFT measurements were obtained at three time points: after induction of anesthesia (T1), after a passive leg raise (T2), and post-bypass (T3). Simultaneously, CO and SV were measured by calibrated pulse contour analysis. Three different equations (Bazett, Chambers, and Wodey) were used to calculate ccFT. The correlation and percentage change in time (concordance) between ccFT and CO and between ccFT and SV were evaluated.

Results

Mean ccFT values differed significantly for the three equations (p < 0.001). The correlation between ccFT and CO and between ccFT and SV was highest for Bazett's (ρ = 0.43, p < 0.0001) and Wodey's (ρ = 0.33, p < 0.0001) equations, respectively. Concordance between ΔccFT and ΔCO and between ΔccFT and ΔSV was highest for Bazett's (100%) and Wodey's (82%) equations, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that correlation and concordance between SV and ccFT improved when assessed within limited heart rate (HR) ranges.

Conclusion

The use of different ccFT equations leads to variable correlation and concordance rates between ccFT and CO/SV measurements. Bazett's equation acceptably tracked CO changes in time, while the trending capability of SV was poor.

SUBMITTER: van Houte J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10063698 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluating corrected carotid flow time as a non-invasive parameter for trending cardiac output and stroke volume in cardiac surgery patients.

van Houte Joris J Raaijmaakers Anniek E AE Mooi Frederik J FJ Meijs Loek P B LPB de Boer Esmée C EC Suriani Irene I Houterman Saskia S Montenij Leon J LJ Bouwman Arthur R AR

Journal of ultrasound 20220409 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>The corrected carotid flow time (ccFT) is derived from a pulsed-wave Doppler signal at the common carotid artery. Several equations are currently used to calculate ccFT. Its ability to assess the intravascular volume status non-invasively has recently been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation and trending ability of ccFT with invasive cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) measurements.<h4>Methods</h4>Eighteen cardiac surgery patients were i ...[more]

PMID: 35397758

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn women presenting for caesarean section under spinal anesthesia, continuous measurement of circulatory aspects, such as blood pressure and cardiac output, is often needed. At present, invasive techniques are used almost exclusively. Reliable non-invasive monitoring would be welcome, as it could be safer, less uncomfortable, and quick and easy to apply. We aimed to evaluate whether a non-invasive, finger plethysmographic device, the ccNexFin monitor, can replace invasively measured blood pressure in the radial artery, and whether cardiac output measurements from this device can be used interchangeably with measurements from the mini-invasive LiDCO monitor currently in use at our institution.MethodsSimultaneous invasive measurements were compared to ccNexFin in 23 healthy women during elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia. We used Bland Altman statistics to assess agreement, and polar plot methodology to judge trending abilities with pre-defined limits.ResultsMean arterial and systolic pressures showed biases (invasive - ccNexFin) of - 4.3 and 12.2 mmHg, with limits of agreement of - 15.9 - 7.4 and - 11.1 - 35.6, respectively. The ccNexFin trending abilities were within the suggested limits for mean pressure but insufficient for systolic pressure compared to invasive measurements. Cardiac output had a small bias of 0.2 L/min, but wide limits of agreement of - 2.6 - 3.0. The ccNexFin trending abilities compared to the invasive estimated values (LiDCO) were unsatisfactory.ConclusionsWe consider the ccNexFin monitor to have sufficient accuracy in measuring mean arterial pressure. The limits of agreement for systolic measurements were wider, and the trending ability compared to invasive measurements was outside the recommended limit. The ccNexFin is not reliable for cardiac output measurements or trend in pregnant women for caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.Trial registrationRegistered May 23, 2013, at ClinicalTrials.gov under number NCT01861132 .

Project description:OBJECTIVES:Adequate assessment of fluid responsiveness in shock necessitates correct interpretation of hemodynamic changes induced by preload challenge. This study evaluates the accuracy of point-of-care Doppler ultrasound assessment of the change in carotid corrected flow time induced by a passive leg raise maneuver as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM, Cheetah Medical, Newton Center, MA) system based on a bioreactance method was used. DESIGN:Prospective, noninterventional study. SETTING:ICU at a large academic center. PATIENTS:Patients with new, undifferentiated shock, and vasopressor requirements despite fluid resuscitation were included. Patients with significant cardiac disease and conditions that precluded adequate passive leg raising were excluded. INTERVENTIONS:Carotid corrected flow time was measured via ultrasound before and after a passive leg raise maneuver. Predicted fluid responsiveness was defined as greater than 10% increase in stroke volume on noninvasive cardiac output monitoring following passive leg raise. Images and measurements were reanalyzed by a second, blinded physician. The accuracy of change in carotid corrected flow time to predict fluid responsiveness was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Seventy-seven subjects were enrolled with 54 (70.1%) classified as fluid responders by noninvasive cardiac output monitoring. The average change in carotid corrected flow time after passive leg raise for fluid responders was 14.1 ± 18.7 ms versus -4.0 ± 8 ms for nonresponders (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that change in carotid corrected flow time is an accurate predictor of fluid responsiveness status (area under the curve, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96) and a 7 ms increase in carotid corrected flow time post passive leg raise was shown to have a 97% positive predictive value and 82% accuracy in detecting fluid responsiveness using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring as a reference standard. Mechanical ventilation, respiratory rate, and high positive end-expiratory pressure had no significant impact on test performance. Post hoc blinded evaluation of bedside acquired measurements demonstrated agreement between evaluators. CONCLUSIONS:Change in carotid corrected flow time can predict fluid responsiveness status after a passive leg raise maneuver. Using point-of-care ultrasound to assess change in carotid corrected flow time is an acceptable and reproducible method for noninvasive identification of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with undifferentiated shock.

Dataset Information

Evaluating corrected carotid flow time as a non-invasive parameter for trending cardiac output and stroke volume in cardiac surgery patients.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Evaluating corrected carotid flow time as a non-invasive parameter for trending cardiac output and stroke volume in cardiac surgery patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets