Gender-differences of proceduralists in perception of hand-held surgical instrument fit - A cross-sectional survey.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
Determining perception of hand size as it relates to instrument use and ability to perform a procedure in a diverse population of proceduralists across surgical and medical specialties.Methods
Cross-sectional survey was distributed via electronic format to a convenience sample of surgeons/physicians. Secondary analysis included identified instrument use and choice of/perception of ability to learn and perform procedures.Results
488 respondents, 84.4% (female), 75.8% (glove size ≤6.5), and 82.2% (surgical specialties). 67.8% reported trouble using surgical instruments, primarily endoscopes, laparoscopic instruments, and needle drivers. Latent class analysis identified two groups of female respondents with similar hand sizes but differ in the perception of their hand's abilities.Conclusions and relevance
Instruments beyond laparoscopic instruments do not fit all hands. Even among female with physicians with similar hand size, there is a sub-set who struggle using surgical tools. Beyond gender and hand size, the operator's perception of their hand and their ability is critical in determining the viability of instrument mastery.
SUBMITTER: Weinreich HM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10066856 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Gender-differences of proceduralists in perception of hand-held surgical instrument fit - A cross-sectional survey.
Weinreich Heather M HM Babu Meghana M Kamil Rebecca R Williams Quintin Q Buhimschi Irina A IA
American journal of surgery 20220515 6
<h4>Objective</h4>Determining perception of hand size as it relates to instrument use and ability to perform a procedure in a diverse population of proceduralists across surgical and medical specialties.<h4>Methods</h4>Cross-sectional survey was distributed via electronic format to a convenience sample of surgeons/physicians. Secondary analysis included identified instrument use and choice of/perception of ability to learn and perform procedures.<h4>Results</h4>488 respondents, 84.4% (female), 7 ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:In this study, we investigated whether the first impression of a crowd of faces-crowd perception-is influenced by social background and cognitive processing. Specifically, we explored whether males and females, two groups that are distinct biologically and socially, differ in their ability to extract ensemble characteristics from crowds of faces that were comprised of different identities. Participants were presented with crowds of similar faces and were instructed to scroll through a morphed continuum of faces until they found a face that was representative of the average identity of each crowd. Consistent with previous research, females were more precise in single face perception. Furthermore, the results showed that females were generally more accurate in estimating the average identity of a crowd. However, the correlation between single face discrimination and crowd averaging differed between males and females. Specifically, male subjects' ensemble integration slightly compensated for their poor single face perception; their performance on the crowd perception task was not as poor as would be expected from their single face discrimination ability. Overall, the results suggest that group perception is not an isolated or uniform cognitive mechanism, but rather one that interacts with biological and social processes.
| S-EPMC4557101 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the reliability and agreement between two devices - Wii Fit Balance Board (WBB) versus Hand-Held Dynamometer (HHD) to measure isometric strength during the athletic shoulder (ASH) test in healthy amateur rugby players.MethodsFifteen males (23.73 ± 2.8 years) completed two testing sessions. Maximal isometric contractions using the dominant arm (D) and non-dominant arm (ND) against a WBB and HHD were assessed at three angles of abduction (180°, 'I'; 135°, 'Y' and 90°, 'T'), in a prone lying position.ResultsThe results indicate a very large correlation between the HHD and the WBB. WBB provides acceptable reliability at I-Test D (CV = 9.97%, ICC = 0.88) and HHD in the I-Test D (CV = 8.90%, ICC = 0.94), I-Test ND (CV = 8.60%, ICC = 0.95) in peak strength values. The HHD is most reliable in D ASH I-Y-T (CV = 10.94%) and WBB (CV = 11.05%). In the ND ASH I-Y-T test, the HHD is the most reliable (CV = 12.5%) compared to the WBB (CV = 14.43%).ConclusionsThese results suggest that WBB is a reliable device to assess strength in the ASH test with a very large correlation with the HHD. WBB and HHD are two affordable devices to assess isometric shoulder strength.
| S-EPMC10901178 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate students' perceptions of differences in learning from faculty of different gender.MethodThis cross-sectional study involved pre-doctoral dental students (years 2 to 4) who had a simulation and/or clinical experience working with dental faculty for at least one year. Students completed a self-administered questionnaire with three sections: demographic, difference between faculty related to their knowledge, skill, critical thinking, acceptance of cultural differences, and students' preferences in working with faculty in specialty clinics.ResultsA total of 136 students completed the survey (75.4% response rate). Participants were 52.6% women, 62.2% self-identified as Caucasian/White. Students reported that female faculty are more understanding (p = 0.001) and accepting of cultural differences (p<0.001) compared to male faculty (p<0.05). Students reported perceiving female faculty more as being a role model than male faculty (p = 0.034). When comparing male and female students, male student's perception of male faculty as a role model was significantly higher than female students (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in student's perceptions between male and female faculty in their knowledge, skills, compassion, critical thinking, providing feedback, communication skills, and grading (p>0.05). Caucasian/White students perceived female faculty as more encouraging for discussions and male faculty as more rigid/inflexible (p<0.05).ConclusionsStudents perceived female faculty as more understanding and culturally competent compared to male faculty. There were no significant differences in student's perceptions of male and female faculty in their knowledge, skills, compassion, critical thinking, feedback, communication skills, and grading. Students perceived female faculty as role models more than male faculty.
| S-EPMC9337690 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn 2017, the hashtags #MeToo and #MeTooMedicine went viral and raised awareness of sexual harassment (SH) and sexual violence affecting all ages, genders, races, sexualities, and careers. Most studies investigating SH have found that women report higher rates of SH experiences compared to men, with documented incidences reaching as high as 81%. Notably, 47% of these incidents go unreported. A study from the Association of Anesthesiologists found that female victims of sexual assault often do not speak up due to the myth that harassment is rare, which further silences women and stigmatizes this issue, leading them to be discouraged from participating in academic anesthesia. Due to the outdated data examining the incidence of SH in the field of anesthesiology, an anonymous 20 item survey was administered to physician attendings and trainees to assess the incidence of SH perceiving SH within the field.MethodsAn anonymous questionnaire-based cross-sectional study, adapted from a validated survey tool on SH and burnout, was administered to a sample of registered members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) to evaluate physicians' perceptions related to SH and burnout in their workplace.ResultsThe email survey was sent to 30,765 registered ASA members; a total of 2,830 (9.2%) members responded to the 20-item survey for this quantitative analysis. 53.4% (n = 1,511) and 44.2% (n = 1,251) identified themselves as men and women, respectively. Among all the respondents, 57.6% perceived some form of SH (75.5% women and 44.2% men, p-value:<0.0001). Around 40.1% of respondents indicated that they did not react to or report SH events, with a significantly higher incidence among women when compared to men (46.3% vs. 35.5%; p-value:<0.0001). Respondents who perceived SH were more likely to agree with the 5-point Likert-scale questions related to experiencing burnout, facing declining job opportunities or leaving a job, and becoming more emotionally detached from others.ConclusionSH has been reported by both male and female anesthesiologists, with female physicians perceiving significantly higher rates of SH compared to their male counterparts. Most respondents who experienced SH in their workplaces expressed agreement with statements related to "burnout feelings" and/or "declining a job opportunity or leaving the workplace." This study contributes to the current literature that SH is prevalent within the field of anesthesiology. Furthermore, our study demonstrates that SH has a positive correlation to feelings of burnout. This study demonstrates the critical importance of instituting policies regarding reporting SH events. Additionally, implementing bystander training can empower individuals to report witnessed SH events. Lastly, safeguards should be implemented to protect those who report witnessing or experiencing SH events.
| S-EPMC11864136 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionHand grip strength (HGS) is an important measure in a physiotherapy assessment and for this purpose it is necessary to have valid and reliable instruments to measure it. In this study we aimed at investigating the reliability, validity, and agreement of the new hand-held dynamometer NOD (OT-Bioelettronica, To-Italy) compared to Jamar® hydraulic dynamometer (JD), the gold standard.MethodsFifty healthy subjects were selected; 9 trials for the dominant hand and 9 trials for the non-dominant hand were administrated to each of them: 3 trials of HGS with the JD in rung #3, 3 trials with the JD-adapted-grip (like the NOD one), and 3 trials with NOD. To verify the reliability of NOD, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC 3,1) was calculated with a mixed effects model with the addition of adjustment variables (age, gender, dominant / non-dominant limb, trials). The model used single HGS measurements to estimate variance components, so reflecting both degree of correspondence and agreement among devices. To assess concurrent validity NOD was compared to the "gold standard" JD, in terms of ICCs and through Pearson correlation. The agreement between the methods of measurement was calculated with the Limits of Agreement (LoA) and the plots of Bland-Altman.ResultsAll ICCs show high inter-reliability; the results are very similar for both dynamometers. The value of the adjusted ICC of NOD was 0.90. For validity, Pearson correlations of NOD towards JD and JD-adapted-grip were high (r = 0.87 and 0.88). However, the LoA and the plots of Bland-Altman demonstrated that there is no agreement between NOD and JD and between NOD and JD-adapted-grip, with NOD showing lower mean scores than JD.ConclusionsNOD is a reliable and valid instrument for HGS. However, even if it cannot be considered interchangeable with JD because there is no agreement between them in free-living adults, NOD is easier to carry than other dynamometers, it has a Bluetooth® connection with a free App and it is a multi-purpose tool that should be considered both in daily practice and in clinical settings.
| S-EPMC11694367 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn the last decade surgical care has been propelled into the public health domain with the establishment of a World Health Organisation (WHO) designated programme and key publications. The passing of the historic World Health Assembly Resolution (WHA) acknowledged surgical care as a vital component towards achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC). We conducted the first worldwide survey to explore the perception of surgical care as a public health issue.MethodThe anonymous, cross sectional survey targeted worldwide participants across a range of professional backgrounds, including non-medical using virtual snowball sampling method (in English) using Google Forms (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) from 20th February 2019 to 25th June 2019. The survey questions were designed to gauge awareness on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), UHC, WHO programmes and key publications on surgical care as well as perception of surgical care as a priority topic in public health.ResultsThe survey was completed by 1954 respondents from 118 countries. Respondents were least aware of surgical care as a teaching topic in public health courses (27%; n = 526) and as a WHO programme (20%; n = 384). 82% of respondents were aware of UHC (n = 1599) and of this 72% (n = 1152) agreed that surgical care fits within UHC. While 77% (n = 1495) of respondents were aware of SDGs, only 19% (n = 370) agreed that surgery was a priority to meet SDGs. 48% (n = 941) rated surgical care as a cost-effective component of Primary Health Care. 88% (n = 1712) respondents had not read the WHA Resolution on 'Strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anaesthesia as a component of UHC'.ConclusionThere is still a widespread gap in awareness on the importance of surgical care as a public health issue amongst our respondents. Surgical care was not seen as a priority to reach the SDGs, less visible as a WHO programme and not perceived as an important topic for public health courses.
| S-EPMC8139156 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOur objective is to evaluate the utilization fraction (UF) of surgical instruments during a commonly performed ambulatory hand surgery case as an avenue for cost reduction, increased operating room efficiency, and systems quality improvement.MethodsThe total number of instruments opened at the start of the case was recorded followed by instruments being divided into those used and not used during the procedure. Total sterile processing costs were estimated at $1.56 per instrument according to data from our institution's central sterilization processing (CSP) department.ResultsNineteen hand procedures performed by 2 surgeons were included in this study. An average of 120.1 ± 10.9 instruments were opened at the start of each case, while an average of 12.6 ± 5.4 instruments were used per case (Figure 1). This yielded an UF of 10.7% ± 4.8%. Using our internal CSP estimate, we calculated an annual cost of $16 863 to reprocess the current hand tray (Figure 2). Using literature data, this cost ranged from $5 513 to $34 484 annually. The same cost calculations were performed for the theoretical optimized tray (incorporating instruments used at least 20% of the time when opened) containing 23.2 instruments. The annual reprocessing cost of this new tray according to CSP data was $3 260, demonstrating a cost-reduction of $13 603 or 80.7% (Figure 2).ConclusionsEvaluation of pre- and peri-operative processes is a valuable technique to mitigate increasing healthcare costs and reduce unnecessary healthcare spending, with broad applicability to multiple surgical subspecialties and procedures.
| S-EPMC11571127 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWork-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), also referred to as work-related musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs), cause surgeons pain and discomfort. Implementing ergonomics in the operating room has helped reduce such symptoms. However, there are still many issues that surgeons face when dealing with medical instruments, especially among female surgeons or surgeons with smaller hands.MethodsThe Cochrane methodology for performing a systematic review was utilized to search five databases for pertinent literature based on the study question "Do female surgeons or surgeons with smaller hand size, who use surgical instruments have an increased risk of musculoskeletal disorders and discomfort compared to male or larger handed surgeons?". The literature search strategy was designed around the three conceptual domains of surgeons/surgery, smaller hand size, and instrumentation. We searched PubMed, Embase.com, CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. This exploration identified 2165 research publications, and after specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. Risk of bias analysis was conducted to assess the quality of the included studies. After conducting a heterogeneity test, a meta-analysis was not performed due to high heterogeneity.ResultsUsing certain surgical instruments presents challenges in the form of MSKIs for female and smaller-handed surgeons. Studies showed that 77% of females and 73% of surgeons who wear < 6.5 glove size report musculoskeletal issues ranging from difficulty of use to pain. Difficulties using surgical instruments and reported injuries have a greater impact on surgical trainees which might deter interest in surgical fields for future proceduralists. Recommendations for improved ergonomic tool design are suggested by some of the included studies to help tackle the MSKIs that surgeons face when performing operations.ConclusionsThe number of female surgeons has increased substantially in the last decade. Hence, there exists an urgent need to address the major challenges they encounter by focusing on this specific aspect of workplace safety and health to mitigate injury. Doing so will yield a productive environment while simultaneously protecting the health and safety of both surgeons and patients.Systematic review registrationThe study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022283378).
| S-EPMC10848514 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of socioeconomic factors on access to congenital hand surgery care, hospital admission charges, and analyze these geographic trends across regions of the country.MethodsRetrospective cohort study was conducted of congenital hand surgery performed in the United States from 2010 through 2020 using the Pediatric Health Information System. Multivariate regression was used to analyze the impact of socioeconomic factors.ResultsDuring the study interval, 5531 pediatric patients underwent corrective surgery for congenital hand differences, including syndactyly repair (n = 2439), polydactyly repair (n = 2826), and pollicization (n = 266). Patients underwent surgery at significantly earlier age when treated at above-median case volume hospitals (P < .001). Patients with above-median income (P < .001), non-white race (P < .001), commercial insurance (P < .001), living in an urban community (P < .001), and not living in an underserved area (P < .001) were more likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. Nearly half of patients chose to seek care at a distant hospital rather than the one locally available (49.5%, n = 1172). Of those choosing a distant hospital, most patients chose a higher-volume facility (80.9%, n = 948 of 1172). On multivariate regression, white patients were significantly more likely to choose a more distant, higher-volume hospital (P < .001).ConclusionsSocioeconomic and geographic factors significantly contribute to disparate access to congenital hand surgery across the country. Patients with higher socioeconomic status are more likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. Treatment at hospitals with higher case volume is associated with earlier age at surgery and decreased hospital admission charges.
| S-EPMC10786106 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveWe investigated gender differences in psychosocial determinants that affect hand hygiene (HH) performance among physicians.DesignThe survey included a structured questionnaire with 7 parts: self-assessment of HH execution rate; knowledge, attitude, and behavior regarding HH; internal and emotional motivation for better HH; barriers to HH; need for external reminders; preference for alcohol gel; and embarrassment due to supervision.SettingThe study was conducted across 4 academic referral hospitals in Korea.ParticipantsPhysicians who worked at these hospitals were surveyed.MethodsThe survey questionnaire was sent to 994 physicians of the hospitals in July 2018 via email or paper. Differences in psychosocial determinants of HH among physicians were analyzed by gender using an independent t test or the Fisher exact test.ResultsOf the 994 physicians, 201 (20.2%) responded to the survey. Among them, 129 (63.5%) were men. Male physicians identified 4 barriers as significant: time wasted on HH (P = .034); HH is not a habit (P = .004); often forgetting about HH situations (P = .002); and no disadvantage when I do not perform HH (P = .005). Female physicians identified pain and dryness of the hands as a significant obstacle (P = .010), and they had a higher tendency to feel uncomfortable when a fellow employee performed inadequate HH (P = .098). Among the respondents, 26.6% identified diversifying the types of hand sanitizers as their first choice for overcoming barriers to improving HH, followed by providing reminders (15.6%) and soap and paper towels in each hospital room (13.0%).ConclusionA significant difference in the barriers to HH existed between male and female physicians. Promoting HH activities could help increase HH compliance.
| S-EPMC10877538 | biostudies-literature