Dataset Information

First-line atezolizumab/durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide combined with radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Immunotherapy has made significant advances in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but data in combination with radiotherapy are scarce. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients with ES-SCLC who received standard platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with atezolizumab or durvalumab immunotherapy as induction treatment, followed by consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (CTRT) before disease progression in the first-line setting. Adverse events during radiotherapy with or without maintenance immunotherapy and survival outcomes were assessed.

Results

Between December 2019 and November 2021, 36 patients with ES-SCLC were identified to have received such treatment modality at one hospital. The number of metastatic sites at diagnosis was 1-4. The biological effective dose of CTRT ranged from 52 to 113 Gy. Only two patients (6%) developed grade 3 toxic effect of thrombocytopenia, but none experienced grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Four patients developed immune-related pneumonitis during the induction treatment period but successfully completed later CTRT. The rate of radiation-related pneumonitis was 8% with grades 1-2 and well tolerated. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months, but the median overall survival (OS) was not determined. The estimated 1-year OS was 80.2% and 1-year PFS was 53.4%.

Conclusions

Immunotherapy combined with CTRT for ES-SCLC is safe and has ample survival benefit.

SUBMITTER: Li L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10080806 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

First-line atezolizumab/durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide combined with radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Li Lijuan L Yang Dan D Min Yanmei Y Liao Anyan A Zhao Jing J Jiang Leilei L Dong Xin X Deng Wei W Yu Huiming H Yu Rong R Zhao Jun J Shi Anhui A

BMC cancer 20230406 1

<h4>Background</h4>Immunotherapy has made significant advances in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but data in combination with radiotherapy are scarce. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC.<h4>Methods</h4>This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients with ES-SCLC who received standard platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with atezolizumab or durvalumab ...[more]

PMID: 37024843

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThe real-world data evaluating treatment outcomes of atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide chemotherapy (atezolizumab) for extensive-stage SCLC (ESCLC) are lacking. Our objective was to evaluate real-world outcomes of ESCLC treated with atezolizumab.MethodsA retrospective analysis of provincial patients with ESCLC who started first-line (1L) systemic treatment was conducted. We primarily evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in association with atezolizumab compared with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy (chemotherapy) while adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical factors. Adverse events (AEs) during 1L were evaluated.ResultsA total of 67 patients were identified. Of the 34 patients who received atezolizumab, 24% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2, approximately 50% were more than or equal to 65 years, 21% received cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy before atezolizumab, and 12% had thoracic radiation (tRT).Within the atezolizumab versus chemotherapy group, the median PFS equals to 6.0 versus 4.3 months (p = 0.03) whereas OS = 12.8 versus 7.1 months (p = 0.01). Relative to chemotherapy, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for PFS was 0.53 (0.28-1.02) and OS was 0.42 (0.20-0.88) with atezolizumab. tRT compared with no tRT receipt correlated with reduced death risk (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.33 [0.13-0.88]).AE-related treatment withdrawal with atezolizumab was 32% and 15% with chemotherapy (p = 0.02). Within the tRT subgroup, 25% versus 20% in atezolizumab versus chemotherapy group, respectively, discontinued 1L owing to AE.ConclusionsThis is the first real-world study revealing comparable survival with that in the IMpower133 trial. Treatment discontinuation from AEs was higher with atezolizumab among Canadian patients with ESCLC. Our data suggest safe use of tRT and chemoimmunotherapy, but its efficacy for ESCLC warrants further study.

Project description:IntroductionIn the phase 3 study involving the use of durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in untreated extensive-stage SCLC (CASPIAN study), first-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide (EP) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus EP alone (p = 0.0047). We report exploratory subgroup analyses of treatment patterns and outcomes according to the presence of baseline brain or central nervous system metastases.MethodsPatients (WHO performance status 0 or 1), including those with asymptomatic or treated-and-stable brain metastases, were randomized to four cycles of durvalumab plus EP followed by maintenance durvalumab until progression or up to six cycles of EP and optional prophylactic cranial irradiation. Prespecified analyses of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in subgroups with or without brain metastases used unstratified-Cox proportional hazards models. The data cutoff was on January 27, 2020.ResultsAt baseline, 28 out of 268 patients (10.4%) in the durvalumab plus EP arm and 27 out of 269 patients (10.0%) in the EP arm had known brain metastases, of whom 3 of 28 (10.7%) and 4 of 27 (14.8%) had previous brain radiotherapy, respectively. Durvalumab plus EP (versus EP alone) prolonged OS (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) in patients with (0.79, 0.44-1.41) or without (0.76, 0.62-0.92) brain metastases, with similar PFS results (0.73, 0.42-1.29 and 0.80, 0.66-0.97, respectively). Among patients without brain metastases, similar proportions in each arm developed new brain lesions as part of their first progression (8.8% and 9.5%), although 8.3% in the EP arm received prophylactic cranial irradiation. Similar proportions in each arm received subsequent brain radiotherapy (20.5% and 21.2%), although more common in patients with than without baseline brain metastases (45.5% and 18.0%).ConclusionsThe OS and PFS benefit with first-line durvalumab plus EP were maintained irrespective of the presence of brain metastases, further supporting its standard-of-care use.

Project description:BackgroundThe latest published CASPIAN trial demonstrated that adding durvalumab to etoposide and platinum (EP) improved survival dramatically for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Considering the high cost of durvalumab, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab plus EP (DEP) in the first-line setting for treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC from the U.S. payer perspective.Materials and methodsWe developed a three-state Markov model to simulate the disease course and source consumption of ES-SCLC over a lifetime horizon. Pseudo-individual patient-level data were generated from digitized Kaplan-Meier curves. Direct medical costs, including drug and administration costs, disease management and adverse events treatment fees, best supportive care and terminal care costs were obtained from sources including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and relevant literature. Health state utility values were derived from published literature. Main outcomes considered were total costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). All costs were adjusted for inflation to reflect 2019 U.S. dollars. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set as $150,000/QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to explore the uncertainty of model assumptions.ResultsCompared with EP, DEP was projected to increase life expectancy by 0.86 LYs (1.73 vs. 0.87) and 0.44 QALYs (0.93 vs. 0.49). The incremental treatment cost was $95,907, and the corresponding ICER was $216,953/QALY. The result was most sensitive to the variation of durvalumab acquisition cost. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the probability of DEP over EP regimen to be cost-effective was 9.4% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY. In the case of reducing the price of durvalumab by 30.7%, DEP was more cost-effective than EP.ConclusionFrom the perspective of the U.S. payer, adding durvalumab to EP is estimated to be not cost-effective compared with EP alone for patients with untreated ES-SCLC.Implications for practiceThe information provided by this analysis serves as a reference for decision makers. Lowering the price of durvalumab would be a potential measure to improve the economics of durvalumab plus etoposide and platinum (DEP), and the inclusion of durvalumab in the Medicare pharmacopeia could make DEP more economically available. These results may also guide physicians and patients to choose the most economically feasible treatment.

Project description:BackgroundCurrently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with platinum-etoposide (EP) are gradually becoming the first-line standard treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with EP vs. EP alone in the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met inclusion criteria from January 2016 to November 2023. Outcome measures included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), treatment-related serious adverse events (TRSAEs), and immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). The effect analysis statistics of the outcome indicators were expressed with hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsThis study included nine RCTs with a total of 4,711 patients. Compared to EP, ICIs plus EP improved patients' PFS (HR =0.71; 95% CI: 0.64-0.79; P<0.001), OS (HR =0.79; 95% CI: 0.74-0.84; P<0.001), and ORR (OR =1.27; 95% CI: 1.12-1.44; P=0.001), but increased the incidence of adverse events (AEs): TRAEs (OR =1.45; 95% CI: 1.20-1.76; P<0.001), IRAEs (OR =3.97; 95% CI: 2.49-6.32; P<0.001), and grade 3-4 IRAEs (OR =6.17; 95% CI: 2.36-16.15; P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 TRAEs (OR =1.05; P=0.54), TRSAEs (OR =1.40; P=0.13), and grade 3-4 TRSAEs (OR =1.17; P=0.72). Subgroup analysis found that patients with brain metastasis did not benefit from ICIs combined with EP therapy, and patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥1% had poorer survival benefits compared to patients with PD-L1 expression <1%.ConclusionsIn the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC, compared to EP chemotherapy, ICIs with EP can benefit patients in terms of PFS, OS, and ORR, but it will increase the occurrence of AEs.

Dataset Information

First-line atezolizumab/durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide combined with radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

First-line atezolizumab/durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide combined with radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets