Dataset Information

Concomitant Medial and Lateral Meniscus Posterior Horn Root Repair With ACL Reconstruction Using Trans-Tibial Tunnel Technique

ABSTRACT: Concomitant medial meniscus posterior horn root tears and lateral meniscus posterior horn root tears are rare in occurrence. There is limited literature on the simultaneous repair of medial and lateral meniscus root tears, with ACL reconstruction. We discuss management of concomitant medial meniscus posterior horn root tear (MMPHRT), lateral meniscus posterior horn root tear (LMPHRT), and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. We highlight the surgical technique in which we perform a repair of both medial and lateral meniscus posterior horn root repairs with ACL reconstruction. We explain the sequence of such a repair to avoid tunnel coalescence. Technique Video Video 1 The patient is in the supine position with the knee in near extension with valgus stress applied. Pie crusting of the medial collateral ligament is performed to improve the visualization of the medial meniscus posterior horn root (MMPHR) tear. FiberTape (Arthrex, Naples, FL) and FiberWire 2-0 (Arthrex) are passed through the remnant of the medial meniscus root using an antegrade suture passing device; Firstpass Mini (Smith & Nephew, London UK). The tape and sutures are passed with an antegrade suture passer, working from the anteromedial portal and visualizing from the anterolateral portal. The footprint for the MMPHR is prepared, and a guide wire is passed using a low-profile jig set at 50°. The MMPHR tunnel is reamed with a 4.5-mm reamer. The suture and tape passed through the MMPHR are shuttled out and pulled out through the tibia tunnel. With the MMPHR reduced, three all-inside devices; Fastfix 360 (Smith & Nephew) are used to repair the complex horizontal meniscus tear and the posteromedial junction radial tear. These stitches—two to the posterior capsule and the third to the posteromedial capsule—helps to reinforce the medial meniscus to the posterior capsule. We then proceed to do the LMPHRT repair. In a figure-of-four positions, lateral meniscus posterior root tear is visualized. The footprint of the lateral meniscus root is prepared. FiberTape (Arthrex) and FibreWire 2-0 (Arthrex) are passed through the remnant of the lateral meniscus root using an antegrade suture passing device; Firstpass Mini (Smith & Nephew). The FiberTape is introduced through the anteromedial portal and the FiberWire is also introduced through the anteromedial portal (Fig 3C). This is to obtain the best trajectory to pass the suture through good meniscus tissue. A guide wire is inserted at the footprint of the LMPHR using a low-profile jig set at 50°. The LMPHR tunnel is reamed using a 4.5-mm reamer. The FiberTape and the FiberWire pulled out through the LMPHR tunnel. This is followed by ACL reconstruction and passage of ACL graft. The orientation of the tunnel in the proximal tibia from medial to lateral are the MMPHR tunnel, LMPHR tunnel, and ACL tunnel. The medial and lateral meniscus roots are tensioned individually and tied over the cortical button, following which, the ACL graft is fixed with a tibial interference screw.

SUBMITTER:

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10149901 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe role of meniscal lesions and repair in combination with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction has not been extensively investigated in vivo and under weightbearing conditions.PurposeThe purposes of this study were to (1) compare the in vivo knee kinematics between patients with ACL tear and those with combined ACL and medial meniscal tears and (2) investigate kinematic differences between isolated ACL reconstruction and ACL reconstruction plus medial meniscal repair (MR). It was hypothesized that concomitant posterior horn medial meniscal tear and ACL deficiency would affect knee internal-external rotation and anterior-posterior translation but MR would restore these parameters.Study designControlled laboratory study.MethodsNineteen patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were included: 10 had intact menisci (IM group) and 9 had a medial meniscal injury that was repaired during ACL reconstruction using an all-inside technique (MR group). Preoperatively and 18 months postoperatively, active knee kinematics under weightbearing conditions was evaluated during a single-leg squat using a dynamic biplane x-ray imaging system. The general linear model was used to investigate the differences between group (IM vs MR) and time (preoperative vs follow-up) and their interactions.ResultsTibial internal rotation was higher in the MR group than the IM group both before and after surgery (P = .007). Knee valgus rotation was higher in the MR group preoperatively (P < .001), while no differences were found postoperatively because of an increase of valgus rotation in the IM group, which was significant in the descendant phase (P < .001). Preoperatively, the IM group showed a more medial tibial translation compared with the MR group in the descendant phase (P = .006).ConclusionWhen performing a single-leg squat, patients with ACL-deficient knees and a medial meniscal tear demonstrated a more valgus rotation, tibial internal rotation, and lateral tibial translation versus those with intact menisci. After ACL reconstruction and MR, these patients demonstrated significantly higher tibial internal rotation when compared with patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction.Clinical relevanceSurgeons should be aware that MR does not fully restore knee kinematics in vivo and under weightbearing conditions in the context of ACL reconstruction.

Project description:BackgroundIndependent transtibial pullout repair is a common surgical technique for repairing lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs). The shared anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) bone tunnel technique is an alternative technique for LMPRT repair combined with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) to avoid the establishment of additional bone tunnels.PurposeTo compare the clinical outcomes of the shared ACL bone tunnel versus the independent transtibial pullout techniques for LMPRT repair combined with ACLR.Study designCohort study; Level of evidence, 3.MethodsBetween March 2014 and February 2018, a total of 48 patients were diagnosed with ACL injury with concomitant LMPRT; 22 patients underwent independent transtibial pullout repair (group T), and 26 patients underwent the shared ACL bone tunnel technique (group S). At a follow-up of >2 years, we compared knee functional recovery using the Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores and the pivot-shift test. Lateral meniscal extrusion, and cartilage degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were also compared. The healing status of the lateral meniscus posterior root was compared using second-look arthroscopy and MRI.ResultsThe duration of surgery was significantly shorter in group S compared with group T (98.3 ± 11.1 vs 127.9 ± 17.5 min; P = .001). At final follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in knee functional scores, pivot shift, or grade of cartilage degeneration. Lateral meniscal extrusion was decreased in group S compared with group T (2.41 ± 0.61 vs 1.59 ± 1.35 mm; P = .014). Second-look arthroscopy revealed stable healing in 16 of 18 patients (88.9%) in group S and 10 of 15 patients (66.7%) in group T (P = .38).ConclusionBoth the shared ACL bone tunnel and the independent transtibial pullout techniques led to satisfactory clinical outcomes. The shared ACL bone tunnel technique is the simpler of the 2 procedures for combined LMPRT repair with ACLR.

Dataset Information

Concomitant Medial and Lateral Meniscus Posterior Horn Root Repair With ACL Reconstruction Using Trans-Tibial Tunnel Technique

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets