Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Outcomes and Complications of Radiological Gastrostomy vs. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy for Enteral Feeding: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (PRG) are commonly utilized to establish access to enteral nutrition. However, data comparing the outcomes of PEG vs. PRG are conflicting. Therefore, we aimed to conduct an updated systemic review and meta-analysis comparing PRG and PEG outcomes.

Methods

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched until February 24, 2023. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality, tube leakage, tube dislodgement, perforation, and peritonitis. Secondary outcomes included bleeding, infectious complications, and aspiration pneumonia. All analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software.

Results

The initial search revealed 872 studies. Of these, 43 of these studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. Of 471,208 total patients, 194,399 received PRG and 276,809 received PEG. PRG was associated with higher odds of 30-day mortality when compared to PEG (odds ratio (OR): 1.205, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.015 - 1.430, I2 = 55%). In addition, tube leakage and tube dislodgement were higher in the PRG group than in PEG (OR: 2.231, 95% CI: 1.184 - 4.2 and OR: 2.602, 95% CI: 1.911 - 3.541, respectively). Perforation, peritonitis, bleeding, and infectious complications were higher with PRG than PEG.

Conclusion

PEG is associated with lower 30-day mortality, tube leakage, and tube dislodgement rates than PRG.

SUBMITTER: Ahmed Z 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10181338 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Outcomes and Complications of Radiological Gastrostomy vs. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy for Enteral Feeding: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ahmed Zohaib Z   Iqbal Umair U   Aziz Muhammad M   Arif Syeda Faiza SF   Badal Joyce J   Farooq Umer U   Lee-Smith Wade W   Gangwani Manesh Kumar MK   Kamal Faisal F   Kobeissy Abdallah A   Mahmood Asif A   Nawras Ali A   Khara Harshit S HS   Confer Bradley D BD   Adler Douglas G DG  

Gastroenterology research 20230428 2


<h4>Background</h4>Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (PRG) are commonly utilized to establish access to enteral nutrition. However, data comparing the outcomes of PEG vs. PRG are conflicting. Therefore, we aimed to conduct an updated systemic review and meta-analysis comparing PRG and PEG outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched until February 24, 2023. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality, tube  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6811353 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8474729 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8010805 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4325364 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7689522 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8076911 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11828731 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10393568 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7037529 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10791499 | biostudies-literature