Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Validity of forensic cartridge-case comparisons.


ABSTRACT: This article presents key findings from a research project that evaluated the validity and probative value of cartridge-case comparisons under field-based conditions. Decisions provided by 228 trained firearm examiners across the US showed that forensic cartridge-case comparison is characterized by low error rates. However, inconclusive decisions constituted over one-fifth of all decisions rendered, complicating evaluation of the technique's ability to yield unambiguously correct decisions. Specifically, restricting evaluation to only the conclusive decisions of identification and elimination yielded true-positive and true-negative rates exceeding 99%, but incorporating inconclusives caused these values to drop to 93.4% and 63.5%, respectively. The asymmetric effect on the two rates occurred because inconclusive decisions were rendered six times more frequently for different-source than same-source comparisons. Considering probative value, which is a decision's usefulness for determining a comparison's ground-truth state, conclusive decisions predicted their corresponding ground-truth states with near perfection. Likelihood ratios (LRs) further showed that conclusive decisions greatly increase the odds of a comparison's ground-truth state matching the ground-truth state asserted by the decision. Inconclusive decisions also possessed probative value, predicting different-source status and having a LR indicating that they increase the odds of different-source status. The study also manipulated comparison difficulty by using two firearm models that produce dissimilar cartridge-case markings. The model chosen for being more difficult received more inconclusive decisions for same-source comparisons, resulting in a lower true-positive rate compared to the less difficult model. Relatedly, inconclusive decisions for the less difficult model exhibited more probative value, being more strongly predictive of different-source status.

SUBMITTER: Guyll M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10193974 | biostudies-literature | 2023 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Validity of forensic cartridge-case comparisons.

Guyll Max M   Madon Stephanie S   Yang Yueran Y   Burd Kayla A KA   Wells Gary G  

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20230508 20


This article presents key findings from a research project that evaluated the validity and probative value of cartridge-case comparisons under field-based conditions. Decisions provided by 228 trained firearm examiners across the US showed that forensic cartridge-case comparison is characterized by low error rates. However, inconclusive decisions constituted over one-fifth of all decisions rendered, complicating evaluation of the technique's ability to yield unambiguously correct decisions. Spec  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9371688 | biostudies-literature
2015-02-21 | GSE64840 | GEO
| S-EPMC10106295 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11306263 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5482259 | biostudies-other
2015-02-21 | E-GEOD-64840 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| PRJEB5437 | ENA
| PRJEB39413 | ENA
| S-EPMC7870635 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8248000 | biostudies-literature