S-EPMC10208471 - The effects of an integrated exercise and cardiovascular health education programme on community-dwelling older adults at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. - OmicsDI

Unknown

Dataset Information

The effects of an integrated exercise and cardiovascular health education programme on community-dwelling older adults at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although older adults are at an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), the effect of an integrated exercise and cardiovascular health education programme based on self-efficacy theory has not been well investigated among older adults. This study aims at examining the effect of this programme on community-dwelling older adults at risk of ASCVD concerning physical activity level, exercise self-efficacy and ASCVD risk profile.

Methods

A parallel two-arm randomised controlled trial with pretest-posttest design will be performed among 190 Chinese community-dwelling adults aged 60 or above in elderly community centres of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Eligible participants will be randomised by computerised generation. Experimental group will receive a 12-week integrated exercise and cardiovascular health education programme, which comprises a one-hour group-based health education talk conducted at Week 1, a booklet, a lecture video, a tailor-made exercise video, and a booster intervention by text messaging starting from Week 1 to Week 12. Control group will receive placebo intervention including a talk on basic health issues, a lecture video and corresponding leaflet. The outcomes will be investigated through self-report questionnaires and physiological evaluations at baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 36. Physical activity level, exercise self-efficacy and ASCVD risk profile will be assessed, with physical activity level at Week 24 considered the primary outcome. The main intervention effect (group differences on continuous outcome variables) will be examined via Generalized Estimating Equations with identity link.

Discussion

This study findings will provide clues to the effect of the integrated exercise and cardiovascular health education programme, which is theoretically underpinned with self-efficacy theory, in older adults at risk of ASCVD. It will also enhance the quality of community health education by providing insight into the effective teaching strategies targeting older adults.

Trial registration

This study has been registered on ChinicalTrial.gov (Trial ID: NCT05434273).

SUBMITTER: Lo FMW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10208471 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

The effects of an integrated exercise and cardiovascular health education programme on community-dwelling older adults at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Lo Flora M W FMW Wong Eliza M L EML Ho Ka Yan KY

PloS one 20230524 5

<h4>Background</h4>Although older adults are at an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), the effect of an integrated exercise and cardiovascular health education programme based on self-efficacy theory has not been well investigated among older adults. This study aims at examining the effect of this programme on community-dwelling older adults at risk of ASCVD concerning physical activity level, exercise self-efficacy and ASCVD risk profile.<h4>Methods</h4>A parallel ...[more]

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionExercise interventions have a strong evidence base for falls prevention. However, exercise can be challenging to implement and often has limited reach and poor adherence. Digital technology provides opportunities for both increased access to the intervention and support over time. Further knowledge needs to be gained regarding the effectiveness of completely self-managed digital exercise interventions. The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a self-managed digital exercise programme, Safe Step, in combination with monthly educational videos with educational videos alone, on falls over 1 year in older community-dwelling adults.Methods and analysisA two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial will be conducted with at least 1400 community-living older adults (70+ years) who experience impaired balance. Participants will be recruited throughout Sweden with enrolment through the project website. They will be randomly allocated to either the Safe Step exercise programme with additional monthly educational videos about healthy ageing and fall prevention, or the monthly education videos alone. Participants receiving the exercise intervention will be asked to exercise at home for at least 30 min, 3 times/week with support of the Safe Step application. The primary outcome will be rate of falls (fall per person year). Participants will keep a fall calendar and report falls at the end of each month through a digital questionnaire. Further assessments of secondary outcomes will be made through self-reported questionnaires and a self-test of 30 s chair stand test at baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after study start. Data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained by The Regional Ethical Review Board in Umeå (Dnr 2018/433-31). Findings will be disseminated through the project web-site, peer-reviewed journals, national and international conferences and through senior citizen organisations' newsletters.Trial registration numberNCT03963570.

Project description:BackgroundChronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common health problem in rural Nigeria but access to rehabilitation is limited. Current clinical guidelines unanimously recommend patient education (PE) including instruction on self-management, and exercises as frontline interventions for CLBP. However, the specific content of these interventions and how they are best delivered remain to be well-described, particularly for low-resource communities. This study determined the effectiveness of PE plus motor control exercise (MCE) compared with either therapy alone among rural community-dwelling adults with CLBP.MethodsA single-blind, three-arm parallel-group, randomised clinical trial including 120 adult rural dwellers (mean [SD] age, 46.0 [14.7] years) with CLBP assigned to PE plus MCE group (n = 40), PE group (n = 40), and MCE group (n = 40) was conducted. The PE was administered once weekly and the MCE twice weekly. Each group also received stretching and aerobic exercises twice weekly. All interventions were administered for 8 weeks. Blinded assessments for pain intensity and disability level as primary outcomes, and quality of life, global perceived recovery, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophising, back pain consequences belief and pain medication use as secondary outcomes were conducted at baseline, 8-week (immediately after intervention) and 20-week follow-ups.ResultsAll the groups showed significant improvements in all the primary and secondary outcomes evaluated over time. Compared with PE alone, the PE plus MCE showed a significantly greater reduction in pain intensity by an additional -1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.04 to -0.25) points at the 8-week follow-up and -1.25 (95% CI, -2.14 to -0.35) points at the 20-week follow-up. For disability level, both PE plus MCE and MCE alone showed a significantly greater improvement compared with PE alone by an additional -5.04% (95% CI, -9.57 to -0.52) and 5.68% (95% CI, 1.15 to 10.2) points, respectively, at the 8-week follow-up, and -5.96% (95% CI, -9.84 to -2.07) and 6.57% (95% CI, 2.69 to 10.4) points, respectively, at the 20-week follow-up. For the secondary outcomes, at the 8-week follow-up, PE plus MCE showed a significantly greater reduction in fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity compared with either therapy alone, and a significantly greater reduction in pain medication use compared with PE alone. However, compared with PE plus MCE, PE alone showed a significantly greater reduction in pain catastrophising at all follow-up time points, and a significantly greater improvement in back pain consequences belief at the 20-week follow-up. Additionally, PE alone compared with MCE alone showed a significantly greater improvement in back pain consequences belief at all follow-up time points. No significant between-group difference was found for other secondary outcomes.ConclusionsAmong rural community-dwelling adults with CLBP, PE plus MCE led to greater short-term improvements in pain and disability compared with PE alone, although all intervention strategies were associated with improvements in these outcomes. This trial provides additional support for combining PE with MCE, as recommended in current clinical guidelines, to promote self-management and reduce the burden of CLBP in low-resource rural communities.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03393104), Registered on 08/01/2018.

Project description:BackgroundAlmost half of the stroke patients admitted to geriatric rehabilitation has persisting problems after discharge. Currently, there is no evidence based geriatric rehabilitation programme available for older stroke patients, combining inpatient rehabilitation with adequate ambulatory aftercare in the community. Therefore, we developed an integrated multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme that includes aftercare for older persons with stroke. We evaluated the effectiveness of this newly developed rehabilitation programme in comparison to usual care.MethodsA multicentre randomised controlled trial was conducted in eight geriatric rehabilitation stroke units and their collaborating partners in primary care. The study population involved stroke patients and their informal caregivers who were aged 65 or over, living in the community before admission to geriatric rehabilitation, and expected to be able to return home after discharge. The programme consisted of three modules: inpatient neurorehabilitation, home-based self-management training, and stroke education. For patients, daily activity (FAI) was assessed as primary outcome and functional dependence (Katz-15), perceived quality of life (SSQoL) and social participation (IPA) as secondary outcomes. Additionally, among informal caregivers perceived care burden (self-rated burden VAS), objective care burden (Erasmus iBMG), and quality of life (CarerQol), were assessed as secondary outcomes.ResultsIn total 190 patients and 172 informal caregivers were included. Mean age of the patients in the intervention group was 78.9 years (SD = 7.0) and in the usual care group 79.0 years (SD = 6.5). Significant favourable effects for the programme were observed for the subscale autonomy outdoors of the IPA (- 2.15, P = .047, and for the informal caregivers perceived care burden (1.23, P = .048. For the primary outcome daily activity and the other secondary outcomes, no significant effects were observed.ConclusionThe integrated multidisciplinary programme had no effect on daily activity of older stroke patients. However, patients participating in the programme had a higher level of perceived autonomy of outdoor activities and their informal caregivers perceived a lower care burden. The programme might be promising in providing adequate (after) care, although adaptation of the programme is recommended to increase its feasibility and improve its effects.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN62286281 . Registered 19-3-2010.