Dataset Information

Multi-institutional feasibility and safety outcomes of retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in morbidly obese patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is an established treatment modality for small renal masses. While retroperitoneal RAPN (rRAPN) has the benefit of avoiding the peritoneal cavity and provides more direct access to the renal hilum and posterior kidney, there is concern about the feasibility of rRAPN particularly in morbidly obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m²] patients. We present a large scale multi-institutional study on the outcomes of rRAPN in morbidly obese patients.

Methods

A retrospective review of a cohort of morbidly obese patients who underwent rRAPN at two academic institutions was performed. Patient characteristics, operative data, and postoperative complication rates were assessed.

Results

A total of 22 morbidly obese patients were included for analysis, with a median follow-up duration of 52 months. Median patient age was 61 years and median BMI was 44.9 kg/m². Based on nephrometry score, 55% of the masses had low complexity and 32% had intermediate complexity. Median operative time was 186.0 minutes and median warm ischemia time was 23.5 minutes. Median postoperative length of stay was 2 days, and only one patient experienced a high-grade complication within 30 days of surgery.

Conclusions

rRAPN in select morbidly obese patients appears to have acceptable operative and postoperative outcomes. Further studies and follow-up are needed to better generalization and understand long-term impacts.

SUBMITTER: Stout TE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10251096 | biostudies-literature | 2023 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Multi-institutional feasibility and safety outcomes of retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in morbidly obese patients.

Stout Thomas Edward TE McElree Ian Mitchell IM Smith Aaron Christopher AC Rac Goran G Patel Hiten H Gupta Gopal G Gellhaus Paul Thomas PT

Translational andrology and urology 20230508 5

<h4>Background</h4>Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is an established treatment modality for small renal masses. While retroperitoneal RAPN (rRAPN) has the benefit of avoiding the peritoneal cavity and provides more direct access to the renal hilum and posterior kidney, there is concern about the feasibility of rRAPN particularly in morbidly obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] patients. We present a large scale multi-institutional study on the outcomes of rRAPN in morbi ...[more]

PMID: 37305642

Similar Datasets

Project description:ContextRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has gained increasing popularity as primary minimally invasive surgical treatment for localized renal tumors, and it has preferably been performed with a transperitoneal approach. However, the retroperitoneal approach represents an alternative approach given potential advantages.ObjectiveTo provide an updated analysis of the comparative outcomes of retroperitoneal RAPN (R-RAPN) versus transperitoneal RAPN (T-RAPN).Evidence acquisitionA systematic review of the literature was performed up to September 2021 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. A sensitivity analysis was performed considering only matched-pair studies.Evidence synthesisSeventeen studies, which were published between 2013 and 2021, were retrieved. None of them was a randomized clinical trial. Among the 6,266 patients included in the meta-analysis, 2261 (36.1%) and 4,005 (63.9%) underwent R-RAPN and T-RAPN, respectively. No significant difference was found in terms of baseline features. The T-RAPN group presented a higher rate of male patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.86, p = 0.03) and larger tumor size (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 0.2 cm; p = 0.003). The R-RAPN group reported more frequent posterior renal masses (OR: 0.23; p < 0.0001). The retroperitoneal approach presented lower estimated blood loss (WMD: 30.41 ml; p = 0.001), shorter operative time (OT; WMD: 20.36 min; p = 0.0001), and shorter length of stay (LOS; WMD: 0.35 d; p = 0.002). Overall complication rates were 13.7% and 16.05% in the R-RAPN and T-RAPN groups, respectively (OR: 1.32; p = 0.008). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding major (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥3 grade) complication rate, "pentafecta" achievement, as well as positive margin rates. When considering only matched-pair studies, no difference between groups was found in terms of baseline characteristics. Posterior renal masses were more frequent in the R-RAPN group (OR: 0.6; p = 0.03). Similar to the analysis of the entire cohort, R-RAPN reported lower EBL (WMD: 35.56 ml; p < 0.0001) and a shorter OT (WMD: 18.31 min; p = 0.03). Overall and major complication rates were similar between the two groups. The LOS was significantly lower for R-RAPN (WMD: 0.46 d; p = 0.02). No statistically significant difference was found between groups in terms of overall PSM rates.ConclusionsR-RAPN offers similar surgical outcomes to T-RAPN, and it carries potential advantages in terms of shorter OT and LOS. Available evidence remains limited by the lack of randomized clinical trials.Patient summaryIn this review of the literature, we looked at comparative outcomes of two surgical approaches to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. We found that the retroperitoneal technique offers similar surgical outcomes to the transperitoneal one, with potential advantages in terms of shorter operative time and length of hospital stay.

Project description:ImportanceTechnical skill in complex surgical procedures may affect clinical outcomes, and there is growing interest in understanding the clinical implications of surgeon proficiency levels.ObjectivesTo determine whether surgeon scores representing technical skills of robot-assisted kidney surgery are associated with patient outcomes.Design, setting, and participantsThis quality improvement study included 10 urological surgeons participating in a surgical collaborative in Michigan from July 2021 to September 2022. Each surgeon submitted up to 7 videos of themselves performing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Videos were segmented into 6 key steps, yielding 127 video clips for analysis. Each video clip was deidentified and distributed to at least 3 of the 24 blinded peer surgeons from the collaborative who also perform robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Reviewers rated technical skill and provided written feedback. Statistical analysis was performed from May 2023 to January 2024.Main outcomes and measuresReviewers scored each video clip using a validated instrument to assess technical skill for partial nephrectomy on a scale of 1 to 5 (higher scores indicating greater skill). For all submitting surgeons, outcomes from a clinical registry were assessed for length of stay (LOS) greater than 3 days, estimated blood loss (EBL) greater than 500 mL, warm ischemia time (WIT) greater than 30 minutes, positive surgical margin (PSM), 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, and 30-day readmission.ResultsAmong the 27 unique surgeons who participated in this study as reviewers and/or individuals performing the procedures, 3 (11%) were female, and the median age was 47 (IQR, 39-52) years. Risk-adjusted outcomes were associated with scores representing surgeon skills. The overall performance score ranged from 3.5 to 4.7 points with a mean (SD) of 4.1 (0.4) points. Greater skill was correlated with significantly lower rates of LOS greater than 3 days (-6.8% [95% CI, -8.3% to -5.2%]), EBL greater than 500 mL (-2.6% [95% CI, -3.0% to -2.1%]), PSM (-8.2% [95% CI, -9.2% to -7.2%]), ED visits (-3.9% [95% CI, -5.0% to -2.8%]), and readmissions (-5.7% [95% CI, -6.9% to -4.6%]) (P < .001 for all). Higher overall score was also associated with higher partial nephrectomy volume (β coefficient, 11.4 [95% CI, 10.0-12.7]; P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceIn this quality improvement study on video-based evaluation of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, higher technical skill was associated with lower rates of adverse clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that video-based evaluation plays a role in assessing surgical skill and can be used in quality improvement initiatives to improve patient care.

Dataset Information

Multi-institutional feasibility and safety outcomes of retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in morbidly obese patients.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Multi-institutional feasibility and safety outcomes of retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in morbidly obese patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets