Dataset Information

Measurement of serum anti-Mullerian hormone by revised Gen II or automated assay: Reproducibility under various blood/serum storage conditions.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

We investigated the agreement between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels measured with revised Gen II (rev-Gen II) and automated AMH (Access) assays and evaluated the reproducibility of each method under various blood/serum storage conditions.

Methods

AMH levels in blood samples from 74 volunteers were measured by rev-Gen II and Access assays under various conditions: immediate serum separation and AMH measurement (fresh control); serum stored at -20 °C and AMH measured after 48 hours, 1 week, and 2 years; serum stored at 0 to 4 °C and AMH measured after 48 hours and 1 week; and blood kept at room temperature and delayed serum separation after 48 hours and 1 week, with immediate AMH measurement.

Results

In fresh controls, all rev-Gen II-AMH values were higher than comparable Access-AMH values (difference, 8.3% to 19.7%). AMH levels measured with the two methods were strongly correlated for all sample conditions (r=0.977 to 0.995, all p<0.001). For sera stored at -20 °C or 0 to 4 °C for 48 hours, Access-AMH values were comparable to control measurements, but rev-Gen II-AMH values were significantly lower. AMH levels in sera stored at -20 °C or 0 to 4 °C for 1 week were significantly lower than in fresh controls, irrespective of method. Across methods, long-term storage at -20 °C for 2 years yielded AMH measurements significantly higher than control values. When serum separation was delayed, rev-Gen II-AMH values were significantly lower than control measurements, but Access-AMH values varied.

Conclusion

The rev-Gen II and Access-AMH assays showed varying reproducibility across blood/serum storage conditions, but automated Access yielded superior stability to rev-Gen II.

SUBMITTER: Lee JY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10258520 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Measurement of serum anti-Müllerian hormone by revised Gen II or automated assay: Reproducibility under various blood/serum storage conditions.

Lee Joong Yeup JY Kim Chung Hyon CH Choe Seung-Ah SA Seo Soyeon S Kim Seok Hyun SH

Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine 20230524 2

<h4>Objective</h4>We investigated the agreement between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels measured with revised Gen II (rev-Gen II) and automated AMH (Access) assays and evaluated the reproducibility of each method under various blood/serum storage conditions.<h4>Methods</h4>AMH levels in blood samples from 74 volunteers were measured by rev-Gen II and Access assays under various conditions: immediate serum separation and AMH measurement (fresh control); serum stored at -20 °C and AMH measured ...[more]

PMID: 37258104

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEndometrial proliferative lesions (EPL) usually refer to endometrial hyperplasia (EH) and endometrial cancer (EC). Among patients with premenopausal EPL who wish to preserve their fertility, only those with EH and early-stage EC have the possibility to undergo fertility preservation therapy. However, there is currently a lack of specific and reliable screening criteria and models for identifying these patients.MethodsThis study utilized a retrospective diagnostic study design. The training set included medical record information that met the criteria between August 2017 and October 2022, while the validation set consisted of medical record information that met the criteria from November 2022 to May 2023. The endometrial pathological test served as the gold standard. The serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level before endometrial sampling and a regression model were employed to predict EPL.ResultsThe study included a total of 1209 patients with PCOS (1119 in the control group and 90 in the endometrial proliferative lesion group) and 5366 women without PCOS (5249 in the control group and 117 in the proliferative lesion group). In the case of PCOS patients aged 20-39 years, the most effective screening threshold for AMH was found to be a serum AMH level of ≤5.39 ng/mL. The model used for this group was logit(p) = -2.562 - 0.430 × AMH + 0.127 × BMI + 1.512 × hypertension + 0.956 × diabetes -1.145 × regular menstruation. On the other hand, for non-PCOS women aged 20-39 years, the optimal screening threshold for AMH was determined to be a serum AMH value of ≤2.18 ng/mL. The model used for this group was logit(p) = -3.778 - 0.823 × AMH + 0.176 × BMI + 2.660 × diabetes -1.527 × regular menstruation -1.117 × dysmenorrhea. It is important to note that all of these findings have successfully passed internal verification.ConclusionFor PCOS and non-PCOS women aged 20-39 years, the serum AMH test and related multiple regression models were obtained for the warning of EPL.

Project description:BackgroundTo determine the effects of age and the serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes, especially among young women with low serum AMH levels and older women with high AMH levels.MethodsThis study was a cohort study in which a total of 9431 women aged 20-51?years who were undergoing their first IVF cycles were recruited. Ovarian response parameters included the number of retrieved oocytes, the number of 2 pronuclear zygotes (2PN), and the frequency of good-quality embryos (GQE). Pregnancy outcomes included the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR), miscarriage rate (MR), and cumulative CPR and LBR (CCPR and CLBR).ResultsAmong women under 35?years of age, the ovarian response, CPR, CCPR, LBR and CLBR (p?<?0.01) were significantly lower in the low-AMH group than in the average-AMH and high-AMH groups. In women above 35?years of age, the ovarian response, CPR, CCPR and CLBR (p?<?0.01) were significantly higher in the average-AMH and low-AMH groups. The LBR in the older high-AMH group was significantly higher (37.45% vs 20.34%, p?<?0.01) than that in the older low-AMH group, but there was no difference (37.45% vs 32.46%, p?=?0.11) compared with the older average-AMH group. When there was a discrepancy between age and the AMH level, the young low-AMH group showed a poorer ovarian response but a better CPR (58.01% vs 49.44%, p?<?0.01) and LBR (48.52% vs 37.45%, p?<?0.01) than the older high-AMH group. However, the CCPR (65.37% vs 66.11%, p?=?0.75) and CLBR (56.35% vs 52.89%, p?=?0.15) between the two groups were comparable. The conservative CLBR in the two discrepancy groups increased until the third embryo transfer and reached a plateau thereafter.Conclusion(s)Even with a relatively low AMH level, young women still had better pregnancy outcomes following IVF than older women. However, increasing the AMH level improves the cumulative outcomes of the older group to a comparable level through a notable and superior ovarian response.