Unknown

Dataset Information

0

MRI-based deep learning model predicts distant metastasis and chemotherapy benefit in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma.


ABSTRACT: Chemotherapy remains controversial for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma because of its considerable prognostic heterogeneity. We aimed to develop an MRI-based deep learning model for predicting distant metastasis and assessing chemotherapy efficacy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 1072 patients from three Chinese centers for training (Center 1, n = 575) and external validation (Centers 2 and 3, n = 497). The deep learning model significantly predicted the risk of distant metastases for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma and was validated in the external validation cohort. In addition, the deep learning model outperformed the clinical and radiomics models in terms of predictive performance. Furthermore, the deep learning model facilitates the identification of high-risk patients who could benefit from chemotherapy, providing useful additional information for individualized treatment decisions.

SUBMITTER: Hu YJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10291473 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

MRI-based deep learning model predicts distant metastasis and chemotherapy benefit in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Hu Yu-Jun YJ   Zhang Lin L   Xiao You-Ping YP   Lu Tian-Zhu TZ   Guo Qiao-Juan QJ   Lin Shao-Jun SJ   Liu Lan L   Chen Yun-Bin YB   Huang Zi-Lu ZL   Liu Ya Y   Su Yong Y   Liu Li-Zhi LZ   Gong Xiao-Chang XC   Pan Jian-Ji JJ   Li Jin-Gao JG   Xia Yun-Fei YF  

iScience 20230519 6


Chemotherapy remains controversial for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma because of its considerable prognostic heterogeneity. We aimed to develop an MRI-based deep learning model for predicting distant metastasis and assessing chemotherapy efficacy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 1072 patients from three Chinese centers for training (Center 1, n = 575) and external validation (Centers 2 and 3, n = 497). The deep learning model significantly pr  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7449924 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7452897 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5731982 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6738077 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9151760 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4980057 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10566074 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4939954 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8490628 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6127191 | biostudies-literature