Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy for Patients With Bladder Cancer.


ABSTRACT:

Importance

The value to payers of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) when compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC) for patients with bladder cancer is unclear.

Objectives

To compare the cost-effectiveness of iRARC with that of ORC.

Design, setting, and participants

This economic evaluation used individual patient data from a randomized clinical trial at 9 surgical centers in the United Kingdom. Patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer were recruited from March 20, 2017, to January 29, 2020. The analysis used a health service perspective and a 90-day time horizon, with supplementary analyses exploring patient benefits up to 1 year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken. Data were analyzed from January 13, 2022, to March 10, 2023.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive either iRARC (n = 169) or ORC (n = 169).

Main outcomes and measures

Costs of surgery were calculated using surgery timings and equipment costs, with other hospital data based on counts of activity. Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level instrument responses. Prespecified subgroup analyses were undertaken based on patient characteristics and type of diversion.

Results

A total of 305 patients with available outcome data were included in the analysis, with a mean (SD) age of 68.3 (8.1) years, and of whom 241 (79.0%) were men. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy was associated with statistically significant reductions in admissions to intensive therapy (6.35% [95% CI, 0.42%-12.28%]), and readmissions to hospital (14.56% [95% CI, 5.00%-24.11%]), but increases in theater time (31.35 [95% CI, 13.67-49.02] minutes). The additional cost of iRARC per patient was £1124 (95% CI, -£576 to £2824 [US $1622 (95% CI, -$831 to $4075)]) with an associated gain in quality-adjusted life-years of 0.01124 (95% CI, 0.00391-0.01857). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £100 008 (US $144 312) per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy had a much higher probability of being cost-effective for subgroups defined by age, tumor stage, and performance status.

Conclusions and relevance

In this economic evaluation of surgery for patients with bladder cancer, iRARC reduced short-term morbidity and some associated costs. While the resulting cost-effectiveness ratio was in excess of thresholds used by many publicly funded health systems, patient subgroups were identified for which iRARC had a high probability of being cost-effective.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03049410.

SUBMITTER: Dixon S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10314306 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy for Patients With Bladder Cancer.

Dixon Simon S   Hill Harry H   Flight Laura L   Khetrapal Pramit P   Ambler Gareth G   Williams Norman R NR   Brew-Graves Chris C   Kelly John D JD   Catto James W F JWF  

JAMA network open 20230601 6


<h4>Importance</h4>The value to payers of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) when compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC) for patients with bladder cancer is unclear.<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare the cost-effectiveness of iRARC with that of ORC.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>This economic evaluation used individual patient data from a randomized clinical trial at 9 surgical centers in the United Kingdom. Patients with nonmetastatic blad  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC11842888 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6122745 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9051984 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6130186 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7769378 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9109000 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4424172 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9522012 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9117739 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9084475 | biostudies-literature