Dataset Information

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in central and northern Europe (Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland)—SMART 2017–21

ABSTRACT: Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli collected in four central and northern European countries (Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland) during 2017–21.

Methods

Participating clinical laboratories each collected up to 250 consecutive Gram-negative isolates per year from patients with bloodstream, intraabdominal, lower respiratory tract or urinary tract infections. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using 2022 EUCAST breakpoints. β-Lactamase genes were identified in select β-lactam-non-susceptible isolate subsets.

Results

Ninety-five percent of all Enterobacterales (n = 4158), 95% of ESBL-positive non-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (non-CRE) phenotype Escherichia coli and 85% of ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Klebsiella pneumoniae were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible. By country, 88% (Belgium), 91% (Sweden, Switzerland) and 96% (Norway) of ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Enterobacterales were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible. Greater than ninety-nine percent of non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales and all ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Enterobacterales were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (96%) and imipenem/relebactam (95%) inhibited most Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 823). Both agents retained activity against ≥75% of cefepime-resistant, ceftazidime-resistant and piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant isolates; 56% and 43% of meropenem-resistant isolates were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible and imipenem/relebactam susceptible, respectively. By country, 94% (Belgium), 95% (Sweden) and 100% (Norway, Switzerland) of P. aeruginosa were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible and 93% (Sweden) to 98% (Norway, Switzerland) were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Carbapenemase gene carriage among Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates was generally low (<1%) or completely absent with one exception: an estimated 2.7% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Belgium carried an MBL.

Conclusions

Recent clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected in four central and northern European countries were highly susceptible (≥95%) to ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam.

SUBMITTER:

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10416811 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo assess the in vitro antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam and comparator agents against clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli collected in Israel from 2018 to 2022.MethodsSix clinical laboratories each collected up to 250 consecutive Gram-negative isolates per year from patients with bloodstream, intra-abdominal, lower respiratory tract and urinary tract infections. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted with 2024 EUCAST breakpoints. Acquired β-lactamase gene carriage was investigated for most ceftolozane/tazobactam- and imipenem/relebactam-resistant isolates.ResultsAmong the full collection of Enterobacterales (n = 4420), 95.1% were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, including 95.3% of putative AmpC/ESBL-positive, non-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) phenotype Escherichia coli and 86.6% of AmpC/ESBL-positive, non-CRE phenotype Klebsiella pneumoniae. Overall, 99.8% of non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (n = 3723) were imipenem/relebactam susceptible including 98% of the MDR isolates. Most Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (n = 1182) were inhibited by ceftolozane/tazobactam (93.9% susceptible) and imipenem/relebactam (94.7%). Imipenem/relebactam retained activity against ≥78% of cefepime-resistant, ceftazidime-resistant, and piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant P. aeruginosa, while ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited the greatest percentage of meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (67.4%) among comparator β-lactam antimicrobials. Molecular characterization showed the majority of imipenem/relebactam-resistant Enterobacterales harboured a metallo-β-lactamase, while half of the ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant Enterobacterales carried an acquired ESBL or AmpC. Most of the imipenem/relebactam- and ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant P. aeruginosa characterized did not possess acquired β-lactamases.ConclusionsRecent clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected in Israel were highly susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam.

Project description:ObjectivesTo determine susceptibility profiles and β-lactamase content for ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant and imipenem/relebactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected in eight global regions during 2016-21.MethodsBroth microdilution MICs were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints. PCR to identify β-lactamase genes or WGS was performed on selected isolate subsets.ResultsCeftolozane/tazobactam-resistant [from 0.6% (Australia/New Zealand) to 16.7% (Eastern Europe)] and imipenem/relebactam-resistant [from 1.3% (Australia/New Zealand) to 13.6% (Latin America)] P. aeruginosa varied by geographical region. Globally, 5.9% of isolates were both ceftolozane/tazobactam resistant and imipenem/relebactam resistant; 76% of these isolates carried MBLs. Most ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant/imipenem/relebactam-susceptible isolates carried ESBLs (44%) or did not carry non-intrinsic (acquired) β-lactamases (49%); 95% of imipenem/relebactam-resistant/ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible isolates did not carry non-intrinsic β-lactamases. Isolates that carried indicators of strong PDC (Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase) up-regulation without a mutation known to expand the spectrum of PDC, or non-intrinsic β-lactamases, showed an 8-fold increase in ceftolozane/tazobactam modal MIC; however, this rarely (3%) resulted in ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance. Isolates with a PDC mutation and an indicator for PDC upregulation were ceftolozane/tazobactam non-susceptible (MIC, ≥ 8 mg/L). MICs ranged widely (1 to >32 mg/L) for isolates with a PDC mutation and no positively identified indicator for PDC up-regulation. Imipenem/relebactam-resistant/ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible isolates without non-intrinsic β-lactamases frequently (91%) harboured genetic lesions implying OprD loss of function; however, this finding alone did not account for this phenotype. Among imipenem-non-susceptible isolates without non-intrinsic β-lactamases, implied OprD loss only shifted the distribution of imipenem/relebactam MICs up by 1-2 doubling dilutions, resulting in ∼10% imipenem/relebactam-resistant isolates.ConclusionsP. aeruginosa with ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant/imipenem/relebactam-susceptible and imipenem/relebactam-resistant/ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible phenotypes were uncommon and harboured diverse resistance determinants.

Project description:Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are being isolated from patient specimens with increasing frequency in Latin America and worldwide. The current study provides an initial description of the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam (IMR) against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) and P. aeruginosa infecting hospitalized patients in Latin America. From 2018 to 2020, 37 clinical laboratories in nine Latin American countries participated in the SMART global surveillance program and contributed 15,466 NME and 3408 P aeruginosa isolates. MICs for IMR and seven comparators were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted by CLSI M100 (2022) breakpoints. β-lactamase genes were identified in selected isolate subsets. IMR (96.9% susceptible), amikacin (95.9%), meropenem (90.7%), and imipenem (88.7%) were the most active agents against NME. Among piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible NME (n = 4124), 90.4% of isolates were IMR-susceptible (range by country, 97.2 [Chile] to 67.0% [Guatemala]) and among meropenem-nonsusceptible NME isolates (n = 1433), 74.0% were IMR-susceptible (94.1% [Puerto Rico] to 5.1% [Guatemala]). Overall, 6.3% of all collected NME isolates carried a KPC (metallo-β-lactamase [MBL]-negative), 1.8% an MBL, 0.4% an OXA-48-like carbapenemase (MBL-negative), and 0.1% a GES carbapenemase (MBL-negative). Amikacin (85.2% susceptible) and IMR (80.1%) were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa; only 56.5% of isolates were imipenem-susceptible. Relebactam increased susceptibility to imipenem by 22.0% (from 23.9% to 45.9%) in piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates (n = 1031) and by 35.5% (from 5.5% to 41.0%) in meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates (n = 1128). Overall, 7.6% of all collected P. aeruginosa isolates were MBL-positive and 0.7% carried a GES carbapenemase. In conclusion, in 2018‒2020, almost all NME (97%) and most P. aeruginosa (80%) isolates from Latin America were IMR-susceptible. Continued surveillance of the in vitro activities of IMR and comparator agents against Gram-negative pathogens, and monitoring for β-lactamase changes (in particular for increases in MBLs), is warranted.

Project description:BackgroundCarbapenem-resistant bacteria are an increasing problem in clinical practice; thus, it is important to identify β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., relebactam) that can restore carbapenem susceptibility. We report analyses of relebactam enhancement of imipenem activity against both imipenem-nonsusceptible (NS) and imipenem-susceptible (S) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. Gram-negative bacterial isolates were collected for the ongoing Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends global surveillance program. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-defined broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were used to determine the imipenem and imipenem/relebactam antibacterial susceptibilities of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates.ResultsBetween 2018 and 2020, 36.2% of P. aeruginosa (N = 23,073) and 8.2% of Enterobacterales (N = 91,769) isolates were imipenem-NS. Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility in 64.1% and 49.4% of imipenem-NS P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates, respectively. Restoration of susceptibility was largely observed among K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenemase-negative P. aeruginosa. Relebactam also caused a lowering of imipenem MIC among imipenem-S P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates from chromosomal Ambler class C β-lactamase (AmpC)-producing species. For both imipenem-NS and imipenem-S P. aeruginosa isolates, relebactam reduced the imipenem MIC mode from 16 μg/mL to 1 μg/mL and from 2 μg/mL to 0.5 μg/mL, respectively, compared with imipenem alone.ConclusionsRelebactam restored imipenem susceptibility among nonsusceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhanced imipenem susceptibility among susceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and isolates from Enterobacterales species that can produce chromosomal AmpC. The reduced imipenem modal MIC values with relebactam may result in a higher probability of target attainment in patients.

Project description:ObjectivesTo describe the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa recently isolated from lower respiratory tract infection samples by hospital laboratories in Western Europe.MethodsFrom 2018 to 2020, 29 hospital laboratories in six countries in Western Europe participated in the SMART global surveillance programme and contributed 4414 NME and 1995 P. aeruginosa isolates. MICs were determined using the CLSI broth microdilution method and interpreted by EUCAST (2021) breakpoints. β-Lactamase genes were identified in selected isolate subsets (2018-20) and oprD sequenced in molecularly characterized P. aeruginosa (2020).ResultsImipenem/relebactam (99.1% susceptible), amikacin (97.2%), meropenem (96.1%) and imipenem (95.9%) were the most active agents tested against NME; by country, relebactam increased imipenem susceptibility from <1% (France, Germany, UK) to 11.0% (Italy). A total of 96.0% of piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant (n = 990) and 81.1% of meropenem-resistant (n = 106) NME were imipenem/relebactam-susceptible. Only 0.5% of NME were MBL positive, 0.9% were OXA-48-like-positive (MBL negative) and 2.8% were KPC positive (MBL negative). Amikacin (91.5% susceptible) and imipenem/relebactam (91.4%) were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa; 72.3% of isolates were imipenem-susceptible. Relebactam increased susceptibility to imipenem by 34.4% (range by country, 39.1%-73.5%) in piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant and by 37.4% (3.1%-40.5%) in meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. Only 1.8% of P. aeruginosa isolates were MBL positive. Among molecularly characterized imipenem/relebactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from 2020, 90.9% (30/33) were oprD deficient.ConclusionsImipenem/relebactam appears to be a potential treatment option for lower respiratory tract infections caused by piperacillin/tazobactam- and meropenem-resistant NME and P. aeruginosa in Western Europe.