Dataset Information

Drug-coated balloons for treating de novo lesions in large coronary vessels: A case report.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, while an effective intervention, can frequently lead to acute occlusion with severe consequences. Although clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in treating acute coronary artery occlusion and in preventing restenosis, there has been limited exploration on the use of DCB in treating de novo lesions in large vessels. Currently, DCB are only recommended for patients with small vessel lesions and in-stent restenosis lesions, those at high risk of bleeding, and other special groups of patients.

Case summary

This report presents a case of successful drug-coated balloon treatment of de novo lesions in large coronary vessels. Postoperatively, the patient demonstrated favorable recovery, with subsequent examination results revealing no significant differences from the previous examination.

Conclusion

The successful treatment of the patient in our case highlights the potential of DCB in the treatment of de novo lesions in large coronary vessels.

SUBMITTER: Zhang ZQ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10424029 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Drug-coated balloons for treating <i>de novo</i> lesions in large coronary vessels: A case report.

Zhang Zhi-Qiang ZQ Qin Yi-Ran YR Yin Man M Chen Xue-Heng XH Chen Lei L Liang Wen-Yan WY Wei Xi-Qing XQ

World journal of clinical cases 20230701 20

<h4>Background</h4>Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, while an effective intervention, can frequently lead to acute occlusion with severe consequences. Although clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in treating acute coronary artery occlusion and in preventing restenosis, there has been limited exploration on the use of DCB in treating <i>de novo</i> lesions in large vessels. Currently, DCB are only recommended for patients with small vessel le ...[more]

PMID: 37584001

Similar Datasets

Project description:The role of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) is unclear. Increasing evidence has shown a benefit for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Its effect on de novo coronary lesions is more controversial. Several smaller randomized trials found conflicting results.This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the effect of local Paclitaxel delivery/drug eluting balloons (DEB) (+/- bare metal stent) compared to current standard therapy (stenting) to treat de novo coronary lesions. Data sources for RCT were identified through a literature search from 2005 through 28 December 2012. The main endpoints of interest were target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), binary in-segment restenosis, stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), late lumen loss (LLL) and mortality. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals.Eight studies (11 subgroups) and a total of 1,706 patients were included in this analysis. Follow-up duration ranged from 6 to 12 months. Overall, DEB showed similar results to the comparator treatment. The relative risk (RR) for MACE was 0.95 (0.64 to 1.39); P = 0.776, for mortality it was 0.79 (0.30 to 2.11), P = 0.644, for stent thrombosis it was 1.45 (0.42 to 5.01), P = 0.560, for MI it was 1.26 (0.49 to 3.21), P = 0.629, for TLR it was 1.09 (0.71 to 1.68); P = 0.700 and for binary in-stent restenosis it was 0.96 (0.48 to 1.93), P = 0.918. Compared to bare metal stents (BMS), DEB showed a lower LLL (- 0.26 mm (-0.51 to 0.01)) and a trend towards a lower MACE risk (RR 0.66 (0.43 to 1.02)).Overall, drug-eluting balloons (+/- bare metal stent) are not superior to current standard therapies (BMS or drug eluting stent (DES)) in treating de novo coronary lesions. However, the performance of DEB seems to lie in between DES and BMS with a trend towards superiority over BMS alone. Therefore, DEB may be considered in patients with contraindications for DES. The heterogeneity between the included studies is a limitation of this meta-analysis; different drug-eluting balloons have been used.