Dataset Information

Conjoint tendon lengthening for recalcitrant anterior shoulder pain after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a technique article.

ABSTRACT: The incidence of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has increased since the Food and Drug Administration approved its use in the United States in 2004. With the current RSA implants available for surgeon use within the United States of America, each design, regardless of humeral inlay vs. onlay, distalizes the shoulder's center of rotation. This new center of rotation purposely increases tension to the deltoid, which is the main working muscle in RSA, but also retensions the adjacent tendons. Some patients after RSA experience continued anterior shoulder discomfort that limits their active range of motion and overall patient satisfaction. It has been isolated with physical examination that there is tenderness to palpation at the coracoid process and throughout the conjoint tendon. We have completed conjoint tendon lengthening procedures on this subset of patients with excellent clinical results. This article describes the technique for patients who underwent conjoint tendon lengthening after RSA for recalcitrant anterior shoulder pain.

SUBMITTER: Gomez GV

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10426463 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Conjoint tendon lengthening for recalcitrant anterior shoulder pain after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a technique article.

Gomez Gregory V GV Huffman G Russell GR

JSES reviews, reports, and techniques 20220113 2

The incidence of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has increased since the Food and Drug Administration approved its use in the United States in 2004. With the current RSA implants available for surgeon use within the United States of America, each design, regardless of humeral inlay vs. onlay, distalizes the shoulder's center of rotation. This new center of rotation purposely increases tension to the deltoid, which is the main working muscle in RSA, but also retensions the adjacent tendons. S ...[more]

PMID: 37587959

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDegenerative arthritis of the shoulder is a common condition that is successfully treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Rotator cuff disease has evolved as a leading cause of failure of anatomic TSA, requiring revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This revision procedure can be extremely complex, particularly if removal of a well-fixed glenoid component is necessary. This case series outlines the technique and preliminary clinical results of conversion of anatomic TSA to RSA utilizing both modular humeral and hybrid glenoid components.MethodsFrom July 2017 to December 2019, the senior author (PMC) performed 84 consecutive anatomic TSA procedures utilizing a modular humeral arthroplasty system and a unique hybrid glenoid component. Three cases (3/84, or 3.6%) required conversion from anatomic TSA to RSA because of postoperative traumatic rotator cuff failure. All modular revision cases were performed without humeral stem removal and with utilization of the existing, well-fixed hybrid glenoid central titanium peg as the foundation for glenoid component revision. Preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, visual analog scale pain scores, forward flexion, and patient satisfaction were analyzed in this modular revision group. In addition, several perioperative variables including operative time, blood loss, and length of stay were compared between this modular revision group and a nonmodular anatomic TSA to RSA revision comparative cohort.ResultsAt an average follow-up of 24 months, average active forward flexion, postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and visual analog scale pain scores improved significantly compared with preoperative scores in the modular revision group. All three patients were satisfied with their outcome. The average total operative time (109 minutes vs. 154 minutes, P = .02), blood loss (183 cc vs. 500 cc, P = .08), and length of hospital stay (26.3 hours vs. 36.6 hours P < .05) were lower in the modular revision group than those in a nonmodular revision cohort.ConclusionRevision of anatomic TSA to RSA utilizing a modular humeral system and a convertible hybrid glenoid component that does not require removal of a well-fixed central titanium peg which serves as the foundation for glenoid component revision was performed efficiently, safely, and successfully in three cases. This technique results in significantly improved clinical outcomes when revision to RSA is needed while potentially decreasing perioperative complications in the revision setting.

Project description:BackgroundManagement of failed anterior stabilization is difficult. There are two main options for revision either a revision labral repair which has published high failure rates because of poor quality capsulolabral tissues or a bone block/Latarjet procedure with associated morbidity and complication rates. On this background, the senior author (D.T.) has developed a new procedure to treat this difficult to manage clinical scenario.AimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the 2-year results of an arthroscopic conjoint tendon transfer procedure. The procedure has previously been developed to provide a potential solution for active patients with a failed labral repair, subcritical glenoid bone loss, and an on-track Hill-Sachs lesion.MethodsConsecutive patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were prospectively recruited. Inclusion criteria were active patients with recurrent shoulder instability owing to failed labral repair, less than 10% anterior glenoid bone loss, and an on-track Hill Sachs lesion. Patients were fully consented and offered a choice of revision with an arthroscopic labral repair, a Latarjet procedure or the arthroscopic conjoint tendon transfer procedure. Preoperative and postoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index and Oxford Instability Score were collected.ResultsEight patients met the inclusion criteria and opted for the conjoint tendon transfer procedure. Mean age was 35 with a male:female ratio of 7:1. No patients had hyperlaxity clinically. At median follow-up of 31 months (range 24-41), there was a significant improvement in both the median Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (53.7 to 13.4, P = .0003) and Oxford Instability Score (27 to 44.5, P = .0017) scores. No patient had a further dislocation, and all were able to resume contact and noncontact sports.ConclusionOur results at a minimum of 2-year follow-up demonstrate that the arthroscopic transfer of the conjoint tendon confers clinical stability in patients with a failed primary labral repair who have minimal bone loss.

Dataset Information

Conjoint tendon lengthening for recalcitrant anterior shoulder pain after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a technique article.

Publications

Conjoint tendon lengthening for recalcitrant anterior shoulder pain after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a technique article.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets