Dataset Information

Thread-embedding acupuncture may improve symptom resolution in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Various traditional medicine treatments have been investigated to treat GERD. Among those, thread-embedding acupuncture (TEA) has the advantage that patients need to undergo the procedure infrequently; however, its efficacy is unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy of TEA in treating GERD.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 66 participants with GERD: 33 received two sessions of TEA + standard therapy (proton-pump inhibitor [PPI]) (TEA+PPI group) and 33 received PPI alone (PPI group). Primary outcomes included GerdQ score and heartburn and regurgitation resolution. Secondary outcomes were antacids requirement, the Frequency Scale for Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) score, and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score. The safety outcome was adverse events (AEs).

Results

After four weeks of treatment, the TEA+PPI group significantly reduced the GerdQ score (mean difference [MD] and 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.8 [-2.4, -1.1]) and increased the rate of heartburn and regurgitation resolution compared to PPI (54.5% versus 9.1%, respectively) compared to PPI. The TEA+PPI group also significantly reduced the number of antacid packs used (MD [95%-CI]: -9.4 [-12.1, -6.7]), FSSG score (MD [95%-CI]: -9.4 [-11.0, -7.8]), and GERD-HRQL score (MD [95%-CI]: -5.6 [-7.7, -3.5]) compared to PPI. Five patients experienced AEs, which were mild local complications at the acupoints.

Conclusion

TEA combined with PPI is more effective than PPI alone in treating GERD. Further studies with longer follow-ups are required to confirm these findings.

Clinical trials registration information

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05353933.

SUBMITTER: Trinh DT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10448015 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Thread-embedding acupuncture may improve symptom resolution in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomized controlled trial.

Trinh Dieu-Thuong Thi DT Tran An Hoa AH Bui Minh-Man Pham MP Vuong Nguyen Lam NL

Integrative medicine research 20230707 3

<h4>Background</h4>Various traditional medicine treatments have been investigated to treat GERD. Among those, thread-embedding acupuncture (TEA) has the advantage that patients need to undergo the procedure infrequently; however, its efficacy is unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy of TEA in treating GERD.<h4>Methods</h4>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 66 participants with GERD: 33 received two sessions of TEA + standard therapy (proton-pump inhibitor [PPI]) (TEA+PPI group ...[more]

PMID: 37637187

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and aimsTo evaluate and compare gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) symptom scores with pH-impedance and test the effects of acid-suppressive medications with or without feeding modifications on pH-impedance in high-risk infants.MethodsInfant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) and 24-hour pH-impedance data were analyzed from 94 infants evaluated in a tertiary care setting for GER disease. Longitudinal data from 40 infants that received randomized GER therapy (proton pump inhibitor [PPI] with or without feeding modifications) for 4 weeks followed by 1-week washout were analyzed. Relationships between I-GERQ-R and pH-impedance metrics (acid reflux index, acid and bolus GER events, distal baseline impedance, and symptoms) were examined and effects of treatments compared.Results(A) Correlations between I-GERQ-R and pH-impedance metrics were weak. (B) I-GERQ-R sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were suboptimal when correlated with pH-impedance metrics. I-GERQ-R negative predictive value (NPV) was high for acid symptom-association probability (NPV = 84%) and distal baseline impedence (NPV = 86%) thresholds. (C) PPI with feeding modifications (vs PPI alone) did not alter pH-impedance metrics or symptom scores (P > .05); however, bolus clearance metrics worsened for both treatment groups (P < .05).ConclusionsIn high-risk infants (1) I-GERQ-R may be a helpful clinical screening tool to exclude acid-GER disease diagnosis and minimize unnecessary acid-suppressive treatment, but further testing is needed for diagnosis. (2) Acid-suppressive therapy with feeding modifications has no effect on symptom scores or pH-impedance metrics. Clearance of refluxate worsened despite PPI therapy, which may signal development of pharyngoesophageal dysmotility and persistence of symptoms. (3) Placebo-controlled trials are needed in high-risk infants with objective pH-impedance criteria to determine efficacy, safety, and underlying mechanisms. Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02486263.

Project description:IntroductionThread embedding acupuncture (TEA) is a special type of acupuncture that inserts certain medical threads (eg, catgut or polydioxanone) into subcutaneous tissue or muscles at specific points. Although TEA has been widely used for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain in Korea, China and Taiwan, evidence regarding its efficacy is lacking. The aim of this protocol is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TEA in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain, by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods and analysisThe following 16 databases will be searched from their inception to 14 May 2017: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, three Chinese database (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database and the Wanfang database) and eight Korean databases (Korean Medical Database, Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors, Korean Studies Information Service System, Korean National Assembly Digital Library, National Digital Science Library, Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System, 'Database Periodical Information Academic and Korean Traditional Knowledge Portal'). The WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will also be searched to retrieve the recently completed studies.All randomised controlled studies in which TEA was used on specific points for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain will be included and no restrictions on language will be applied. The risk of bias of each study will be evaluated by the Cochrane risk of bias tool.Mean difference or standardised mean difference for continuous data and risk ratio for dichotomous data will be calculated with 95% CIs using a random effects model or a fixed effects model. Additional subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be conducted according to a predefined protocol.Ethics and disseminationNo ethical issues are predicted. The systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal or conference presentation. These findings will summarise the current evidence of TEA for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain and may provide guidance for clinicians and patients to select TEA for musculoskeletal pain.Prospero registration numberCRD42015019046.

Project description:BackgroundDegenerative knee osteoarthritis (KOA) shows an increase in morbidity with improvement in the living conditions and extended lifespans. Treatment for degenerative KOA has been gaining attention since it significantly affects the life of the elderly population and is also associated with increased expenses for medical services and high socioeconomic costs. Treatments for degenerative KOA include nondrug therapy, drug therapy, and surgical treatment. For cases that show little response to conservative treatment but have not involved severe deformation of the knee, procedures such as arthroscopic surgery, autologous chondrocyte implantation, or autologous osteochondral transplantation can be performed. However, effective treatment is required for patients experiencing sustained knee pain after surgery. Although studies confirming the therapeutic effects of acupuncture or thread-embedding acupuncture (TEA) treatment for degenerative KOA have been reported, clinical studies on a combination of TEA and electroacupuncture (EA) in patients complaining of knee pain after arthroscopic surgery, autologous chondrocyte implantation, or autologous osteochondral transplantation have not yet been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this combination treatment in patients with persistent knee pain after arthroscopic surgery, autologous chondrocyte implantation, or autologous osteochondral transplantation.Methods/designThis study has been designed as a 2-group, parallel, single-center, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial. Thirty-six patients with degenerative KOA who complained of pain even after arthroscopic surgery, autologous chondrocyte implantation, or autologous osteochondral transplantation will be randomized to either the (TEA + EA + Usual care) group or the (Usual care only) group in a 1:1 ratio. The patients in the (TEA + EA + Usual care) group will receive TEA treatment once a week for 4 weeks for a total of 4 sessions and EA twice a week for a total of 8 sessions while continuing usual care. The (Usual care only) group will only receive usual care for 4 weeks. To assess the efficacy of the TEA and EA combination treatment, the visual analogue scale, the Korean version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level, and the doses of the rescue drug taken will be evaluated at baseline (1W) and weeks 2 (2W), 4 (4W), 6 (6W), and 8 (8W). The primary efficacy endpoint is the mean change in visual analogue scale at week 4 (4W) compared to baseline. Adverse events will be assessed at every visit.DiscussionThis study will provide useful data for evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of TEA and electroacupuncture combination treatment for improving pain and quality of life after surgery for degenerative KOA.Trial registrationClinical Research Information Service of Republic of Korea (CRIS- KCT0004804), March 6, 2020.

Project description:HypothesisScreening for esophageal adenocarcinoma has focused on identifying Barrett esophagus (BE) in patients with severe, long-standing symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Unfortunately, 95% of patients who develop esophageal adenocarcinoma are unaware of the presence of BE before their cancer diagnosis, which means they never had been selected for screening. One possible explanation is that no correlation exists between the severity of GERD symptoms and cancer risk. We hypothesize that severe GERD symptoms are not associated with an increase in the prevalence of BE, dysplasia, or cancer in patients undergoing primary endoscopic screening.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingUniversity hospital.PatientsA total of 769 patients with GERD.InterventionsPrimary screening endoscopy performed from November 1, 2004, through June 7, 2007.Main outcomes measuresSymptom severity, proton pump inhibitor therapy, and esophageal adenocarcinogenesis (ie, BE, dysplasia, or cancer).ResultsEndoscopy revealed adenocarcinogenesis in 122 patients. An increasing number of severe GERD symptoms correlated positively with endoscopic findings of esophagitis (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.09). Conversely, an increasing number of severe GERD symptoms were associated with decreased odds of adenocarcinogenesis (odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.98). Patients taking proton pump inhibitors were 61.3% and 81.5% more likely to have adenocarcinogenesis if they reported no severe typical or atypical GERD symptoms, respectively, compared with patients taking proton pump inhibitors, who reported that all symptoms were severe.ConclusionsMedically treated patients with mild or absent GERD symptoms have significantly higher odds of adenocarcinogenesis compared with medically treated patients with severe GERD symptoms. This finding may explain the failure of the current screening paradigm in which the threshold for primary endoscopic examination is based on symptom severity.

Dataset Information

Thread-embedding acupuncture may improve symptom resolution in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomized controlled trial.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical trials registration information

Publications

Thread-embedding acupuncture may improve symptom resolution in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomized controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets