Dataset Information

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke with a Large Ischemic Core: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Endovascular thrombectomy (ET) efficacy and safety in stroke with a large ischemic core is still inconclusive as this population has been underrepresented in ET randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing RCTs, which were retrieved by systematically searching: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through February 18th, 2023. Our primary outcome was neurological disability measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using risk ratio (RR) along with confidence interval (CI) using Revman V. 5.4 software.

Results

Three RCTs with a total of 1010 patients were included in our analysis. ET significantly increased the rates of functional independence (mRS ≤ 2) (RR: 2.54 with 95% CI [1.85, 3.48]), independent ambulation (mRS ≤ 3) (RR: 1.78 with 95% CI [1.28, 2.48]), and early neurological improvement (RR: 2.46 with 95% CI [1.60, 3.79]). However, there was no difference between endovascular thrombectomy and medical care in excellent neurological recovery (mRS ≤ 1) (RR: 1.35 with 95% CI [0.88, 2.08]). Also, ET significantly reduced the rate of poor neurological recovery (mRS 4-6) (RR: 0.79 with 95% CI [0.72, 0.86]). However, endovascular thrombectomy was associated with more incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 2.40 with 95% CI [1.90, 3.01] [0.72, 0.86]).

Conclusion

ET combined with medical care was associated with better functional outcomes compared with medical care alone. However, ET was associated with a higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage. This can support extending ET indication in the management of stroke with a large ischemic core.

SUBMITTER: Abuelazm M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10450014 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke with a Large Ischemic Core: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Abuelazm Mohamed M Ahmad Unaiza U Abu Suilik Husam H Seri Amith A Mahmoud Abdelrahman A Abdelazeem Basel B

Clinical neuroradiology 20230526 3

<h4>Background</h4>Endovascular thrombectomy (ET) efficacy and safety in stroke with a large ischemic core is still inconclusive as this population has been underrepresented in ET randomized controlled trials (RCTs).<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing RCTs, which were retrieved by systematically searching: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through February 18th, 2023. Our primary outcome was neurological disability measured by the modified R ...[more]

PMID: 37233795

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectiveAutomated machine learning or autoML has been widely deployed in various industries. However, their adoption in healthcare, especially in clinical settings is constrained due to a lack of clear understanding and explainability. The aim of this study is to utilize autoML for the prediction of functional outcomes in patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy and compare it with traditional ML models with a focus on the explainability of the trained models.MethodsA total of 156 patients of acute ischemic stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) who underwent mechanical thrombectomy within 24 h of stroke onset were included in the study. A total of 34 treatment variables including clinical, demographic, imaging, and procedure-related data were extracted. Various conventional machine learning models such as decision tree classifier, logistic regression, random forest, kNN, and SVM as well as various autoML models such as AutoGluon, MLJAR, Auto-Sklearn, TPOT, and H2O were used to predict the modified Rankin score (mRS) at the time of patient discharge and 3 months follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC for traditional ML and autoML models were compared.ResultsThe autoML models outperformed the traditional ML models. For the prediction of mRS at discharge, the highest testing accuracy obtained by traditional ML models for the decision tree classifier was 74.11%, whereas for autoML which was obtained through AutoGluon, it showed an accuracy of 88.23%. Similarly, for mRS at 3 months, the highest testing accuracy of traditional ML was that of the SVM classifier at 76.5%, whereas that of autoML was 85.18% obtained through MLJAR. The 24-h ASPECTS score was the most important predictor for mRS at discharge whereas for prediction of mRS at 3 months, the most important factor was mRS at discharge.ConclusionAutomated machine learning models based on multiple treatment variables can predict the functional outcome in patients more accurately than traditional ML models. The ease of clinical coding and deployment can assist clinicians in the critical decision-making process. We have developed a demo application which can be accessed at https://mrs-score-calculator.onrender.com/.

Project description:BackgroundThe current guideline recommended the use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), but the effectiveness and safety of tenecteplase compare to alteplase in patients before EVT remain uncertain.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify eligible articles from inception until September 16, 2023. The primary outcome was functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) at 90 days, all-cause mortality at follow-up, successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3) after the end of EVT, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) or any intracranial hemorrhage (aICH). The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42023470419.ResultsEight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included involving 2,836 acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Compared to EVT alone, tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg) + EVT and 0.9 mg/kg alteplase + EVT were significant difference associated with higher successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3) after the end of EVT (RR = 2.31; 95% CI 1.15-4.63; RR = 2.31; 95% CI 1.00-5.33; RR = 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09). And compared to 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase + EVT, alteplase (0.6 mg/kg and 0.9 mg/kg) + EVT were significant difference associated with lower successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3) after the end of EVT (RR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.90; RR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.23-0.91). The risk of aICH (RR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.07-2.09) was significantly higher for 0.6 mg/kg alteplase + EVT than EVT alone. There was no significant difference in functional independence (mRS 0-2), excellent outcome (mRS 0-1), all-cause mortality or sICH among the different IVT strategies (0.25 mg/kg or 0.4 mg/kg tenecteplase and 0.6 mg/kg or 0.9 mg/kg alteplase) before EVT.ConclusionThe use of alteplase before EVT may potentially improve the successful reperfusion after EVT compared to tenecteplase. Due to the insufficient sample size, more high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm effectiveness and safety of tenecteplase compare to alteplase in patients before EVT.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42023470419.

Project description:BackgroundRecent randomized trials have suggested that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone may provide similar functional outcomes as the current standard of care, EVT combined with intravenous alteplase treatment, for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. We conducted an economic evaluation of these 2 therapeutic options.MethodsWe constructed a decision analytic model with a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients to assess the cost-effectiveness of EVT with intravenous alteplase treatment versus EVT alone for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion from both the societal and public health care payer perspectives. We used studies and data published in 2009-2021 for model inputs, and acquired cost data for Canada and China, representing high- and middle-income countries, respectively. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) using a lifetime horizon and accounted for uncertainty using 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. All costs are reported in 2021 Canadian dollars.ResultsIn Canada, the difference in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained between EVT with alteplase and EVT alone was 0.10 from both the societal and health care payer perspectives. The difference in cost was $2847 from a societal perspective and $2767 from the payer perspective. In China, the difference in QALYs gained was 0.07 from both perspectives, and the difference in cost was $1550 from the societal perspective and $1607 from the payer perspective. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the distributions of modified Rankin Scale scores at 90 days after stroke were the most influential factor on ICERs. For Canada, compared to EVT alone, the probability that EVT with alteplase would be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY gained was 58.7% from a societal perspective and 58.4% from a payer perspective. The corresponding values for at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $47 185 (3 times the Chinese gross domestic product per capita in 2021) were 65.2% and 67.4%.InterpretationFor patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion eligible for immediate treatment with both EVT alone and EVT with intravenous alteplase treatment, it is uncertain whether EVT with alteplase is cost-effective compared to EVT alone in Canada and China.

Project description:ImportanceEndovascular thrombectomy (ET) has previously been reserved for patients with small to medium acute ischemic strokes. Three recent randomized control trials (RCTs) have demonstrated functional benefit and risk profiles for ET in large volume ischemic strokes.ObjectiveThe primary objective of the meta-analysis was to determine the combined benefit of ET in adult patients with large volume acute ischemic strokes and to better determine the risk of adverse events following ET.Data sourcesWe systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled, and Google Scholar for all RCTs published in English language between January 1, 2010, to February 19, 2023.Study selectionWe included only RCTs specifically comparing ET to medical therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large volume infarctions as defined by Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) 3-5 or calculated infarct volume of > 50-70mL. Two independent reviewers screened potential studies for full text review and metaanalysis inclusion with conflicts being resolved by consensus or third reviewer.Data extraction and synthesisData was extracted based on pre-specified variables on study methods and design, participant characteristics, analysis approach, as well as efficacy and safety outcomes. Results were combined using a restricted maximum-likelihood estimation random-effects model. Studies were assessed for potential bias and quality of evidence.Main outcomes and measuresThe prespecified primary outcome was an overall ordinal shift across the range of modified Rankin scale scores toward a better outcome at 90 days following either ET or medical management for patients with large volume ischemic strokes.ResultsA total of 3044 studies were screened, and 29 underwent full text review. 3 RCTs (1011 patients) were included in the analysis. The pooled random effects model for the primary outcome of mRS improvement favored ET over medical management, generalized odds ratio 1.55 [95% CI 1.25 - 1.91, T 2 = 0.01, I 2 = 42.84%]. There was a trend toward increased risk of symptomatic ICH in the ET group, relative risk 1.85 [95% CI 0.94 - 3.63, T 2 = 0.00, I 2 = 0.00%].Conclusions and relevanceIn patients with large volume ischemic strokes, ET has a clear functional benefit and does not confer increased risk of significant complications compared to medical management alone.

Project description:ImportanceWhether endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) efficacy for patients with acute ischemic stroke and large cores varies depending on the extent of ischemic injury is uncertain.ObjectiveTo describe the relationship between imaging estimates of irreversibly injured brain (core) and at-risk regions (mismatch) and clinical outcomes and EVT treatment effect.Design, setting, and participantsAn exploratory analysis of the SELECT2 trial, which randomized 352 adults (18-85 years) with acute ischemic stroke due to occlusion of the internal carotid or middle cerebral artery (M1 segment) and large ischemic core to EVT vs medical management (MM), across 31 global centers between October 2019 and September 2022.InterventionEVT vs MM.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcome was functional outcome-90-day mRS score (0, no symptoms, to 6, death) assessed by adjusted generalized OR (aGenOR; values >1 represent more favorable outcomes). Benefit of EVT vs MM was assessed across levels of ischemic injury defined by noncontrast CT using ASPECTS score and by the volume of brain with severely reduced blood flow on CT perfusion or restricted diffusion on MRI.ResultsAmong 352 patients randomized, 336 were analyzed (median age, 67 years; 139 [41.4%] female); of these, 168 (50%) were randomized to EVT, and 2 additional crossover MM patients received EVT. In an ordinal analysis of mRS at 90 days, EVT improved functional outcomes compared with MM within ASPECTS categories of 3 (aGenOR, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.04-2.81]), 4 (aGenOR, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.19-3.40]), and 5 (aGenOR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.22-2.79]). Across strata for CT perfusion/MRI ischemic core volumes, aGenOR for EVT vs MM was 1.63 (95% CI, 1.23-2.16) for volumes ≥70 mL, 1.41 (95% CI, 0.99-2.02) for ≥100 mL, and 1.47 (95% CI, 0.84-2.56) for ≥150 mL. In the EVT group, outcomes worsened as ASPECTS decreased (aGenOR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82-1.00] per 1-point decrease) and as CT perfusion/MRI ischemic core volume increased (aGenOR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.89-0.95] per 10-mL increase). No heterogeneity of EVT treatment effect was observed with or without mismatch, although few patients without mismatch were enrolled.Conclusion and relevanceIn this exploratory analysis of a randomized clinical trial of patients with extensive ischemic stroke, EVT improved clinical outcomes across a wide spectrum of infarct volumes, although enrollment of patients with minimal penumbra volume was low. In EVT-treated patients, clinical outcomes worsened as presenting ischemic injury estimates increased.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03876457.

Dataset Information

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke with a Large Ischemic Core: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke with a Large Ischemic Core: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets