Dataset Information

Robotic Parenchymal-Sparing Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Parenchymal-sparing approaches to pancreatectomy are technically challenging procedures but allow for preserving a normal pancreas and decreasing the rate of postoperative pancreatic insufficiency. The robotic platform is increasingly being used for these procedures. We sought to evaluate robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy and assess its complication profile and efficacy.

Methods

This systematic review consisted of all studies on robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy (central pancreatectomy, duodenum-preserving partial pancreatic head resection, enucleation, and uncinate resection) published between January 2001 and December 2022 in PubMed and Embase.

Results

A total of 23 studies were included in this review (n = 788). Robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy is being performed worldwide for benign or indolent pancreatic lesions. When compared to the open approach, robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomies led to a longer average operative time, shorter length of stay, and higher estimated intraoperative blood loss. Postoperative pancreatic fistula is common, but severe complications requiring intervention are exceedingly rare. Long-term complications such as endocrine and exocrine insufficiency are nearly nonexistent.

Conclusions

Robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy appears to have a higher risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula but is rarely associated with severe or long-term complications. Careful patient selection is required to maximize benefits and minimize morbidity.

SUBMITTER: Zheng R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10486530 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Robotic Parenchymal-Sparing Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review.

Zheng Richard R Ghabi Elie E He Jin J

Cancers 20230901 17

<h4>Background</h4>Parenchymal-sparing approaches to pancreatectomy are technically challenging procedures but allow for preserving a normal pancreas and decreasing the rate of postoperative pancreatic insufficiency. The robotic platform is increasingly being used for these procedures. We sought to evaluate robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy and assess its complication profile and efficacy.<h4>Methods</h4>This systematic review consisted of all studies on robotic parenchymal-sparing panc ...[more]

PMID: 37686648

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe advantages of parenchymal-sparing resection (PSR) over anatomic resection (AR) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial. Here, we aim to evaluate their safety and efficacy.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term perioperative outcomes and long-term oncological outcomes for PSR and AR were performed by searching Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases.ResultsTwenty-two studies were considered eligible (totally 7228 patients: AR, n = 3154 (43.6%) vs. PSR, n = 4074 (56.4%)). Overall survival (OS, HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.95-1.22, P = 0.245) and disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.94-1.28, P = 0.259) were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in 3-year OS, 5-year OS, 3-year DFS, 5-year DFS, 3-year liver recurrence-free survival (liver-RFS) and 5-year liver-RFS. In terms of perioperative outcome, patients undergoing AR surgery were associated with prolonged operation time (WMD = 51.48 min, 95% CI: 29.03-73.93, P < 0.001), higher amount of blood loss (WMD = 189.92 ml, 95% CI: 21.39-358.45, P = 0.027), increased intraoperative blood transfusion rate (RR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.54-3.26, P < 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (WMD = 1.00 day, 95% CI: 0.34-1.67, P = 0.003), postoperative complications (RR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.88-2.77, P < 0.001), and 90-day mortality (RR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.88-5.03, P < 0.001). While PSR surgery was associated with positive resection margins (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.97, P = 0.024), intrahepatic recurrence (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82-0.98, P = 0.021) and repeat hepatectomy (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55-0.76, P < 0.001).ConclusionConsidering relatively acceptable heterogeneity, PSR had better perioperative outcomes without compromising oncological long-term outcomes. However, these findings must be carefully interpreted, requiring more supporting evidence.Trial registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42023445332.

Project description:BackgroundPrognosis of stage IV colorectal cancer is related to control of liver metastasis. As of now, surgery provides survival advantage for patients affected by resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), with parenchymal sparing strategies representing the most accepted strategy {[1]. In this setting, 3D reconstruction programs represent the newest available technological leap to improve anatomical accuracy [2]. Despite being quite expensive, 3D models have proved themselves as helpful adjunctive tools to enhance pre-operative strategy [3] in complex liver procedures, even in the eyes of expert hepatobiliary surgeons [4].MethodsWe present a video describing the practical use of a custom-made 3D model, acquired following specific quality criteria [2], for a case of bilateral CLRM after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.ResultsIn our reported case and as described in the video, pre-operative visualization of 3D reconstructions altered significantly the pre-operative surgical plan. First, following the principles of parenchymal sparing surgery, challenging atypical resections of metastatic lesions close to main vessels (right posterior branch of the portal vein, inferior vena cava) were preferred to anatomic resections/major hepatectomies, allowing the highest projected future liver remnant volume possible (up to 65%) amongst different available strategies. Secondly, the order of hepatic resections was planned to follow a decreasing degree of difficulty, in order minimize the effect of blood redistribution after previous resections during parenchymal dissection (thus starting from atypical resections close to main vessels, followed by anatomical resections and atypical resections of superficial resections). In addition, the availability of the 3D model in the operating room was crucial in the surgical field to guide safe surgical pathways, especially during atypical resections of lesions close to the main vessels: detection and navigation were further enhanced thanks to tools of augmented reality that allowed the surgeon to manipulate the 3D model through a touchless sensor in a dedicated screen in the operating room and to replicate a mirroring snapshot of the surgical field, without compromising sterility nor the surgical set-up. In the setting of these complex liver procedures, the application of 3D printed models has been described [4]; when available, 3D printed models, particularly useful in the pre-operative phase when explaining the procedure to patients and relatives, have been reported to have comparable significant impact, with feedback from expert hepatobiliary surgeons that is very similar to the one we are reporting in our experience [4].ConclusionRoutine use of 3D technology does not claim to revolutionize the world of traditional imaging but may be impactful in helping the surgeon visualize the anatomy of that specific individual in a dynamic and three-dimensional way that is similar to the surgical field, thus improving multidisciplinary preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation during complex liver surgery.

Dataset Information

Robotic Parenchymal-Sparing Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Robotic Parenchymal-Sparing Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets