Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Pancreatitis and cholangitis caused by metallic wire in the duodenal submucosa and muscularis near the papilla: removal by endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER: Ando K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10500199 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Saline-immersion endoscopic submucosal dissection using pocket-creation method.

Project description:Video 1Saline-immersion endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method.

| S-EPMC10794121 | biostudies-literature

The usefulness of wire-guided endoscopic snare papillectomy for tumors of the major duodenal papilla.

Project description:ObjectivesAlthough endoscopic papillectomy is useful for treating papillary tumors, it is associated with a high rate of complications including pancreatitis; therefore, safer treatment options are needed. We examined the utility of wire-guided endoscopic papillectomy by comparing the pancreatic duct stenting and pancreatitis rates before and after wire-guided endoscopic papillectomy was introduced at our institution.MethodsWe retrospectively examined the data from 16 consecutive patients who underwent conventional endoscopic papillectomy between November 1995 and July 2005 and the data from 33 patients in whom wire-guided endoscopic papillectomy was first attempted at our institution between August 2005 and April 2017. We compared the pancreatic duct stenting and pancreatitis rates between the two groups.ResultsOf the 33 patients in whom wire-guided endoscopic papillectomy was first attempted, the procedure was completed in 21. Pancreatic duct stenting was possible in 30 of the 33 patients in whom wire-guided endoscopic papillectomy was attempted (91%), and this rate was significantly higher than that before the introduction of wire-guided endoscopic papillectomy (68.8%). The incidence of pancreatitis before the introduction of wire-guided endoscopic papillectomy was 12.5%, but after August 2005, the incidence was reduced by half to 6.1%, which includes those patients in whom wire-guided endoscopic papillectomy could not be completed.ConclusionsAlthough wire-guided endoscopic papillectomy cannot be completed in some patients, we believe that this method shows some potential for reducing the total incidence of post-endoscopic papillectomy pancreatitis owing to more successful pancreatic duct stenting.

| S-EPMC6343902 | biostudies-literature

The pocket-creation method facilitates gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection and overcomes challenging situations.

Project description:Video 1Demonstration of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method at the angle along the lesser curvature and fornix.

| S-EPMC8433391 | biostudies-literature

Pocket-creation method in endoscopic submucosal dissection for a gastric carcinoma located on the pyloric ring.

Project description:Video 1Early gastric carcinoma across the pyloric ring was effectively treated by the pocket-creating method during endoscopic submucosal dissection.

| S-EPMC8186167 | biostudies-literature

Successful removal of duodenal submucosal tumors with endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6119220 | biostudies-literature

Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.

Project description:Background/aimsEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection is challenging because of severe fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the pocket-creation method (PCM) with a traction device (TD) with that of conventional ESD for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 72 patients with residual or recurrent colorectal lesions resected using ESD. Overall, 31 and 41 lesions were resected using PCM with TD and conventional ESD methods, respectively. We compared patient background and treatment outcomes between the PCM with TD and conventional ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoints were en bloc resection and R0 resection rates. The secondary endpoints were the dissection speed and incidence of adverse events.ResultsEn bloc resection was feasible in all cases with PCM with TD, but failed in 22% of cases of conventional ESD. The R0 resection rates for PCM with TD and conventional ESD were 97% and 66%, respectively. Dissection was significantly faster in the PCM with TD group (13.0 vs. 7.9 mm2/min). Perforation and postoperative bleeding were observed in one patient in each group.ConclusionPCM with TD is an effective method for treating residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection.

| S-EPMC9539301 | biostudies-literature

A recurrent lesion with severe fibrosis of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using the combination of pocket-creation method and traction device.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7730864 | biostudies-literature

Confocal laser endomicroscopic finding of lymphoma of the duodenal papilla.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6095798 | biostudies-literature

Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Project description:Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standard method for minimally invasive resection of superficial gastrointestinal tumors. The pocket creation method (PCM) facilitates ESD regardless of location in the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ESD for superficial neoplasms in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract comparing the PCM to the non-PCM. Methods Randomized controlled, prospective, and retrospective studies comparing the PCM with the non-PCM were included. Outcomes included en bloc resection, R0 resection, dissection speed, delayed bleeding and perforation. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using the Mantel-Haenszel random effect model were documented. Results Eight studies including gastric, duodenal, and colorectal ESD were included. The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (OR 3.87, 95 %CI 1.24-12.10 P = 0.020). The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (OR 2.46, 95 %CI 1.14-5.30, P = 0.020). The dissection speed was significantly faster in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (mean difference 3.13, 95 % CI 1.35-4.91, P < 0.001). The rate of delayed bleeding was similar in the two groups (OR 1.13, 95 %CI 0.60-2.15, P = 0.700). The rate of perforation was significantly lower in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (OR 0.34, 95 %CI 0.15-0.76, P = 0.009). Conclusions The PCM facilitates high-quality, fast and safe colorectal ESD. Further studies are needed regarding the utility of PCM in ESD of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

| S-EPMC9106436 | biostudies-literature

A novel curved wire retraction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description:Video 1Traction wire presentation and demonstration of technology in 3 endoscopic submucosal dissection cases.

| S-EPMC8350987 | biostudies-literature