Dataset Information

Evaluation of a Portable Aerosol Collector and Spectrometer to measure particle concentration by composition and size.

ABSTRACT: We evaluated a newly developed Portable Aerosol Collector and Spectrometer (PACS) in the laboratory. We developed an algorithm to estimate mass concentration by size and composition with a PACS. In laboratory experiments, we compared particle size distributions measured with the PACS to research instruments for multi-modal aerosols: two-mode generated by spark discharge, consisting of ultrafine (fresh Mn fume) and fine particles (aged Cu fume); and three-mode produced by adding coarse particles (Arizona road dust) to the two-mode. Near-real-time size distributions from the PACS compared favorably to those from a scanning mobility particle sizer and an aerodynamic particle sizer for the three-mode aerosol (number, bias=9.4% and R2=0.96; surface area, bias=17.8%, R2=0.77; mass, bias=-2.2%, R2=0.94), but less so for the two-mode aerosol (number, bias=-17.7% and R2=0.51; surface area, bias=-45.5%, R2=0; for mass, bias=-81.75%, R2=0.08). Elemental mass concentrations by size were similar to those measured with a nano micro-orifice uniform deposition impactor for coarse-mode particles, whereas agreement was considerably poorer for ultrafine- and fine-mode particles. The PACS has merit in estimating multi-metric concentrations by size and composition but requires further research to resolve discrepancies identified for two-mode aerosol.

SUBMITTER: Cai C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10512808 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of a Portable Aerosol Collector and Spectrometer to measure particle concentration by composition and size.

Cai Changjie C Stebounova Larissa V LV Peate David W DW Peters Thomas M TM

Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research 20190601 6

We evaluated a newly developed Portable Aerosol Collector and Spectrometer (PACS) in the laboratory. We developed an algorithm to estimate mass concentration by size and composition with a PACS. In laboratory experiments, we compared particle size distributions measured with the PACS to research instruments for multi-modal aerosols: two-mode generated by spark discharge, consisting of ultrafine (fresh Mn fume) and fine particles (aged Cu fume); and three-mode produced by adding coarse particles ...[more]

PMID: 37736266

Similar Datasets

Project description:This article presents the development of a Portable Aerosol Collector and Spectrometer (PACS), an instrument designed to measure particle number, surface area, and mass concentrations continuously and time-weighted mass concentration by composition from 10 nm to 10 μm. The PACS consists of a six-stage particle size selector, a valve system, a water condensation particle counter to detect number concentrations, and a photometer to detect mass concentrations. The stages of the selector include three impactor and two diffusion stages, which resolve particles by size and collect particles for later chemical analysis. Particle penetration by size was measured through each stage to determine actual collection performance and account for particle losses. The data inversion algorithm uses an adaptive grid-search process with a constrained linear least-square solver to fit a tri-modal (ultrafine, fine, and coarse), log-normal distribution to the input data (number and mass concentration exiting each stage). The measured 50% cutoff diameter of each stage was similar to the design. The pressure drop of each stage was sufficiently low to permit its operation with portable air pumps. Sensitivity studies were conducted to explore the influence of unknown particle density (range from 500 to 3,000 kg/m3) and shape factor (range from 1.0 to 3.0) on algorithm output. Assuming standard density spheres, the aerosol size distributions fit well with a normalized mean bias of -4.9% to 3.5%, normalized mean error of 3.3% to 27.6%, and R2 values of 0.90 to 1.00. The fitted number and mass concentration biases were within ±10% regardless of uncertainties in density and shape. However, fitted surface area concentrations were more likely to be underestimated/overestimated due to the variation in particle density and shape. The PACS represents a novel way to simultaneously assess airborne aerosol composition and concentration by number, surface area, and mass over a wide size range.

Project description:IntroductionElectronic cigarettes (EC) have evolved rapidly toward higher powered devices that produce more vaping aerosol and a more satisfying vaping experience. This research characterized the particle size distribution and estimated the mass concentration of vaping aerosols produced at power outputs spanning the operating range typical of second generation variable voltage EC devices.MethodsEC aerosol was characterized from a single coil atomizer powered by a variable voltage EC battery at the minimum and maximum dial settings (3.3, 11.2 Watts, W), and a lab controlled power supply (3-11.9 W). Aerosol particle size distribution was measured by a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer and Aerodynamic Particle Sizer, spanning 16 nm to 19.8 μm. A mouth puff was simulated using a 100 mL glass syringe.ResultsConsistent with prior studies, sub-micron EC aerosol size distributions were bimodal, with peaks at 40 and 200 nm, however a previously unreported third mode was observed at approximately 1000 nm. The ~1000 nm mode accounted for 7-20x the aerosol mass of the smaller modes. Increasing atomizer power decreased count concentration of particles <600 nm but increased particle count >600 nm. Particle mass distribution shifted toward micron sized particles with increasing power and increased the respirable fraction of aerosol, likely due to increased coagulation and condensation around nano-sized particles.ConclusionsVaping power greatly affects EC aerosol count and mass distribution. Mouth puffed EC aerosol spans a much wider particle size range than previously reported, although the major portion of the mass is still well within the alveolar size range the larger particles will deposit within the oro-pharyngeal cavity at 2-3x greater efficiency than in alveoli. These observations have major clinical implications, as aerosol particle size distribution determines deposition sites along the respiratory tract. The results of this experiment stress the need for further research to inform the design, regulation and use of e-cigarette products.

Project description:Aerosol sampling and identification is vital for the assessment and control of particulate matter pollution, airborne pathogens, allergens, and toxins and their effect on air quality, human health, and climate change. In-situ analysis of chemical and biological airborne components of aerosols on a conventional filter is challenging due to dilute samples in a large collection region. We present the design and evaluation of a micro-well (µ-well) aerosol collector for the assessment of airborne particulate matter (PM) in the 0.5-3 micron size range. The design minimizes particle collection areas allowing for in-situ optical analysis and provides an increased limit of detection for liquid-based assays due to the high concentrations of analytes in the elution/analysis volume. The design of the collector is guided by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling; it combines an aerodynamic concentrator inlet that focuses the aspirated aerosol into a narrow beam and a µ-well collector that limits the particle collection area to the µ-well volume. The optimization of the collector geometry and the operational conditions result in high concentrations of collected PM in the submillimeter region inside the µ-well. Collection efficiency experiments are performed in the aerosol chamber using fluorescent polystyrene microspheres to determine the performance of the collector as a function of particle size and sampling flow rate. The collector has the maximum collection efficiency of about 75% for 1 micron particles for the flow rate of 1 slpm. Particles bigger than 1 micron have lower collection efficiencies because of particle bounce and particle loss in the aerodynamic focusing inlet. Collected samples can be eluted from the device using standard pipettes, with an elution volume of 10-20 microliters. The transparent collection substrate and the distinct collection region, independent of particle size, allows for in-situ optical analysis of the collected PM.

Project description:Many dental procedures are considered aerosol-generating procedures that may put the dental operator and patients at risk for cross-infection due to contamination from nasal secretions and saliva. This aerosol, depending on the size of the particles, may stay suspended in the air for hours. The primary objective of the study was to characterize the size and concentrations of particles emitted from 7 different dental procedures, as well as estimate the contribution of the nasal and salivary fluids of the patient to the microbiota in the emitted bioaerosol. This cross-sectional study was conducted in an open-concept dental clinic with multiple operators at the same time. Particle size characterization and mass and particle concentrations were done by using 2 direct reading instruments: Dust-Trak DRX (Model 8534) and optical particle sizer (Model 3330). Active bioaerosol sampling was done before and during procedures. Bayesian modeling (SourceTracker2) of long-reads of the 16S ribosomal DNA was used to estimate the contribution of the patients' nasal and salivary fluids to the bioaerosol. Aerosols in most dental procedures were sub-PM1 dominant. Orthodontic debonding and denture adjustment consistently demonstrated more particles in the PM1, PM2.5, PM4, and PM10 ranges. The microbiota in bioaerosol samples were significantly different from saliva and nasal samples in both membership and abundance (P < 0.05) but not different from preoperative ambient air samples. A median of 80.15% of operator exposure was attributable to sources other than the patients' salivary or nasal fluids. Median operator's exposure from patients' fluids ranged from 1.45% to 2.75%. Corridor microbiota showed more patients' nasal bioaerosols than oral bioaerosols. High-volume saliva ejector and saliva ejector were effective in reducing bioaerosol escape. Patient nasal and salivary fluids are minor contributors to the operator's bioaerosol exposure, which has important implications for COVID-19. Control of bioaerosolization of nasal fluids warrants further investigation.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of a Portable Aerosol Collector and Spectrometer to measure particle concentration by composition and size.

Publications

Evaluation of a Portable Aerosol Collector and Spectrometer to measure particle concentration by composition and size.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets