Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term comparison of outcomes.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

There is a lack of multi-institutional large-volume and long-term follow-up data on comparisons between robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery. This study compared the surgical and long-term survival outcomes between patients who underwent robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients from five large academic institutions who underwent either robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of endometrial cancer between 2012 and 2017, ensuring at least 5 years of potential follow-up. Intra- and postoperative outcomes, long-term disease-free survival, and overall survival were compared.

Results

The study cohort included 1,003 unselected patients: 551 and 452 patients received conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 57 months. Postoperative complications were significantly less likely to occur in the robot-assisted surgery group compared to the laparoscopic surgery group (7.74% vs. 13.79%, P = 0.002), primarily limited to minor complications. There were no significant differences in survival: 5-year disease-free survival was 91.2% versus 90.0% (P = 0.628) and overall survival was 97.9% versus 96.8% (P = 0.285) in the robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery cohorts, respectively. Cox proportional hazard regression models demonstrated that the mode of surgery was not associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.897; confidence interval, 0.563-1.429) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.791; confidence interval, 0.330-1.895) after adjusting for confounding factors.

Conclusion

Robot-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer demonstrates comparable long-term survival outcomes and a reduced incidence of postoperative minor complications when compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery.

SUBMITTER: Eoh KJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10540847 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term comparison of outcomes.

Eoh Kyung Jin KJ   Kim Tae-Joong TJ   Park Jeong-Yeol JY   Kim Hee Seung HS   Paek Jiheum J   Kim Young Tae YT  

Frontiers in oncology 20230915


<h4>Objective</h4>There is a lack of multi-institutional large-volume and long-term follow-up data on comparisons between robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery. This study compared the surgical and long-term survival outcomes between patients who underwent robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients from five large academic institutions who underwent either robot-assisted or con  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5779699 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10702022 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4726673 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC10930702 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8146293 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10936717 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9296389 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9317461 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7804851 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9090736 | biostudies-literature