Efficacy and safety of finerenone in chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Yasmin F
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10553111 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global public health issue. In recent years, the effectiveness of finerenone for treatment of CKD has been the subject of considerable debate. The main objective of the current meta-analysis was to validate the clinical efficacy and safety of finerenone in patients with CKD. Methods: Seven databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing finerenone with placebo in patients with CKD. Data from eligible studies were extracted, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool utilized for evaluating the methodological quality of RCTs. The effect size was estimated using the risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Five trials (n = 13,078) were included. Compared to placebo groups, the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) mean from the baseline was significantly lower [MD -0.30 (95% CI -0.32, -0.28), p < 0.00001], while a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline was significantly higher [MD -2.44 (95% CI -2.82, -2.05), p < 0.00001] for the finerenone groups. Furthermore, the proportion of patients with decreased eGFR (≥40%) post-baseline was significantly lower [RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.78, 0.93), p = 0.0002], along with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) [RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.65, 0.99), p = 0.04] and cardiovascular events (CVs) [RR 0.88 (95% CI 0.80, 0.95), p < 0.003] in the finerenone groups. In terms of safety, the increase in the serum potassium concentration and incidence of hyperkalemia was significantly higher for the finerenone groups [MD 0.17 (95% CI 0.10, 0.24), p < 0.00001; RR 2.03 (95% CI 1.83, 2.26), p < 0.00001, respectively], but the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar to placebo [RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.98-1.01), p = 0.67]. In all cases, the results were rated as providing moderate-quality or high-quality evidence. Conclusion: Data from our meta-analysis suggest that finerenone confers significant renal and cardiovascular benefits in patients with CKD. While higher risk of hyperkalemia was observed with finerenone than placebo, differences in AEs were not significant. Finerenone may therefore present a novel promising therapeutic agent for patients with CKD. Systematic Review Registration: [https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-9-0020/], identifier [INPLASY202190020].
| S-EPMC8859447 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsFinerenone, a selective, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, improves cardiovascular (CV) and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This subgroup analysis of FIDELITY, a pre-specified, pooled, individual patient-data analysis of FIDELIO-DKD (NCT02540993) and FIGARO-DKD (NCT02545049), compared finerenone vs. placebo in patients with and without baseline history of atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD).Methods and resultsOutcomes included a composite CV outcome [CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF)]; CV death or HHF; a composite kidney outcome (kidney failure, sustained estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease ≥57%, or kidney-related death); all-cause mortality; and safety by baseline history of ASCVD.Of 13 026 patients, 5935 (45.6%) had a history of ASCVD. The incidence of the composite CV outcome, CV death or HHF, and all-cause mortality was higher in patients with ASCVD vs. those without, with no difference between groups in the composite kidney outcome. Finerenone consistently reduced outcomes vs. placebo in patients with and without ASCVD (P-interaction for the composite CV outcome, CV death or HHF, the composite kidney outcome, and all-cause mortality 0.38, 0.68, 0.33, and 0.38, respectively). Investigator-reported treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent between treatment arms across ASCVD subgroups.ConclusionFinerenone reduced the risk of CV and kidney outcomes consistently across the spectrum of CKD in patients with T2D, irrespective of prevalent ASCVD.
| S-EPMC9753093 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAnemia is common in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. Finerenone improved heart and kidney outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes in FIDELITY.ObjectivesThis post hoc analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of finerenone vs placebo by baseline anemia status.MethodsAnemia was defined as serum hemoglobin levels <13 g/dL (male) or <12 g/dL (female) or treatment with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent at baseline. Outcomes included cardiovascular (CV) and kidney composites, hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Safety was assessed through treatment-emergent adverse events.ResultsOf 12,971 patients, 33% had anemia at baseline. Finerenone reduced the risk of the CV composite outcome to a greater extent in patients with vs without anemia (HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.65-0.88] vs HR: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.82-1.05]; P for interaction = 0.03). Finerenone reduced the risk of the kidney composite outcome vs placebo, with no heterogeneity between patients with vs without anemia (HR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.65-0.95] and HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.60-0.91]; P for interaction = 0.77). The risk of hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality was lower with finerenone vs placebo, irrespective of anemia status. Patients with anemia experienced higher incidence of treatment-emergent hyperkalemia vs those without.ConclusionsFinerenone demonstrated CV and kidney benefit in patients with and without anemia. The benefit of finerenone on CV outcomes was greater in patients with vs without anemia at baseline. Anemia is likely a marker for higher-risk patients who are more susceptible to the benefits of finerenone. (Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Kidney Disease [FIDELIO-DKD], NCT02540993; Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Clinical Diagnosis of Diabetic Kidney Disease [FIGARO-DKD], NCT02545049).
| S-EPMC11905162 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of finerenone and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on reducing new-onset of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD).MethodWe searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline and Embase covering January 1, 2000 to April 30, 2022. Randomized control trials comparing finerenone or SGLT2i with placebo in patients with T2DM and CKD were selected. Results were reported as risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsA total of 10 studies (35,841 patients) were included. Finerenone (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.62-0.99) was associated with a decreased risk of AF compared with placebo, while SGLT2i were not. SGLT2i were associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization for heart failure (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.98) compared with finerenone. They were comparable in AF(RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.48,1.46), major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE) (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81,1.06) and nonfatal stroke(RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.58,1.05). They both showed no significant risk of adverse events compared with placebo.ConclusionThere was no significant difference in the reduction of new-onset of atrial fibrillation between Finerenone and SGLT2i based on the indirect comparisons of currently available clinical studies. The large-sampled head-to-head trials was needed for the more precise conclusion.
| S-EPMC9609222 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched (July 31, 2021) for phase II/III randomized clinical trials, which reported the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin. Continuous variables were calculated as weighted mean difference (WMD) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs); dichotomous data were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. Results: Nine randomized clinical trials including 5638 type 2 diabetes patients were included. For efficacy, ertugliflozin significantly reduced HbA1c (%) (WMD -0.452%; 95% CI -0.774 to -0.129), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (WMD -0.870 mmol/L; 95% CI -1.418 to -0.322), body weight (WMD -1.774 kg; 95% CI -2.601 to -0.946), and blood pressure levels (systolic blood pressure: WMD -2.572 mmHg; 95% CI -3.573 to -1.571 and diastolic blood pressure: WMD -1.152 mmHg; 95% CI -2.002 to -0.303) compared with placebo and other hypoglycaemic agents. Compared with placebo, ertugliflozin was superior in reducing HbA1c (%) (WMD -0.641%) and FPG (WMD -1.249 mmol/L). And compared with active agents, ertugliflozin also could decrease HbA1c by 0.215% and FPG by 0.266 mmol/L. The interactive effect between different controls was significant (P interaction of 0.039). For safety, similar to other sodium-glucose cotransporter type-2 inhibitors, ertugliflozin mainly increased the risk of genital mycotic infection (RR: 4.004; 95% CI 2.504-6.402). There was no significant difference in the incidence of any adverse events (AEs), AEs related to study drug, serious AEs, deaths, and discontinuations due to AEs. Results were consistent with the most primary outcomes in subgroups analysis and sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: Ertugliflozin was relatively effective and tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes compared with placebo or other hypoglycaemic agents, except for a high risk of genital mycotic infection. Systematic Review Registration: (ClinicalTrials.gov), identifier (CRD42020206356).
| S-EPMC8811446 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe last international consensus on the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) recommends SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists for patients with clinical cardiovascular (CV) disease; metformin remains the first-line glucose lowering medication. Last studies suggested beneficial effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, in secondary CV prevention. Recently, a potential benefit of SGLT-2 inhibitors in primary CV prevention also has been suggested. However, no comparison of all the new and the old hypoglycemic drugs is available on CV outcomes. We aimed to compare the effects of old and new hypoglycemic drugs in T2D, on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality.Methods and findingsWe conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials. Randomized trials, blinded or not, assessing contemporary hypoglycemic drugs on mortality or MACE in patients with T2D, were searched for in Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov. References screening and data extraction were done by multiple observers. Each drug was analyzed according to its therapeutic class. A random Bayesian network meta-analysis model was used. The primary outcomes were overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and MACE. Severe adverse events and severe hypoglycemia were also recorded. 175,966 patients in 34 trials from 1970 to 2018 were included. No trials evaluating glinides or alpha glucosidase inhibitors were found. 17 trials included a majority of patients with previous cardiovascular history, 16 trials a majority of patients without. Compared to control, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of overall mortality (OR = 0.84 [95% CrI: 0.74; 0.95]), SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists with a decreased risk of MACE (OR = 0.89 [95% CrI: 0.81; 0.98] and OR = 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.81; 0.95], respectively). Compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of overall mortality (OR = 0.82 [95% CrI: 0.69; 0.98]), GLP-1 agonists with a decreased risk of MACE (OR = 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.79; 0.99]). Insulin was also associated with an increased risk of MACE compared to GLP-1 agonists (OR = 1.19 [95% CrI: 1.01; 1.42]). Insulin and sulfonylureas were associated with an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia. In the trials including a majority of patients without previous CV history, the comparisons of SGLT-2 inhibitors, metformin and control did not showed significant differences on primary outcomes. We limited our analysis at the therapeutic class level.ConclusionsSGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists have the most beneficial effects, especially in T2D patients with previous CV diseases. Direct comparisons of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists and metformin are needed, notably in primary CV prevention.Trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42016043823.
| S-EPMC6592598 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe FIDELIO-DKD trial (Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease) evaluated the effect of the nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes with optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade. Compared with placebo, finerenone reduced the composite kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. We report the effect of finerenone on individual cardiovascular outcomes and in patients with and without history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD).MethodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included patients with type 2 diabetes and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30 to 5000 mg/g and an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥25 to <75 mL per min per 1.73 m2, treated with optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade. Patients with a history of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive finerenone or placebo. The composite cardiovascular outcome included time to cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure. Prespecified cardiovascular analyses included analyses of the components of this composite and outcomes according to CVD history at baseline.ResultsBetween September 2015 and June 2018, 13 911 patients were screened and 5674 were randomized; 45.9% of patients had CVD at baseline. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years (interquartile range, 2.0-3.4 years), finerenone reduced the risk of the composite cardiovascular outcome compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.99]; P=0.034), with no significant interaction between patients with and without CVD (hazard ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.71-1.01] in patients with a history of CVD; hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.68-1.08] in patients without a history of CVD; P value for interaction, 0.85). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatment arms, with a low incidence of hyperkalemia-related permanent treatment discontinuation (2.3% with finerenone versus 0.8% with placebo in patients with CVD and 2.2% with finerenone versus 1.0% with placebo in patients without CVD).ConclusionsAmong patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes, finerenone reduced incidence of the composite cardiovascular outcome, with no evidence of differences in treatment effect based on preexisting CVD status. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02540993.
| S-EPMC7864612 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Aim/introductionEarly therapeutic interventions are necessary to reduce cardiovascular and renal composite endpoints in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Clinical trials have shown that finerenone suppresses cardiovascular and renal composite endpoints by reducing the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and suppressing the decline in the Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). However, the efficacy and safety of finerenone in real-world clinical practice remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the reduction in the UACR as an efficacy endpoint as well as changes in eGFR and serum potassium levels as safety endpoints before and after finerenone administration.Materials and methodsThis retrospective observational study collected data from outpatients with T2DM and DKD upon initiation of finerenone treatment and 3 months after treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the UACR from the start of finerenone treatment to after 3 months, while the primary safety endpoints were the changes in serum potassium levels and eGFR over the same period.ResultsThe mean UACR significantly decreased from 668.6 mg/gCr at the start of finerenone treatment to 367.8 mg/gCr after 3 months (p < 0.001). Contrastingly, serum potassium levels, eGFRs, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, body mass indices, and HbA1c levels showed no significant changes between treatment initiation and 3 months post-treatment (all p > 0.05).ConclusionsIn individuals with T2DM and DKD, finerenone treatment significantly reduced the UACR, with no post-treatment changes in potassium levels or eGFRs.Trial registrationThis trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000054821).
| S-EPMC11417194 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: The non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are promising treatments in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of the non-steroidal MRAs (finerenone, apararenone, esaxerenone) and detect the differences among them. Methods: We searched several databases for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating non-steroidal MRAs versus placebo in patients with CKD and T2D. We performed a conventional meta-analysis separately, and then indirect comparisons for efficacy and safety outcomes were conducted among these included drugs. Results: Eight RCTs with 14,450 subjects were enrolled. In patients with CKD and T2D, a greater reduction in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) (WMD −0.40, 95% CI −0.48 to −0.32, p < 0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (WMD −2.69, 95% CI −4.47 to −0.91, p = 0.003), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD −4.84, 95% CI −5.96 to −3.72, p < 0.001) and a higher risk of hyperkalemia (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.30, p < 0.001) were observed in the non-steroidal MRAs versus placebo; there is no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events between two groups (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.79, p = 0.067). Compared with finerenone, esaxerenone showed no significant difference in UACR reduction (WMD 0.24, 95% CI −0.016 to 0.496, p = 0.869); apararenone and esaxerenone showed greater decreases in SBP (WMD 1.37, 95% CI 0.456 to 2.284, p = 0.010; WMD 3.11, 95% CI 0.544 to 5,676, p = 0.021). Conclusions: Despite the moderate increased risk of hyperkalemia, use of non-steroidal MRAs could reduce proteinuria and SBP in patients with CKD and T2D. In terms of renoprotection, esaxerenone and finerenone may have similar effects. Esaxerenone and apararenone may have better antihypertensive effects than finerenone. The head-to-head RCTs are still needed to compare the differences of the efficacy and safety in these non-steroidal MRAs.
| S-EPMC9243561 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsFinerenone significantly reduced the risk of kidney and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes in the FIDELIO-DKD trial (NCT02540993). This exploratory subgroup analysis investigates the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use on the treatment effect of finerenone.Materials and methodsPatients with type 2 diabetes, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 30-5000 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate 25-<75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 receiving optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade were randomized to finerenone or placebo.ResultsOf the 5674 patients analysed, overall, 394 (6.9%) received GLP-1RAs at baseline. A reduction in UACR with finerenone was observed with or without baseline GLP-1RA use; ratio of least-squares means 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.56, 0.70) with GLP-1RA use and 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.67, 0.72) without GLP-1RA use (p value for interaction .20). Finerenone also significantly reduced the primary kidney (time to kidney failure, sustained decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥40% from baseline, or renal death) and key secondary CV outcomes (time to CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) versus placebo, with no clear difference because of GLP-1RA use at baseline (p value for interaction .15 and .51 respectively) or any time during the trial. The safety profile of finerenone was similar between subgroups.ConclusionsThis exploratory subgroup analysis suggests that finerenone reduces UACR in patients with or without GLP-1RA use at baseline, and the effects on kidney and CV outcomes are consistent irrespective of GLP-1RA use.
| S-EPMC9293162 | biostudies-literature