Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Contribution of MEK Inhibition to BRAF/MEK Inhibitor Combination Treatment of BRAF-Mutant Melanoma: Part 2 of the Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III COLUMBUS Trial.


ABSTRACT:

Purpose

In COLUMBUS part 1, patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice a day (COMBO450), vemurafenib 960 mg twice a day, or encorafenib 300 mg once daily (ENCO300). As previously reported, COMBO450 improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus vemurafenib (part 1 primary end point) and ENCO300 (part 1 key secondary end point; not statistically significant). Part 2, requested by the US Food and Drug Administration, evaluated the contribution of binimetinib by maintaining the same encorafenib dosage in the combination (encorafenib 300 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily [COMBO300]) and ENCO300 arms.

Methods

In part 2, patients were randomly assigned 3:1 to COMBO300 or ENCO300. ENCO300 (parts 1 and 2) data were combined, per protocol, for PFS analysis (key secondary end point) by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). Other analyses included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival, and safety.

Results

Two hundred fifty-eight patients received COMBO300, and 86 received ENCO300. Per protocol, ENCO300 arms (parts 1 and 2 combined) were also evaluated (n = 280). The median follow-up for ENCO300 was 40.8 months (part 1) and 57.1 months (part 2). The median PFS (95% CI) was 12.9 months (10.9 to 14.9) for COMBO300 versus 9.2  months (7.4 to 11.1) for ENCO300 (parts 1  and  2) and 7.4  months (5.6 to 9.2) for ENCO300 (part 2). The hazard ratio (95% CI) for COMBO300 was 0.74 (0.60 to 0.92; two-sided P = .003) versus ENCO300 (parts 1  and  2). The ORR by BIRC (95% CI) was 68% (62 to 74) and 51% (45 to 57) for COMBO300 and ENCO300 (parts 1  and  2), respectively. COMBO300 had greater relative dose intensity and fewer grade 3/4 adverse events than ENCO300.

Conclusion

COMBO300 improved PFS, ORR, and tolerability compared with ENCO300, confirming the contribution of binimetinib to efficacy and safety.

SUBMITTER: Ascierto PA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10564308 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Contribution of MEK Inhibition to BRAF/MEK Inhibitor Combination Treatment of <i>BRAF</i>-Mutant Melanoma: Part 2 of the Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III COLUMBUS Trial.

Ascierto Paolo A PA   Dummer Reinhard R   Gogas Helen J HJ   Arance Ana A   Mandala Mario M   Liszkay Gabriella G   Garbe Claus C   Schadendorf Dirk D   Krajsova Ivana I   Gutzmer Ralf R   Chiarion-Sileni Vanna V   Dutriaux Caroline C   de Groot Jan Willem B JWB   Yamazaki Naoya N   Loquai Carmen C   Robert Caroline C   Flaherty Keith T KT  

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20230728 29


<h4>Purpose</h4>In COLUMBUS part 1, patients with advanced <i>BRAF</i><sup>V600</sup>-mutant melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice a day (COMBO450), vemurafenib 960 mg twice a day, or encorafenib 300 mg once daily (ENCO300). As previously reported, COMBO450 improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus vemurafenib (part 1 primary end point) and ENCO300 (part 1 key secondary end point; not statistically significant). Part 2, requeste  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9916040 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8616282 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8562134 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8445818 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6895913 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3867020 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9984800 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8157545 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9538392 | biostudies-literature