Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transfer
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER:
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10576635 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:IntroductionPreimplantation genetic diagnosis and/or screening (PGD/PGS) allow the assessment of the genetic health of an embryo before transferring it into the uterus. These techniques require the removal of cellular material (polar bodies, blastomere(s) or trophectoderm cells) in order to perform the proper genetic analysis. We report the implantation and live birth outcome of a vitrified-warmed blastocyst developed after triple biopsy and double vitrification procedures at oocyte, cleavage embryo and blastocyst stage.Case descriptionAn infertile couple, with family history of β-thalassemia, searched for IVF procedure and PGD. First polar bodies biopsy with subsequent vitrification was uninformative due to meiotic crossing-over, so oocytes were inseminated after warming. Two embryos were obtained and blastomere biopsy was performed on day 3 with inconclusive results on their genetic status. Their culture resulted in one expanded blastocyst stage on day 7 that underwent trophectoderm biopsy and vitrification. This embryo showed to be normal. It was then warmed and transferred in an artificial cycle.Discussion and evaluationPreconception genetic analysis by removal and analysis of the first polar body is technically possible, but the genetic information that we can obtain at this stage may be limited and the oocytes to be inseminated is not predictable. Compared to blastomere biopsy, trophectoderm biopsy has more diagnostic efficiency with respect to both chromosomal mosaicism and PCR accuracy, reducing the problems of amplification failure and allele drop out. Moreover, embryos biopsied at the cleavage stage seem to have lower implantation rate than biopsied blastocyst.ConclusionsThis is the first case report of a live birth obtained from a three step biopsy and double vitrification procedures of a blastocyst. This case report seems also to suggest the harmlessness of all these procedures if carefully performed by a skilled biologist in an IVF lab with quality management system. Finally, our study highlight that blastocyst cryopreserved on day 7 have clinically important potential and embryos that not reach blastocyst stage on day 6 should not to be discharged because they may result in an ongoing pregnancy.
| S-EPMC4300308 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Study questionHas cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) improved over time and which factors are associated with such an improvement?Summary answerDuring an 11-year period, 2007-2017, CLBR per oocyte aspiration increased significantly, from 27.0% to 36.3%, in parallel with an increase in blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation by vitrification.What is known alreadyWhile it has been shown that live birth rate (LBR) per embryo transfer (ET) is higher for fresh blastocyst than for fresh cleavage stage embryo transfer, CLBR per oocyte aspiration, including one fresh ET and all subsequent frozen embryo transfers (FET), does not seem to differ between the two culture strategies.Study design size durationA national register study including all oocyte aspirations performed in Sweden from 2007 to 2017 (n = 124 700 complete IVF treatment cycles) was carried out. Oocyte donation cycles were excluded.Participants/materials setting methodsData were retrieved from the Swedish National Registry of Assisted Reproduction (Q-IVF) on all oocyte aspirations during the study period where autologous oocytes were used. CLBR was defined as the proportion of deliveries with at least one live birth per oocyte aspiration, including all fresh and/or frozen embryo transfers within 1 year, until one delivery with a live birth or until all embryos were used, whichever occurred first. The delivery of a singleton, twin, or other multiples was registered as one delivery. Cryopreservation of cleavage stage embryos was performed by slow freezing and of blastocyst by vitrification.Main results and the role of chanceIn total, 124 700 oocyte aspirations were performed (in 61 313 women), with 65 304 aspirations in women <35 years and 59 396 in women ≥ 35 years, resulting in 38 403 deliveries with live born children. Overall, the CLBR per oocyte aspiration increased significantly during the study period, from 27.0% to 36.3% (odds ratio (OR) 1.039, 95% CI 1.035-1.043) and from 30.0% to 43.3% if at least one ET was performed (adjusted OR 1.055, 95% CI 1.050-1.059). The increase in CLBR was independent of maternal age, number of oocytes retrieved and number of previous IVF live births. The CLBR for women <35 and ≥35 years both increased significantly, following the same pattern. During the study period, a substantially increasing number of blastocyst transfers was performed, both in fresh and in FET cycles. Other important predicting factors for live birth, such as number of embryos transferred, could not explain the improvement. An increased single embryo transfer rate was observed with time.Limitations reasons for cautionThe retrospective design implicates that other confounders of importance for CLBR cannot be ruled out. In addition, some FET cycles might be performed later than 1 year post oocyte aspiration for the last year (2017) and are, thus, not included in this study. In addition, no data on 'dropouts', i.e. patients that do not continue their treatment despite having cryopreserved embryos, are available, or if this drop-out rate has changed over time.Wider implications of the findingsThe results suggest that blastocyst transfer, particularly when used in FET cycles and in combination with vitrification, is an important contributor to the improved live birth rates over time. This gives a possibility for a lower number of oocyte aspirations needed to achieve a live birth and a shortened time to live birth.Study funding/competing interestsThe study was financed by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-70940) and by Hjalmar Svensson's research foundation. None of the authors declares any conflict of interest.
| S-EPMC8240131 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeWhile several studies reported the association between morphokinetic parameters and implantation, few predictive models were developed to predict implantation after day 5 embryo transfer, generally without external validation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the respective performance of 2 commercially available morphokinetic-based models (KIDScore™ Day 5 versions 1 and 2) for the prediction of implantation and live birth after day 5 single blastocyst transfer.MethodsThis monocentric retrospective study was conducted on 210 ICSI cycles with single day 5 embryo transfer performed with a time-lapse imaging (TLI) system between 2013 and 2016. The association between both KIDScore™ and the observed implantation and live birth rates was calculated, as well as the agreement between embryologist's choice for transfer and embryo ranking by the models.ResultsImplantation and live birth rate were both 35.7%. A significant positive correlation was found between both models and implantation rate (r = 0.96 and r = 0.90, p = 0.01) respectively. Both models had statistically significant but limited predictive power for implantation (AUC 0.60). There was a fair agreement between the embryologists' choice and both models (78% and 61% respectively), with minor differences in case of discrepancies.ConclusionsKIDScore™ Day 5 predictive models are significantly associated with implantation rates after day 5 single blastocyst transfer. However, their predictive performance remains perfectible. The use of these predictive models holds promises as decision-making tools to help the embryologist select the best embryo, ultimately facilitating the implementation of SET policy. However, embryologists' expertise remains absolutely necessary to make the final decision.
| S-EPMC6885460 | biostudies-literature
Project description:An increasing number of studies have related the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content to embryo viability and transfer outcomes. However, previous studies have focused more on the relationship between mtDNA and embryo implantation, few studies have studied the effect of the mtDNA content on live birth. In the study, we investigated whether mtDNA content is a reliable screening biomarker for live birth after single blastocyst transfer. A total of 233 couples with 316 blastocyst stage embryos undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment and pre-implantation genetic testing analysis were included in the study. All embryos were chromosomally normal and had undergone single-embryo transfers. There was no significant difference observed in the blastocyst mtDNA content among the live birth, miscarriage and non-implanted groups (p=0.999), and the mtDNA content in blastocysts from the miscarriage and live birth groups was similar [median (interquartile range), 1.00*108(7.59*107- 1.39*108) vs 1.01*108 (7.37*107- 1.32*108)]. Similarly, no significant association was observed between mtDNA content and embryo implantation potential (p=0.965). After adjusting for multiple confounders in a logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations, no associations between mtDNA content and live birth were observed in all blastocysts, Day-5 and Day-6 blastocysts (p=0.567, p=0.673, p=0.165, respectively). The live birth rate was not significantly different between blastocysts with an elevated mtDNA content and blastocysts with a normal mtDNA content (26.7% vs 33.6% p=0.780). Additionally, there was no linear correlation between the mtDNA content and maternal age (p=0.570). In conclusion, the mtDNA content does not seem to be a potential biomarker for embryo transfer outcomes (i.e., implantation and live birth) based on the existing testing tools. Embryos with an elevated mtDNA content also have development potential for successful live birth.
| S-EPMC8637898 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundA number of studies have compared the clinical outcomes between the two endometrial preparation methods: natural cycles (NCs) and hormone replacement treatment (HRT) before frozen embryo transfer, but the results were conflicting. In order to mitigate the potential effect of embryos per se, several researchers have worked on this subject for euploid blastocyst transfer, but the results were still inconsistent. Therefore, the present study was aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes between HRT and NC for autologous single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer based on our data.MethodsA total of 598 frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer cycles in the assisted reproductive center of Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital from January 2014 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Women were stratified into the NC (n = 125) or HRT (n = 473) group according to the patient's preference and the physician's guidance. Multivariate regression models and subgroup analysis were constructed to analyze the association between endometrial preparation and live birth.ResultsWomen in the NC group had a higher live birth rate (68.80% versus 58.35%, P = 0.034) and a lower risk of total pregnancy loss (8.51% versus 21.14%, P = 0.005) when compared with women in the HRT group. The biochemical pregnancy rate (75.20% versus 74.00%, P = 0.784) and clinical pregnancy rate (74.40% versus 69.98%, P = 0.334) were similar between the two groups (NC versus HRT). NC was associated with an increased odds of live birth compared with HRT by different multivariable analysis models (Model 1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57, 0.36 - 0.90; Model 2: aOR, 95%CI: 0.57, 0.35 - 0.92). In addition, the increased chance of live birth in the NC group was found in all subgroups. No major obstetrical complications and two malformation livebirths were reported.ConclusionsIn women undergoing single euploid frozen blastocyst transfers, the NC group was associated with a lower pregnancy loss rate and an ultimately higher live birth rate than the HRT group. Although HRT is convenient for both clinicians and patients, the lower live birth rate should be taken into account and NC might be the first choice of endometrial preparation method.
| S-EPMC9650322 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC11630046 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo compare live-birth rates, blastocyst to live-birth efficiency, gestational age, and birth weights in a large cohort of patients undergoing single versus double thawed blastocyst transfer.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingAssisted reproduction technology (ART) practice.Patient(s)All autologous frozen blastocyst transfers (FBT) of one or two vitrified-warmed blastocysts from January 2009 through April 2012.Intervention(s)Single or double FBT.Main outcome measure(s)Live birth, blastocyst to live-birth efficiency, preterm birth, low birth weight.Result(s)Only supernumerary blastocysts with good morphology (grade BB or better) were vitrified, and 1,696 FBTs were analyzed. No differences were observed in patient age, rate of embryo progression, or postthaw blastomere survival. Double FBT yielded a higher live birth per transfer, but 33% of births from double FBT were twins versus only 0.6% of single FBT. Double FBT was associated with statistically significant increases in preterm birth and low birth weight, the latter of which was statistically significant even when the analysis was limited to singletons. Of the blastocysts transferred via single FBT, 38% resulted in a liveborn child versus only 34% with double FBT. This suggests that two single FBTs would result in more liveborn children with significantly fewer preterm births when compared with double FBT.Conclusion(s)Single FBT greatly decreased multiple and preterm birth risk while providing excellent live-birth rates. Patients should be counseled that a greater overall number of live born children per couple can be expected when thawed blastocysts are transferred one at a time.
| S-EPMC4457687 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo determine whether endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) improves live births in patients with and without a history of unsuccessful frozen embryo transfers (FETs).DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingLarge reproductive center.Patient(s)Patients with and without ERA before euploid single FET were included in the analysis.Intervention(s)Subjects in the exposed group underwent ERA and ERA-timed FETs. Subjects in the unexposed group followed a standard protocol FET without ERA. Outcomes were compared between nonreceptive and receptive subjects undergoing an ERA-timed FET and between ERA-timed vs. standard protocol FETs.Main outcome measure(s)The primary outcome was a live birth; secondary outcomes were biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates.Result(s)A total of 307 ERA-timed FETs and 2,284 standard protocol FETs were analyzed. One hundred twenty-five patients (40.7%) were ERA receptive, and 182 (59.3%) were ERA nonreceptive. After adjusting for the number of the previously failed FETs, there was no difference in the proportion of receptive and nonreceptive ERA results. There were no statistically significant differences in live births in patients with ERA-receptive vs. ERA-nonreceptive results (48.8% and 41.7%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio 1.17; 95% CI, 0.97-1.40). There were no statistically significant differences in live births in patients with or without ERA testing results before FET (44.6% and 51.3%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.04).Conclusion(s)Patients with an increasing number of previous failed euploid FET cycles are not at an increased risk of a displaced window of implantation. Patients categorized as receptive vs. nonreceptive and those without ERA testing results have comparable FET success rates.
| S-EPMC9329263 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate whether blastocyst morphology and developmental rate are associated with euploidy and live birth rates (LBRs) in single euploid frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles.DesignRetrospective cohort study.MethodsThis study included 431 preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles followed by 393 FET cycles performed at our center from June 2017 to March 2021. All cycles were analyzed for euploidy based on blastocyst morphology (good, average and poor), developmental stage (day 5 and 6) and maternal age (< 35 and ≥ 35 years old). Multivariate logistic analysis models were used to identify the independent effects of conventional blastocyst morphology, developmental rate and morphological parameters (degree of blastocoele expansion, and grade of inner cell mass and trophectoderm (TE)) on LBRs.ResultsIn the group of women aged < 35 years, compared with poor-quality blastocysts, good-quality blastocysts (62.90% vs. 32.46%; odds ratio (OR) 3.163, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.247-4.451; P < 0.001) and average-quality blastocysts (46.70% vs. 32.46%; OR 1.665, 95% CI 1.287-2.154; P < 0.001) had significantly higher euploidy rates. Additionally, day 5 blastocysts were associated with higher euploidy rates than day 6 blastocysts (49.28% vs. 35.02%; OR 1.506, 95% CI 1.191-1.903; P= 0.001). In the group of women aged ≥ 35 years, euploidy rates were also associated with blastocyst morphology, with 41.86%, 45.65% and 24.39% of good, average and poor-quality embryos, respectively, exhibiting euploidy. However, no relationship was seen between euploidy and blastocyst developmental rate. Multiple logistic regression analysis show that overall blastocyst morphology of euploid embryos was not associated with LBR, only embryos with A-grade TE had significantly higher LBRs than those with C-grade TE (62.71% vs. 45.40%; OR 2.189, 95% CI 1.166-4.109; P=0.015). Similarly, LBRs were significantly higher when day 5 blastocysts were transferred than when day 6 blastocysts were transferred (57.75% vs. 41.67%; OR 2.132, 95% CI 1.370-3.318; P = 0.001).ConclusionPoor-quality embryos have reduced rates of euploidy. However, blastocyst developmental rate only significantly associates with euploidy rates in women aged younger than 35. Furthermore, only TE grade and blastocyst developmental rate are significantly associated with LBRs following FET cycles.
| S-EPMC9044033 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeSpecific serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) parameters that can predict live birth after an embryo transfer have yet to be defined.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 1,028 patients with a detectable β-hCG who underwent a single embryo transfer between 2002 and 2019 at a large academic center. Two β-hCG parameters were examined in relation to live birth: 1) "doubling" defined as β-hCG doubling over 48 h and 2) "reaching 100" defined as a β-hCG ≥ 100 mIU/mL by 15 days after oocyte retrieval (AOR).ResultsOne thousand three hundred forty cycles involving a single embryo were analyzed. Two thirds were frozen embryos and 86% were blastocyst transfers. Preimplantation genetic testing was performed in almost 30% of cycles. When β-hCG levels "doubled," a live birth occurred in 80.7% of cycles and when β-hCG levels "reached 100" by 15 days AOR, live birth occurred in 81.6% of cycles. When β-hCG levels both doubled and reached 100 by 15 days, AOR 85.4% cycles resulted in live birth. A multiple logistic regression model to control for patient and cycle level factors revealed a live birth odds ratio (OR) of 8.0 (95% CI 5.7-11.1) when β-hCG "doubled" and an OR of 21.2 (95% CI 14.3-31.5) when β-hCG "reached 100." When both these latter parameters were met, the OR was 12.5 (95% CI 8.9-17.8).Conclusionβ-hCG parameters of "doubling" and "reaching 100" by 15 days AOR are robust predictors of live birth and can aid in patient counseling regarding pregnancy outcomes soon after single embryo transfer.
| S-EPMC9596620 | biostudies-literature