Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Substance Use Outcomes Among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals Living with HIV Following Residential Substance Use Treatment in Washington, DC.


ABSTRACT: This study explored how sexual or gender minority (SGM) status influenced substance use (SU) treatment outcomes in a predominantly African American and unemployed sample of people with HIV. N = 60 participants were enrolled in an abstinence-focused inpatient SU treatment center, followed by outpatient treatment sessions. At 12-months follow-up, the survival rate (i.e. those who did not reuse substances) was 37.6% (non-SGM group) vs. 4.8% (SGM group). The impact of SGM status on reuse was .54 log odds, p = .11, which translates to a 71.8% increase in the hazard of reusing substances for SGM vs. non-SGM individuals. For both groups, frequency of reuse remained stable and problems associated with SU decreased over time. Results suggest a potentially clinically relevant finding that SGM individuals have possible heigh-tened risk of SU after a mixed inpatient-outpatient program. ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration number: NCT01351454.

SUBMITTER: Belus JM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10601688 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Substance Use Outcomes Among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals Living with HIV Following Residential Substance Use Treatment in Washington, DC.

Belus Jennifer M JM   Tralka Hannah H   Satinsky Emily N EN   Seitz-Brown C J CJ   Daughters Stacey B SB   Magidson Jessica F JF  

Alcoholism treatment quarterly 20230808 4


This study explored how sexual or gender minority (SGM) status influenced substance use (SU) treatment outcomes in a predominantly African American and unemployed sample of people with HIV. <i>N</i> = 60 participants were enrolled in an abstinence-focused inpatient SU treatment center, followed by outpatient treatment sessions. At 12-months follow-up, the survival rate (i.e. those who did not reuse substances) was 37.6% (non-SGM group) vs. 4.8% (SGM group). The impact of SGM status on reuse was  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6430403 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9732144 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7194133 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6214200 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6469851 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10040327 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10505308 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8171963 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9262325 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5726448 | biostudies-literature