Dataset Information

AI in medical education: medical student perception, curriculum recommendations and design suggestions.

ABSTRACT: Medical AI has transformed modern medicine and created a new environment for future doctors. However, medical education has failed to keep pace with these advances, and it is essential to provide systematic education on medical AI to current medical undergraduate and postgraduate students. To address this issue, our study utilized the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model to identify key factors that influence the acceptance and intention to use medical AI. We collected data from 1,243 undergraduate and postgraduate students from 13 universities and 33 hospitals, and 54.3% reported prior experience using medical AI. Our findings indicated that medical postgraduate students have a higher level of awareness in using medical AI than undergraduate students. The intention to use medical AI is positively associated with factors such as performance expectancy, habit, hedonic motivation, and trust. Therefore, future medical education should prioritize promoting students' performance in training, and courses should be designed to be both easy to learn and engaging, ensuring that students are equipped with the necessary skills to succeed in their future medical careers.

SUBMITTER: Li Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10637014 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

AI in medical education: medical student perception, curriculum recommendations and design suggestions.

Li Qianying Q Qin Yunhao Y

BMC medical education 20231109 1

Medical AI has transformed modern medicine and created a new environment for future doctors. However, medical education has failed to keep pace with these advances, and it is essential to provide systematic education on medical AI to current medical undergraduate and postgraduate students. To address this issue, our study utilized the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model to identify key factors that influence the acceptance and intention to use medical AI. We collected data f ...[more]

PMID: 37946176

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized both medical education and healthcare by delivering innovative tools that enhance learning and improve overall outcomes. The study aimed to assess students' perceptions regarding the credibility and effectiveness of AI as a learning tool and to explore the dynamics of integrating AI in medical education.MethodologyA cross-sectional study was carried out across medical colleges in Pakistan. A 26-question survey was developed using Google Forms from previously validated studies. The survey assessed demographics of participants, basic understanding of AI, AI as a learning tool in medical education and socio-ethical impacts of the use of AI. The data was analyzed using SPSS (v 26.0) to derive descriptive and inferential statistics.ResultA total of 702 medical students aged 18 to 26 years (mean age 20.50 ± 1.6 years) participated in the study. The findings revealed a generally favorable attitude towards AI among medical students (80.3%), with the majority considering it an effective (60.8%) and credible (58.4%) learning tool in medical education. Students agreed that AI learning optimized their study time (60.3%) and provided up-to-date medical information (63.1%). Notably, 65.7% of students found AI more efficient in helping them grasp medical concepts compared to traditional tools like books and lectures, while 66.8% reported receiving more accurate answers to their medical inquiries through AI. The study highlighted that medical students view traditional tools as becoming increasingly outdated (59%), emphasizing the importance of integrating AI into medical education and creating dedicated AI tools (80%) for the medical education.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that AI is an effective and credible tool in medical education, offering personalized learning experiences and improved educational outcomes. AI tools are helping students learn medical concepts by cutting down on study-time, providing accurate answers, and ultimately improving study outcomes. We recommend developing dedicated AI tools for medical education and their formal integration into medical curricula, along with appropriate regulatory oversight to ensure AI can enhance human abilities rather than acting as a replacement for humans.

Project description:BackgroundExtant literature reveals that medical students suffer from various mental health problems in the process of learning medicine. However, there are few studies evaluating the implementation of a mental health education course in medical curriculum. The current study aimed to test the effectiveness of an 8-week intensive mental health education course, the College Student Mental Health Education Course (CSMHEC), and to gain further insights on how the course could be improved from students' feedback.MethodsThis is a quasi-experimental study with both quantitative and qualitative analyses. We recruited 374 first year medical students as our subjects with 188 (age = 17.97 ± 0.65 years, 37.2% male) for the experiment group and 186 (age = 18.02 ± 0.63 years, 40.3% male) for the control group. For quantitative analysis, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), Chinese College Student Academic Burnout Inventory (CCSABI) and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) were used and a 5-point Likert scale was used to indicate students' overall satisfaction with CSMHEC. For qualitative analysis, a thematic analysis method was adopted to gain insights from the feedback of medical students.ResultsMedical students in the experiment group saw a significant decline in psychological distress (p < 0.001, d = 0.31) and academic burnout (p < 0.001, d = 1.46), while they experienced a significant increase in life satisfaction levels after the intervention (p < 0.001, d = 0.48). Compared with students in the control group, students in the experiment group had statistically significant lower levels of psychological distress (p < 0.05, d = 0.23) and academic burnout (p < 0.001, d = 0.70), but statistically significant higher levels of life satisfaction in the post-test (p < 0.01, d = 0.31). Most students in the experiment group were satisfied with CSMHEC and themes extracted in the thematic analysis shed light on how the course could be improved.ConclusionsImplementing a mental health education course like CSMHEC in medical curriculum can be effective in helping medical students improve psychological health. More research needs to be conducted on further refinement and better design of such a course to implement in medical education.

Project description:BackgroundBiostatistics is a key but challenging subject in medical curricula that is usually delivered via a didactic approach in China. However, whether it is the best teaching approach to improve the learner's competency, especially for medical postgraduates is yet to be proved. Therefore, a block curriculum design was initially developed to provide selective education to the postgraduates towards the professional career of their interest. A questionnaire was designed to assess the students' perceptions toward biostatistics as these affective factors might impact the learning process. Thus, the present study aimed to detect whether the new block curriculum design could promote the students' positive perceptions and further improve the course achievement.MethodsThis cohort study investigated and assessed the perceptions toward biostatistics of the first-year postgraduates undergoing traditional teaching and block teaching, respectively. Structural equation modeling was applied to explore the association between perception and course achievement in the block teaching group.ResultsWith a response rate of 97.84 and 96.67% from the two cohorts respectively, 499 block teaching postgraduates had more positive perceptions as compared to 465 traditionally teaching postgraduates with Likert 5-point agreement response mean of 3.50 vs. 3.31 for course value, 3.66 vs. 2.97 for course comment, and 4.29 vs. 4.10 for expectation. Moreover, block teaching students presented superior confidence about academic statistical knowledge, and therefore, 77.96% of them approved of the new teaching approach. Age, specialty, research experience, logical thinking capacity, mathematical basics, and computer basics might influence the postgraduates' self-assessment ability (all P < 0.05). Structural equation modeling confirmed a positive correlation between perceptions and the course achievements with a reasonable fit.ConclusionsThe block curriculum design in the biostatistics course improved the postgraduates' positive perception and may have had a positive role in improving postgraduates' achievement in learning biostatistics.

Project description:BackgroundThe successful integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare depends on the global perspectives of all stakeholders. This study aims to answer the research question: What are the attitudes of medical, dental, and veterinary students towards AI in education and practice, and what are the regional differences in these perceptions?MethodsAn anonymous online survey was developed based on a literature review and expert panel discussions. The survey assessed students' AI knowledge, attitudes towards AI in healthcare, current state of AI education, and preferences for AI teaching. It consisted of 16 multiple-choice items, eight demographic queries, and one free-field comment section. Medical, dental, and veterinary students from various countries were invited to participate via faculty newsletters and courses. The survey measured technological literacy, AI knowledge, current state of AI education, preferences for AI teaching, and attitudes towards AI in healthcare using Likert scales. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc test.ResultsThe survey included 4313 medical, 205 dentistry, and 78 veterinary students from 192 faculties and 48 countries. Most participants were from Europe (51.1%), followed by North/South America (23.3%) and Asia (21.3%). Students reported positive attitudes towards AI in healthcare (median: 4, IQR: 3-4) and a desire for more AI teaching (median: 4, IQR: 4-5). However, they had limited AI knowledge (median: 2, IQR: 2-2), lack of AI courses (76.3%), and felt unprepared to use AI in their careers (median: 2, IQR: 1-3). Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences between the Global North and South (r = 0.025 to 0.185, all P < .001) and across continents (r = 0.301 to 0.531, all P < .001), with generally small effect sizes.ConclusionsThis large-scale international survey highlights medical, dental, and veterinary students' positive perceptions of AI in healthcare, their strong desire for AI education, and the current lack of AI teaching in medical curricula worldwide. The study identifies a need for integrating AI education into medical curricula, considering regional differences in perceptions and educational needs.Trial registrationNot applicable (no clinical trial).

Dataset Information

AI in medical education: medical student perception, curriculum recommendations and design suggestions.

Publications

AI in medical education: medical student perception, curriculum recommendations and design suggestions.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets