Dataset Information

MPOWERED Trial Open-Label Extension: Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Data for Oral Octreotide Capsules in Acromegaly.

ABSTRACT:

Context

The MPOWERED core trial (NCT02685709) and open-label extension (OLE) phase investigated long-term efficacy and safety of oral octreotide capsules (OOC) in patients with acromegaly. Core trial primary endpoint data demonstrated noninferiority to injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (iSRLs). Core trial completers were invited to participate in the OLE phase.

Objective

To assess long-term efficacy and safety of OOC in patients with acromegaly who previously responded to and tolerated both OOC and injectable octreotide/lanreotide and completed the core phase. The unique study design of transitioning between OOC and iSRLs allowed within-patient evaluations.

Main outcome measure

Proportion of biochemical responders (insulin-like growth factor I < 1.3 × upper limit of normal) at end of each extension year who entered that year as responders.

Results

At year 1 extension end, 52/58 patients from both mono- and combination therapy groups were responders (89.7%; 95% CI, 78.8-96.1), 36/41 (87.8%; 95% CI, 73.8-95.9) in year 2, and 29/31 (93.5%; 95% CI, 78.6-99.2) in year 3. No new or unexpected safety signals were detected; 1 patient withdrew owing to treatment failure. Patients who transitioned from iSRLs in the core trial to OOC in the OLE phase reported improved treatment convenience/satisfaction and symptom control.

Conclusions

Patient-reported outcome data support for the first time that transitioning patients randomized to iSRL (who previously responded to both OOC and iSRLs) back to OOC, had significant effect on patients' symptoms score in a prospective cohort. The MPOWERED OLE showed long-term maintenance of response and sustained safety with OOC.

SUBMITTER: Fleseriu M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10655542 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

MPOWERED Trial Open-Label Extension: Long-term Efficacy and Safety Data for Oral Octreotide Capsules in Acromegaly.

Fleseriu Maria M Molitch Mark M Dreval Alexander A Pokramovich Yulia Y Bondar Irina I Poteshkin Yury Y Macut Djuro D Obermayer-Pietsch Barbara B Gilgun-Sherki Yossi Y Haviv Asi A Biermasz Nienke N Strasburger Christian J CJ

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 20231101 12

<h4>Context</h4>The MPOWERED core trial (NCT02685709) and open-label extension (OLE) phase investigated long-term efficacy and safety of oral octreotide capsules (OOC) in patients with acromegaly. Core trial primary endpoint data demonstrated noninferiority to injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (iSRLs). Core trial completers were invited to participate in the OLE phase.<h4>Objective</h4>To assess long-term efficacy and safety of OOC in patients with acromegaly who previously responded to a ...[more]

PMID: 37319438

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract Background Oral octreotide capsules (OOC) are a treatment option for patients with acromegaly in the United States. The MPOWERED trial (NCT02685709) showed that OOC were noninferior to injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (iSRLs; octreotide or lanreotide) in maintenance of biochemical control in patients previously responding to both treatments, as well as demonstrated improvements in patient-reported outcomes among patients receiving OOC. Objective Report long-term safety and efficacy outcomes with OOC from the open-label extension (OLE) of MPOWERED. Methods Patients were eligible for and could voluntarily enroll into the OLE if they had completed the 15-month core treatment phase of MPOWERED (6-month Run-in phase plus 9-month randomized controlled treatment [RCT] phase or, for OOC nonresponders during/at end of Run-in at participating sites, combination sub-study evaluating OOC in combination with cabergoline) and were adequately biochemically controlled per investigator assessment. Maintenance of response (definition: IGF-I <1.3×ULN; single timepoint) was assessed in each year of the OLE in patients responding at the start of that year. Additional analyses were performed on patients switching to OOC in the OLE from iSRLs in the core study. Results Sixty patients elected to enroll in the OLE (35 who received OOC and 19 who received iSRLs in the RCT phase, 6 from the combination sub-study). Median and maximal OOC exposure durations in the OLE were 2.2 and 3.5 years, respectively. A total of 94%, 90%, and 93% of patients receiving OOC monotherapy maintained biochemical response at the end of years 1, 2, and 3 of the OLE, respectively (using last observation carried forward imputation). Of patients switching from iSRLs to OOC during the OLE, 79% reported very good (47%) or excellent (32%) symptom control at the end of the OLE, compared with 47% (42% very good, 5% excellent) at the end of the RCT phase while receiving iSRLs. Patients switching from iSRLs also experienced significant improvements in the treatment convenience and treatment satisfaction domains (both P<0.05) of the Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. Median OOC compliance rate during the OLE was 99%. OOC safety during the OLE was consistent with that observed during the core study, with no new safety signals observed with long-term exposure. Conclusions The OLE of MPOWERED demonstrated a high percentage (≥90%) of patients maintaining biochemical response while receiving OOC monotherapy with a favorable long-term safety profile of OOC. Those who switched from iSRLs to OOC demonstrated improvements in symptom control, treatment convenience, and treatment satisfaction. Presentation: Sunday, June 12, 2022 1:12 p.m. - 1:17 p.m., Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.

Project description:Abstract Background Oral octreotide capsules (OOC) are an approved treatment option in the United States for patients with acromegaly who have previously responded to injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (iSRLs). Safety and efficacy of OOC was demonstrated in the CHIASMA OPTIMAL trial (NCT03252353), showing maintenance of response and a safety profile consistent with iSRLs. Results from the first 48 weeks of the open-label extension (OLE) of this trial suggested that this effect was durable for the long-term. Objective Report efficacy and safety through the second year of the OLE. Methods Eligible patients had the option to enroll in the OLE of CHIASMA OPTIMAL following the double-blind placebo-controlled (DPC) period. Endpoints in the second year of the OLE were exploratory, including: the proportion of patients completing week 96 of the OLE, the proportion of responders entering year 2 who remained responders of those with evaluable data (response defined as average Insulin-like growth factor I [IGF-I] ≤1. 0 × upper limit of normal [ULN] at last 2 visits between weeks 84-96), and changes in IGF-I and growth hormone (GH) from OLE baseline to OLE week 96 in those completing the DPC period on study drug. Results Thirty-two patients from the core period (DPC groups: n=14, placebo; n=18, OOC) entered year 2 of the OLE and 31 (97%) completed. OOC dose at the start of year 2 was 40 mg/d, n=3; 60 mg/d, n=8; and 80 mg/d, n=21. For patients who had non-missing data response rate at 96 weeks was 100% (17/17) for patients who entered year 2 as responders, and 93% (27/29) for patients overall. Mean IGF-I for patients from the OOC group who completed the DPC period on study drug (n=14) was 0.81 × ULN at baseline of OLE and 0.78 × ULN at week 96, (change, −0. 03 × ULN). Mean GH (n=12) was 0.43 ng/mL and 0.44 ng/mL at baseline and week 96, respectively (change, 0. 01 ng/mL). For patients who completed the DPC period on placebo (n=8), mean IGF-I was 1. 05 and 0.77 × ULN at OLE baseline and week 96, respectively (change, −0.28); mean GH (n=5) was 1. 06 and 0.34 ng/mL at OLE baseline and week 96, respectively (change, −0.72 ng/mL). Median exposure to OOC was 2.1 years, with exposure >3 years for 5 patients. Throughout the OLE period, 50% of patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with no serious AEs. One patient discontinued treatment due to an AE (headache). The safety profile was consistent with that reported for OOC; no new patterns were observed with increased exposure. Conclusion Maintenance of biochemical response with OOC was durable up to 96 weeks. The safety profile of OOC was consistent with that of iSRLs. No new safety signals were observed with increased exposure duration. Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.

Project description:Background and objectiveViloxazine ER (extended-release capsules; Qelbree®) is a nonstimulant medication that has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children (> 6 years old) and adults. This phase 3 open-label extension to a pivotal phase 3, double-blind trial evaluated the long-term safety and continued efficacy of viloxazine ER in adults with ADHD.MethodsThis was a multicenter, flexible-dose, open-label extension to a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT04016779). Viloxazine ER was initiated at 200 mg/day and adjusted (between 200 and 600 mg/day) to achieve optimal efficacy and tolerability. Trial enrollment was halted temporarily (24 March 2020 to 23 July 2020) due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Participants completing double-blind treatment during that time were offered delayed enrollment upon trial requalification. Safety outcomes were the primary objectives. Secondary objectives were efficacy outcomes, including the ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS), and were assessed relative to double-blind baseline (or trial re-entry baseline for those whose enrollment was delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic).ResultsOverall, 159 participants (133 immediate and 26 delayed rollover) received viloxazine ER, with a mean exposure of 265 ± 254.9 days. Adverse events (AEs) included (> 10% incidence) insomnia (13.8%), nausea (13.8%), headache (10.7%), and fatigue (10.1%). AEs led to discontinuation for 17.6% of participants [most commonly insomnia (2.5%), nausea (2.5%), and fatigue (1.9%)]. AISRS total score [baseline mean ± standard deviation (SD): 37.9 ± 6.3] improved by the first follow-up visit (-11.4 ± 9.5; week 2) with continued improvement at subsequent visits (last on-study visit: -18.2 ± 11.54). Similar patterns of improvement were seen for other measures of efficacy, including quality of life and executive function. Following initial dose optimization, most participants (73%) used viloxazine ER doses ≥ 400 mg/day, with 36% using doses of 600 mg/day.ConclusionsLong-term viloxazine ER use was well tolerated, with no new long-term safety findings. Improvements in ADHD symptoms and associated measures were sustained throughout trial participation. In total, 73% percent of adult participants in this long-term study used viloxazine ER doses of 400 mg or more during maintenance treatment.Clinical trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04143217.

Project description:Abstract Background Oral octreotide capsules (OOC) are a treatment option for patients with acromegaly in the United States who have previously responded to injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (iSRLs, octreotide or lanreotide). In previous phase 3 studies, the safety of OOC was shown to be consistent with iSRLs, without dose-dependent adverse reactions. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled period (DPC) of the CHIASMA OPTIMAL trial (NCT03252353), patients were randomized to twice-daily OOC at 40-mg/day, with the option for up-titration to 80-mg/day. In contrast, patients entered the open-label extension (OLE) at a 60-mg/day dose. Objective Examine the safety of 40-mg/day versus 60-mg/day OOC doses. Methods Eligible patients had the option to enroll in the OLE following the core trial. All patients received OOC 60-mg/day upon entering the OLE regardless of prior treatment in the DPC, including patients who received placebo in the DPC. OOC doses were up- or down-titrated based on insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) level and/or acromegaly signs or symptoms. The current analysis compared the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), TEAE-related study drug discontinuation, and acromegaly-related TEAEs (defined as new or worsening signs or symptoms of acromegaly). Results Twenty-eight patients randomized to OOC in the DPC (40-mg/day dose) and 19 who were originally randomized to placebo and continued into the OLE (60-mg/day dose) were included in the analysis. Biochemical control was similar in both groups as demonstrated by mean IGF-I levels over the respective periods. Ninety-six percent of patients on 40-mg/day and 57.9% on 60-mg/day experienced ≥1 TEAEs. Two patients on 60-mg/day reported a total of 2 SAEs, both deemed unrelated to study drug. Two patients on 40-mg/day experienced TEAEs leading to study drug discontinuation (headache and gastrointestinal symptoms). The incidence of acromegaly-related TEAEs was generally lower in those on 60-mg/day versus 40-mg/day. Conclusions This is the first analysis exploring differences in OOC doses. The nature and incidence of TEAEs occurring with an OOC dose of 60-mg/day versus 40-mg/day were similar, though this analysis was limited by differences in TEAE reporting across sequential phases of a lengthy trial. A trend was observed for decreased incidence of acromegaly-related TEAEs with the 60-mg/day dose. This finding is in line with previous analyses showing no dose-related TEAEs with OOC. Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.

Project description:ObjectiveEvaluate long-term efficacy (percent seizure frequency reduction and responder rates), safety, and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate in an open-label extension (OLE) of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.MethodsPatients (aged 18-70 years) with uncontrolled focal seizures despite treatment with 1-3 antiseizure medications who completed the 18-week double-blind study (n=360) could enter the OLE, where they underwent a 2-week blinded conversion to cenobamate (target dose, 300 mg/day; min/max, 50/400 mg/day).ResultsThree hundred fifty-five patients were included in the OLE safety population (265 originally randomized to cenobamate, 90 originally randomized to placebo), and 354 were included in the OLE modified intent-to-treat population. As of July 2019, 58.9% (209/355) of patients were continuing cenobamate treatment and 141 had discontinued, including 16.6% (59/355) due to lack of efficacy, 8.7% (31/355) due to withdrawal by patient, and 7.6% (27/355) due to adverse events. Median (range) duration of OLE exposure was 53.9 (1.1-68.7) months. Retention rates at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 83%, 71%, 65%, and 62%, respectively. Median percent seizure frequency reduction over baseline increased with each 6-month OLE interval, up to 76.1% at months 43-48. Among observed patients, 16.4% (36/220) achieved 100% and 39.1% (86/220) achieved ≥90% seizure reduction during >36-48 months. Among the initial OLE mITT population, 10.2% (36/354) of patients achieved 100% and 24.3% (86/354) achieved ≥90% seizure reduction during >36-48 months. Similar to the double-blind study, adverse events (AEs) included dizziness, somnolence, fatigue, and headache. Serious AEs occurred in 20.3% (72/355) of patients.ConclusionLong-term efficacy, including 100% and ≥90% seizure reduction, was sustained during 48 months of cenobamate treatment, with 71% retention at 24 months. No new safety issues were identified. These results confirm the findings of the double-blind study and support the potential long-term clinical benefit of cenobamate.RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01866111.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that oral Cenobamate 50-400 mg/day is effective as an adjunctive treatment for the long-term management of patients with uncontrolled focal seizures previously treated with 1 to 3 ASMs.