Dataset Information

Is positive communication sufficient to modulate procedural pain and anxiety in the emergency room? A randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Research suggests that therapeutic communication could enhance patient comfort during medical procedures. Few studies have been conducted in clinical settings, with adequate blinding. Our hypothesis was that a positive message could lead to analgesia and anxiolysis, and that this effect would be enhanced by an empathetic interaction with the nurse performing the procedure, compared to an audio-taped message. This study aimed to modulate the contents and delivery vector of a message regarding peripheral intravenous catheter (PIC) placement in the emergency room (ER).

Methods

This study was a 2 + 2 randomized controlled trial registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03502655). A positive versus standard message was delivered through audio tape (double blind) in the first phase (N = 131) and through the nurse placing the catheter (single blind) in the second phase (N = 120).

Results

By design, low practitioner empathic behavior was observed in the first phase (median 1 out of 5 points). In the second phase, higher empathic behavior was observed in the positive than in the standard message (median 2 vs. 3, p < 0.001). Contrary to our hypothesis, the intervention did not affect pain nor anxiety reports due to PIC placement in either phase (all p values>0.2).

Conclusions

The positive communication intervention did not impact pain nor anxiety reports following PIC. There might have been a floor effect, with low PIC pain ratings in a context of moderate pain due to the presenting condition. Hence, such a therapeutic communication intervention might not be sufficient to modulate a mild procedural pain in the ER.

SUBMITTER: Berna C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10662595 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Is Positive Communication Sufficient to Modulate Procedural Pain and Anxiety in the Emergency Department? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Berna Chantal C Favre-Bulle Anne A Bonzon Adélaïde A Gross Nathan N Gonthier Ariane A Gerhard-Donnet Hélène H Taffé Patrick P Hugli Olivier O

Psychosomatic medicine 20230824 9

<h4>Objective</h4>Research suggests that therapeutic communication could enhance patient comfort during medical procedures. Few studies have been conducted in clinical settings, with adequate blinding. Our hypothesis was that a positive message could lead to analgesia and anxiolysis, and that this effect would be enhanced by an empathetic interaction with the nurse performing the procedure, compared with an audio-taped message. This study aimed to modulate the contents and delivery vector of a m ...[more]

PMID: 37678374

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn the emergency department (ED), medical procedures, such as arterial blood gas (ABG) testing, can cause pain and high stress levels. However, ABG testing is a routine procedure assessing the severity of the patient's condition. To reduce the pain of ABG, several methods have been investigated without significant difference in pain perception. Communication, a key element of care, has shown a significant effect on pain perception. A positive communication strategy, including positive, kind, or reassuring words, can reduce pain perception, while negative words can raise this perception, causing discomfort, known as the "nocebo effect." Although some studies have compared the impact of verbal attitudes, particularly in anesthesia and mainly with staff already trained in hypnosis, to the best of our knowledge, none have investigated the effect of communication in the emergency setting, where patients may be more suggestible to the words used.ObjectiveIn this study, we will investigate the effect of positive therapeutic communication on pain, anxiety, discomfort, and global satisfaction in patients requiring ABG compared to nocebo and neutral communication.MethodsA single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 3 parallel arms will be conducted with 249 patients requiring ABG during their ED visit. Patients will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups before receiving ABG: positive communication group, negative communication (nocebo) group, or neutral communication (neutral) group. The communication and the words used by the physicians during hygiene preparation, artery location, and puncture will be imposed in each group. The study will be proposed to each patient corresponding to the inclusion criteria. The physicians will not be trained in hypnosis or in positive therapeutic communication. The procedure will be recorded with audio recorders to test its quality. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. The primary endpoint is the onset of pain. The secondary outcomes are patient comfort, patient anxiety, and global satisfaction of the patient with the communication strategy used.ResultsOn average, 2000 ABG procedures are performed each year in the EDs of hospitals. In this study, 249 patients are expected to be included. With a projected positive response rate of 80%, we intend to include 25 (10%) patients per month. The inclusion period began in April 2023 and will run until July 2024. We hope to publish the results of the study during the fall of 2024.ConclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this study is the first RCT assessing the use of positive communication on pain and anxiety in patients undergoing the ABG procedure in the ED. A reduction in pain, discomfort, and anxiety is expected when using positive communication. If the results are positive, this could be useful to the medical community and encourage clinicians to monitor their communication during care.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05434169; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05434169.International registered report identifier (irrid)PRR1-10.2196/42043.

Project description:IntroductionChildren presenting to the emergency department (ED) often require procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) prior to procedures. Although ketamine is used widely for PSA safely, there is a risk of adverse effects. Among them, vomiting is significant as it occurs in about 10% of patients and can potentially endanger the airway. Because there is evidence that post-operative complications might be due to anxiety prior to the operation, this study aims to investigate the association between pre-procedural anxiety and vomiting in the ED.MethodsIn this cohort study, a convenient sample of children aged 2 to 14 years who were a candidate for PSA with ketamine in the ED were enrolled. Anxiety was evaluated using the short version of the modified Yale preoperative anxiety scale (mYAS). Vomiting was recorded during the period of hospitalization in the ED and 24 h after discharge by a phone call. Association between anxiety level and vomiting was analyzed using the independent samples t-test and multivariable logistic regression was used to control for covariates.Results102 children were enrolled and 93 were included in final analysis. The mean age of participants was 3.95 ± 1.79 years and 55.9% were male. According to the mYAS, the mean score of anxiety was 48.67 ± 21.78 in the waiting room and 59.10 ± 23.86 in the operating room. The mean score of anxiety was 58.3±25.3 and 51.0±20.7 in the vomiting and non-vomiting groups, respectively. At least one episode of vomiting was reported in 23 children of which, 19 took place in the hospital and 4 after discharge. No significant association was observed between pre-procedural anxiety and the occurrence of vomiting. On univariate regression model, the odds ratio of the association between mean anxiety and vomiting was 1.02 (CI 95%: 0.99-1.04) (P-value: 0.16). On the multivariable logistic regression model, after adjusting for all the covariates, the odds ratio was 1.03 (CI 95%: 1.0-1.05) (P-value: 0.05).ConclusionThe present study showed that anxiety before procedural sedation and analgesia with ketamine in children was not associated with the incidence of vomiting.

Project description:How professionals communicate during medical procedures may have a significant impact on children and adolescents' pain. Rel@x is a manualized training program designed to develop hypnosis-derived communication skills to mitigate childhood pain and distress. The study aimed to evaluate if this training was associated with an improvement and maintenance in communication skills over time, and measure associations between changes and participants' characteristics. A 9-hour training in hypnosis-derived communication was offered to 78 volunteer healthcare professionals from a tertiary pediatric hospital, and 58 participated in the evaluative study. Participants were evaluated at baseline, immediately after training, and 5 months later (39 ± 10 yrs, 52 women, 54 nurses). We used a video-recorded standardized simulation protocol of blood draw and coded the participants' interactions with the pre-validated Sainte-Justine Hypnotic Communication Assessment Scale (SJ-HCAS) assessing relational, technical, and total skills. We modeled pre-post-follow-up changes over time with latent growth curve models. Satisfaction with Rel@x was consistently excellent (97%). Across the 3 domains, we observed significant improvements of total (+ 61%, 95% CI 53-69%), relational (+ 27%, 95% CI 20-34%), and technical skills (+ 124%, 95% CI 08-140%). Post-training competence levels were 73-91% across domains. A large proportion of acquired skills were maintained at 5 months (55-75%) suggesting a significant effect of the training. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results (best-case/worst-case skill maintenance ratio: 59-79%/49-73%). Larger improvements in technical skills were associated with younger age and lower baseline skills of participants. The Rel@x training is associated with improved skills in hypnotic communication post-training and at follow-up. This simulation study paves the way for future efficacy studies to examine the effect of hypnotic communication on real patients' pain and distress.