A Review of Therapeutic Escalation for Pediatric Patients Admitted for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Flares
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Koubek D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10681080 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectivesFew studies have examined the role of non-Clostridium difficile enteric infections in flares of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our objective was to investigate enteric infection detected by multiplex PCR stool testing in patients with IBD.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of 9403 patients who underwent 13,231 stool tests with a gastrointestinal pathogen PCR panel during a diarrheal illness from March 2015 to May 2017. Our primary outcome was the presence of an infection. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic and histologic predictors of infection, and IBD outcomes following testing.ResultsA total of 277 patients with Crohn's disease (CD), 300 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 8826 patients without IBD underwent 454, 503, and 12,275 tests, respectively. Compared to patients without IBD, patients with IBD were less likely to test positive (CD 18.1%, UC 16.1%, no IBD 26.6%, p < 0.001). Compared to patients without IBD, CD had a higher prevalence of norovirus (p = 0.05) and Campylobacter (p = 0.043), whereas UC had a lower prevalence of norovirus (p = 0.001) and a higher prevalence of Campylobacter (p = 0.013), Plesiomonas (p = 0.049), and Escherichia coli species (p < 0.001). Of 77 patients who underwent endoscopy, there were no major endoscopic or histologic predictors of a positive test. Patients who tested negative were more likely to have IBD therapy escalated (p = 0.004). Enteric infection did not impact IBD outcomes following testing (log-rank 0.224).ConclusionsNon-Clostridium difficile enteric infections were identified in 17% of symptomatic patients with IBD. Endoscopic and histologic findings may not differentiate flare from infection. Norovirus and E.coli may play an important role in flare of IBD.
| S-EPMC7939066 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLimited data are available on biological therapy de-escalation after prior escalation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. This study aimed to assess the frequency and success rate of de-escalation of biological therapy in IBD patients after prior dose escalation and to evaluate which measures are used to guide de-escalation.MethodsThis multicentre retrospective cohort study enrolled IBD patients treated with infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA) or vedolizumab (VEDO) in whom therapy was de-escalated after prior biological escalation. De-escalations were considered pharmacokinetic-driven if based on clinical symptoms combined with therapeutic or supratherapeutic trough levels, and disease activity-driven if based on faecal calprotectin less than or equal to 200 µg/g or resolution of perianal fistula drainage or closure or endoscopic remission. Successful de-escalation was defined as remaining on the same or lower biological dose for greater than or equal to 6 months after de-escalation without the need for corticosteroids.ResultsIn total, 206 IFX users, 85 ADA users and 55 VEDO users underwent therapy escalation. Of these patients, 34 (17%) on IFX, 18 (21%) on ADA and 8 (15%) on VEDO underwent therapy de-escalation. De-escalation was successful in 88% of IFX patients, 89% of ADA and 100% of VEDO. The probability of remaining on the de-escalated regimen or further de-escalation after 1 year was 85% for IFX, 62% for ADA and 100% for VEDO. Disease activity-driven de-escalations were more often successful (97%) than pharmacokinetic- and no marker-driven de-escalations (76%); P = 0.017.ConclusionDe-escalation after biological dose escalation was successful in the majority of carefully selected IBD patients. Objective assessment of remission increased the likelihood of successful de-escalation.
| S-EPMC8983943 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and aimsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the relapse rate after therapeutic de-escalation in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients who achieved deep remission [DR].MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and major gastroenterology conferences up to July 2019 for studies reporting relapse in adult patients with DR who subsequently underwent therapeutic de-escalation. Eligible studies defined DR as at least a combination of clinical remission and mucosal healing/endoscopic remission. The primary outcome was cumulative 1-year and 2-year relapse rates after therapeutic de-escalation. Secondary outcomes were relapse rates in ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD], relapse after anti-tumour necrosis factor-α [anti-TNFα] de-escalation, and the rate of disease response recapture following re-escalation.ResultsThirteen studies encompassing 837 patients were identified. The cumulative relapse rate after therapeutic de-escalation was 28.7% within 1 year [12 studies], and 38.4% within 2 years [eight studies]. Relapse rates within 1 year and 2 years were comparable between UC [five studies; 25.4% and 37.4%] and CD [seven studies; 34.1% and 39.9%]. Ten studies reported de-escalation of anti-TNFα, of which 29.8% patients relapsed within 1 year and 41.4% within 2 years. Response recapture following re-escalation [eight studies] was 75.4%.ConclusionsDespite achieving deep remission, therapeutic de-escalation in this patient population is associated with significant relapse risk within 1 year and 2 years. This risk is more pronounced in patients requiring anti-TNFα for management, likely because of more severe disease. Similar rates of relapse were reported among UC and CD within these time periods. These findings suggest that combined clinical and endoscopic remission should not be an impetus to consider therapeutic de-escalation.
| S-EPMC7533897 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic disease of unknown origin that requires long-term treatment. The optical duration of maintenance treatment once remission has been achieved remains unclear. When discussing a de-escalation strategy, not only the likelihood of relapse but also, the outcome of retreatment for relapse after de-escalation should be considered. Previous evidence has demonstrated controversial results for risk factors for relapse after de-escalation due to the various definitions of remission and relapse. In fact, endoscopic or histologic remission has been suggested as a treatment target; however, it might not always be indicative of a successful drug withdrawal. For better risk stratification of relapse after de-escalation, it may be necessary to evaluate both the current and previous treatments. Following de-escalation, biomarkers should be closely monitored. In addition to the risk of relapse, a comprehensive understanding of the overall outcome, such as the long-term safety, patient quality of life, and impact on healthcare costs, is necessary. Therefore, a shared decision-making with patients on a case-by-case basis is imperative.
| S-EPMC10018304 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are the two main forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with both overlapping and distinct clinical, pathological and biomolecular features. It has been suggested that pediatric IBD is a distinct disease entity, with probably different disease subtypes.The aim of this study is to review and summarize the evolution of the current concept of pediatric IBD. The results of this review reinforce the idea that pediatric CD and UC may be further classified in various clinicopathologic entities. For clinicians and pathologists convenience, practical algorithms for the distinction of the various subphenotypes of pediatric IBD are also provided.
| S-EPMC4130834 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and Aim: Accumulating evidence have implicated gut microbiota alterations in pediatric and adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, the results of different studies are often inconsistent and even contradictory. It is believed that early changes in new-onset and treatment-naïve pediatric patients are more informative. We performed a systematic review to investigate the gut microbiota profiles in pediatric IBD and identify specific microbiota biomarkers associated with this disorder. Methods: Electronic databases were searched from inception to 31 July 2020 for studies that observed gut microbiota alterations in pediatric patients with IBD. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: A total of 41 original studies investigating gut microbiota profiles in pediatric patients with IBD were included in this review. Several studies have reported a decrease in α-diversity and an overall difference in β-diversity. Although no specific gut microbiota alterations were consistently reported, a gain in Enterococcus and a significant decrease in Anaerostipes, Blautia, Coprococcus, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Ruminococcus, and Lachnospira were found in the majority of the included articles. Moreover, there is insufficient data to show specific microbiota bacteria associated with disease activity, location, and behavior in pediatric IBD. Conclusions: This systematic review identified evidence for differences in the abundance of some bacteria in pediatric patients with IBD when compared to patients without IBD; however, no clear overall conclusion could be drawn from the included studies due to inconsistent results and heterogeneous methodologies. Further studies with large samples that follow more rigorous and standardized methodologies are needed.
| S-EPMC7884334 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundVedolizumab is a gut-selective anti-lymphocyte trafficking agent approved for the treatment of moderate to severely active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD: ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD]).MethodsA systematic literature review (SLR) of real-world studies was conducted to assess the effectiveness of dose escalation of vedolizumab every 8 weeks (Q8W) during maintenance treatment to achieve a response in patients who were either vedolizumab responders experiencing secondary loss of response (SLOR) or non-responders. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from January 2014 to August 2021.ResultsScreening of SLR outputs identified 72 relevant real-world study publications featuring dose escalation of vedolizumab maintenance therapy. After qualitative review, ten eligible studies (9 articles, 1 abstract) were identified as reporting clinical response and/or clinical remission rates following escalation of intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg Q8W maintenance dosing to every 4 weeks (Q4W) maintenance dosing in adult patients with UC/CD (≥10 patients per study). Overall, 196/395 (49.6%) patients with IBD had a response within 54 weeks of vedolizumab maintenance dose escalation. Although definitions for clinical response/remission varied across the 10 studies, clinical response rates after escalated vedolizumab Q8W maintenance dosing ranged from 40.0% to 73.3% (9 studies) and from 30.0% to 55.8% for remission (4 studies) over a range of 8 to <58 weeks' follow-up.ConclusionsThis synthesis of real-world effectiveness data in vedolizumab-treated patients with IBD indicates that approximately half were able to achieve or recapture clinical response after escalating vedolizumab maintenance dosing.
| S-EPMC9802433 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The aim of the present study was to identify a pediatric inflamatory bowel disease (pIBD) characteristic microRNA profile serving as potential Crohns disease and ulcerative colitis specific diagnostic pattern and to further analyze the related target genes. Illumina small RNA sequencing was performed on inflamed and intact colonic biopsies of Crohn's disease and control patients. Selected miRs were further investigated by real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. To analyze network connection of differentially expressed miRs and their target genes the MiRTarBase database and previous transcriptome sequencing data were used. We demonstrated a characteristic colonic miR pattern in pIBD that could facilitate deeper understanding of the pathomechanism of IBD and may serve as a diagnostic tool in the future.
2017-01-18 | E-MTAB-5010 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:To explore the association between inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) flares and potential triggers.Patients evaluated for an acute flare of IBD by a gastroenterologist at the Dallas VA Medical Center were invited to participate, as were a control group of patients with IBD in remission. Patients were systematically queried about nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, antibiotic use, stressful life events, cigarette smoking, medication adherence, infections, and travel in the preceding 3 mo. Disease activity scores were calculated for each patient at the time of enrollment and each patient's chart was reviewed. Multivariate regression analysis was performed.A total of 134 patients with IBD (63 with Crohn's disease, 70 with ulcerative colitis, and 1 with indeterminate colitis) were enrolled; 66 patients had flares of their IBD and 68 were controls with IBD in remission (for Crohn's patients, average Crohn's disease activity index was 350 for flares vs 69 in the controls; for UC patients, Mayo score was 7.6 for flares vs 1 for controls in those with full Mayo available and 5.4p for flares vs 0.1p for controls in those with partial Mayo score). Only medication non-adherence was significantly more frequent in the flare group than in the control group (48.5% vs 29.4%, P = 0.03) and remained significant on multivariate analysis (OR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.33-6.18). On multivariate regression analysis, immunomodulator use was found to be associated with significantly lower rates of flare (OR = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.19-0.86).In a study of potential triggers for IBD flares, medication non-adherence was significantly associated with flares. These findings are incentive to improve medication adherence.
| S-EPMC3989967 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Several studies have suggested worsening in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity following fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). We aimed to assess the risk of worsening in IBD activity following FMT. An electronic search was conducted using MEDLINE (1946-June 2016), EMBASE (1954-June 2016) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2016). Studies in which FMT was provided to IBD patients for IBD management or (Clostridium difficile infection) CDI treatment were included. The primary outcome was the rate of worsening in IBD activity.ResultsTwenty-nine studies with 514 FMT-treated IBD patients were included. Range of follow up was 4 weeks to 3 y. The pooled rate of IBD worsening was 14.9% (95% CI 10-21%). Heterogeneity was detected: I2 D 52.1%, Cochran Q test D 58.1, p D 0.01. A priori subgroup analyses were performed. Although not significant, the pooled rate of worsening in IBD activity following FMT for CDI (22.7% (95% CI: 13-36%)) was higher compared with FMT for IBD (11.1% (95% CI 7-17%)). Rates of worsening in IBD after lower GI FMT delivery revealed a higher rate of worsening in IBD activity (16.5% (95% CI: 11-24%)) compared with upper GI delivery (5.6% (95% CI: 2-16%)). Rates of worsening in high quality studies and randomized controls trials (RCTS) suggested a marginal risk of worsening in IBD activity (4.6%, (95% CI: 1.8-11%). Rates of IBD worsening are overall marginal across high quality RCTS. It is unknown if the FMT itself led to the worsening of IBD in this small fraction or if this represents alternative etiologies.
| S-EPMC5730391 | biostudies-literature