Dataset Information

Development of a Diagnostic Model for Differentiating Tuberculous Spondylitis and Pyogenic Spondylitis with MRI: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.

ABSTRACT:

Study design

Multicenter retrospective observational study.

Objective

This study aimed to distinguish tuberculous spondylitis (TS) from pyogenic spondylitis (PS), using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Further, a novel diagnostic model for differential diagnosis was developed.

Summary of background data

TS and PS are the two most common spinal infections. Distinguishing between these types clinically is challenging. Delayed diagnosis can lead to deficits or kyphosis. Currently, there is a lack of radiology-based diagnostic models for TS and PS.

Methods

We obtained radiological images from MRI imaging of patients with TS and PS and applied least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select the optimal features for a predictive model. Predictive models were built using multiple logistic regression analysis. Clinical utility was determined using decision curve analysis (DCA) and internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling.

Results

A total of 201 patients with TS (n=105) or PS (n=96) were enrolled. We identified significant differences in MRI features between both groups. We found that non-contiguous multi- and single-vertebral body involvement were common in TS and PS, respectively. Vertebral bone lesions were more severe in the TS group than in the PS group (Z=-4.553，P<0.001). The patients in the TS group were also more prone to vertebral intraosseous, epidural, and paraspinal abscesses (P<0.001). A total of 8 predictors were included in the diagnostic model. Analysis of the calibration curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve suggested that the model was well-calibrated with a high prediction accuracy.

Conclusion

This is the largest study comparing MRI features in TS and PS and the first to develop an MRI-based nomogram which may help clinicians distinguish between TS and PS.

SUBMITTER: Wang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10702692 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Development of a Diagnostic Model for Differentiating Tuberculous Spondylitis and Pyogenic Spondylitis With MRI: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.

Wang Jin J Li Zhaoxin Z Chi Xiansu X Chen Yungang Y Wang Huaxin H Wang Xiaoying X Cui Kaiying K Wang Qing Q Lu Tongxin T Zheng Jianhu J Zhang Qiang Q Hao Yanke Y

Spine 20231005 1

<h4>Study design</h4>Multicenter retrospective observational study.<h4>Objective</h4>This study aimed to distinguish tuberculous spondylitis (TS) from pyogenic spondylitis (PS) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Further, a novel diagnostic model for differential diagnosis was developed.<h4>Summary of background data</h4>TS and PS are the two most common spinal infections. Distinguishing between these types clinically is challenging. Delayed diagnosis can lead to deficits or kyphosis. Curren ...[more]

PMID: 37796171

Similar Datasets

Project description:The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the clinical data, laboratory examination and imaging examination of tuberculous spondylitis (TS) and pyogenic spondylitis (PS), and to provide ideas for diagnosis and treatment intervention. The patients with TS or PS diagnosed by pathology who first occurred in our hospital from September 2018 to November 2021 were studied retrospectively. The clinical data, laboratory results and imaging findings of the two groups were analyzed and compared. The diagnostic model was constructed by binary logistic regression. In addition, an external validation group was used to verify the effectiveness of the diagnostic model. A total of 112 patients were included, including 65 cases of TS with an average age of 49 ± 15 years, 47 cases of PS with an average of 56 ± 10 years. The PS group had a significantly older age than the TS group (P = 0.005). In laboratory examination, there were significant differences in WBC, neutrophil (N), lymphocyte (L), ESR, CRP, fibrinogen (FIB), serum albumin (A) and sodium (Na). The difference was also statistically significant in the comparison of imaging examinations at epidural abscesses, paravertebral abscesses, spinal cord compression, involvement of cervical, lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. This study constructed a diagnostic model, which was Y (value of TS > 0.5, value of PS < 0.5) = 1.251 * X1 (thoracic vertebrae involved = 1, thoracic vertebrae uninvolved = 0) + 2.021 * X2 (paravertebral abscesses = 1, no paravertebral abscess = 0) + 2.432 * X3 (spinal cord compression = 1, no spinal cord compression = 0) + 0.18 * X4 (value of serum A)-4.209 * X5 (cervical vertebrae involved = 1, cervical vertebrae uninvolved = 0)-0.02 * X6 (value of ESR)-0.806 * X7 (value of FIB)-3.36. Furthermore, the diagnostic model was validated using an external validation group, indicating a certain value in diagnosing TS and PS. This study puts forward a diagnostic model for the diagnosis of TS and PS in spinal infection for the first time, which has potential guiding value in the diagnosis of them and provides a certain reference for clinical work.

Project description:BackgroundTuberculous spondylitis (TS) and brucellar spondylitis (BS) are commonly observed in spinal infectious diseases, which are initially caused by bacteremia. BS is easily misdiagnosed as TS, especially in underdeveloped regions of northwestern China with less sensitive medical equipment. Nevertheless, a rapid and reliable diagnostic tool remains to be developed and a clinical diagnostic model to differentiate TS and BS using machine learning algorithms is of great significance.MethodsA total of 410 patients were included in this study. Independent factors to predict TS were selected by using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model, permutation feature importance, and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A TS risk prediction model was developed with six different machine learning algorithms. We used several metrics to evaluate the accuracy, calibration capability, and predictability of these models. The performance of the model with the best predictability was further verified with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the calibration curve. The clinical performance of the final model was evaluated by decision curve analysis.ResultsSix variables were incorporated in the final model, namely, pain severity, CRP, x-ray intervertebral disc height loss, x-ray endplate sclerosis, CT vertebral destruction, and MRI paravertebral abscess. The analysis of appraising six models revealed that the logistic regression model developed in the current study outperformed other methods in terms of sensitivity (0.88 ± 0.07) and accuracy (0.79 ± 0.07). The AUC of the logistic regression model predicting TS was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.90) in the training set and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.92) in the validation set. The decision curve analysis indicated that the logistic regression model displayed a higher clinical efficiency in the differential diagnosis.ConclusionsThe logistic regression model developed in this study outperformed other methods. The logistic regression model demonstrated by a calculator exerts good discrimination and calibration capability and could be applicable in differentiating TS from BS in primary health care diagnosis.

Project description:BackgroundPyogenic spondylitis (PS) and Brucella spondylitis (BS) are commonly seen spinal infectious diseases. Both types can lead to vertebral destruction, kyphosis, and long-term neurological deficits if not promptly diagnosed and treated. Therefore, accurately diagnosis is crucial for personalized therapy. Distinguishing between PS and BS in everyday clinical settings is challenging due to the similarity of their clinical symptoms and imaging features. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a radiomics nomogram using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to accurately differentiate between the two types of spondylitis.MethodsClinical and MRI data from 133 patients (2017-2022) with pathologically confirmed PS and BS (68 and 65 patients, respectively) were collected. We have divided patients into training and testing cohorts. In order to develop a clinical diagnostic model, logistic regression was utilized to fit a conventional clinical model (M1). Radiomics features were extracted from sagittal fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI) sequence. The radiomics features were preprocessed, including scaling using Z-score and undergoing univariate analysis to eliminate redundant features. Furthermore, the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was employed to develop a radiomics score (M2). A composite model (M3) was created by combining M1 and M2. Subsequently, calibration and decision curves were generated to evaluate the nomogram's performance in both training and testing groups. The diagnostic performance of each model and the indication was assessed using the receiver operating curve (ROC) with its area under the curve (AUC). Finally, we used the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) model explanations technique to interpret the model result.ResultsWe have finally selected 9 significant features from sagittal FS-T2WI sequences. In the differential diagnosis of PS and BS, the AUC values of M1, M2, and M3 in the testing set were 0.795, 0.859, and 0.868. The composite model exhibited a high degree of concurrence with the ideal outcomes, as evidenced by the calibration curves. The nomogram's possible clinical application values were indicated by the decision curve analysis. By using SHAP values to represent prediction outcomes, our model's prediction results are more understandable.ConclusionsThe implementation of a nomogram that integrates MRI and clinical data has the potential to significantly enhance the accuracy of discriminating between PS and BS within clinical settings.

Project description:ObjectiveFluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) and PET/CT have been suggested for confirming or excluding musculoskeletal infection but the diagnostic value of this tool for pyogenic spondylitis remains to be confirmed. This meta-analysis was performed to verify the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in diagnosing suspected pyogenic spondylitis by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library to retrieve diagnostic accuracy studies in which suspected pyogenic spondylitis was assessed with 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summarized receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) and the area under the sROC (AUC) were calculated by using Stata software.ResultsA total of 18 eligible studies (660 patients) with suspected pyogenic spondylitis were included in the quantitative analysis. 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT illustrated relatively high sensitivity (0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.95) and specificity (0.90, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95) for the diagnosis of pyogenic spondylitis. The pooled DOR and AUC were 86.00 (95% CI, 31.00-240.00) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), respectively. For diagnosing pyogenic spondylitis without previous spine surgery, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85-0.97), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.77-0.97), 136 (95% CI, 35-530) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98), respectively. For diagnosing postoperative pyogenic spondylitis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.93), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.96), 38 (95% CI, 9 to 167) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.94), respectively.Conclusion18F-FDG PET and PET/CT presented satisfactory accuracy for diagnosing pyogenic spondylitis. The diagnostic effect of this nuclear imaging method for pyogenic spondylitis without previous spine surgery seems to be better than that for the postoperative ones. However, whether 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT could become a routine in patients with suspected pyogenic spondylitis remains to be confirmed.Level of evidenceLevel I evidence, a summary of meta-analysis.

Project description:BackgroundMicrobiological diagnosis of tuberculous spondylodiscitis (TS) and pyogenic spontaneous spondylodiscitis (PS) is sometime difficult. This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for differentiating TS from PS using clinical characteristics, radiologic findings, and biomarkers, and to develop scoring system by using predictive factors to stratify the probability of TS.MethodsA retrospective single-center study. Demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory findings and radiographic findings of patients, confirmed causative pathogens of PS or TS, were assessed for independent factors that associated with TS. The coefficients and odds ratio (OR) of the final model were estimated and used to construct the scoring scheme to identify patients with TS.ResultsThere were 73 patients (51.8%) with TS and 68 patients (48.2%) with PS. TS was more frequently associated with younger age, history of tuberculous infection, longer duration of symptoms, no fever, thoracic spine involvement, ≥3 vertebrae involvement, presence of paraspinal abscess in magnetic-resonance-image (MRI), well-defined thin wall abscess, anterior subligamentous abscess, and lower biomarker levels included white blood cell (WBC) counts, erythrocyte-sedimentation-rate (ESR), neutrophil fraction, and C-reactive protein (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed significant predictors of TS included WBC ≤9,700/mm3 (odds ratio [OR] 13.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.23-40.61), neutrophil fraction ≤78% (OR 4.93, 95% CI 1.59-15.30), ESR ≤92 mm/hr (OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.24-13.36) and presence of paraspinal abscess in MRI (OR 10.25, 95% CI 3.17-33.13), with an area under the curve of 0.921. The scoring system stratified the probability of TS into three categories: low, moderate, and high with a TS prevalence of 8.1%, 29.6%, and 82.2%, respectively.ConclusionsThis prediction model incorporating WBC, neutrophil fraction counts, ESR and presence of paraspinal abscess accurately predicted the causative pathogens. The scoring scheme with combination of these biomarkers and radiologic features can be useful to differentiate TS from PS.