Dataset Information

Long-term outcomes after endovascular aortic treatment in patients with thoracic aortic diseases.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Endovascular treatments for thoracic aortic diseases have been adopted rapidly, and long-term studies are relevant for durability evaluation.

Objective

To evaluate the long-term results of a prospective observational study of endovascular treatment in patients with thoracic aortic diseases who underwent percutaneous implantation of self-expandable endoprostheses.

Methods

Procedural success was defined as the absence of endoleak into the aneurysm or dissection-induced false lumen, no migration, and no conversion to open surgery. Intraoperative, postoperative, and late postoperative outcomes were evaluated in terms of complications, mortality, and evolution of the endoprosthesis over a follow-up of up to 179 months (median: 46 months).

Results

A total of 150 endoprostheses were implanted in 112 patients. Primary success was observed in 100 (82.14%) patients. Immediate mortality occurred in 7 patients (6.25%). Late mortality occurred in 31 patients (27.68%), 10 (8.93%) of whom died from cardiovascular causes, 12 (10.71%) from non-cardiovascular causes, and 2 (1.78%) from natural causes, while 7 (6.25%) had no diagnosis for cause of death. Types I, II, and IV endoleaks occurred during hospitalization in 4 (3.57%), 5 (4.46%), and 3 (2.68%) patients, respectively. Late types I and IV endoleaks occurred in 5 (4.46%) and 3 (2.68%) patients respectively. Twenty-two patients (19.64%) had clinical complications in the immediate postoperative period. Actuarial survival free from death from cardiovascular causes was 79.3% (95% confidence interval, 67.0-91.7%) at 132 months.

Conclusions

The low levels of intraoperative and postoperative complications demonstrate that endovascular treatment is safe and effective. The high rate of late survival for these critically ill patients indicates that the endovascular technique is beneficial for treatment of thoracic aortic diseases in terms of long-term outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Brandi AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10706006 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Long-term outcomes after endovascular aortic treatment in patients with thoracic aortic diseases.

Brandi Antonio Carlos AC Dos Santos Carlos Alberto CA Brandi Josélia Menin JM Dos Santos Marcio Antonio MA Botelho Paulo Henrique Husseine PHH

Jornal vascular brasileiro 20231120

<h4>Background</h4>Endovascular treatments for thoracic aortic diseases have been adopted rapidly, and long-term studies are relevant for durability evaluation.<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the long-term results of a prospective observational study of endovascular treatment in patients with thoracic aortic diseases who underwent percutaneous implantation of self-expandable endoprostheses.<h4>Methods</h4>Procedural success was defined as the absence of endoleak into the aneurysm or dissection-ind ...[more]

PMID: 38076580

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background The treatment of chronic type B aortic dissection by thoracic endovascular aortic repair has some challenges, and its long-term outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to analyze the 5-year clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection, compare the differences between patients with and without adverse aortic events (AAEs), and identify risk factors for AAEs. Methods and Results Patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection from January 2009 to June 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. The primary end points were AAEs, including aorta-related death, procedural complications, and disease progression requiring reintervention. Clinical outcomes were described at the 5-year follow-up visit. The secondary end point was the comparison of the results between patients with and without AAEs. Univariable and multivariable logistic analyses were used to identify potential risk factors for AAEs. A total of 214 patients were enrolled. AAEs occurred in 46 (21.5%) patients. Compared with patients without AAEs, those with AAEs had higher rates of residual type A aortic dissection (26.1% versus 4.2%, P<0.001) and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm (69.6% versus 11.3%, P<0.001), and a lower rate of complete false lumen thrombosis (23.9% versus 89.9%, P<0.001). Meanwhile, the median interval from symptom onset to intervention was longer in patients with AAEs (26 months versus 12 months, P=0.004). Partial or no false lumen thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 14.71 [95% CI, 5.67-38.14; P<0.001]) and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm (AOR, 10.16 [95% CI, 3.86-26.73; P<0.001]) were identified as independent risk factors for AAEs. Conclusions While thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection might be challenging in some cases, its long-term outcomes appeared promising as this treatment was effective in preventing catastrophic aortic events. Patients with AAEs showed higher rates of residual type A aortic dissection and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm, a lower rate of complete false lumen thrombosis, and a longer median interval from symptom onset to intervention. Failure of complete false lumen thrombosis and an aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm were predictors of AAEs.

Project description:ImportanceThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been adopted rapidly for treating traumatic thoracic aortic injury (TAI). The long-term durability and efficacy remain unknown.ObjectiveTo determine the long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair and those of open repair (OR) for traumatic TAI.Design, setting, participantsThis nationwide cohort study used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database to evaluate patients with traumatic TAI between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013. This single-payer National Health Insurance program covered more than 99.9% of the Taiwanese population. Those who received OR or TEVAR for TAI by propensity score matching were included. Data analysis was conducted in October 2017.ExposuresThoracic endovascular aortic repair vs open repair.Main outcomes and measuresIn-hospital outcomes, all-cause mortality, aorta reintervention, and stroke during follow-up.ResultsOf the 287 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.66 [17.98] years; 80.5% male) who received OR or TEVAR for TAI, propensity score matching yielded 100 patients each in the OR and TEVAR groups. After propensity score matching, in-hospital mortality risk was significantly lower in the TEVAR group (9 [9.0%]) than in the OR group (27 [27.0%]; TEVAR vs open repair: odds ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12-0.60). With a mean (SD) follow-up of 2.80 (2.63) years, the proportion of survivors was 71.9% at 1 year, 70.8% at 2 years, 68.2% at 3 years, and 65.1% at 5 years in the OR group vs 88.9% at 1 year, 88.9% at 2 years, 88.9% at 3 years, and 88.9% at 5 years in the TEVAR group (log-rank test, P < .001). The TEVAR group had only 2 events (2%) of late reintervention and 1 event (1%) of late cerebrovascular accident. The proportion of freedom from reintervention was 100% at 1 year, 100% at 2 years, 100% at 3 years, and 100% at 5 years in the OR group vs 97.4% at 1 year, 97.4% at 2 years, 97.4% at 3 years, and 97.4% at 5 years in the TEVAR group (log-rank test, P = .18).Conclusion and relevanceCompared with OR, TEVAR was associated with better long-term outcomes, mainly owing to lower mortality during the perioperative period. In addition, TEVAR was associated with a similar rate of survival and reintervention after hospital discharge.

Project description:ObjectiveThis study aimed to summarize the long-term experience of using the chimney technique in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch diseases.MethodsFrom November 2007 to June 2021, a total of 345 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 11.3 years, range 28-83, 302 men) with aortic arch pathologies underwent TEVAR combined with chimney technique (cTEVAR). Their medical data and follow-up results were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.ResultsAmong the 345 patients, 278 (80.6%) received single chimneys, 53 (15.4%) received double chimneys, 7 (2%) received triple chimneys, and 7 (2%) underwent cTEVAR accompanied by other techniques (two with extra-anatomical bypass, two with in situ fenestration, and three with physician modified fenestration). A total of 412 chimney stents were used, including 27 in the innominate artery (IA), 113 in the left common carotid artery, 270 in the left subclavian artery, and two in the aberrant right subclavian artery. Early type IA endoleaks were found in 38 (11%) patients, including 12 with the double or triple chimney technique. Early type II endoleak was found in nine (2.6%) patients. Early re-intervention occurred in two patients with double chimney technique, one for chimney stent migration and the other for compression of chimney stent. The 30-day mortality was 1.2% (4 in 345). During a mean follow-up of 42 ± 22 months (range 1-108 months), major stroke occurred in nine (2.6%) patients, chimney occlusion or stenosis occurred in six (1.7%), and retrograde type A aortic dissection occurred in four (1.2%). Fourteen (4.1%) patients received the secondary intervention. The all-cause mortality was 6.7% (23 in 345). Additionally, the total adverse event rate after cTEVAR was 13.9% (48 in 345).ConclusionTEVAR with chimney technique provides a minimally invasive alternative with good chimney graft patency and low postoperative mortality during follow-up. However, the double and triple chimney techniques should be used cautiously as they seem to have a higher risk for type IA endoleak and adverse events after the operation.

Project description:Heritable aortic aneurysm is an increasingly recognized cause of morbidity and mortality. Whilst Marfan syndrome (MFS) is well-known, the clinical presentation and prognosis of more newly described genetic syndromes is less familiar to clinicians. There is a particular lack of knowledge regarding clinical outcomes for non-syndromal heritable aortic disease. This study investigated the presentation, clinical course and survival of patients with syndromal [Loeys-Dietz, aneurysm-osteoarthritis, and aneurysm-cerebral arteriopathy (ACTA2) syndrome] and non-syndromal heritable aortic disease in comparison to MFS. The study group includes 536 individuals (283 Marfan, 176 non-syndromal heritable aortopathy, 36 aneurysm-osteoarthritis, 32 Loeys-Dietz, and 9 ACTA2 aneurysm) enrolled in a longitudinal clinical follow-up between 1990 and 2022. Age at diagnosis differed between groups: Marfan = 22.0 ± 16.6; Loeys-Dietz = 29.6 ± 21.5; aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 36.4 ± 18.8; ACTA2 aneurysm = 43.4 ± 18.6; non-syndromal heritable aortopathy = 47.2 ± 16.6 years (p < 0.001). Aortic dissection was the presenting event in 8% individuals with Marfan compared to 27% with non-syndromal heritable aortopathy and 34% with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (p < 0.01). Mean follow-up duration for the group was 16.4 years (range 0.2-30 years) and 74 individuals died during follow-up (Marfan = 52, Loeys-Dietz = 6, aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 4, ACTA2 aneurysm = 1, heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 11). At 10 years follow-up, actuarial mean survivals were: aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 77.5 ± 10.4%; Loeys-Dietz = 90.0 ± 6.8%; Marfan = 94.6 ± 1.4%; heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 95.9 ± 2.1% (NS). There were 60 aortic dissections (24 Type A, 36 Type B) during follow-up. At 10 years, survival free of dissection was comparable between groups: aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 90.7 ± 6.4%; Loeys-Dietz = 94.4 ± 5.4%; Marfan = 96.1 ± 1.2%; heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 93.9 ± 2.3%, with similar findings at 20 years. Prophylactic aortic surgery was a first event during follow-up for 196 individuals (ACTA2 aneurysm = 3; aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 10; Loeys-Dietz = 19; Marfan = 119; heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 45). A second surgical intervention was required in 45 individuals and a third intervention in 21 individuals. At 10 years follow-up, survival free of surgery differed between groups: aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 68.5 ± 10.1%; Loeys-Dietz = 40.8 ± 11.2%; Marfan = 75.5 ± 2.7%; heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 63.8 ± 4.7% (p < 0.001). At 20 years follow-up mean survival free of surgery was: aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 26.6 ± 14.7%; Loeys-Dietz = 9.1 ± 8.2%; Marfan = 57.2 ± 3.4%; heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 41.6 ± 8.2% (p < 0.001). Diagnosis of newer syndromic and non-syndromal heritable aortopathies is delayed compared to MFS, with associated complications of presentation with aortic dissection. Survival of individuals enrolled in follow-up surveillance is comparable between different genetic aortopathies, however aortic dissections still occur and need for surgical intervention is high.

Dataset Information

Long-term outcomes after endovascular aortic treatment in patients with thoracic aortic diseases.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Long-term outcomes after endovascular aortic treatment in patients with thoracic aortic diseases.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets